• Announcements

    • Evan Burton

      OPEN REGISTRATION BY EMAIL ONLY !!! DETAILS HERE:

      We are opening registration!! If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We require you use your real name, a valid email address, and your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. Additionally, you will have to send us your photo for use as an avatar and submit a brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
John Dolva

Climate and Capitalism

20 posts in this topic


evidence_leaked_title.jpg

You probably already knew somewhere deep inside that something wasn’t right about the “global warming” theory.


Sure, during the 1990s, we all noticed it getting warmer. But, to say that it is directly tied what humans are doing seemed to be a stretch, and, we have all noticed it getting a LOT cooler lately.


So it might not come as a surprise to say that “global warming” is a sham. But what does come as a surprise to many is the evidence of outright lying that is now leaking out of trustworthy scientific agencies.


Shortly after John exposed the truth about “global warming,” 1,000 emails and 2,000 documents from leading “global warming” scientists were found . . . revealing potential conspiracies, collusions, data manipulation, destruction of information, and even admission of flaws that were buried.


For example:


  • One leading scientist — Kevin Trenberth — admitted “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty we can’t.” A travesty simply because they were worried about losing their government funding.
  • In another email, Dr. Phil Jones — a leading “global warming” advocate at the United Nations — admitted that he used “Mike’s Nature trick” in a 1999 graph to “hide the decline” in temperature.
  • And another study done by Stephen Goddard at Real Science revealed just how ridiculous “climate scientists” can get with data manipulation. Here is what he had to say: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has been “adjusting” its record by replacing real temperatures with data “fabricated” by computer models.”

There are several other documents just like these.


More recently, Professor Robert Stavins — who helped write the 2014 United Nations Climate Report — came out to Breitbart News . . . and revealed that politicians demanded he change and edit parts of the report to fit their needs!


In short, governments, and government-funded scientists, want to make sure that any “global warming” research published . . . will say exactly what they want it to say.


Now, everyone knows from their high school education that the No. 1 rule of doing scientific research is that it cannot be undertaken with an end goal in mind because you will only use the data points that support your end goal.


That’s not real science.


But that’s exactly what “global warming” scientists are doing! They are only using partial data . . . the data the supports their end goal . . . to make their point that there is man-made “global warming.”


So, we’re being told that the survival of our planet, of the human race, relies on tackling “global warming” . . . yet the whole thing is a sham.


but_why_title.jpg

Why would this network of politicians, corporations, and scientists do such a thing?


Well, think about it.


Our federal government spends $22 billion on “global warming” research each and every year (twice as much as we spend on protecting our border!).


Again, that is $41,856 every minute.


If government-funded scientists came out and said “global warming” didn’t exist, their funding would be cut immediately.


But “global warming” has been kept on life support for another crucial reason: It has been a practical ATM for every in-the-know political figure.


al_pointing-s.jpg

The media is catching on to Al Gore’slies, but he is not going down without a fight.



Al Gore, for example, has been one of the most vocally aggressive crusaders for “global warming.”


In 2001, before leaving office as vice president, Gore was worth less than $2 million. Since then, he has grown his wealth to $100 million . . . almost entirely by investing in a handful of “green-tech” companies . . . 14 of which received more than $2.5 billion in loans, grants, tax breaks, and more from the Obama administration.


The Telegraph reports Al Gore could become the “world’s first carbon billionaire” thanks to his investments in green companies . . . all of which benefit from tax dollars and government loans to “prevent global warming.”


And he’s not alone.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

obama_hand_cookie_jar_title.jpg

victory_speech-s.jpg

After accepting $1.25 million in campaign contributions, President Obama made sure to include his “global warming” plans in his victory speech: “We want our children to live in an America that isn’t threatened by the destructive power of a warming planet.”



You are likely familiar with the story of the failed Solyndra green energy initiative, which cost taxpayers $500 million; President Obama took a lot of flak for that.


But here’s a little-known side of the Solyndra story I bet you haven’t heard: Obama, in essence, used taxpayer money to finance his re-election campaign . . . by funneling it through Solyndra.


You see, when Solyndra fell on hard times, it passed into the hands of two large private equity investors . . . Goldman Sachs and George Kaiser. When $500 million in taxpayer money was given to Solyndra, both Goldman Sachs and George Kaiser benefited. Coincidentally, both have made contributions to Obama’s election campaigns adding up to roughly $1.25 million.


It doesn’t stop there.


  • In 2010, another federal loan of $400 million went Abound Solar. That resulted in a bankruptcy as well. But investors in Abound Solar seemed to do just fine . . . investors like billionaire heiress Patricia Stryker. Stryker has famously contributed $500,000 to the Coalition for Progress while throwing $85,000 toward Obama’s inaugural committee. It’s just a coincidence that the government handed a company she invested in $400 million just before bankruptcy . . . right?
  • There’s also A123 Systems, which paid one lobbying firm $970,000 to secure money from the government — and received $279 million in federal assistance. The CEO of A123 Systems went on to fund multiple Democratic senators and contributed to Obama’s campaign.
  • First Solar received $646 million in government loan guarantees, and has since contributed more than $180,000 to Democratic campaigns.
  • GE is notorious for spending tens of millions of dollars a year to “buy” green energy credits for its wind turbines and other green technologies — credits which helped the firm pay ZERO taxes in 2011.

There are a host of other examples of liberals getting wealthy off “global warming” initiatives just like these.


You can see why green energy is such a profitable business — CEOs and executives get to rake in millions of dollars, while politicians get lucrative donations for their campaigns . . . and scientists get all the funding they need to keep them going . . . all on your dime.


But here’s the cherry on top . . .


While $22 billion of our money is being redistributed every year to greedy scientists, politicians, and corporations . . .


real_cost_title.jpg

$22 billion is just what is spent on these “global warming” initiatives.


The reality is, these initiatives have ripple effects . . . mainly the regulations (from government agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency) that shackle free enterprise and force us to rely on foreign energy.


According to Forbes, the total cost of these ripple effects is a staggering $1.75 trillion annually.


I want you to really think about that for a moment.


We’re watching $1.75 trillion per year . . . $3,329,528 per minute . . . go to waste.


It’s worse when you note that the U.S. Energy Information Administration says these regulations could ultimately cause gasoline prices to rise 77% over baseline projections . . . send 3 million Americans to the welfare line . . . and reduce average household income by a whopping $4,000 each year.


Washington knows all of this . . . and is still barreling forward with its nonsense policies!


They’re just letting you foot the bill, while they pocket the benefits.


Fact is, organizations like the Environmental Protection Agency have handcuffed capitalism . . . based on a theory even its staunchest supporters (like the aforementioned Dr. Allegre) have already renounced.


The result: reduced business, higher energy and food costs, higher taxes, lost jobs, and more money going overseas.


With $1.75 trillion in annual costs, you would think someone out there would listen to John and his research, but . . .


mocked_him_title.jpg

When John discovered that the world was indeed cooling, he urgently shared his findings, only to get lambasted.


Al Gore himself specifically called John a “pseudo-scientist” and discarded his findings.


“Global warming” advocate Dr. Benjamin Kirtman simply dismissed John’s warnings as the “usual nonsense.”


Media Matters has published two personal attacks against John — saying he has “no background in climate science” (which isn’t true) and calling him a “scam artist.”


But think about something for a moment.


Why would John take on this mission to expose the truth about “global warming” if he didn’t fully know that his evidence was fact? Why would he risk his reputation, his retirement, and his way of life?


It would have been much easier to walk away.


But John isn’t the type to walk away from the truth . . . especially when it would put his family, country, and even the world at risk.


That is why John has taken on this mission, even if it means doing it alone.


It is why he has exhausted his savings and retirement funds to spread the word about his research through his organization, Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC).


He will let nothing stop him.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hope_title.jpg

John’s persistence is finally paying off.


A small movement is starting . . . one that I am proud to be a part of, and one that I will invite you to join in a moment.


Helping fuel this movement has been the series of cold winters and cool summers that John predicted would come. The media no longer could ignore the irony in front of them. Here is what they have reported recently.


media_quotes_700.jpg

And now, a small but distinguished group of scientists and researchers are publically aligning themselves with John Casey and his organization.


One such organization recently named John . . .


climate_forecaster_title.jpg

Perhaps that is because unlike some of the “global warming” darlings and proponents — NOAA, NASA, and the IPCC — John’s research has consistently predicted weather patterns correctly.


john_speaking-s.jpg

John has spoken at conferences across the United States . . . making 11 accurate predictions.



Since he first began sharing this work in 2007, John’s 11 predictions have come true (mind you, these are MAJOR events, not predicting that tomorrow will be slightly cloudy with a chance of rain).


I could walk you through all 11, but they are very extensive and heavy on the science. John has accurately predicted everything from a drop in solar activity (NASA later adjusted their own projections to fall in line with his) to a rise in historic earthquake activity (10 months before the earthquake that hit Japan and caused the Fukushima meltdown).


Please know, all 11 of his predictions of have been verified — by myself and other third parties. All of them have been attacked by government-funded scientists, only for those same scientists to eat their words later.


Each and every one of John’s predictions have been made publicly and shared with top government officials and the mainstream media for the last seven years.


John has made every effort to share this information. But instead of listening, the media and the left treated him like a leper and have done their best to smear his name.


Science and politics have worked this way for hundreds of years.


Galileo was ridiculed by scientists invested in the idea the sun revolves around the Earth.


Robert Goddard — the man who ushered in the Space Age and rocket ships — was ridiculed endlessly during his life for proposing . . . traveling to the moon.


William Harvey was ostracized for proposing the theory of blood circulation . . .


Opponents could never refute the science — they could only attack the man behind it. Just like they do with John today.


But there is a small group of scientists that are starting to listen, and take action!


masterminds_speak_title.jpg

Unlike the “scientists” who want to present information that has been twisted to fit a political agenda, and slam anyone who rebels against the accepted dogma . . .


John has done nothing but put his research up to public scrutiny for the last few years.


And now some of the top scientific minds in the world are rallying to him. Here’s what they have to say . . .


  • Dr. Fumio Tsunoda, professor emeritus of geology at Japan’s Saitama University, testified, “ [John’s] work is quite a revelation that marks a step toward a new scientific civilization ” and his findings “add a brilliant page to the history of science.”
  • Dr. Natarajan Venkatanathan, professor of physics, SASTRA University, said, “ [John’s] ideas may be opposed by conventional scientists, but they will have to accept his theory because the truth prevails.
  • Dr. Boris Komitov, one of Europe’s top solar physicists and a professor at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, was so impressed with John’s work, he reached out to John and joined the Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC). Here’s what Dr. Komitov had to say: “These problems brought on by this next climate change that Casey ably discusses . . . are more important than ever.
  • Dr. Ole Humlum, professor of physical geography at the University of Oslo, said, “The history of science is filled with examples of individuals with new ideas being met by the current scientific establishment not with enthusiasm, but rather with disregard and sometimes, even ridicule. These hypotheses were considered outrageous by many contemporary scientists, but today they represent the very foundation for much of our present understanding of planet Earth’s dynamics. New hypotheses based on empirical observations should always be welcomed warmly. This also applies very much to [the work] by John Casey.”
  • Dr. Giovanni Gregori, who has served on the National Research Council of Italy since 1963 and serves on multiple astronomical councils and in several societies, went so far as to say that John Casey is the modern day Leonardo da Vinci. He also said: “[John Casey’s work] is an important contribution for understanding and facing the environmental challenge, in its multifaceted and often disquieting manifestations.”
  • Dr. Dong Choi, editor-in-chief of the New Concepts in Global Tectonics newsletter, calls John’s work “earth-shattering.”

Each of these scientists has reviewed John’s work and had no choice but to agree with his conclusion after seeing the evidence, just as I did.


John even confided in me that several other scientists secretly support his work. They agree with his conclusions. They think “global warming” and the accepted climate science is hogwash.


But they can’t say anything about it.


In John’s words: “If you work for the government and you stand up and say, ‘Man-made climate change is all nonsense’ you can kiss your government job goodbye. They’ll either make it hell to work there, or fire you outright.”


It’s easy to get upset with these scientists, and we should be, but in reality, they are just trying to keep their jobs. We should put the bulk of the blame on our government.


We have a government that prefers comfortable delusion to uncomfortable truth.


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So is this just another sensationalist trying to sell a book or a theory or a political agenda? The presentation leaves much to be desired, IMO. However, there is a "fight fire with fire" strategy that might be in play. I don't care for it though. Alarmism is alarmism. It usually serves no one better than he who sounded it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am seeing Climate-Change deniers changing their tune. Many are saying that Climate-Change is happening. Of course they are wavering between how it is being caused and whether anything can be done about it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0