Jump to content
The Education Forum

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. These are the same frames (albeit from different sources) as Groden's version. Quality is a little better. imo Groden's appears to be complete minus a few at the very beginning (before the sync point - not important at this time). This stabilized (my work) gif is from one of the other sources (one of the countless JFK specials with bits and pieces). The gif starts with the same Bell frame I equated to the Z435 sync and ends with the underpass sync. The span = 29 progressive frames.
  3. Yesterday
  4. That makes perfect sense. I was just prediagnosed with Meniere's Disease which is not curable. So my doctor recommended two drugs to take once I feel an attack coming on. One for vertigo and one for nausea. My health plan does not cover the anti nausea one. So I asked the druggist, how much is it without insurance. She said 8 bucks per pill. How do people get along without insurance? And my God, how much profit is enough for big pharma? As RFK Jr said, Big Pharma owns congress.
  5. Oh oh oh! Look over here everybody! Look at the deep state at work! Don't pay attention to Trump's treason in the Ukraine and Syria, look what "they" did with George Papadopoulos! It's right out of the Trump playbook -- look at the latest shiny object (Steele Dossier! Steele Dossier!) while high crimes go down right out in public...Sickening.
  6. It's not in the Constitution, Ray. It's been a Dept. of Justice guideline since 1973. Trump has successfully politicized the DOJ, and is above the law as long as the Trump cult of personality maintains its' hold on the Republican Party. He'll be impeached, but likely not removed until the 2020 election. It's interesting to watch the defenders of fascism wet themselves over Josef Misfud's blackberries. The investigations into Carter Page and George Papadopoulos went nowhere, and since they were never reported upon before the election had no impact on anything. Trump's water carriers like Mr. Wheeler and Mr. DiEugenio want to pretend that the Mueller investigation had something to do with this nonsense, but it didn't. These guys get all their talking points from Trump's disinformation playbook.
  7. "Where's the line? Answer me that." precisely Bob.
  8. Jawarki's opinion is irrelevant except in the case where he makes the determination of whether to indict or not. He has no standing in this case and his decision in WG holds no value as precedent other to be used as an excuse by a Trump friendly AG . Under that understanding, as I said before, he could have the FBI jail the Supremes and eliminate a branch of government. Ridiculous. What if he shot someone? Where's the line? Answer me that.
  9. Mr. Wheeler: This is really interesting. Addendum: It's embarrassing when a CIA operative posing as a Russian Intelligence agent looses his Crowdstrike Blackberry and Attorney General Barr and  US Attorney John Durham travel all the way to Italy to retrieve it. Everyone should click through on this. To me that just about cinches it as far as George P goes. But you think Mifsud was CIA instead of FBI? Why? Also, what do you think the whole Awan brothers episode was about and why was Schultz invovled?
  10. From my understanding, Jaworski wrestled with this idea for months on end during Watergate. He came to the conclusion that one could not indict a sitting president and that the Constitutional method was impeachment, and perhaps indicting him later once he was out of office. Its not what the Constitution does not say, its what it says.
  11. ...and to veer off for a second. I caught a virus on an airplane five years ago and ended up in a coma for two months. Fentanyl while I was out, dilaudid every three hours once I woke up(for two months, with a shot of ativan the next hour), and then finally oxycontin by the handful for almost a year after that. I weighed 85lbs when I got out of the hospital several months later. I am over six feet tall and not a small frame either. Couldn't gain an ounce. Went back to California with my folks for physical rehab and locked myself in the Safari Inn in Burbank for a week not allowing anyone to see me as I cold turkey cured the opiate nonsense. Switched to cookies and herbal oils for bedsores and joint pains and wouldn't you know it, within a week I had gained weight. Within a year I was competing again in professional golf tournaments. If you can't tell I have a certain bias against opiates and what they have done to our society and my generation.
  12. Where does it say in the constitution that a President cannot be indicted for a crime. Is he really above the law? Just a Limey wondering.
  13. I find the time frame quite interesting. In the 90's, when the Reagan War on Drugs fad was fading a bit, pharma and opiates start being introduced to the mainstream media in advertising. In a few years heroin and crack are no longer in the limelight, but here comes oxy. I graduated high school in 2001. Out of all the drugs you could find where I am from(Southwest Florida, lots of them), I never once heard of anyone using/selling/possessing heroin. Our class of 375 did lose over 24 students to overdoses of Oxycontin by the time we were 20. Fast forward a few years, now pill mills are in the limelight, Oxycontin is frowned upon, news about how bad the epidemic is start being churned out, and here comes heroin again. How hard would it be to track the people behind opiates? Who controls it? Who brings it in? Who monitors what is done with it? There just seems to be a cycle and now that Oxycontin is not as popular, heroin has made another resurgence. As well, you look at the 60's and heroin, and you see a lot of it was being produced in Southeast Asia. Then in the early 2000's I find out that Afghanistan was/still is a huge producer of poppy. Not saying there is a connection there, but it is awfully coincidental. If we track who is running the show for the big pharma companies, will we see a lot of the same ole' names from the past 100 years?
  14. Trump does not one thing from virtue. Agreed. His entire view of the world starts with "how does it effect me?" How anyone can miss the clinical narcissism is beyond me.
  15. Meanwhile, Trump sends troops to Saudi Arabia and continues to aid the Saudi slaughter in Yemen. By pulling out of the Iran nuke deal Trump pushed the region closer to war. But the defenders of Trumpian fascism celebrate when Trump betrays our Kurdish allies and plunges north-east Syria into war and ethnic cleansing. A real peacenik, that Trump!
  16. Take a look at this press conference, from about the 34 minute mark on, he really gives it to Graham and people like Kristol who want to see us stay in Syria. I can see why the neo cons don't like this stuff.
  17. This does sound logical Chris, and the frames you use with the Limo entering the bridge shadow looks synchronized to me. Sadly I don't have access to the original Bell frames, so I can't do any accurate calculations regarding frame numbers (i.e. to get the relative frame rate ratio from Bell to Zapruder). Do you have access to all of the original frames?
  18. John, I think I have worked out what is going on. I think the white pillar furthest away is actually the one north of Elm street as per this diagram: Interestingly you mentioned the human figures north of Elm street are the same size in your post so I suspect you may have been one step ahead here! Just for clarity here is a brighter version: I don't think Marie Muchmore (labelled 70 in the animation frame above) is visible in this photo. She starts filming about 2-3 seconds after the Bronson photo was taken so she may be just to the right of the frame as she dashed across. Here is a view from the other side so you can see more clearly where Muchmore was standing when she took the final scene of her film: Here is a view of the pillar to the north of Elm Street taken circa Z133, known as Willis 4, with the light pillar side to the left, and the shaded side to the right (matching the Bronson photo): There were about 102 Zapruder frames between this and the Bronson photo, or about 5.6 seconds, so the people may have moved slightly. I don't think this helps with anything in the animation, but its worth putting on the public record just for reference.
  19. A sitting President cannot be indicted for a crime. Robert Mueller indicated in his House testimony that Trump would have been indicted for obstruction of justice if he wasn't President. Michael Cohen was sentenced to 3 years in prison for campaign finance felonies he committed under Trump's direction. Once the American people give this scum the boot he'll face multiple trials. Only a matter of time. A Trump defender railing against spite, invective, sound and fury...Savor the irony, gentle reader!
  20. Sebastian Gorka is a Hungarian fascist. The fascists grow desperate and shrill as Trump implodes.
  21. Trying to say there is no political cost to his attitudes and actions? How about at the voting booth? I guess we've wandered of topic now. Sorry mods....
  22. On ‎10‎/‎15‎/‎2019 at 8:07 PM, John Butler said: "Trump is a traitor and he's going down." In the last 3 years, I have seen nothing in these madcap, fake MSM / Democrat scenarios that would indicate Donald Trump is a traitor or a criminal." Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine in return for a favor -- blame Ukrainians for the 2016 election meddling, and launch phony investigations into Joe Biden and his son. It's a crime to solicit foreign influence in an American election. Has Donald Trump been indicted for a crime? Has he been tried in court? Has he been found guilty of being a traitor or a criminal by a court? Has the House of Representatives brought impeachment articles? Has the Senate tried those imaginary impeachment articles? Has he been removed by the Senate? Until these conditions are met all is sound and fury offering spite and invective and little else.
  23. Jim, In your recent post you said: "In the 1990s, John A. examined at the National Archives “photographs taken by Harvey Oswald of aircraft, troops and bunkers in Taiwan [which] were found by the Dallas Police among his possessions and are now in the National Archives.” " Did Mr. Armstrong make a copy of the National Archive photos mentioned, and if so, could you maybe take the time and post those if you can obtain copies. One of the things that frustrates me to no end is the mixing of Michael Paine's Army photos and vacation photos into the Oswald photos in the Paine garage. I made what I thought was a huge error on these photos, but going back and looking at the situation further the error may not have big as I thought. A lot of these photos are like this one from Jack Swike: This appears to be an Army compound rather than Marine. Marine Corps personnel were not required to blouse their boots until 2003. These are more than likely Army personnel and not Marines. This might be a photo of Marines on the USS Bexar. I believe this is an Oswald photo and if not the Bexar then some other Naval transport on one of his sea voyages. Notice that their boots are unbloused. This is how Marines looked during that period. I see the same kind of thing in the 201 file photos. Michael Paine was in the combat artillery. In those photos allegedly Paine's I didn't find any involving artillery. And, no aircraft photos that could not be explained by being in Japan or Korea rather than Taiwan. Don't get me wrong on this, I'm not challenging the idea that Harvey Oswald was in Taiwan. There is way to much evidence saying so and as far as I can see the notion of Harvey Oswald not being in Taiwan is not worth the time debating it. What I am doing is trying to get a sense of whose photos, Paine's or Oswald's, are the military ones in the Oswald 201 file photos. I used Swike's photo above because he is one who simply denies that Oswald was in Taiwan or at Iwakuni. In his One Oswald Theory he simply ignores any evidence not found at Atsugi, Japan concerning Oswald. Or, others meld the Taiwan information into Atsugi information to a single timeline of Lee Harvey Oswald in their One Oswald Theories. I'm not impressed by that type of reasoning.
  24. Many of us are salivating for an official impeachment hearing. You can bet that Trump is looking forward to his impeachment on at least one level, and most likely two. Level One: What we have now is an unofficial impeachment inquiry. It is not a "thing", and Trump does not get to present his defense and avail himself of his rights, with the benefit of live feed testimony, not filtered by the MSM. Schiff, Pelosi and the gang have instead cooked up this "Impeachment inquiry" under the correct assumption that 90% of the American public will just hear the word "Impeachment" and assume Trump is being impeached. The MSM is of course going out its way to encourage the public's perception that an important impeachment of Trump is in process, even though it is not. As far as Team Trump is concerned, a real impeachment beats a fake impeachment any day, with 70% of the public (or whatever %) believing the current fake effort is real. Level Two: Trump gets to present his case in an official impeachment. Do you think Team Trump knows a few things? The things that I know are bad. Imagine what Team Trump knows. A real impeachment opens up a can of worms that Pelosi has been trying to keep closed for months now. Unfortunately for her though, the Schiff's, Ted Lieu's, Wasserman-Schultzs and another roughly 30+ Democrats who carried around Awan brother's Blackberry's have no choice but to move forward with the fake impeachment. (Trump could have video and audio of Schiff injecting crystal meth into the necks of black teenagers with Ed Buck laughing in the background; or arraigning for the payment from George Clooney to a helicopter mechanic that can arrange an "accident" that kills the General Manager of the Standard Hotel because it was being used by pedophiles in the entertainment industry and Epstein style compromise, but Trump would be accused of obstructing the impeachment, even though it is fake.) As mentioned above, the Awan brother's were handing out special Blackberry's (highly secure and custom configured) to roughly 30 congressman on the Democrat side of the aisle. ("Coincidentally" (#sarcasm) those 30 were also super-delegates for Hillary.) The Awan's did not actually configure the Blackberries, they just made sure they surreptitiously synced to the laptops they carried in their backpacks when ever they visited the office of the Congress person to do normal IT maintenance. Obviously, the information on the lap tops was pretty valuable and it's not like CrowdStrike was going to do the actual configuration for free. Always the entrepreneur, Hillary was able to offset the CrowdStrike expense by selling the information to whatever foreign intel. agency was willing to find a straw donor to funnel cash into the Clinton Foundation. The President looks like he is "chomping at the bit" to get an official impeachment underway. He mentioned the CrowdStrike server eight times yesterday; At this point though, he probably doesn't care all that much about the Awan's congressional Blackberries, and what classified and personal information ended up on the CrowdStrike server. The compromised congress people obviously care, so that faction is making Pelosi continue the impeachment charade despite her better judgement. Brennan, Clapper, Obama and a host of other "conspirators" must be feeling backed up against the wall, or else they would not have thrown Biden under the bus wheels over his Ukraine issues. Everyone in DC knows Hunter Biden is a malcontent (who gets thrown out of the Navy for smoking crack these days?), and Pelosi certainly wouldn't let the "impeachment" inquiry go on if the Biden's stupidity didn't threaten a closer look into Paul Pelosi Jrs. own connections to a Ukrainian energy company. To be clear, Brennan, Clapper, Obama, HRC know they are safe as long as a fake impeachment (a "real" one opens the worm can) prevents Trump from dropping the hammer, which the MSM would spin as politically motivated. Hence, the CIA "whistle-blower" inadvertently (sarcasm) exposes Biden's corruption, which is not new news, but conveniently exposes potential problems for the Pelosi family, forcing her to get on the fake impeachment bandwagon. Does anyone know that Trump met with Nixon over a long weekend back in 1987? What do you think they talked about? Who killed JFK? That Watergate was an internal coup and always view transition team volunteers suspiciously? Addendum: It's embarrassing when a CIA operative posing as a Russian Intelligence agent looses his Crowdstrike Blackberry and Attorney General Barr and  US Attorney John Durham travel all the way to Italy to retrieve it.
  25. Steve, In addition to the USMC docs I’ve already shown, there is quite a bit more evidence that the Russian-speaking Oswald was indeed in Taiwan/Formosa. In the 1959 Moscow interview with Priscilla Johnson, her notes indicated he observed Americans in foreign countries: “Like Formosa. The conduct of American technicians there, helping drag up guns for the Chinese.” In her finished article, Johnson wrote that Oswald “had spent 14 months in Japan, the Phillipines, Indonesia, and Formosa as a radar operator….” A message of November 4, 1959 reported that Oswald “served with Marine Air Control Squadrons in Japan and Taiwan with duties involving ground control intercept." A Naval Message also dated November 4, 1959 further confirms that Oswald was Stationed in Taiwan. “Marguerite Oswald" told the Warren Commission (emphasis added): This is a picture of Lee with his marines, and it is a special, I think he was doing special work there. I am not familiar--I wasn't told that. But it is different than the other picture. Lee went to many, many a school, gentlemen. He went to the Marine Air Force Base in Biloxi, Mississippi, to schooling. He went to Jacksonville and some others. I remarked, "Your brothers were not sent from here to there like you were." Lee was in Japan, Lee was in Corregidor, Lee was in the Philippines, and Lee was in Formosa. That has not been publicly stated. In the 1990s, John A. examined at the National Archives “photographs taken by Harvey Oswald of aircraft, troops and bunkers in Taiwan [which] were found by the Dallas Police among his possessions and are now in the National Archives.” The evidence that one Oswald was in Atsugi, Japan, while the other was on the high seas and in Taiwan/Formosa is substantial.
  26. Why would Jackie Kennedy want to relive the worst moments of her life for three hours?
  1. Load more activity
  • Create New...