Kathy Beckett

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kathy Beckett

  1. Hey , Thomas, I don't think you have any business editing someone else's quotes in the quote box, even if you use a different color. That is what they wrote. It's their work. If you have a problem with what they wrote, then copy the particular text to the reply area, and then you can make comments on what you think it should say.
  2. This is great news, Doug!
  3. Brad, I 've been around for a long time, and was a member at Lancer since 2006, here since 2007. I have seen a lot of JFK forums, and been a member of quite a few. I know several people over the years that have different ideas of what appears in a photo. I also know that some people are a little more set in their beliefs than others, and will put a quite a strong fight, and it becomes personal. (Have you read the old threads--go back a few years-same thing) Like I wrote you in the PM I sent you, the Ed forum is an historical record which we try to preserve, because we have had a lot of researchers who are no longer among us, and we want to continue to provide their work, and the work of our current community. All I did was provide the link that was referenced, and state that the thread appeared continuous. Someone who would've just read the thread, and not seen the link, may have thought Robin did something. That you believe that ROKC may be responsible, I find funny, but you are allowed to believe what you wish. I don't agree. And that's fine.
  4. Just an FYI: This is regarding the post that Mr. Butler made to James, re Robin removing a conversation on the passport thread. I reviewed the thread about Oswald's passports photo here: Robin is a respected member of this community, and I believe it is important to clear his name, in regard to this. I cannot see where Robin contributed anywhere to it, and the flow of the thread appears continuous.
  5. For indications of interest, please add your name to this thread.
  6. ...to the Political Discussion Area. We are getting complaints, and in truth, those threads don't belong over here in the JFK area, anyway. If you wish to start threads dealing with today's politics, put them in the Political Discussion area. If any more are posted in the JFK Debate area, we will hide them from view.
  7. I can assure you that Dan Doyle is not Brian. Chris, your post was hidden because Dan isn't Brian. Also, I am well aware of what Mr.Doyle has posted about us at Duncan's forum as well as DPF, when he was running around telling everyone we banned him, which we didn't do. I made a copy of all of it. I was a bit surprised both that he was saying those things when he was already in a bit of doo, and him thinking he was banned, when he could still log in. Oh, well....
  8. We are open for registration! If anyone is interested in joining the Education Forum, please send the following to edforumbusiness@outlook.com: a photo of yourself for use as an avatar, a brief biography, and an agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?/topic/21403-terms-of-forum-us Once this is done, we will send you your temporary password. If we can be of help to assist you in joining, please contact us at the above email address. Sincerely, Ed Forum Team
  9. We have reopened this thread. Please post evidence that you have with respect to your position. Do not expect others to go looking for your evidence for you. It is your responsibility to do so.
  10. The Administration has decided to lock this thread for 48 hours as a cooling off period. Please do not start any new threads dealing with this subject.
  11. Brian, I don't have a dog in this fight. Andrej posted this to you: "Brian, please post or link the original Wiegman's frame from which your alleged female has been produced, and please give us details about the methods. If you give us these details, I will be able to comment on the validity of Duncan's picture. We need to know in particular what was the original Wiegman's still (there are multiple version of it), what resolution it had and whether it was resized and using which algorithm, what section of the doorway has been cut and why, in particular why the space above the alleged head was not analysed, what tools (brightness: what intensity, contrast: what ratio, any other tool?" This is the only way to accomplish what you want to do. If you really want to convince people of the merits of your argument, you have to do this. You can't just say "if a photo expert sees this," because if he were an expert, he would want to see the original. Also, I would ask Duncan if he could find his study. This has been argued on a few forums over the years. Now you're here, and you have another opportunity to present your case. If i were you in your shoes, I'd hit the books.
  12. Andrej has been very polite when discussing this topic. I don't see that he's getting away with murder, as you say. He has every right to debate with you. Also, even if he is a member of ROKC, what difference does that make? I am aware that you and ROKC have had some battles in the past (!), but he is posting his research, as you do, and very politely and calmly. I suggest you respond to him in kind.
  13. Yes, Pam, and it amazes me that she has complained to her fans that have friends who aren't supporters, to get rid of them!!! What in the world? Who does that? That is so high school. And my favorite is when she asks her fans if she can help them with their problems. How nice of her to offer a listening ear. My antennae go up when I hear that. The first thing I thought is that if you tell someone something personal, it can, if the person you told and you are no longer friends, be used against you. I learned a long time ago, (and it was a hard lesson for me) not to tell anyone anything except for on a "need to know" basis.
  14. Yes, it's one "t". When John Simkin registered me, years ago, he put my name as Beckett. I just left it..it's a no biggie to me.
  15. Brad, Jerry Dealey was the Lancer Forum moderator. He is also a member of this forum: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showuser=5159 I've met him a couple of times, and cannot imagine him acting up as a mod. He's got a good sense of humour, but I don't think he'd act poorly in a more serious role.I'd have to see what he was responding to, as well as his responses. He has presented at the Conference a few times. (BTW, I always viewed Lancer in linear mode as well, as I couldn't stand the trees.) Kathy
  16. Hi, folks! Work on the Lancer Forum restoration begins next week, and we hope to have it up in October of this year, or hopefully, to coincide with the Lancer Conference,Nov 18-20, at the Hotel Adolphus and no later than 11/22/16. I am not sure if we'll need to get a different host for that site or not. (James, help me out here.) I do know though, that in order to be able to both post in and view that Forum, and receive a registration key, you need to be a member of this one. Here is a link where you may post your name, or "I'm in" or "Sure" , to let us know you want to be a member there as well. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=23042 The old threads on the Lancer site, as we understand it, will all be restored.
  17. Bumped so everyone can see it. I'll pin it at the top of the Forum in a few days. BTW, I get several messages from people who have tried to register for the Ed forum, and cannot. We do requests for membership by email only : edforumbusiness@outlook.com We require you use your real name, a valid email address, and your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforu...showtopic=21403. Additionally, you will have to send us your photo for use as an avatar and submit a brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these.
  18. This is a photo I took standing left of the stairs. This is where I had to go to view the Tower.
  19. =http://smg.photobucket.com/user/cbecket/media/2blondesandacamera-16.jpg.html] I did this a few years ago...
  20. I still can't figure out why she has to move every 90 days to keep safe, but she comes over here every year. Hey, the Conference is announced, and folk know where's she's gonna be, but yet, she can't live over here, for fear of her life????? Why isn't she doing a video thing instead? (Oh, and BTW, that stuff about her being blocked from here is a load...I have checked her account numerous times, and it's fine. She probably forgot her password.)
  21. I don't think any of the Admin staff knew about it until I got a PM, and shared it with the others. A lot of times, we don't read the threads, and hollering at us in all caps, no less, in a thread we haven't even read, certainly doesn't help, now does it?. We took corrective action, and then we see this thread. So....... The correct way to handle something like this is to get a hold of an Admin.
  22. Or perhaps, the evidence offered is assailable. That's why there are two sides. Some may not agree. We have an area called "JFK online seminars" where one can post his entire presentation. Also, the JFK Research area would be good for this.
  23. Ramon, AFAIK, there is only one moderator at JFKfacts, and he probably has a regular job (he doesn't get paid for moderating), and since posts are pre-screened, then it may take a bit for them to be approved and "up".
  24. Why are you asking on this Forum if they will post their "moral authority" on another Forum? Doesn't the PM function work? This topic should probably be moved to a different area of our Forum.