Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! PLEASE CLICK ON THIS TITLE FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION!:   06/03/2017

      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send these  to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. The KGB and the JFK case

    Paul, With all due respect, IMHO you grossly underestimate not only the average American citizen's capacity for (conscious or unconscious) self-loathing, but his or her capacity for being deceived and manipulated. In this case, not by the evil, evil, evil "Deep State" or the "Military Industrial Intelligence Complex," but by 90-plus years of Soviet / Russian "active measures counterintelligence ops" waged against us and our allies (and against Nazi Germany during WWII), artfully interwoven with 58 years of Second Chief Directorate "strategic deception" / "operational deception" operations (the most effective example of which toxic and unholy brew was, I'm coming to believe, the assassination of our beloved president, JFK). -- Tommy PS Do you think those three Russian "companies" and those thirteen Russian nationals indicted yesterday by Mueller are "patsies" created by the evil, evil, evil "Deep State" and/or the evil, evil, evil MIIC? (LOL!) (And what about the eleven Russian "illegals" uncovered in 2010, including that silly, silly, silly "Anna Chapman"? Hmm?) (In short, are you a "closet" Trump AND Putin supporter, Maestro?) PPS But then again, Castro might have "dood da deed," and patsied BOTH the CIA and the KGB ... Ever thought about THAT possibility? Of course not. PPPS Or maybe LHO never got the "stop and desist" order from Mister K, or DID receive such, and decided to go "rogue elephant" on the emerging Global Village ...
  3. Greg has since added the above. Apparently, realizing that a prophylaxis (teeth cleaning) doesn't fail, he moved on to find something on Oswald's charts that could fail. And what he found was "sealant." (Unfortunately for him, on a different, earlier chart.) A sealant is like a varnish that is painted onto pits and fissures of teeth that are prone to getting cavities. The idea is that it prevents the acids from bacteria from eating away at the enamel. Sealants do indeed fail. These days they last as long as ten years. They weren't anywhere that effective in the 1950s. Problem is, there is absolutely no mention of "sealant" on the 1958 record that has the "FAILED 5-5-58" notation on it. And yet Greg wants up to believe that the dentist meant "SEALANT FAILED" when he wrote "FAILED." And that he wrote that in the "Prosthesis Required?" field. This is just silly. There is plenty of space in the field called "Remarks" for the dentist to note that the sealant failed. One other thing.... why did the dentist note that the sealant failed on May 5, but didn't note it on March 27 when the examination took place? We know for sure that one of the two cavities was found before May 5, because it was filled on April 30, according to the chart. Why wasn't the failed sealant noted then? Greg is just making up whatever excuses he can for what is clearly a notation indicating that an existing prosthesis (false tooth) failed.
  4. Today
  5. Greg Parker is all over the place on this, first talking about sealant and prophylaxis treatments, and a crossbite, reported on Oswald's 1956/57 dental record. And then moving on to a prophylaxis reported on his 1958 record. Which is somehow tied to a surgery reported on May 14. It's all very confusing! But we can look at the one statement made by Parker regarding the "FAILED 5-5-58" notation and see how silly it is. The purpose for doing so is to show that Parker doesn't understand these dental records and dental procedures. Here's the 1958 dental record where the prosthesis is reported to have failed: Right below the dental charts (drawings of the teeth), there is a field on the left that asks if a prophylaxis is needed. A "prophylaxis" in dentistry is what we call a cleaning of the teeth. (Not to be confused with "antibiotic prophylaxis," which means taking a course of antibiotics prior to a dental procedure.) The dentist wrote "yes" in this field. So he is saying that Oswald needed a dental cleaning. To the right of the prophylaxis field is a field asking if a prosthesis is needed. A prosthesis is a false tooth. The dentist is instructed to "explain briefly" if the answer is yes. Here the dentist wrote "FAILED 5-5-58." The logical reading of this is that a prosthesis (false tooth) is need because an existing one failed. Now lets look at what Greg says these two fields. He wrote: "The correct reading of the form is "prophylaxis (treatment) needed - yes" - at some later point in time, someone else has added that this treatment failed on May 5 and he was then scheduled for some type of surgery on May 14." So Greg's interpretation of the form is that the teeth cleaning failed. There was no room to write the word "FAILED" in the prophylaxis (teeth cleaning) field, so instead the dentist wrote "FAILED" in the prosthesis (false tooth) field. Greg apparently does not know what a prophylaxis is. If he did, he would know that teeth cleanings do not fail. Which is why there is no space to write "FAILED" for a teeth cleaning. Greg goes on to say that, because of the failed prophylaxis (teeth cleaning), the dentist prescribed some type of surgery to take place on May 14. Since when is surgery required to correct a failed teeth cleaning?? (If there were such a thing as failed teeth cleaning.) The truth is, Oswald got a filling on May 14. If you look at the chart on the left (the drawings of the teeth), you will see that two teeth are marked as having cavities (caries). Tooth #10 and tooth #20. Now look at the appointment table at the bottom of the record, and you will see that tooth #20 got a filling on April 30, and tooth #10 got a filling on May 14. A filling is not surgery. And it has nothing to do with a failed tooth cleaning. Something that doesn't even exist.
  6. The size of the Darnell frame and Buttons...

    Nice one, by both of you. I really like that comparison photo by David. Duncan "I lost my date" McRae was such a hack.
  7. Joannides

  8. Joannides

    As I read on, his acceptance that Oswald was there bothers me.... (the duh is silent) Choaden is Phillips. He gets a bulk materials in a pouch Oct 1... He arrives as antiCastro ops Mexico - Cuban Desk on Oct 7 or 8. The Goodpasture LADILLINGER memo goes out the 8th about OSWALD. Goodpasture works for Phillips and Win Scott. He is a CI specialist. Connect some dots.... Oswald aka Mystery Man known to JCKing... Is born... Alvarado is controlled by Phillips
  9. But here is what I said about the surgery set down for May 14: "The correct reading of the form is "prophylaxis (treatment) needed - yes" - at some later point in time, someone else has added that this treatment failed on May 5 and he was then scheduled for some type of surgery on May 14." As you can also see, the word "severe" is not a word I used. They are just setting up the strawmen to knock down. I did not specify what type of surgery was done on 5/14. Sandy may well have it right. I didn't bother looking into it because in the scheme of things, it doesn't matter. I did say that crossbites may require surgery. That remains true, but I made no effort to claim that was the surgery he was having on the 14th. My own timeline taken from the paperwork had been: 03/27/58 Initial examination: posterior lateral crossbite and rotated tooth noted. 04/30/58 Unknown procedure undertaken. 05/05/58 procedure noted as having failed. Note made in only available space giving rise to Larsen's misreading. 05/14/58 - unknown surgery completed on this date. --------------------------------------- Note 1: The crossbite reference has no readable date but it is in the same hand as the writer of the "failed" notation which was written in May 5, 1958. Note 2: The "yes" to "prophylaxis needed is in the same hand as the "exam" notation made on March 23, 1958. https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/pdf/WH19_Donabedian_Ex_1.pdf (starts on page 29) Based on the above, If Sandy wants to say that the "crossbite" notation was made on entry to the USMC in 1956, he will have to show that the dentist from stateside also went to Japan and was there in 1958 . Is Larsen also saying that Oswald had no treatment at all for the bilateral posterior crossbite? This does not correct itself. In someone still growing, an expansion devise is usually worn (in some cases, only at night) for several months. Adults can also have this, but as previously indicated, may be better advised to have surgery. The sidebar on this is that by the very nature of the treatment, the facial shape will change. I therefore can understand why Sandy and Hargrove avoided bringing the crossbite into it. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894776/ I just want a permanent record of this. Because I will criticize some of its silliness and I don't want those silly parts to disappear.
  10. The size of the Darnell frame and Buttons...

    I believe, .....those are Crickets. Now we have the 4 foot stoop which was 5 feet... And the 1.5 foot distance between them with is closer to 5 feet.. And when did Lovelady move to his left? (bottom right)
  11. Joannides

    Lol... You think they planned it that way...
  12. Unaltered Zapruder film

    OMG
  13. Unaltered Zapruder film

    Paz, Yes, that H.L. Hunt. Steve Thomas
  14. That's the problem, Jim. If you and others who believe in this nonsense were really, truly seekers of the truth or common sense, then you WOULD read what Parker and others who ARE versed in common sense would have to say. This case was not one big grand conspiracy like you and others want to believe and push here and elsewhere. But of course like Larsen, you can always cop out of this theory by saying - as SL did - that "oh this entire Oswald Project had absolutely nothing to do with the Kennedy case." LOL
  15. The KGB and the JFK case

    Tom, I can't answer your questions because I simply don't know and no one else does for that matter. Even State Secret author Simpich says the same thing. We can read the available records and then speculate. I just find it hard to believe that there was never a single photograph from the most photographed building in the western hemisphere showing the one and only Oswald outside the doors of the embassy down there. In this case, no picture is worth a thousand words. FWIW - here's a pretty simple to follow Duran timeline about what happened: http://spartacus-educational.com/JFKduranS.htm Rather than get bogged down into the minutiae of this event, it's clear that the CIA was involved and manipulating the Oswald narrative before and after 11/22. I don't know what else to say about the Russia/Cuba involvement connection other than I don't see, at least in my mind, that direction being plausible. Motive should play a role in this and I just don't see a real motive from Cuba or Russia being the case.
  16. Joannides

    Rats. I'm sorry. That's April 16th at the bottom of the first page. That must be something else entirely. Steve Thomas
  17. Joannides

    David, Is it possible that the two sheets you provided here are for two different people? I ask that for two reasons: 1) On the first page, there is a different employee serial number that has been crossed out in the upper right hand corner. 2) On the first page, there is a date of January 16, in the bottom left hand corner, but a date of January 19 alongside the employee name on the second page. Did the first page actually belong to someone else originally? Steve Thomas PS: Is there a way to search files by employee ID number?
  18. Unaltered Zapruder film

    Mr. W, That was the 2nd post to his first... Where he only posted images. How long have you been working with Chris? How well do you know him ? What you don't and can't understand is that there are intellectual friendships here advancing what we understand... How long have you played devil's advocate in friendship with Chris... Oh, wait. You condemn the MATH RULES thread... Too far beyond your reach. As anyone who can follow the thread easily sees, Chris explains... And it makes very good sense.... See where a shot traces back to if Altgens there is hit with blood. Then you can go back to sleep Altgens says in his testimony... There was flesh particles that flew out of the side of his head in my direction from where I was standing, so much so that it indicated to me that the shot came out of the left side of his head
  19. ?? I'm what u mean

  20. Unaltered Zapruder film

    You have to be one of the most dishonest people on this board, David. Here's what you said: But he was shot from the front Chris.... And there were people between your shooter and JFK... if you're talking just past the pole. ?? NOWHERE in that post do I detect anything "...in jest." Rather than honestly admit that you said this - and to show agreement with my claim that this "theory" is absolutely bullxxxx - you're now claiming that you said this "in jest??!!" What in God's name does me not knowing Chris Davidson have to do with pointing out silly claims like this? OMFG! How can you expect ANYONE on this board or anywhere for that matter to take anything you say on here seriously? If this doesn't take the cake for being dishonest on here I don't know what else would! And don't tell me enough. This is a forum where anyone - not just you, Chris and other "everything is a conspiracy" folks - can post and express their thoughts and rebuttals. You need to get down from your Kennedys and King high horse and face it that you do not know everything about this case and also be a little more honest when people you don't like point things out that go against yours and others' silly theories.
  21. Hi: What big picture awareness do I think that the choir needs to attain to be productive for what I have in mind? We will have to shake all in-group awareness. Identity politics and other in-group activities will have no place in the choir. It does not matter if people are white, black, brown, male, female, straight, gay, rich, poor, and so on. We are all the Universal People, and anybody can attain the awareness needed for my approach to work. However, Third and Second Epoch peoples probably can’t help too much, although among the best that I saw in the free energy pursuit began their lives on farms. But they did not stay there as illiterate peasants. We have to lay sociality behind, which is based on survival, and understand that combined positive intention, not sociality, is going to be the key. That is far easier said than done. Mass movements are based on sociality, and mutual self-interest is another way of saying it. If self-interest is the “glue” for what I am doing, it will certainly fail. You don’t see me asking for money. I purposely designed what I am doing so that I don’t need money to build the choir. The biggest of the big picture understandings is about seeing the world through a creator’s eyes, not a victim’s, and creators create with love. In the end, it is all about love. In the best mystical material, that message comes through very clearly, and the Michael Material comes to mind. Many years after first reading the Michael Material, as I look at my big essay, many of Michael’s themes can be seen in it. Michael calls humanity an ensouled species, he says that cetaceans are also ensouled (I’ll buy that), and that there are one million different ensouled species in our galaxy. He made that statement when there was great debate on whether many star systems had planets. Now we know that they are standard features, and his million ensouled species number seems entirely reasonable today. Michael said that even though we are ensouled, we are primates, with the traits that evolution gave us, and to realize that both are true, and interact, is a very valid understanding. Non-ensouled species have more of a hive awareness. I have also seen in the Michael teachings that cetaceans have a much more fluid relationship between souls and bodies than humans do, to where a pod of eight dolphins has eight souls, but they switch and swap them among the bodies. They play a different game than we do. Michael described the evolution of souls through the physical plane in “ages,” which overlies my “Epochs” conception with almost eerie correspondence, which I did not realize until I stepped back and recalled the Michael teachings. Michael said that humanity became ensouled about 60,000 years ago, which is also about the time that humans became behaviorally modern, left Africa, and conquered Earth. So, the First Epoch was about the journey to becoming ensouled, as our brains grew and our ancestors discovered new ways to harness energy. The Second Epoch was the Epoch of Infant Souls, as they learned to be an ensouled species. The Third Epoch was the Epoch of baby souls, as they learned how to become civilized. Rigid social hierarchies typify that phase, and there is not enough energy surplus to fund freedom except for the elite. The Fourth Epoch has been the Epoch of Young Souls, for whom winning is everything. Young Souls are great civilization builders and planet destroyers, and their religion is materialism, in all of its guises. Michael repeatedly stated that our species is on the cusp of the greatest transition that any ensouled species ever undertakes, going from Young to Mature, as the focus changes from outward to inward. Michael also said that a third of the time, species like ours do not make it, and destroy themselves in the transition. We obviously have our toes over the edge of the abyss today. Michael said that when ensouled species destroy themselves, a third of the time it is through warfare, and two-thirds of the time through environmental destruction. If humanity survives long enough to enter the Fifth Epoch, the transition will be the greatest of all. If we keep to Michael’s framework, then the Fifth Epoch would appear to be the realm of the Mature Soul. Maybe so, but I think that Old Souls will be vital. I have been read as an Old Artisan, and my site and big essay in particular is classic Old Artisan work. Under Michael’s framework, he might call that heavenly Roads world an Old Soul civilization. I can get with that. As I have stated, humanity will not become enlightened overnight if the Fifth Epoch arrives. It will take some time to shed the “ideals” and delusions of a Young Soul world. Maybe there will be a century or two of a Mature Soul Earth, until the Old Soul Epoch materializes. Is that heavenly Roads world a Sixth Epoch society? I can get with that. The Fifth is mind-boggling enough to wrap our heads around. That hellish Roads world I would call a late Fourth-Epoch civilization that went to the dark side, taking materialism and egocentrism to its extreme. Somebody like Max would be right at home in it. Readers of my work know that I certainly don’t take an either/or stance on the mystical teachings, but I see how they all have their validity. If it is about love and enlightenment, it is a worthy teaching. I also see strong echoes of the Ra Material in my work, especially where dark pathers and the GCs are concerned. A comprehensive perspective takes it all in, making sense of the whole, and it is possible that only Artisans can do the initial work, wired as we are. But I hope that my work can appeal to all roles, and I think that it eventually will. Michael stressed that love is the positive pole of all roles and orientations (except for the Chief Feature, perhaps), and fear is its opposite, and that all ages and roles can understand love. Love is the energy of creation and the greatest power, ultimately the only power, in our universe. This is where my work comes full circle, from the mystical to the physical to the mystical again. Seth’s statement on idealists has been a key star that I steered by during my journey. During my journey, and seeing how all free energy efforts failed and what they had in common, I began to suspect that the zero-point field is divine in nature, and that if an effort was not properly aligned with its nature, it would fail. Again, that is far easier said than done, in a world of scarcity and fear, but if there ever was a soul-sized issue to take on in the human journey, this is it. In physical and mystical ways, the coming of the Fifth Epoch will be the biggest event in the human journey, by far. I may make a coda post or two, but my big picture posts are done for now. This year is about regaining my health, while being crazily busy at my day job, working on Uncle Ed’s bio project, and seeing if I can get that essay update done this year. That is a lot to have on my plate, for a guy turning 60 this year, and we will see how it goes. Best, Wade
  22. The Men Who Killed Kennedy series

    Bruce, I am located on the Monterey Peninsula on the Central California Coast line 125 miles South of San Francisco. Home to such luminaries as Doris Day, Clint Eastwood and passed on ones such as Mae Brussell, Harrison Livingstone.
  23. The KGB and the JFK case

    Completely unfair characterization. No one here sees the KGB and GRU as really nice. By far the harder thing to contemplate is the evil WITHIN our own government.
  24. Reply To Sandy and Jim from Parker: ---------------------------- Here we go... the usual MO with these guys - never quoting me directly - that way they can change what I said to whatever suits them. jim hagrove wrote: But here is what I said about the surgery set down for May 14: "The correct reading of the form is "prophylaxis (treatment) needed - yes" - at some later point in time, someone else has added that this treatment failed on May 5 and he was then scheduled for some type of surgery on May 14." As you can also see, the word "severe" is not a word I used. They are just setting up the strawmen to knock down. I did not specify what type of surgery was done on 5/14. Sandy may well have it right. I didn't bother looking into it because in the scheme of things, it doesn't matter. I did say that crossbites may require surgery. That remains true, but I made no effort to claim that was the surgery he was having on the 14th. My own timeline taken from the paperwork had been: 03/27/58 Initial examination: posterior lateral crossbite and rotated tooth noted. 04/30/58 Unknown procedure undertaken. 05/05/58 procedure noted as having failed. Note made in only available space giving rise to Larsen's misreading. 05/14/58 - unknown surgery completed on this date. --------------------------------------- Note 1: The crossbite reference has no readable date but it is in the same hand as the writer of the "failed" notation which was written in May 5, 1958. Note 2: The "yes" to "prophylaxis needed is in the same hand as the "exam" notation made on March 23, 1958. https://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh19/pdf/WH19_Donabedian_Ex_1.pdf (starts on page 29) Based on the above, If Sandy wants to say that the "crossbite" notation was made on entry to the USMC in 1956, he will have to show that the dentist from stateside also went to Japan and was there in 1958 . Is Larsen also saying that Oswald had no treatment at all for the bilateral posterior crossbite? This does not correct itself. In someone still growing, an expansion devise is usually worn (in some cases, only at night) for several months. Adults can also have this, but as previously indicated, may be better advised to have surgery. The sidebar on this is that by the very nature of the treatment, the facial shape will change. I therefore can understand why Sandy and Hargrove avoided bringing the crossbite into it. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3894776/
  25. More from Parker: the attached section of the records show a Nov 1, 1956, entry, "sealing - prophylaxis - instructions" I believe this indicates he had tooth pits sealed to stop possible decay - any ongoing care needs explained, and instructions on how to maintain the seals. From google: "Sealants can last up to 10 years. But they need to be checked at regular dental check-ups to make sure they are not chipped or worn away. The dentist or dental hygienist can repair sealants by adding more sealant material." I think this is what is being referenced 5/5.58 as having failed and this is why he needed 2 cavities filled. The failure has nothing to do with a dental prosthesis. It was the only space available to indicate the sealing failure. BTW, I am not "embarrassed" by anything, I am just passing the information along. But I think it shows that there are other reasonable explanations and that the assertion that the "failed" notation "indisputably" proves two Oswalds is silly. This is exactly what would happen if a qualified individual reviewed the entire case including LHO's dental history and the other relevant facts. Such a person would undoubtedly find alternate explanations.
  26. Unaltered Zapruder film

    David, did you my PM?
  27. Unaltered Zapruder film

    Enough... If you are going to us my name or anything you claim I said.... Post the link.... What I said, in jest, was " but Chris, the shot comes from the front " .... You don't know Chris nor do you have the first idea what he is saying... But here you are sticking foot in mouth none the less.... So quick to jump to conclusions without first looking.... Stick to your own disastrous presentation of your own thoughts.. Last thing I need is association with your terribly narrow-minded POV and school yard mentality...
  1. Load more activity
×