• Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! DETAILS HERE:

      We are opening registration!! If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We require you use your real name, a valid email address, and your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. Additionally, you will have to send us your photo for use as an avatar and submit a brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Ian Lloyd

Members
  • Content count

    193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ian Lloyd

  • Rank
    Experienced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. Ah yes, I see - the reticule adjuster...(well, I still don't see, if you know what I mean)... Even better!!!...Can't see one of these either!!!
  2. Yep, me too...just can't think what else could be being referred to as the "reticule"...
  3. Is the circled item in the pic below what you are referring to as the "Reticule Adjuster Screw"?
  4. Certainly does David. The other thing about this is that the majority (if not all?) of the handwriting analysis carried out for the WCR was carried out on copies, not originals. I believe that is a major flaw in the analysis in that, as I understand it, in order to carry out a meaningful analysis, the original handwriting must be available so that the person carrying out the analysis can include factors such as pressure and finer details to determine if the handwriting is 'natural' (i.e. genuine) or 'unnatural' (i.e. faked - someone trying to copy another's handwriting)...
  5. The "Spot the difference" bit was tongue-in-cheek...I was just struck by the overall similarity between the signatures.
  6. Just for fun... The top 2 are M. "Nick" McDonald's, bottom 2 are Oswald's:
  7. Thought I'd give it a try from Snipping tool (about the extent of my capabilities!!!)...
  8. Hi Andrej, Unfortunately, I don't have the software or capabilities to do that!!! I'm quite sure that Robin and/or others have already done it in the past - maybe an internet search might bring something up or, hopefully, Robin will visit and see this and provide more information.
  9. I believe that quite a few years ago Robin Unger identified that there was a woman standing in front of Prayer Man on the lower steps - as you say, if you look closely enough, you can see the bottom half of her legs . The overall effect is to make Prayer Man appear to be much 'bulkier' than he might be (that's not to say he wasn't bulky; obviously, we can't tell when there's a woman in front blocking the view). Not sure if it was Robin who first identified that there was a woman there but he was the first I was aware of.
  10. I wonder how the chin in the 1963 photo compares to "Oswald's" chin in the BYPs?
  11. Tommy, Not sure if the "...Running Woman..." you refer to is the same person I'm looking at, but is that Marrion Baker exiting frame right? Looks like someone wearing dark clothes with a white helmet/hat on to me, though doesn't seem to be moving quickly enough to be Baker (or running at all for that matter)?...hmmm...
  12. Roy, Good stuff!!! Can you post the pics you have of JED please? I'm sure a lot of people here would be extremely interested in them since he seems to be such an elusive character.
  13. IIRC, BWF (not WBF) was asked the question at a recent conference he was attending (in the last year or so) and BWF said he couldn't recall who it was that was standing there and that the photograph was too blurry for him to figure it out. Jack Dougherty is an interesting character too...
  14. Indirect link...read on... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3716997/How-Frank-Sheeran-killed-Jimmy-Hoffa-shockingly-claims-41-years-legendary-union-activist-vanished.html
  15. Jus' wond'rin - an 8mm film? Just how big/small is the negative that a blob would have been painted onto a small section of that portion of the negative?