Len Colby Posted March 7, 2012 Author Share Posted March 7, 2012 Come'on Gaal, fess up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted March 8, 2012 Share Posted March 8, 2012 (edited) Come'on Gaal, fess up! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ My,my ,did you ever think you are rude ?? ever........??? Steven Gaal +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv Confession is good. Now I do have a lead. However the person is in his eighties and lives with one of his children. I suspect that there may be age related mental issues. Contact IMHO would be inappropriate. I can if you wish give the datum to a Education forum monitor (I would give it to their home email) and he/she can relay it to you. You can ,not like the great movie line,"Always do the right thing." but the opposite. To me its my memory,its what I remember. Not every thing is on the internet. I recall your fiasco with the NATION magazine in the CIA cancer thread. Now as to signatures with inaccuracies, I thought at one point your signiture stated you had a PHD from Oberlin College,and that 'now' you state you only have BS. Yes you only have BS. If such is true that you misinformed.....well..... . Let me try to help you in a fatherly fashion. Two below are for you. Not a wall of words but a wall for help. BTW very busy with Chruch youth projects that I am initiating. These projects make me feel better than interacting with you on this forum. BTW when I posted about the History of False flags I was doing a service,not everyone has advanced knowledge base. I also did this on CANCER CIA thread and the Carol Quigley thread to name a few. You denigrate what I try to do.....this "IS" an education forum. ==================================================================================== The true Christian needs to let GOD work in his heart to get the FRUITS mentioned in Galatians 5:22-23. Related links very good. Moral transformation demonstrates the power and profundity of the Bible which can and does occur. (wink). Jesus is Lord. Steven Gaal ====================================== ====================================== THE FRUIT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT link http://www.godonthe.net/HolySpirit/sgifts.htm (below) relatted link http://www.biblegateway.com/resources/commentaries/IVP-NT/Gal/Freedom-Moral-Transformation related link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_of_the_Holy_Spirit ======================================================================================= The Holy Spirit brings forth fruit in the believer in Christ-like graces of character. Galatians 5:22-23 [22] But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, [23] gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law. Compare Romans 4:17 As it is written: "I have made you a father of many nations." He is our father in the sight of God, in whom he believed -- the God who gives life to the dead and calls things that are not as though they were. Romans 15:13 May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace as you trust in him, so that you may overflow with hope by the power of the Holy Spirit. Romans 5:5 And hope does not disappoint us, because God has poured out his love into our hearts by the Holy Spirit, whom he has given us. All real beauty of character, all real Christlikeness in us, is the Holy Spirit's work, it is His fruit. He bears it, not us. Notice these graces are not said to be the fruits of the Spirit, they are the fruit. There is a unity of origin running through all the multiplicity of manifestation. It is a beautiful life that is set forth in these verses. Every word is worthy of earnest study and profound meditation. "Love", "joy", "peace", "long-suffering", "kindness", "goodness", "faith", "meekness", "self-control." Is not this the life we all long for, the Christ-life? It is not natural to us, and it is not attainable by any effort of the flesh or nature. The life that is natural to us is set forth in the three preceding verses: Galatians 5:19-21 [19] The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; [20] idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions [21] and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God. But when the indwelling Spirit is given full control in the one He inhabits, when we are brought to realize the utter badness of the flesh and give up in hopeless despair of ever attaining to anything in its power -- when, in other words, we come to the end of self and just give over the whole work of making us what we ought to be to the indwelling Holy Spirit, then, and only then, holy graces of character are His fruit. Do you wish these graces in your character and life? Renounce self utterly and all its striving after holiness, and let the Holy Spirit, who dwells in you, take full control and bear His own glorious fruit. (We get the same essential truth from another point of view in the following passage.) Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. Settle it clearly and forever that the flesh can never bear this fruit, that you can never attain these things by your own effort, that they are "the fruit of the Spirit." We hear a good deal in these days about "ethical culture," which usually means a cultivation of the flesh, until it bears the fruit of the Spirit. It can not be done until thorns can be made to bear figs, and a bramble bush grapes. Luke 6:44 Each tree is recognized by its own fruit. People do not pick figs from thornbushes, or grapes from briers. Matthew 12:33 Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit. We hear also a good deal about "character-building." That is all very well if you let the Holy Spirit do the building, and then it is not so much building as fruit-bearing. See, however, the following: 2 Peter 1:5-7 [5] For this very reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; [6] and to knowledge, self-control; and to self-control, perseverance; and to perseverance, godliness; [7] and to godliness, brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness, love. We hear also about cultivating graces of character, but we must always bear in mind that the way to cultivate true graces of character is by submitting ourselves utterly to the Spirit to do His work. "This is sanctification of the Spirit." 1 Peter 1:2 To God's elect, strangers in the world, ... [2] who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood: Grace and peace be yours in abundance. 2 Thessalonians 2:13 But we ought always to thank God for you, brothers loved by the Lord, because from the beginning God chose you to be saved through the sanctifying work of the Spirit and through belief in the truth. There is a sense, however, in which cultivating graces of character is right. We look at Jesus Christ to see what we ought to be, then we look to the Holy Spirit to make us this that we ought to be. ========================================== ========================================= oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY ABOUT... POSITIVE CONFESSIONS? A BIBLE CONFESSION OF THE MOUTH by Betty Miller As Christians, our confession should be what we term a "Bible confession" instead of just a "positive confession." We are not talking about confessing our sins here, but rather confessing or acknowledging with our mouth the truths from God's Word. Certainly the Bible tells us to confess our sins, but that is not the only confession we need to make. We are also told to confess or speak out loud the promises of God, in faith, so we can receive them. We need to clarify the difference between the so-called "positive confession" taught by the success propagators in the world and a "Bible confession." Many times, their confessions are directed toward "self," not toward God's Word. They build their "castles in the sky," but they are not founded on the Word of God; instead they are based on what they desire for themselves. For example, you will probably never hear them confessing the following portion of God's Word, "If we suffer, we shall also reign with him; if we deny him, he also will deny us" (2 Timothy 2:12). We must begin confessing what the Word of God has to say about our lives and circumstances instead of what those in the world may speak about the situation. In confessing God's Word, we must not pick out only the Scriptures we desire, but also the ones the Lord desires for us. He certainly desires to bless us, but He also desires to cleanse us. We must be as enthusiastic in our confessions to be cleansed from all that would offend the Lord as we are in confessing the physical blessings He has promised us. We must learn to set a guard on our mouths, as it is very important to control our conversation. We will ultimately receive the things that we speak. If we speak evil long enough, it will come to pass; likewise if we speak good. "Whoso offereth praise glorifieth me: and to him that ordereth his conversation aright will I shew the salvation of God" (Psalm 50:23). "A man's belly shall be satisfied with the fruit of his mouth; and with the increase of his lips shall he be filled. Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof" (Proverbs 18:20-21). We must not only claim God's Word, but also learn to speak or confess His Word. We must confess our faith in God's Word. We must not confess lack, as the Heavenly Father has given us everything we need. We must not confess defeat, as God has made us more than conquerors. We must not confess doubt, as God has given us His faith. We are to speak the things that the Word of God declares as truth. We easily quote what men have to say on a subject, and many times we believe them despite what the Word of God has to say about it. Yet we are often hesitant to quote what God says because the devil tells us we would be lying. He causes us to look at our circumstances rather than the Word. Circumstances are subject to change, and one of the things that can cause them to do so is the confession of God's Word over a particular situation. In fact, the Word of God tells us to confess or talk about the things we are believing God to do in our lives and He will bring it to pass. Romans 4:20-22, "He (Abraham) staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God; And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform. And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness." Romans 4:17, "(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were". For instance, if we are in need of finances, the devil will try to get us to confess such things as, "I guess we will just have to take bankruptcy since we can not pay the bills," or "I don't know what we will do when we can't make the house payment." Instead, we need to align our confession with the Word of God. "My God shall supply all your (my) need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus" (Philippians 4:19) "But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you (me)" (Matthew 6:33). (Emphasis is mine). We should confess our faith and trust in the Lord by saying,"I don't know how the Lord is going to help us meet this need, but I confess that He will because He cares for us." We bring evil and good things forth by what we speak. Jesus referred to this in Matthew 12:34-37: Edited March 9, 2012 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 9, 2012 Author Share Posted March 9, 2012 Come'on Gaal, fess up! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ My,my ,did you ever think you are rude ?? ever........??? Steven Gaal Yes, I can be rude. But I don’t think the above example really qualifies; I asked you for an answer on 4 previous occasions but you didn’t reply Confession is good. Now I do have a lead. However the person is in his eighties and lives with one of his children. - I suspect that there may be age related mental issues. Contact IMHO would be inappropriate. I can if you wish give the datum to a Education forum monitor (I would give it to their home email) and he/she can relay it to you. Why don’t you just give us some straight answers: - Whom did you contact? - Which of them got back to you? What did they say? As best I can make out from the above, someone more or less said to you, ‘I have no recollection of this, but [name redacted] might be able to help you’ and the indicated person is in his 80s or you contacted someone of that age an you attribute his lack of a satisfactory answer to his age. But whatever send your info to any of the Mods/Admins You can ,not like the great movie line,"Always do the right thing." but the opposite. To me its my memory,its what I remember. Unfortunately memories are quite fallible, your it seems especially. Not every thing is on the internet. True but even if the articles that made such allegations are not online some of the hundreds of articles/book chapter about Noguchi, several of which focused on his suspension(s) should have said something about this if such allegations were made, ditto books about necrophilia that mention him. "I recall your fiasco with the NATION magazine in the CIA cancer thread." True, but unlike you I admit error. The episode undermines you. The article itself is not online but there are several mentions of it and you were able to prove it appeared in the magazine as claimed. By contrast neither you nor I have found any evidence in support of your Noguchi claim. The claim does not even make sense, he didn’t publicly contradict the case against Sirhan till years later, he was a prosecution witness "Now as to signatures with inaccuracies, I thought at one point your signiture stated you had a PHD from Oberlin College,and that 'now' you state you only have BS. Yes you only have BS. If such is true that you misinformed.....well..... " Accusing me of lying, how polite! Thanks for proving once again how fallible your memory is, according to my bio which is unchanged since 5 September 2005 - 07:42 AM (GMT), when I joined the forum, “I studied American History at Oberlin where I help restart the ACLU. After college I lived in Boston for a few years where I took photography and video classes. I moved back to NYC in 1990 where I ran my own T-shirt business and booked and video taped GG Allin tours among other activities. - I have lived in Brazil since 1993. I teach English…” [1] and no one else on this forum indicated I made such a claim [2]. Once again your recollection doesn’t even make sense, why would I claim to have a PhD from a college that never offered such degrees and only offers masters’ degrees on a very limited basis? 1] http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=4878 2] https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=%22len%20colby%22%20phd%20oberlin%20site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Feducationforum.ipbhost.com&oq=&aq=&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=e50b7ed8b228eb18&biw=780&bih=381&pf=p&pdl=3000 " Let me try to help you in a fatherly fashion…" I have no interest in any advice you have to offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 16, 2012 Author Share Posted March 16, 2012 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Working on youth Church outreach. Yet I have EMAILed people that are Noguchi connected. Waiting response. sg So Steve, still waiting for you to be upfront with us. It has been 42 days since you told us that and 55 days since your previous post. Can you tell us how many: 1) …people you contacted? 2) …of them got back to you? 3) …told you they were sure – almost sure there were no media reports indicating Noguchi, ‘had had sex with dead Hollywood starlets’? 4) …told you they were unsure but had no recollection of such reports? 5) …told you they remembered such reports? 6) Now that I have your attention will you admit you were wrong about my signature stating I “had a PHD from Oberlin College”? You can type y OR n To make things easier for you I’ve included an answer sheet. All you have to do is click the reply button and type in your answers; it shouldn’t take you more than keystrokes/mouse clicks. Your failure to reply will make it even more obvious to everyone that some people got back to you but since their answers were all 3)s or perhaps some 4)s you don’t want to be straight with us. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Also 8 days ago you offered to “…give the datum to a Education forum monitor (I would give it to their home email) and he/she can relay it to you.” I accepted within 24 hours but so far there is no sigh you sent your “datum” (sic) to anyone. What happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted March 16, 2012 Share Posted March 16, 2012 Also 8 days ago you offered to “…give the datum to a Education forum monitor (I would give it to their home email) and he/she can relay it to you.” I accepted within 24 hours but so far there is no sigh you sent your “datum” (sic) to anyone. What happened? +++++++++++++++ I dont have private emails of monitors,none contacted me. I give it 5 more days of response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 17, 2012 Author Share Posted March 17, 2012 Also 8 days ago you offered to “…give the datum to a Education forum monitor (I would give it to their home email) and he/she can relay it to you.” I accepted within 24 hours but so far there is no sigh you sent your “datum” (sic) to anyone. What happened? +++++++++++++++ I dont have private emails of monitors,none contacted me. I give it 5 more days of response. Come on Steve there are links to the mods profile pages at the bottom of the main PC Forum page*. You can send them PMs via their pages. Also you presumably have John Simkin's e-mail or you would not have been able to join the forum. * http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showforum=209 The other questions remain unanswered. For your convenience here's your answer sheet again. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted March 22, 2012 Share Posted March 22, 2012 Also 8 days ago you offered to “…give the datum to a Education forum monitor (I would give it to their home email) and he/she can relay it to you.” I accepted within 24 hours but so far there is no sigh you sent your “datum” (sic) to anyone. What happened? +++++++++++++++ I dont have private emails of monitors,none contacted me. I give it 5 more days of response. Come on Steve there are links to the mods profile pages at the bottom of the main PC Forum page*. You can send them PMs via their pages. Also you presumably have John Simkin's e-mail or you would not have been able to join the forum. * http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showforum=209 The other questions remain unanswered. For your convenience here's your answer sheet again. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Tried to send info to TOM SCULLY, BUT STATED CANT RECEIVE NEW MESSAGES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 23, 2012 Author Share Posted March 23, 2012 Another lame excuse, Gaal. Not counting John Geraghty or Stephen Turner who seem to have abandoned the forum there are 8 other admins/mods of the CT forum not to mention John Simkin and Andy Walker. All ten of them as well as Mr. Scully have an “E-mail:Click here to e-mail me” link on their profile pages. The other questions remain unanswered. For your convenience here's your answer sheet again. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 Another lame excuse, Gaal. Not counting John Geraghty or Stephen Turner who seem to have abandoned the forum there are 8 other admins/mods of the CT forum not to mention John Simkin and Andy Walker. All ten of them as well as Mr. Scully have an “E-mail:Click here to e-mail me” link on their profile pages. The other questions remain unanswered. For your convenience here's your answer sheet again. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) __John Geraghty. emailed ____________________ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 23, 2012 Author Share Posted March 23, 2012 Another lame excuse, Gaal. Not counting John Geraghty or Stephen Turner who seem to have abandoned the forum there are 8 other admins/mods of the CT forum not to mention John Simkin and Andy Walker. All ten of them as well as Mr. Scully have an “E-mail:Click here to e-mail me” link on their profile pages. The other questions remain unanswered. For your convenience here's your answer sheet again. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) __John Geraghty. emailed ____________________ Are you doing this on purpose? I wrote (emphasis added): “Not counting JOHN GERAGHTY or Stephen Turner WHO SEEM TO HAVE ABANDONED THE FORUM there are 8 other admins/mods of the CT forum…” if you’d paid attention you’d seen that John G. was “Last Active: Dec 13 2010 08:38 PM”. It has been 49 days since you told us that you had “EMAILed people that are Noguchi connected” and 62 days since your previous post. Still waiting for you to address the other questions. Here they are again with your answer sheet. Can you tell us how many: 1) …people you contacted? 2) …of them got back to you? 3) …told you they were sure – almost sure there were no media reports indicating Noguchi, ‘had had sex with dead Hollywood starlets’? 4) …told you they were unsure but had no recollection of such reports? 5) …told you they remembered such reports? 6) Now that I have your attention will you admit you were wrong about my signature stating I “had a PHD from Oberlin College”? You can type y OR n 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted March 23, 2012 Share Posted March 23, 2012 John Geraghty likes RFK case = motovated ++ Come back John !! SIMKIN'S BOX ALWAYS ,FULL NO ACCEPT. OF THE MODERATORS SCULLY BEST TO ME. EVIDENCE NOT ON NET,hard to get. PLEASE REPOST YOUR NON INTERNET DATUM NOW TO BE A GOOD EXAMPLE AND SHOW ME HOW ITS DONE KIND SIR. DAY ONE COLBY NO REPOST NON INTERNET DATUM...counting,counting,,,,counting,,,,, sg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 24, 2012 Author Share Posted March 24, 2012 Mr. Geraghty has not been here since Dec. 2010, 15 months ago, and his participation trailed off before that, he made only 1 post after July, 2010, so he’s probably not coming back anytime soon. You seemed to indicate you would send your data to any mod. now you seem to be saying you’ll only send it to the ones you consider favorable to you. As for Simkin you can E-MAIL him through the forum, as of a few days ago it was working normally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 31, 2012 Author Share Posted March 31, 2012 Still waiting for you to answer my questions or pass your info on to a mod. most if not all can be E-MAILED (as opposed to PMed) via a link on their profile pages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Gaal Posted March 31, 2012 Share Posted March 31, 2012 Still waiting for you to answer my questions or pass your info on to a mod. most if not all can be E-MAILED (as opposed to PMed) via a link on their profile pages. +++++++++++++++++++++++++ Gee so much big letter anger. Your not angry ? Oh,we have your word on it ? Oh, yeah like your word you didnt go to live in Brazil for little boys as reported in a groups last interview. Yes we have your word. So ,I recall right wing media attck,and thats my word. Thats what I remember. Thats why I repeat it because thats my memory. Thats my word and it should be as good as yours but,however, you insist its not. Golly thats as polite as your BIG yelling print.The info was sent several days ago to two monitors. I consider the matter closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Len Colby Posted March 31, 2012 Author Share Posted March 31, 2012 Still waiting for you to answer my questions or pass your info on to a mod. most if not all can be E-MAILED (as opposed to PMed) via a link on their profile pages. +++++++++++++++++++++++++ Gee so much big letter anger. Your not angry ? Oh,we have your word on it ? Oh, yeah like your word you didnt go to live in Brazil for little boys as reported in a groups last interview. Yes we have your word. So ,I recall right wing media attck,and thats my word. Thats what I remember. Thats why I repeat it because thats my memory. Thats my word and it should be as good as yours but,however, you insist its not. Golly thats as polite as your BIG yelling print.The info was sent several days ago to two monitors. I consider the matter closed. Me, angry? Hardly. It is just that sometimes you seem slow on the up take, though I explained a few times you could actually e-mail members through their profile pages you couldn't get past the notion I meant PM them - so I hoped putting extreme emphasis on the info would help you understand. So far no ‘monitors’ have contacted me nor posted anything about this here. In a previous situation like this Greg Parker sent his info to Evan who in turn told me the gist of what Greg’s source claimed. Since you remembered falsely that I claimed to have a PhD in my signature and I have only been a member here less than 7 years how much faith should we put in your recollection of something that happened 43 years ago? Several relevant links can be found on this page: https://www.google.com/search?q=obesity+memory. If I put a claim in my signature and after being challenged I was unable to come up with a single supporting reference I would remove it. That would especially apply if I’d demonstrated my recollection of something much more recent was defective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now