Jump to content
The Education Forum

Mark Johansson

Members
  • Posts

    187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Mark Johansson

  • Birthday 11/18/1979

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Sweden
  • Interests
    JFK conspiracy, Hunting, Fishing, Movies, Music

Recent Profile Visitors

6,562 profile views

Mark Johansson's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. The laws of physics do not allow me to believe the lone nut theory. One doesn’t need to be a rocket scientist to see that there were more than one person involved.
  2. Interesting encounter. However, I don't agree with the headline: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2511848/How-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-helped-reporter-telephone-chance-encounter-just-seconds-shot-JFK.html
  3. Shane, I can only agree with Mr. Simkin. One of the best documentaries I've seen. I really enjoyed to hear, for the first time, a very agitated Loran Hall. Cheers
  4. Files should be tortured some more for lying about being involved in the JFK assassination IMO. Neither of the two men described by Bowers as being in the RR yard during the shooting seem to fit Files description or what he claimed to have down following the shooting. Bill Miller Bill, you better direct your anger towards Ed Hoffman. http://i26.tinypic.com/34oeaf9.jpg Whatever he describes, as a witness from over a 100 yards, was seen by no one much closer to it, not even by all the people on the railroad bridge. Has Hoffman really sold you that none of those people saw suitman running towards them along the picket fence, and that none of them saw railroad man accepting and dissassembling suitman's weapon at a distance from them of ..., what is it? 10 yards? Johansson
  5. Files should be tortured some more for lying about being involved in the JFK assassination IMO. Neither of the two men described by Bowers as being in the RR yard during the shooting seem to fit Files description or what he claimed to have down following the shooting. Bill Miller Bill, Allow me to disagree: Lee Bowers Directly in line, towards the mouth of the underpass, there were two men. One man, middle-aged, or slightly older, fairly heavy-set, in a white shirt, fairly dark trousers. Another younger man, about midtwenties, in either a plaid shirt or plaid coat or jacket. James Files At that point, through the scope, I witnessed everything, matter and skull bring blown out to the back on the limousine and everyone on television watching saw Jackie Kennedy crawl out there to get it. I watched her hold it in her hand, crawl back on to the car, I put the Fireball back into the briefcase, and closed it up, I pulled my jacket off, reversed my jacket so I would have, instead of the plaid side out, I would have the grey like a dress jacket more or less and I put a cap on my head, my hat, to walk away, carrying a briefcase. I said: With my clothes I can turn my jacket inside out, it’s plaid on the inside, it looks like railroad workers. Somebody out there wearing a flanel shirt, nobody is going to pay attention to me. I said: I can go over there, walk around a piece of (inaudible), walk up and down those boxcars, cross the railroad tracks, look at things, I ‘ll just be another worker, nobody will even look at me. and my jacket was a grey poplin , we had these car jackets back then, they were like waistelength, not a short jacket, they kind of come down a little bit, no car jacket like … made out of a material that they no longer use, it was called poplin. You might even remember that material, the poplin material? Grey color, had a shine to it. That’s what the jacket was like that I was wearing. A pair of grey pants with it. And I reversed the jacket, it had the all-set plaids in it, kind-a-like checkers on the inside. When I turned it over it looked like one of the old grey flanel shirts we used to wear out, you know, when you’re doing work in the yard or something out there. And I walked around the railroad yard and was waiting for the time to pass. I’ve already reversed my jacket. When I picked up the guncase, I reversed my jacket, no plaid side, I ‘ve got the poplin grey material on the outside, I took the fedora hat under the sleeve of it, snapped it out and put it back on my head and I walked away, carrying the briefcase and my 45 inside my coat pocket. Johansson
  6. Don, I don’t see any resemblance to Frank Sturgis at all. Sturgis had curly hair; the Mexican Oswald seems to have straight hair with a small bare spot on top of the head. Johansson I'm sorry you're not convinced Wim, Undercover secret agents wear wigs, headpieces or whatever to conceal their identity!!! Try matching the facial features, height, body size and maybe you'll find the real Mexico City Oswald. From Spartacus: "In 1956 Sturgis moved to Cuba. He also spent time in Mexico; Venezuela, Costa Rica; Guatemala, Panama and Honduras. It is believed that during this time Sturgis worked undercover as a secret agent for the Central Intelligence Agency." Oh by the way Wim, you look like Kelso in your Johansson avatar!! Don Don, First of all, I am a real person by the name of Mark Johansson. Wim Dankbaar used my profile when his password was lost and he couldn’t get any help from the moderators. Secondly, the guy photographed by the surveillance cameras in Mexico is not Frank Sturgis. If it is, then there must have been some plastic surgery involved. See for yourself. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/LHO25.htm Who is Kelso by the way? Johansson Hey Johannsen/Wim, Who is Kelso by the way? My point exactly... you do not have a clue about America. If you lived in America you would understand, same goes with your understanding of Frank Sturgis. Don Don, Who are you to judge my knowledge of America and Frank Sturgis? Anyone can see that the Mexican version of Oswald is not Frank Sturgis. Johansson
  7. Don, I don’t see any resemblance to Frank Sturgis at all. Sturgis had curly hair; the Mexican Oswald seems to have straight hair with a small bare spot on top of the head. Johansson I'm sorry you're not convinced Wim, Undercover secret agents wear wigs, headpieces or whatever to conceal their identity!!! Try matching the facial features, height, body size and maybe you'll find the real Mexico City Oswald. From Spartacus: "In 1956 Sturgis moved to Cuba. He also spent time in Mexico; Venezuela, Costa Rica; Guatemala, Panama and Honduras. It is believed that during this time Sturgis worked undercover as a secret agent for the Central Intelligence Agency." Oh by the way Wim, you look like Kelso in your Johansson avatar!! Don Don, First of all, I am a real person by the name of Mark Johansson. Wim Dankbaar used my profile when his password was lost and he couldn’t get any help from the moderators. Secondly, the guy photographed by the surveillance cameras in Mexico is not Frank Sturgis. If it is, then there must have been some plastic surgery involved. See for yourself. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/LHO25.htm Who is Kelso by the way? Johansson
  8. Don, I don’t see any resemblance to Frank Sturgis at all. Sturgis had curly hair; the Mexican Oswald seems to have straight hair with a small bare spot on top of the head. Johansson
  9. There's a few pages online of his book "Food for the Jackals". http://books.google.com/books?id=OpX-cJ6ES...L95O-g#PPA40,M1 Well, I guess the jackals have enough bones with page 39 Wim
  10. No Mark, you've got it all wrong. I have not posted for a long time here, and when I resumed , I found that I could not login. My username as well as my password did not work anymore. I tried the "retrieve a new password" function, but that did not function either, because the software kept saying : nos such username or email address i known" or some message of that kind. I have emailed John Simkin with a request to give me some assistance on resolving the problem, but never received a response. Then I have emailed James Richards who responded that he would take it up with John. Since there has been no response, I have then asked Mark Johansson if I could make a post under his name with his password. This was in the assumption that when the moderators would grasp me posting under Mark's name (which postings I always sign with Wim) they would jump in and give me directions on how to post under my own name again. But so far, and to my surprise, this has not happened yet. That's the correct story. Wim
  11. No, I have not seen that before, but even if there is some truth to the statement, I fail to see the significance. Wim
  12. The end conclusion of this video is "Spread the word!" But which word do you want to be spread on the JFK assassination? Wim
  13. .Then why did you ask? Well, tough luck then! That's a strange selection, Bugliosi was 50 bucks, right? I get it now, the funds are dried up for the real witnesses. Tell me Bill, did you ever see the Chauncey Holt DVD I made available? Can you recommend it? Or was he full of XXXX too? http://www.amazon.com/Spooks-Hoods-Hidden-.../dp/B000W8HEC2/ The LHO museum was Judyth's, not mine, and it has been dissolved 3 years ago. But I don't expect you to be current on Judyth. It existed for 6 months and I have yet to see that your Secret History Museum and Assassination Research Center in DC will last longer, if any. You're a real dreamer, Bill, still believing in justice and getting witnesses on the stand, rather than publicizing the truth. I 've got to give you credits for that. Wim
  14. That would be nice, Jack. If only the moderators would come through with some assitance to regain my password. Wim
  15. Bill , I refuse to jump to the demands of someone who wants to know a publicly accessible detail, while he has demonstrated his prejudice and closedmindedness towards the subject, at the same time solliciting monies from me for a grand jury that will never happen, but refusing to buy a DVD for 25 bucks. If you are that cheap, then let someone else here, who has that DVD, write up a transcript for you about the specifics of Judyth's meeting with Lee at the Post office, to finally help you out of your pathetic conjectures based on other one's hearsay. This is exactly why I say that the JFK research community is its own worst enemy and the biggest roadblock to the truth. The real culprits must be laughing their XXX off. For what it's worth, some of your reserach is really good. Wim
×
×
  • Create New...