Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton


      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Michael Walton

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Michael Walton

  1. Jim I'm as happy as can be in this pretty xxxxty world we live in. As for anger you can call it whatever you want. But it's mainly frustration at how you and others spread falsehoods all in the name of Kennedy's memory. I think what you and others like you do is disgraceful.
  2. More than fifty years ago, Sylvia Meagher published her ... OMG! Oh, this is outstanding, Jim. You've just hit it out of the park by confirming exactly what I said above. You're now taking what Sylvia Meagher wrote and projecting it onto Armstrong's clone fairy tale. Did you really think you'd be able to sneak this by knowledgable readers on this forum? Of course Sylvia said there were "doubles" but not ones running around as kids way back in 1953, not ones with a unibrowed and happy Mom. I, like she and other serious researchers, believe that there were impostors (NOT clones) running around in mid-63 doing stuff memorable (like the car dealership incident) so that when 11/22 came around, people would say, "Oh, yeah...I vaguely remember that guy [LHO] at such and such time doing something outrageous." There is too much evidence to prove otherwise that the goal was to make Oswald look like a crazed Communist. But Sylvia did NOT mean that there was a Hungarian kid who looked exactly like the US born Lee Oswald who was found and then living a parallel life like LHO. Jesus - this takes the cake even for you, Jim.
  3. Wow, so now Sandy Larsen is a language expert. Ironically, he says that kids learn languages faster than adults, then contradicts himself when he asks how long does it take a kid to learn Dickens? As if comparing that apple with an orange will prove...what? What a joke. *** As is usually the case here on this forum, whenever a member posts a rebuttal of another "researcher's" pet theory, the normal modus operandi is to either ignore or post long passages of text from testimony and whatnot. The biggest problem with this is that just because a word or phrase is found in the available record, "researchers" then project this word or phrase onto their pet theory. There's no evidence - at all - that this Oswald double and his unibrowed "sad" Mom - each bearing an unbelievably striking resemblance to the real US born Oswald and his Mom - ever existed. When you boil this crazy theory - and many other silly ones as well - down to the essence of it all, the next question is - who really cares? Even if there was an Oswald clone - or three or four - what does it matter? If we are to believe there was a conspiracy to murder Kennedy, there is plenty of solid evidence elsewhere to prove the conspiracy. One is even what Oswald - or was it his clone (LOL) - knew he was being framed when he was caught saying in front of reporters that he was a patsy. You can take it to the bank that he knew, from the time he was dragged from the theater kicking and screaming until he says the word "patsy" that it had dawned on him that the jig was up. Yet, the silliness continues. You'd think the people who planned this murder out had superhuman powers when they: - Had the assassin's clone running around 10 whole years before the assassination; - Had the ability to alter every single piece of film and photo evidence taken during the murder; - Had a Jack Ruby impostor murder Oswald A or B in the Dallas parking garage; - Faked photos of the above when they removed a hanging microphone in some photos but not in others; - Had an assassination headquarters in the basement of Ruby (or *his* clone's) nightclub; - Whisked Kennedy's body from the back of Air Force One to perform pre-autopsy surgery on his body; - But these same supermen, when putting his body back into the coffin, put him in a different body bag (oops) People who fall for this xxxx have no ability to distinguish truth from fiction and silliness. Not to bring up today's toxic political environment, but it's like "researchers" here will believe *anything* you tell them without batting an eyelash.
  4. The Paine Files

    Jim you said you have new info above. What do you mean by that?
  5. Tracking Oswald Part 5

    Just my IMO but I think you both have valid points. The photo may have been taken a little higher up than my illustration: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7Hr9Lrku-Cxdm9ZalJTSWU3cms/view One thing that sways me in my illustration is the leathery lined section in the open head photo. I believe that looks like the back of his neck and you can also see those lines in the photo that shows the back of the head with his matted hair laying over the wound (the same photo I used in the illustration). I also happen to believe that there was a tangential wound from the front that hit in the temple area and slice through his head and came out the back, hence, that rounded beveled hole you see in the illustration above. If it did happen that way, it'd be amazing to find just where in the hell that bullet went when it came out. I know this is all speculation from all of us of course, but as you may have seen in that video i posted where it shows a guy's head flying backward from a frontal shot, somewhere along the way a shot hit JFK from the front pushing his head backward like in the Z film.
  6. Tracking Oswald Part 5

    Micah and Sandy - so what is your own personal interpretation of the photo? Micah - please don't post endless testimony and clips of text. Just what do you personally think the photo shows in your own words? And Sandy?
  7. Tracking Oswald Part 5

    Uhh, no, Micah. You're reading way too much into this with way too many so-called "experts" saying it's this or that or something else. It's his head, Micah. The back of his head. That round shape is the blowout from the bullet hole. Look at my illustration above. It's not hard to figure out. That's a flap, Micah, with the bone underneath. Pat Speer wrote about this too. Look it up on his website.
  8. Tracking Oswald Part 5

    Since we are on the head wounds here, I wanted to put this up. I have always thought this was a decent illustration of two photos combined, not because I made it, but because the so-called "mystery" photo - who Baden couldn't even orient in 1978 (and BTW, every time I see that guy advertised on a TV show I never watch his xxxx) - HAS to be oriented some how. Meaning, if we are to believe that that photo is genuine (and I think it is) then it has to somehow be reconciled with the other autopsy photos that are available. So this illustration below is that reconciliation. PS - this is a large animated GIF so let it load as it may take a moment if you're on a slow connection speed: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-Cxdm9ZalJTSWU3cms
  9. Tracking Oswald Part 5

    Mike - this is a particularly useful video IMO. Did you make it? Yes
  10. This breaking news sounds like pure Italian hokum to me.
  11. Tracking Oswald Part 5

    I'm not saying here that it's impossible for a rear shot to the head to not make a head move backward. But this show is par for the course, meaning it's utter horsexxxx. Ballistics gel in no way mimics the actual human body with gristle, bone, and taunt muscles. All you have to do is look at the Z film to see that JFK - before 313 - was not a blubbery mass of rubber bouncing here and to. He was actually stunned and looks stiffened...how do we know that? Watch his right arm collapse when the head shot hits. So he was not a blubbery mass like this xxxxing show portrays it to be. Meanwhile, how do you explain live human bodies reacting to a shot from the front as well as the back as seen below? https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-CxNm9MNTY3UHVrR1k and https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7Hr9Lrku-CxU0V1ck1GZFN6TWM
  12. Methodology

    This belongs over in the Math or Egypt forums. Or in a new one called My Fantasy World.
  13. David Giglio Interviews Jim DIEugenio

    Chris and Dave, I stand by what I said earlier. The case was not all that hard to pull off. You set the stage, get a patsy in place, the shooters come out and do what they do, then fade away. The government, in cahoots with the media did the rest, causing subterfuge for the past 50 plus years. That's all. People like you two and many others (the Harvey and Lee crowd; the Jackie shot JFK crowd; and many others) have grossly muddled this case, ruining the outstanding work that's been done by real researchers. So yes, this thread deserves to be pinned at the top of this forum so that folks can read what really happen before they start finding the silliness like the Z film was recorded at 48 FPS and 67% of the frames were removed, that blobs were painted onto the film, that Oswald had a clone from Hungary, and the clone's Mom had a unibrow and smiled a lot, and all of the other nonsense (e.g., muck).
  14. David Giglio Interviews Jim DIEugenio

    This thread should be renamed The Kennedy Assassination A Primer and pinned to the top of this forum. Not only does JD cover the case well but Giglio has some outstanding links to other resources. Yet, only 300 odd views of it. Meanwhile, the craziness and zaniness on this forum continues with, for example, Chris carrying on with the ridiculous Towner Frame Split thread - 13,000 views and counting. That's why it's even more important to pin this to the top so there's some kind of balance before visitors start wading through the muck.
  15. I recently led the effort at the company I work for to live stream an event on Facebook. It happened this past week after planning it for almost one year. Have you ever thought about putting this event on Facebook Live for those who cannot attend?
  16. Michael Walton

    Deaf multimedia producer for over 25 years. Firm, practical believer of massive conspiracy to assassinate President John F. Kennedy.
  17. Michael Walton

    Mike, come on. This whole forum is about the JFK assassination. We should try to stick to that topic. Test out your new-fangled software or gadget or gizmo elsewhere. You have plenty of off-line options. Then when it works and if you want to somehow incorporate this gizmo into your JFK research, great. I mean think about it. You and me and others are not the only ones who visit this site. Tom Graves also called you out a while back on how you posted 7 or 10 empty "reserve" posts on a thread. It was like - WTF? There should be a certain etiquette to *how* you use a forum and Graves's call out and mine are two examples of how you don't seem to understand or are too stubborn to consider the point we're trying to get across. But now you'll once again accuse me of being arrogant or a playground basher or whatever without holding up the mirror to see the point I and others have tried to make with you all along.
  18. David Talbot's posting today from Italy

    Meanwhile, Dulles -- for some unexplained reason -- was operating out of a secret CIA facility in northern Virginia on that fateful day, even though Kennedy had pushed him out of government two years before. And then he goes on to be part of the WC. Talk about the fox guarding the hen house.
  19. Michael Walton

    When it works, great, then use it. Don't make it a post though - it just disrupts the thread. Who cares if you're "testing" something. I don't and I'm sure others don't either.
  20. ANDREWS: Good to see the Krock article, Jim. Often that article is cited as anti-CIA and the source of warnings that the CIA was too powerful and interfering, but it's clear from reading Krock that his is an equivocating response to Richard Starnes' courageous work. Krock is doing damage control, goading Kennedy, and stealing Starnes' glory, all in one shot. If a plot against Kennedy were not already underway, this piece would be a serious incitement to war between the Agency and the Executive. I don't agree with your take that Krock was goading Kennedy. Krock was pretty loyal to the Kennedy family having been so since 20 years before. Based on that, I take it that the "high official" was someone very close to Kennedy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Krock MIKE CLARK: OMG you're actually "testing" computer things on a public forum?! Can't you just start a private blog like with Blogger and test there? This is NOT your personal playground, Mike! Jesus! Is it any wonder people are fleeing this forum in droves?
  21. Houston Mock Trial in November

    Not a word in Ramon's list about: Pat Speer (no nonsense and BS free) Gil Jesus (seemingly abandoned site but good stuff) Prayer Man site (the one and only true remaining "theory" that has a lot of potential but which a lot of conspiracy folks actually argue against...because well, they think everything is a conspiracy EXCEPT solid ones?) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  22. Mystery Man?

    Your photo shows the spilled Coke on the ground. The other photo shows the cops with the bags of food. Sitzman states what she saw. She obviously was not watching them every single second as the car came down the street and sped on - who knows, they may have stood up or leaned on the wall to get a closer look as the car approached as seen in that photo known as Dog Man. Finally, from a plausible point of view, I cannot imagine the planners would put shooters or whoever that obvious and out in the open. If the plan was to frame LHO by making up the 6th floor nest with throw down spent shells, then they'd have to have been the dumbest plotters in the world by putting some shooters or whoever that obvious down there.
  23. Mystery Man?

    The one behind the retaining wall was supposedly a black couple that was watching the parade and eating their lunch, never to be seen nor heard from again:
  24. Yes, we shall wait and see what happens in October. That is all we can do. Meanwhile, the comments on that article page are even more entertaining than the article itself. Here's a truly hilarious one (I believe the comment author is actually making fun of the way-out-there CT-ers found here) and reminds me of the comedic theories you can read on this very forum (such as the 67% Solution; Harvey and Lee; Tina Towner's Splice; Ruby didn't shoot Oswald; Ruby's nightclub basement was assassination HQ; and one of the old guys on the knoll had a black pistol in his hand during the shooting, among others): ARTICLE COMMENT: This is what I learned from our U.S. Gov teacher who was said to be a W.H. historian at onetime: 1) In early 1900,s, may be 1901, there was a sharp shooter at Russia, who for the most part, saved Russia from Mideast infiltration in the mountains 2) the sharp shooter could perform age reversal and lived multiple lives 3) the sharp shooter had been Samuel Adams, John Adams, John Hancock, a former Czar and a former king of Scandinavia, Herbert Hoover, Kafka and many others with multiple age reversals and resurrections 4) In early 1960,s, the sharp shooter became John Kennedy! 5) A group of Polish criminals (wanted for human poaching) had escaped to Scandinavia 6) In 1962, they infiltrated the "real" John Kennedy, took over his black phone book and contacts 7) One of the Polish criminal brothers took the real John Kennedy's identity and became John F. Kennedy 8) In the mean time, a group of indigenous Bulgarian, who were after stealing the identity of the Scandinavian king, Czar, historic Russian sharp shooter etc. had already taken over a ranch at Texas from the king; that mob paid to train a sharp shooter, "Oswald to impersonate the "historic" Russian sharp shooter of early 1900,s, who had saved Russia. 9) The Texas mob and takeover guy John F. Kennedy (who wanted to take over Kafka's home at Kings point/ Great Neck N.Y.) competed over the king's identity and assets. 10) When the Texas mob owed back taxes of over $600 million on oil (etc.), John F. Kennedy (the impersonator) may had blackmailed or wanted kickback from the Texas mob, who had the impersonating sharp shooter commit- while they themselves were in the Grassy knoll making sure it would be done. 11) Interesting to note that in the documentary film, the tall doctor in the emergency room (i.e., overseeing the shot John F. Kennedy, impersonator) was the original John Kennedy himself; he had become a Scandinavian passport approval guy and operated "Medical Arts" at then NY college (now Queens borough college), home of the "Soup Kitchen" operation during Cuban missile crisis! Somewhat complicated, this may be the true story! By K.L. OMG - SO, SO FUNNY!!!!
  25. Vietnam Declassified: Kennedy, Johnson,Nixon

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_34A This whole thing goes all the way back to 1954 with the above. I glanced at a book at the store recently (can't remember the name of it) where it mentioned the above and LBJ and McNamara signed off on the above I think it said Feb 64, six months prior to Tonkin. The Tonkin incident was just the "Remember the USS Maine" incident the warmongers were waiting for - that little big incident to get everyone foaming to start the war. You know, like Bush did when he said Sadaam had nuclear weapons. Coincidently, OP34A, starting in 1954, is around the same year where Oswald's Hungarian clone was found and thus, starting the Oswald and his clone operation. Could these two incidents just possibly be related? ¯_(ツ)_/¯