Jump to content
The Education Forum

Michael Walton

Members
  • Content count

    1,547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Michael Walton

  1. Michael Walton

    "My New Thread"

    People do not stand with one leg down for extended periods of time - it's a very unnatural thing to do. We simply do not know or never will know who that is on the stoop - we can continue to go back and forth with 3D animations and low-res extreme blow ups of pixelly images to claim it's a man or woman, Oswald or a female employee. But there is simply not enough hard evidence to prove that it's Oswald up there. And no one seems to ask themselves the significant question because if they do, it will put doubt in their mind. That question is: If the plan was to murder Kennedy and set up Oswald to be the patsy, WHY would they allow their patsy to be out there during these critical moments, risking the whole conspiracy? The planners knew that there was going to be cameras outside during the parade. They most certainly wouldn't want the person they had set up to take the blame for the murder to be anywhere NEAR these cameras. Of course, Andrej, Bart and John will totally ignore this because you DO have to take this into consideration, but instead they prefer to just ignore it and go on with their conspiracy belief that it's Oswald up there seconds after the shooting.
  2. Michael Walton

    New RFK Jr book gives big nod to research community

    Here's a pretty good report of the story: https://www.thedailybeast.com/michael-skakel-was-convicted-of-murdering-martha-moxley-so-why-is-he-free I saw the URL of your review Jim and didn't read it because the URL alone tells me what it's going to be. It's going to be all about how RFKJ strived to get his innocent relative off, why the case is weak against MK, how the lawyers did their thing and on and on until he got off. You'll write you're usual wrap arounds of the review supporting it and that'll be your review. I think there's far more to this story than you or I will know but won't because that's what high-priced lawyers are paid to do. Instead of it being way over here or there, there's some kind of middle ground. I just find it hard to believe that MK or his brother were not involved some how. As I mentioned in those other crimes, they tend to be the victim and killer knowing each other, and it's certainly not some black, deaf, drug-addled person who just wandered into the neighborhood and killed her randomly. I never said I like Fuhrman or anyone for that matter.
  3. Michael Walton

    New RFK Jr book gives big nod to research community

    Not according to witnesses, Jim, who talked to Skakel: Two former students from Élan School, a treatment center for troubled youths, testified they heard Michael Skakel confess to killing Moxley with a golf club. Gregory Coleman testified that Skakel was given special privileges, saying Skakel bragged, "I'm going to get away with murder. I'm a Kennedy." Just because he had a bad lawyer, Jim, doesn't mean he's innocent. Look at OJ - I hope you're not going to say he, too, was innocent and his Dream Team was just icing on the cake. The point I'm trying to make is Skakel knew the girl; he was up in the tree jerking off and peeping into her house; the club was from his family's home. So yeah, maybe if he'd had a Dream Team from the very beginning they'd have come up with some legal bullxxxx to get him off. But they did find him guilty the first time. And yeah, I know you love the Kennedys and it seems you border on worshipfulness with them. Even I don't like them that much. But take away all of the lawyers and xxxx and this is what we're really talking about here. That's the girl who got her head bashed in with a Skakel family 9 iron...
  4. Michael Walton

    New RFK Jr book gives big nod to research community

    For what it's worth, Jim, *someone* murdered that girl. She was bludgeoned to death with supposedly a golf club. That area is an area of rich people. If you watch enough detective shows (real ones...not the fake CSI ones) you'll find that in a lot of murder cases, it's usually a family member or someone that lives nearby. Skakel knew Moxley. And as much as I've always admired the Kennedys, when you have high-priced lawyers, you can make things happen in the legal system than if you don't. That's pretty much what happened here and just because RFK's son wrote a book doesn't mean Skakel was innocent. It's just his side of the story. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Martha_Moxley
  5. Michael Walton

    Maybe

    Very well said, Evan. And you are absolutely right that there is a HUGE amount of bias in folks here and elsewhere when they're "investigating" and "researching" the JFK case. As a matter of fact, the person who replied to you above, Knight, is the person I mentioned that very thing to on another thread on this forum. Here is that post: WALTON -- This is about the fifth time you've said this, Mark - that I'm misrepresenting what you're saying. And FYI - I just showed my own version of why it can't be a 5-10 guy with one foot down on the lower step. Someone's height doesn't fall that much, Mark. And earlier up I made my own graphics showing that the leg Stancak made is too long. You obviously didn't read it. And I've done more than enough work on the Oswald clone story and how Zapruder's film was NOT filmed in 48 FPS and then 67% of the frames were removed. Yes, you've read that correctly, Mark. I've made videos and illustrations. Those, too, are either ignored or someone goes on a rant about how clueless I am instead of further debate on their theory. In other words, they revert to name calling. The biggest problem with the JFK story, Mark, is one of bias. I've asked some other researchers on this and they agree - WHY do these people believe in such nonsense? And it seems like the consensus is many of them have a hatred of the US government. In other words, the big, bad government is terrible, always wrong, always sinister and therefore, lies about everything. EXCEPT - when the written record somehow fits their crazy theory. Then, they'll quote page upon page of whatever's in the official record, probably grudgingly, but they do anyway. Folks who don't buy into the craziness, on the other hand, have the ability to question the THEORY, not the JFK story. They have the ability to say - wait a minute. We're expected to believe that around crying people, passersby and news cameras that when the body left PMH that the Bad Guys squirreled away the body either at Love Field or some other undisclosed location, took the body out of the coffin and threw it into the cargo hold, then snuck it out the back door of 26000 and onto a helicopter, in full view of live TV cameras, family members, and others upon arriving at Andrews? I mean...really, Mark? Do YOU believe in a fantastical story like this? Here's a perfect example of what I mean. I know the researcher who posted the thread below is well respected on this forum. But this guy confirmed to me a while back that, to put it simply, he doesn't like the government. Period. Do you not think this kind of bias doesn't cloud a person's judgement? It does, Mark. I've removed the name of this researcher from the above graphic to abide by the kinder and gentler nature of the new EF. But the above is what he posted on another forum. Not a single person bothered to even reply to his post there. I took a look at it and it was one of those head-shaking and eye-rolling moments for me as well. Do you remember the Mel Gibson movie Conspiracy Theory, Mark? When the guy has his walls covered in foil, photos overlapping photos with scribbles, names and drawings on them, Mark? If you can find the above post and take a look at it, Mark, you'll understand why it was yet another head-shaking, eye-rolling OMFG moment for me and the 326 others who looked at it. And yet, all I hear about on here is how "well-respected" this guy is. Not everything happened like you and others think happened, Mark, on 11/22. The law of averages and life in general just don't have this huge convergence of stolen bodies and faked films and cloned assassins (from Europe) like folks like this well-respected researcher and others think happened. But back to this thread, Mark. As another researcher who's not allowed to post here said - if you were really looking for truth in this thread, Mark, why haven't you asked Stancak to recreate the character with his over-stretched leg to be anatomically correct? In other words, reduced by 3 whole inches? Stancak said his future work would concentrate on dealing with correcting that but we've yet to see it. And if you, yourself, were not biased here, you'd be asking him when that was going to happen instead of turning around and telling ME why don't I do my own research and post it, when I already have ad nauseum.
  6. Michael Walton

    Russell's question

    Eddy- do you not remember that I tried to explain this Math Rules caper back in March 2018? I was trying to help you understand - since you asked about it then and are asking about again here - just what exactly the two other researchers are trying to do with all of these mathematical formulas? So I've copied the exact same reply I sent to you below from back in March 2018. After I posted the below in March, one of the True Believers of the mathematical "work" had a pretty funny reply. He told me to go boil an egg. You know, similar to telling someone to "go fly a kite." Whenever I come across that "boil an egg" quote, it gives me a good little laugh. Eddy, Let me see if I can help you understand and boil down Chris and Dave's math theory to the bare essentials. The bottom line is two FBI guys made a diorama of Dealey Plaza the weekend of the murder. The first version of their diorama showed little toy cars on Elm Street in the position of the shots. They obviously made a mistake because for the Z313 shot - the head shot - they had the car way down almost right next to the knoll steps where the old guys were standing. We all know that that's not what really happened. Now try to keep an open mind here. But how do we know that the head shot did not happen way down there? It's simple - you just have to watch the existing Zapruder film. And even better, you can also watch the Nix film. As a matter of fact, there exists a video on YTV where someone took both of the films and matched them up frame per frame. The end result proves two things: 1) both films match up perfectly; 2) both films prove that the FBI guys who made their diorama got it wrong. That, in a nutshell, is basically it. The FBI guys made a mistake. And during that weekend, the diorama was corrected and the head shot was brought up to where it's supposed to be, more or less the same position as what we see in the Z film and also the Nix film. Simple, right? Not according to Chris and Dave. The Math Team here thinks that something far more sinister happened. They think that an entirely different Z film exists showing shots that actually happened way down by the steps and the old guys. They also believe that the Z film that we can see on YTV was actually filmed in 48 FPS, and then, sneakily and sinisterly, the Bad Secret Agents took out 67% of those frames. It *used to be* 67% but now Chris is saying it's 72% of the frames. But anyway, these removed frames removed enough of the footage to move the shots to where we basically see them on any YTV Zapruder copy. So where does the Math come in? The FBI also did a survey of Dealey so Chris and Dave here are using Math and Geometry to further "prove" that this non-existent secret never-before-seen-by-the-public Z film exists. That's what it all boils down to. Now keep in mind here that Dave Josephs, who is completely and totally anti-WC, meaning he supposedly does not believe *anything* in that written record, will actually pick and choose from that lying xxxx of a document to further "solve" this theory. In other words, he doesn't believe the WC except when it helps him "prove" one of this theories. And now, their more recent exciting and revealing solution to this theory is the Tina Towner film has been discovered to be fake as well(!) But anyway, this is basically what they're doing - they're adding, subtracting, multiplying, dividing, and formulizing the numbers - and numbers from those numbers - from the surveys to prove all of this. They're both playing the John Nash secret agent role here. Remember that? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB9Gzz3yhYY No matter what you tell them - that there's only one Z film and that film *proves conspiracy* because the shooting sequence completely negates the ridiculous SBT - neither of them will listen. In their minds, they're 100% correct and deep into this theory of numbers and missing frames and fake films and the lying liars FBI agents.
  7. Michael Walton

    Russell's question

    Jeremy thanks for posting this as you actually beat me to it. That's one of the funniest posts I've ever read and the folks there hit it out of the park. Since Towner is mentioned above here's another unintentionally funny post. It's now up to over 700 views and not a single person has replied to it... https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?16860-TOWNER-s-background-grows-as-the-foreground-recedes#.WwCFURkpA0M It's absolutely amazing to me how the person who made that post is considered a "well respected" researcher on this kinder and gentler EF forum.
  8. Michael Walton

    "My New Thread"

    Andrej, I used to have the full blown Sketchup. I now only have the web-browser free version but it keeps crashing. And I don't have the ability to add people. But I was able to make *something* in it painfully. Regardless, I found TSBD and imported it and then drew some pillars to the exact heights of the people up there. Just for the hell of it I drew another one to use as a general reference for a person with a height of 5-6. Watch the animated GIF below to get the heights: Here are two different views of this scene, Andrej. See how much higher the 5-10 on the lower step looks compared to yours? This is because I'm not fudging the heights or stretching any legs on the characters to misrepresent someone standing up there leaning on their back foot (because like you said, IF Oswald stood on his back foot in some photos, THEN it just HAS to be Oswald). And I'm also not fudging by stretching a character's leg to make it fit the scenario.
  9. Michael Walton

    "My New Thread"

    This is about the fifth time you've said this, Mark - that I'm misrepresenting what you're saying. And FYI - I just showed my own version of why it can't be a 5-10 guy with one foot down on the lower step. Someone's height doesn't fall that much, Mark. And earlier up I made my own graphics showing that the leg Stancak made is too long. You obviously didn't read it. And I've done more than enough work on the Oswald clone story and how Zapruder's film was NOT filmed in 48 FPS and then 67% of the frames were removed. Yes, you've read that correctly, Mark. I've made videos and illustrations. Those, too, are either ignored or someone goes on a rant about how clueless I am instead of further debate on their theory. In other words, they revert to name calling. The biggest problem with the JFK story, Mark, is one of bias. I've asked some other researchers on this and they agree - WHY do these people believe in such nonsense? And it seems like the consensus is many of them have a hatred of the US government. In other words, the big, bad government is terrible, always wrong, always sinister and therefore, lies about everything. EXCEPT - when the written record somehow fits their crazy theory. Then, they'll quote page upon page of whatever's in the official record, probably grudgingly, but they do anyway. Folks who don't buy into the craziness, on the other hand, have the ability to question the THEORY, not the JFK story. They have the ability to say - wait a minute. We're expected to believe that around crying people, passersby and news cameras that when the body left PMH that the Bad Guys squirreled away the body either at Love Field or some other undisclosed location, took the body out of the coffin and threw it into the cargo hold, then snuck it out the back door of 26000 and onto a helicopter, in full view of live TV cameras, family members, and others upon arriving at Andrews? I mean...really, Mark? Do YOU believe in a fantastical story like this? Here's a perfect example of what I mean. I know the researcher who posted the thread below is well respected on this forum. But this guy confirmed to me a while back that, to put it simply, he doesn't like the government. Period. Do you not think this kind of bias doesn't cloud a person's judgement? It does, Mark. I've removed the name of this researcher from the above graphic to abide by the kinder and gentler nature of the new EF. But the above is what he posted on another forum. Not a single person bothered to even reply to his post there. I took a look at it and it was one of those head-shaking and eye-rolling moments for me as well. Do you remember the Mel Gibson movie Conspiracy Theory, Mark? When the guy has his walls covered in foil, photos overlapping photos with scribbles, names and drawings on them, Mark? If you can find the above post and take a look at it, Mark, you'll understand why it was yet another head-shaking, eye-rolling OMFG moment for me and the 326 others who looked at it. And yet, all I hear about on here is how "well-respected" this guy is. Not everything happened like you and others think happened, Mark, on 11/22. The law of averages and life in general just don't have this huge convergence of stolen bodies and faked films and cloned assassins (from Europe) like folks like this well-respected researcher and others think happened. But back to this thread, Mark. As another researcher who's not allowed to post here said - if you were really looking for truth in this thread, Mark, why haven't you asked Stancak to recreate the character with his over-stretched leg to be anatomically correct? In other words, reduced by 3 whole inches? Stancak said his future work would concentrate on dealing with correcting that but we've yet to see it. And if you, yourself, were not biased here, you'd be asking him when that was going to happen instead of turning around and telling ME why don't I do my own research and post it, when I already have ad nauseum.
  10. Michael Walton

    "My New Thread"

    It's not belittling that folks who don't agree with PM are doing, Mark. Folks who don't believe in this baloney have a real sense of plausibility and real-world mind speak in them. I mean, really, Mark - do you REALLY think half of the crazy theories on this kinder and gentler forum could have happened? Did you watch any of those police detective shows I mentioned to you earlier (I'm guessing not)? If so, did you zoom in and listen to how they talk - "it's impossible to have happened that way" and "it doesn't make sense." It would do you some good to watch a few and hear how these seasoned police detectives talk, then maybe come back here and look through the archives and find how outrageously fake (or a kinder and gentler word would be "implausible") they are. You say get out of the way - that sounds about right coming from you on here, Mark. There have been many many good solid plausible rebuttals that I'm guessing you've never bothered to read on this forum from many people who don't bother posting any more. You know why they don't post any more, Mark? Because of the "get out of the way" attitude you show toward them, Mark. Sadly, it's either "get out of the way" or all of the True Believers of fantastical theories simply cover their eyes up by clicking on their magic Ignore button. Like I said earlier this entire forum is going downhill. No reasonable, sane people post rebuttals any more because the crazies don't even bother reading them any more. I'm finding myself more and more going to other forums, not to join and post but simply to read there because there, you can still see vigorous debate there, not "get out of the way" and people covering their eyes up like the current state of the kinder and gentler EF.
  11. Michael Walton

    "My New Thread"

    There are many anamolies here. First, is about Stancak's latest 3D picture - the one above showing the figure to the left - and could not be Oswald. Stancak is trying to convince us that taking a 5-9 figure and dropping one leg down onto the lower step will make someone shrink that much. The figure looks way too small to be anatomically or "real world" correct and should be "taller. Watch Oswald grow in the GIF below: Second, it's obvious that all on this kinder and gentler forum who really REALLY want to believe in this theory have lost all sense of plausibility or reality. The reason why I say that is because here we see a plot to murder the president. They've planned it out since March '63, getting their patsy to publicly show how he's a hothead Communist (in NO), they get him into position in the building one month before Kennedy visits, yet they let him step out of the building right when the president is being shot and shortly thereafter. I mean - really, kinder and genter EF members? Does that not sound just a little bit too far fetched? I think it does and many other researchers (but not on this forum but on other forums) think the same thing. Third, Stancak is trying to show some photos of Oswald when he was younger, especially the muscular Oswald, that he stood on his back foot a lot. That's fine but there simply is not enough photo evidence to prove this. But now Stancak is also trying to say that because he does that a lot - stands on his back foot a lot - that it makes him shrink enough to fit the PM height. I mean - WOW - what an incredible leap of faith Stancak is taking here. Fourth, that muscular Oswald - according to many kinder and gentler members here - is NOT the so-called Lee Lee Oswald - it's the Hungarian clone that was found roaming the streets of Europe (Hungary?) right after WWII. He was plucked from the streets along with his Mom by fedora-wearing secret agents, who brought him back to the US and trained him to be the impostor of the Texas born Oswald. And it just so happened that this Europe (Hungary?) born Oswald's Mom looked exactly like the US born Margeruite except she was frumpy and never smiled. So Stancak needs to be careful about using photo comparison techniques or it will upset the alternate world view of kinder and gentler members here. Fifth, I'm finding it very hard to believe that in the Stancak image, taken from news footage that also shows Baker running toward the entrance of the building, that that would be Oswald up there (see #2 above) and also because LHO was supposedly found in the lunchroom where he was confronted by Baker and Truly. He cannot be in two places at the same time. So #2 and #5 are real dot connectors for me.
  12. Michael Walton

    Faulty "if/then" Logic

    The problem here, Mark, is that when others post perfectly logical rebuttals to the fantasy theories on this forum, they're either ignored, buried by others with garbage just for the sake of burying them, or both. I've helped you prove nothing, Mark. This forum is slowly going downhill because of the "kinder and gentler" approach it has taken. "Kinder and gentler" as in - agree with our crazy theories or you're banned to two posts a week...or forever. People with solid theories based on reason and the available record are abandoning it in droves. It's becoming a vast echo chamber of the same old people with ridiculous theories and the same old associated hangers on and groupies who stay around burying dissent while offering up "atta boys" to the same old members. You know, sort of like a clique. But if that's your vision of a "forum, then so be it.
  13. Michael Walton

    "My New Thread"

    A simple question that deserves a simple answer for all of the additional cartoon work and overlays and animated GIFs... Do any of you find it just a little bit strange that after all of this planning of the murder - starting back in March '63 - that the planners would have at least told Oswald to stay in the building during the most crucial time of all? Perhaps with the fake notion of "be ready to take a call" or something like that? This is mere seconds before and after the shooting sequence. So they do all of this planning - set up the fake backyard photos, give damning evidence to the Paines, have Oswald recorded on film back in August as a communist, get him a job in the very building where the fake snipers nest is set up, and on and on - and yet... OOPS! There's their patsy lurking around *outside of the snipers nest* I mean, really? Andrej, you said something above about... Lee Harvey Oswald flees the scene knowing that he soon will be a marked man. He travels to his rooming house, changes the slacks and the shirt, and takes his gun with him when leaving the house in haste. Really, Andrej? The evidence suggests otherwise. He catches a cab, gives it up to a lady, and ends up taking the bus - hardly the actions of a man fleeing. Your story above is actually pretty good and kudos to you for writing it. Still, it just seems too far-fetched that all of this planning would have been ruined by allowing Oswald to lurk out there. And didn't I read somewhere that Oswald was good at taking orders? In other words, if they were promising him something - and had been stringing him along all of this time, all the way back to August in NO - why would he suddenly break ranks now? It doesn't make sense.
  14. Is there any possibility - at all - that Tague was simply mistaken about the wound on his face? Maybe a bee stung him or he flinched and scratched himself from all of the commotion? This is actually a serious question and not a xxxx stirring question. I ask because it just seems hard to believe that a guy so far down the line of fire would have had a piece of concrete fly up and hit him. I don't care what other researchers say - I firmly and always believe that the shots do NOT start until right after Kennedy appears from behind the sign. There is no evidence at all when you watch the Zapruder film (and yes "the film is fake" researchers, it IS a real film) that any shots were fired until he appears from the sign. There was some kind of shooting starting down at that point where we see him reappear from the sign - what it is I have no idea. But it makes absolutely no sense at all to me that any shots were fired before because first, if the plotters put in all of this time and effort to set up the fake snipers nest and get their patsy into the building so he could be blamed, they would not have left anything to chance. Therefore, they would NOT have started firing until right after he appears from the sign. The plotters were not stupid. There was NO SHOT at all from the fake snipers nest before the first shot is fired (when he appears from behind the sign). They had to know this so therefore, they would not have complicated the shooting sequence by firing into branches. So regarding Tague, I've always felt a little bit "nah-nah" about this concrete flying up and hitting him in the cheek. If you look at a view from the window, it seems almost impossible for it to have happened.
  15. Michael Walton

    Faulty "if/then" Logic

    If I'm not mistaken, Mark Knight recently encouraged Andrej Stancek's anatomically incorrect Prayer Man 3D cartoon. The one where Stancek, who's trying to fit an over-size crooked leg into a so-called round hole of proof to "prove" that Oswald could be Prayer Man. I believe Knight said something along the lines of, "Good job, Andrej." So what are we to make of this? KNIGHT'S POST HERE: Now members, we have to be careful about using faulty IF/THEN logic. KNIGHT'S ENCOURAGEMENT: Good job, Andrej. IF the over-sized crooked leg on your cartoon works, THEN Prayer Man is LHO.
  16. Michael Walton

    Faulty "if/then" Logic

    So what kind of post is this really, Mark? I just read Gordon's thread about Connally's wounds and several people pointed out to him that his 3D model wasn't even anatomically correct. None of us, including you, are seasoned detectives nor police investigators, Mark, but we all try in our own way to get to some kind of truth in the Kennedy case. Then you have the charlatans and fakers passing off ridiculous "theories" like the Oswald clone - and even his Mom's clone - found in Europe 14 years after 11/22/63; the stealing of the body to alter the wounds (why they needed to be altered the charlatans won't even say why); and the Z film as well as the Nix, Muchmore, and Towner films are all faked (why they needed to be faked the charlatans won't even say why). You may want to check out a show on YouTube called Forensic Files. These are actual murder cases solved by actual seasoned detectives and police investigators. And believe me when I say these detectives come up with all manner of methods to solve the case, including your so-called faulty logic of "if/then." So this is something for you to think about as well. Or put another way, isn't this thread just preaching to the choir?
  17. Michael Walton

    "My New Thread"

    https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,562.100.html Another blistering critique of Andrej's cartoon. People DO NOT stand that way Andrej. You're trying to fit a straight oversized leg in a round hole here. It's as simple as that. And besides this whole "PM is Oswald" goes against every single piece of plausibility and realism. Why would the murderers allow their patsy to even be out there during this crucial period, after planning this murder for the last 6-7 months? All of the groundwork that was laid down, only to see it go up in smoke when the victim of the murder enters the kill zone and the patsy wandering around outside instead of hiding himself up in the lunchroom. OSWALD: So what am I supposed to do? PLANNERS: Well, don't you know? Go right on out the front door and catch a glimpse of the President. And take a few photos while they go by. OSWALD: OK. HAHAHAHA!!!
  18. Michael Walton

    "My New Thread"

    I don't know if any of this means anything but over on the Duncan M. forum someone found a black guy (BG) photo - he's standing on steps so I took this and inserted it into the PM cartoon. I made sure his head was the same size as the other cartoon characters. You can see that based on the grid lines I added proportions are the same which means BG is the correct size. I also took the suit and tie guy and made an extra one of him and put him in there so all three are the same human proportions: Then I put BG's leg down on that 2nd step s if it's down there with the PM character. Then, for fun, I put suit and tie guy down there too just to see what would happen. BG barely fits and his hind leg on the top doesn't quite fit up there - it looks like it's touching the edge of the top step vs. being up there enough so it wouldn't touch the edge. Amazingly, BG and suit and tie guy appear to be physically smaller than the PM character judging by their respective head tops once you move them down one step. One final thing I did was line up the crotches of BG and suit and tie guy with the PM character's crotch. You can see what happens when they're lined up below. So what does it all mean? It does appear that that leaping leg of PM's is too long. I realize that putting 2D images inside of a 3D cartoon is not 100% scientific but the above images do show some interesting results. More importantly, though, for me, is that I STILL can't wrap my head around the idea that the planners would let their patsy be roaming around outside risking being photographed when he's supposed to be up in the 6th floor sniper's nest.
  19. Paul - did you even bother comprehending how Josephs interprets evidence and how Jason does? Josephs is one of those "everything is fake" kind of believers. Fake as in the Z film/Towner film/Muchmore film are fake; that LHO had a clone discovered in Hungary...and the clone's Mom was also a clone of Marge Oswald; that the FBI dioramas were faked; that the body was squirreled away at Love Field and altered for some unknown reason. If you don't think that matters - trust me it DOES matter. And aren't you being just a tad disingenuous here because you know Josephs is a CIA did it believer where as Ward is a Trejo the right wingers did it believer? If you hate the government as much as Josephs does, then you can go to the bank that everything is going to be colored biased in his mind. Trust me when I say no grizzled police investigator would take him seriously knowing how biased he is.
  20. Michael Walton

    Mrs. Stanton, Mrs. Sanders, where are you?

    Tom, I've been doing mutlimedia for 32 years now. Even I like to learn new things. Andrej used a FREE piece of software called Sketch Up. You can download it for free. I know you're 68.5 years old but maybe it will exercise the other part of your brain and add years to your life. Here's a short 3D piece I made with it. I made this when I was 52.75 years old: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-CxSGNvalR0eS1TX00 You can download it here. https://www.sketchup.com/products/sketchup-free Give it a whirl and have fun - who knows, maybe you'll amaze yourself and become the new Dealey Plaza animator with legs that are of human proportions.
  21. Michael Walton

    Mrs. Stanton, Mrs. Sanders, where are you?

    Brian Doyle offers a blistering critique of Andrej's inaccurate 3D cartoon. Not only does Doyle point out the extra long inhuman leg but he also covers how the "new and improved kinder and gentler" version of this forum totally quashes all dissent for the crazy theories you will find on this forum. In other words, all Andrej has to do when someone backs him into a legitimate corner is go crying "enough is enough" and the admins will step in and slap a two posts a day or whatever the xxxx their new policy is. Then DiEugenio will step in and applaud the kinder and gentler "new" forum again. So read Doyle and weep/laugh; bottom line is Andrej, in his zeal to "prove" that the figure in the photos is LHO, will do and say anything to defend his "scientific" work. https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,562.0.html As for me, I don't know where I read it, but I'm now convinced the figure is not LHO. Why? Simple - if the plotters went through all of this planning of setting up a fake snipers nest so the blame can be placed on Oswald, do you really think they would have allowed Oswald to be roaming around in public during the actual murder when he was supposed to be up on the 6th floor killing Kennedy? Of course not. It totally goes against all reason and plausibility. To Tom Graves - I really miss the "dripping with sarcasm" Tom Graves. The kinder and gentler Graves of late is just not you.
  22. Michael Walton

    Focus your research on Zapruder, he is the key

    David, I'm far from a Gary Mack wannabe. I know there was a conspiracy just like you and others here do. I just do not think that many of the theories du jour apply in this case. Such theories as: Hardly Lee Thrumming Copter and Scalpels at the Ready Scenes were Snipped/Painted In/Painted Out in the Z/Nix/Muchmore/Towner/Elsie Films Photos Faked Shooter in the Pavilion Sewer Shooter Carousel Club Basement was Assassination HQ (with Ruby Serving Dulles High Balls) Z Film Alteration Using Outrageous Mathematical Formulas Perry Never Cut into the Throat Incision ...and many more. What you an others don't seem to understand is that the Bad Guys could not just wave a magic wand and make these two films magically sync up like you see in this video. It would have been an impossible feat to pull this off and there is zero evidence anywhere and in the films that this was ever done. It would have taken a tremendous amount of coordination to pull this off and further on Von Pein's video collection, look up the '64 black and white "top secret" assassination film the FBI made. In it, you'll find a BW copy of the Z film in it. It looks exactly the same as the film you see today on YTV - except it's BW. So what's the point of this? The point is this. That's the one and only Z film you and others are ever going to see because that's all we have. No secret "there's another film to see" malarkey that I read about on here ad nauseum. Which brings me to another point - what in the world do you and others think this "other" film could possibly show? The Z film shows conspiracy; it proves that the shot sequence could not have happened like the SBT says. So there we have it - two films from different angles lined up and they match perfectly. No magic or wand waving needed. But if you want to continue to believe in paranoid fantasy theories go right ahead.
  23. Michael Walton

    Questions For Andrej Regarding Prayer Man

    Yes I remember that discussion a while back. I remember taking a snap of Dealey from Maps and showing that the elapsed time from the last shot could allow all in white and the check skirt to walk or trot hysterically from their positions up to the steps in time to be captured in the film.
  24. Michael Walton

    Questions For Andrej Regarding Prayer Man

    If he's in the shadows already but his shiny object is reflective would it matter how far he's in the shadows? There could still be a sliver of light coming in thus creating the shine on his wrist object.
  25. Michael Walton

    Focus your research on Zapruder, he is the key

    Do not forget this one, which proves something very important - NO film alteration. At all.
×