Greg Burnham

Members
  • Content count

    2,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

About Greg Burnham

  • Rank
    Super Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://assassinationofjfk.net

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    San Diego, CA

Recent Profile Visitors

31,408 profile views
  1. LBJ's War: Vietnam 50 Years Ago
  2. Here you go, Steve. I have no comment on the discussion, but I can offer to help with the image upload.
  3. Summarizing: Intentionally flawed or not, Lamson's example is not an adequate representation of the "leaning" Stemmons sign post. The "leaning" sign post cannot be explained by parallax.
  4. Using this logic, shouldn't you prevent non-members from reading the Education Forum's posts, as well, else you'll risk being hacked here, too?
  5. Although I am admittedly biased, (since I participated in The Guilty Men episode in which I and some of my research were featured) I too believe that the series contributed a lot to help the public's understanding of the case. There were many more pluses than minuses. I found Nigel Turner to be not only gracious, but thorough. He displayed a considerable amount of courage in producing the series as a whole, but especially, The Guilty Men episode. Was it perfect? No. Did it achieve what we were hoping to accomplish over all? Yes. It got people exposed to a lot of evidence of which they would not have been aware had the series not been produced. It got people asking the right questions and thinking for themselves instead of blindly accepting the impossible LN narrative.
  6. Welcome, Stu!
  7. For those who have actually had a security clearance, your above comment speaks to your lack of experience. There is CLASSIFIED There is TOP SECRET There is NOFORN There is EYES ONLY [etc] FYI: Obama went on to further say: "There's 'top secret' and then there's TOP SECRET." No, Mr President. There are documents that are CLASSIFIED and there are documents that are not CLASSIFIED. There are documents that are "simply" CLASSIFIED and there are documents that are CLASSIFIED as: TOP SECRET or EYES ONLY or NOFORN (aka: No Foreign Dissemination) and so forth. Yes, Len, it is what it is.
  8. Defending Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton's email scandal this weekend, President Obama said to Chris Wallace [paraphrased]: "Well, there's 'classified' and then there's CLASSIFIED." -- The obvious implication being that there is some sort of distinction between two IDENTICAL words. It was reminiscent of Bill Clinton--when facing possible impeachment--famously saying: "It all depends on what your definition of the word 'is' is." I'll tell you what it is. It's all BS. What has happened to our country? The oligarchs are not hiding in plain sight, they're not hiding at all.
  9. Perhaps I should ask the moderators to change the title of this thread to: "The (JFK) Zapruder Windmills of Those Suffering from ADD."
  10. Altgens corresponds with extant Z-film frame 225. Note Jackie's gloved hand grasping the president's left arm raised to his throat as seen through the limo windshield in Altgens 6. Then note the exact same hand position in the extant Z-film frame 225. It matches to a tee. The Moorman photo corresponds to extant Z-film frame 312. Both of these can be easily confirmed with distinct corresponding "features" within both the still photos and the film frames respectively. As an example one can draw an imaginary straight line from the Z-lens POV to the Moorman lens that passes directly between the motor cop's torso and his motorcycle's windshield on the way to Moorman's lens. At the same time, one can draw a corresponding straight line from the reverse angle--from the Moorman lens POV to the Z-lens--that also passes directly between the motor cop's torso and his motorcycle windshield on its way to the Zapruder lens. I hope that helps. I can post a graphic tomorrow if you want. Thanks Greg, that helped a bunch. (Though you meant Z255, not Z225 for the Altgens 6 shot.) Now I understand better what Robert's points were, I think. As I understand it now, there is a question as to when the shots quit, due to Moorman''s statements. And as for Altgens, his statement (that he was 15 ft from the limo during the fatal head shot) indicates that the head shot really occurred further down the road than where Z313 shows it. This is better than how I earlier understood Robert's post. Because rather than most the Z-footage being altered, it looks like just the latter part of it was. I assume it was altered to remove the limo-stop. The limo-stop would be pretty damning for the Secret Service. This is pretty obvious so I'm sure it's been discussed a lot. But it seems that removing frames to speed up the limo during the limo-stop would be the way to go, followed by a good deal of touch-up work to remove jerkiness. By removing the limo-stop that way, the film would be shortened. The effect would be that the final shot on the revised film would occur closer to the TSBD than it really did. The problem is that this process would also move everything closer to the TSBD. And so, for example, Altgens should be seen in Z313. Which he isn't. Back to the drawing board. I don't know where Greg got his information from when he stated that the Altgens 6 photo corresponded to frame z225 of the Zapruder film. Most researchers agree it actually corresponds to frame z255. Here is something to think about. Witnesses along Elm St. all seem to hear roughly 3-4 shots, yet those at the eastern end of Elm St. seem to hear them at different locations than those closer to the Triple Underpass. Anyone venture a guess why that might be? Why move the head shot from 307 feet from the Sniper's Nest to 265 feet from the Sniper's Nest? Think of it this way. Even from the 6th floor, the advantage of height will diminish eventually. Hint: Why did we never see the Queen Mary (follow up car) immediately behind the limo in any of the reenactments, with SS agents standing on the running boards? P.S. Tom Purvis' research and ballistics "calculations" were a joke and, unfortunately, his nonsense still seems to be polluting this forum. I corrected my typo from Z-225 to Z-255 in the original post. Sorry for the confusion.
  11. Altgens corresponds with extant Z-film frame 255. Note Jackie's gloved hand grasping the president's left arm raised to his throat as seen through the limo windshield in Altgens 6. Then note the exact same hand position in the extant Z-film frame 255. It matches to a tee. The Moorman photo corresponds to extant Z-film frame 312. Both of these can be easily confirmed with distinct corresponding "features" within both the still photos and the film frames respectively. As an example one can draw an imaginary straight line from the Z-lens POV to the Moorman lens that passes directly between the motor cop's torso and his motorcycle's windshield on the way to Moorman's lens. At the same time, one can draw a corresponding straight line from the reverse angle--from the Moorman lens POV to the Z-lens--that also passes directly between the motor cop's torso and his motorcycle windshield on its way to the Zapruder lens. I hope that helps. I can post a graphic tomorrow if you want.