Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! PLEASE CLICK ON THIS TITLE FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION!:   06/03/2017

      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Peter McGuire

Members
  • Content count

    944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Peter McGuire

  1. The Babushka Lady- Fact or Fiction

    Kennedy was shot in the back first. It was a “short shot,” or it would have killed him. This made the assassination more complicated and messy since frontal shots were then needed. It also allows the killing to be exposed because it had to be covered up by saying all shots were from behind.
  2. Inside Inside the Target Car: My Experiences as Limo Researcher for the Show By Pamela McElwain-Brown See Additional Reviews of Inside the Target Car By Dr. David W. Mantik By Milicent Cranor Part One of James DiEugenio's article. Part Two of James DiEugenio's article. Part Three of James DiEugenio's article. The JFK Assassination Aftermath and TV Shows One would think that once the Warren Report (WR) hit the stands in 1964 the government would have said, "there you have it", and moved on to something else. However, there were so many flaws within that it invited a fair amount of criticism. Although the critics were quickly pointed out to be un-American, they continued to grow in number and volume. Their voice threatened to drown out that of the Warren Commission. Something had to be done. Some on the Commission, like Allen Dulles, actually believed the American public would not bother to read the WR. Apparently, they believed that their appeal to authority, dictated by those supposedly the most revered in our government, would be sufficient. They thought that the American public was merely 'sheeple', and would do as they were told. They were wrong. In order to quickly cover their tracks, a special posse was formed behind the scenes devoted to stomping out the growing Critical Community (sometimes called Conspiracy Theorists, or CT's). New books were quickly written to re-emphasize the 'conclusions' of the WR, while some new CT books were written in order to confuse the CT community. And someone in the posse (which we will refer to as the Ongoing Cover-up, or OC) had an 'aha' moment when it came to pushing the WR agendas on that new media called TV. So into the fray jumped the networks, anxious to please; most of them probably co-opted by the OC even prior to the JFK assassination. The sheeple believe our newscasters. So, of course, they would believe what these people had to say about the assassination. This spewing of TV jargon would be more persuasive to the sheeple than any doubts they might have had. Quickly, a TV show on the WR was developed. Others followed. The Jim Garrison investigation was decimated by the NBC White Paper propaganda show against him. The OC had hit the big-time, and television had become the new means of controlling the public. Which brings us to the present. Fairly recently, the Discovery Channel decided to fund shows on the JFK assassination. Their ultimate conclusion, after allegedly looking 'objectively' at all the facts, was—you guessed it—a recrowning of the Warren Commission. On the other hand, in 2004 the SPEED Channel did a one-hour documentary on the Presidential Limousine,. This was called Behind the Headlights: JFK Presidential Limousine (currently .) This program, for which I helped develop the script and was interviewed for, was conspiracy-based and contained new information about what happened to the limo after the assassination. It clearly demonstrated that the limo was the primary crime scene and that there had been a cover-up. How could this be allowed to stand? So somebody at Discovery Channel had a bright idea to do a program focusing on the limo as the crime scene. And that brings us to "JFK: Inside the Target Car", and my participation in it.
  3. I did a search, but did not find a dedicated thread on Robert Vinson. Why, I do not know, as he makes the case for CIA involvement like no other. "In a colossal CIA blunder, Robert Vinson's providential presence on the second Oswald's flight from Dallas has enabled us to see the planning for the Oak Cliff follow-up to the assassination." JFK and the UNSPEAKABLE Washington and Dallas On November 22, 1963, U. S. Air Force sergeant Robert G. Vinson of the North American Defense Command ( NORAD) saw the second Oswald escaping on the same C-54 cargo plane he was hitching a ride home on. Vinson also got off the plane at the same CIA base as Oswald's double did, a few minutes after him. On November 23, 1993, Robert Vinson told the story of his flight from Dallas to news anchor Larry Hatteberg on Wichita's KAKE-TV Channel 10 News. In 2003 James Johnston and journalist Jon Roe co-authored their book FLIGHT FROM DALLAS, describing Robert Vinson's experience in detail.
  4. (2) St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter Richard Dudman wrote an article published in The New Republic on December 21, 1963, in which he stated: “A few of us noted the hole in the windshield when the limousine was standing at the emergency entrance after the President had been carried inside. I could not approach close enough to see which side was the cup-shaped spot which indicates a bullet had pierced the glass from the opposite side.” (3) Second year medical student Evalea Glanges, enrolled at Southwestern Medical University in Dallas, right next door to Parkland Hospital, told attorney Doug Weldon in 1999: “It was a real clean hole.” In a videotaped interview aired in the suppressed episode 7 of Nigel Turner’s The Men Who Killed Kennedy, titled “The Smoking Guns,” she said: “…it was very clear, it was a through-and-through bullet hole through the windshield of the car, from the front to the back…it seemed like a high-velocity bullet that had penetrated from front-to-back in that glass pane.” At the time of the interview, Glanges had risen to the position of Chairperson of the Department of Surgery, at John Peter Smith Hospital, in Fort Worth. She had been a firearms expert all her adult life. http://www.infowars.com/photographic-evidence-of-bullet-hole-in-jfk-limousine-windshield-hiding-in-plain-sight/
  5. WTF is going on with Trump?

    edit
  6. WTF is going on with Trump?

    He is hurting national security by his immature behavior. I don't know what more can be said. I have written to my representatives several times - even before he was the nominee. Now, as POTUS, he is harming the interests of the United States and the world.
  7. 1979 assassination attempt on President Jimmy Carter

    yes was worthy of a bump
  8. Trump and the JFK Assassination

    History is in the making. Since I became bored with the Kennedy assassination as it pertains to gathering evidence in the private sector, sadly this immature brat who somehow got elected POTUS is making life fun again.
  9. Trump and the JFK Assassination

    It seems to me that Schumer gave Trump some helpful advice.
  10. Trump and the JFK Assassination

    Great posts Douglas and Cliff. The "get over post" represents so many Americans who can not see what Trump is. Adding insult to injury we have Trumps speech at CIA and the White Houses Press Secretary lying on the job this past weekend. I moved away from the forum because it became clear, from the great research here, what really happened to Kennedy and more importantly why. The only thing that it seems that we don't know for sure is exactly by whom. But I think you have a pretty good idea. Now we have history in the making with this incompetent POTUS who is endangering our national security.
  11. Great speech by President Kennedy addressing what Blacks face every day. So many of us enjoy White Privilege and forget how difficult it is for all minorities.
  12. Dorothy Kilgallen

    My post got this response.
  13. Dorothy Kilgallen

    I wanted to see what I had previously written before I post again on this 12 year old thread.
  14. Trump?

    Thanks Jim, for taking the time to chime in on my thoughts and this topic. I guess I may be a little hungry for an issue worth looking into. My biggest concerns are about our National Security under a Trump administration. I think voters should have had that in mind rather than voting anti-Clinton. An interesting story brewing is the unwillingness of National Security experts to even work for him.
  15. Trump?

    The more I put together what has happened in this election, the more I believe it is related to the assassinations of the 60's - all of them. They began with JFK and that makes this thread relevant. I believe forces that need the Republican establishment to stay in power have completely taken over the government in a very slick coup. What Comey did is obvious,as is overlooking Trumps dialogues to Russia. Someone backing Clinton tried to stop him with the Bush tapes ( with a Bush family member no less) but it the counter punch by Comey neutralized that move. The bottom line is that powerful forces could not bear a Clinton presidency, just like they could not have the Kennedys stay in power.
  16. Maheu on Harvey

    Jim, I was first read about Maheu when reading a biography of Hughes. That was before I read about the Kennedy assassination. Have you written in detail about Hughesgate in one of your books? I read this biography around 1985.
  17. Trump?

    And then about half the voters in the United States voted for this man - and about half of those voters were women.
  18. Trump?

    Did anyone else think that when the Billy Bush tapes came out, it was a political assassination of Trump? And it seems to me that it worked. Then came Comey.
  19. Trump?

    I think discussing what Comey did is relevant to the JFK discussion here. Among other things, it shows that when you allow one thing to happen, there is no reason another of its kind wont follow.
  20. Decline of the Republican Party

    The man who is not qualified to be POTUS is still backed by many from the Eastern part of the United States! Interesting I used to think Easterners were more inteligent than the rest of us. ( but arrogant, fast talking and impatient )
  21. The Paine's are interesting spies. I learned a lot about deception and how to lie from them.
  22. Decline of the Republican Party

    Sorry my post is so short, but I want to say that I am not angry at Trump because he has the right to run for president. I am angry at those who follow him, and will be sickened if this unqualified man is elected POTUS. The list of disqualifying things he has said are too numerous ( and sickening ) to mention. Go ahead, America, elect an unqualified individual if you like. I guess it is your prerogative. Then you can get back to bowling and tats.
  23. The Real Ruth and Michael Paine

    Great research Jim I will get back to the thread after reading more about the Paines I will say she appears to be a simple looking woman with decent choppers ( legs ) in the interview. Her husband looks harmless.
  24. I am glad the markets did not fall after the Paris attacks, but can't help thinking that the markets were prevented from falling, in order not to allow those who may have known about the attacks in advance, profit by shorting the markets. Swift action by France, in the wake of the attacks, targeted the oil fields controlled by the Radical Muslim Extremists, who, as it was reported, make a whopping million dollars a day in the black market selling oil. This scum has money to spread it's evil, and stopping money getting into their hands needs to be a priority. Any thoughts about my theory that the stock markets were propped up today? There are, plenty of reasons, as you may well know for the markets to crash, yet they do not.
×