Washington Post article on Robert Morrow

[Douglas Caddy]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/09/as-trump-mulls-attack-on-clinton-scandals-one-source-makes-him-a-target/#comments

[Pamela Brown]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/09/as-trump-mulls-attack-on-clinton-scandals-one-source-makes-him-a-target/#comments

Morrow mentions talking to Lucy about her father being a murderer. I am currently reading MUTUAL CONTEMPT by Jeff Shesol and am now keeping the door open to LBJ's having been at least an encouraging factor if not behind the murder of RFK as well.

[Joe Bauer]

Haven't read "Mutual Contempt" but just read a New York Times review.

Ms. Brown, what are some of the key parts of this book that has you "leaving the door open" regards LBJ being an encouraging factor if not behind the murder of Robert Kennedy?

Regards Robert Morrow;

I believe that as eccentric and socially incorrect as he is, sometimes it takes people like him to force others to look at, confront and deal with important truths (no matter how ugly and even scary) that they have previously and neglectfully ignored and have been hiding from.

To tell Lucy Johnson in person that her father L.B.J. was a murderer is appalling on it's face, but perhaps it's a price and burden that she and other children of famous but questionably corrupt politicians must sometimes pay and bear.

Imagine how Chelsea Clinton must feel hearing of her father's worst immoral and possibly illegal indiscretions or Donald Trump's children too. All of whom had to deal with hearing these things with national media cameras focusing on their faces at the same time last Sunday evening?

I am sure these children all felt some embarrassment if not shame and may even experience some future PTSD from their sad experience.

Yet, if their parents hadn't actually done these things, they wouldn't have to bear this burden Remember the old saying ... "sins of the father."

But as uncomfortable as R.Morrow makes everyone feel ( like some animated odd ball showing graphic pictures of pornography or horrible bloody murder at a high society cocktail party

) sometimes it takes people like Morrow to counter the " purposeful burying, hiding and ignoring " of extremely ugly and even horrific yet important truths ( masked as political correctness - which in and of itself is more wrong by far than what Morrow is doing.)

L.B.J.'s involvement with proven criminals such as Bobby Baker, Billy Sol Estes, Malcolm Wallace ( murderer ) and the testimonies of Estes and others who claim L.B.J. was personally involved with murder orders of political and crooked business dealing threats is the most important example of these ugly buried truths.

When great royal court lies are so buried, entrenched and accepted for multiple generations that the so-called good and more socially correct people are afraid to bring them up, discuss and confront them, unfortunately this truth revealing is left only to the court jester.

Edited October 13, 2016 by Joe Bauer

[Douglas Caddy]

As a courtesy I sent this thread to Robert Morrow because he was its subject. He responded by email that, "You can tell them I am banned from Education Forum for engaging in similar truth telling at Ed Forum."

[Pat Speer]

As a courtesy I sent this thread to Robert Morrow because he was its subject. He responded by email that, "You can tell them I am banned from Education Forum for engaging in similar truth telling at Ed Forum."

LOL. Banned? Well, that's one skewed way of looking at it. I'm pretty sure Robert was given more chances than any other member, with the possible exception of James Fetzer. Robert was unable to separate serious research from gossip about the sex lives of famous people. To him, they were one and the same. And the juicier the gossip the more likely it was true. I don't believe he ever questioned the veracity of a single source claiming so and so did such and such. It was actually quite unnerving. He would repeat every bit of garbage as fact, no matter the source. Even obvious liars like C. David Heymann, who filled his books with gossip, and then attributed this gossip to supposed phone calls with long-dead people like Truman Capote. Pretty sleazy. And pretty transparent. Except to Robert.

Edited October 12, 2016 by Pat Speer

[Joe Bauer]

Douglas Caddy, on 12 Oct 2016 - 07:56 AM, said:

As a courtesy I sent this thread to Robert Morrow because he was its subject. He responded by email that, "You can tell them I am banned from Education Forum for engaging in similar truth telling at Ed Forum."

LOL. Banned? Well, that's one skewed way of looking at it. I'm pretty sure Robert was given more chances than any other member, with the possible exception of James Fetzer. Robert was unable to separate serious research from gossip about the sex lives of famous people. To him, they were one and the same. And the juicier the gossip the more likely it was true. I don't believe he ever questioned the veracity of a single source claiming so and so did such and such. It was actually quite unnerving. He would repeat every bit of garbage as fact, no matter the source. Even obvious liars like C. David Heymann, who filled his books with gossip, and then attributed this gossip to supposed phone calls with long-dead people like Truman Capote. Pretty sleazy. And pretty transparent. Except to Robert.

After following this forum for a couple of years as a non-member and then finally overcoming my "uneducated therefor unworthy" insecurities and registering, I have only personally contacted two members.

The first was Robert Morrow. He was the only member posting his personal contact address and my writing him was only in regards to his postings of LBJ,s alleged involvement in several murders of people who had a common thread of being threats to L.B.J.'s personal and political standings.

I e-mailed Morrow 2 or 3 times total. His reply e-mails were always brief.

His last e-mail response to me however, was of a somewhat rude and bothered tone and was something to the effect that he didn't have time to answer my questions and that I should get the answers on my own.

I never contacted him again ( he would send me page link contacts after that ) and I also got totally turned off to his obsessive posting regarding the most lurid sexual activities of ...well...almost everyone of importance in our political world. Morrow would throw every sexual charge out there about so many people and common sense told you that even though much of it were probably true, that this was so over-doing it to a degree that was irrationally unnecessary.

The other member I personally e-mailed when I first joined was Douglas Caddy. His postings inspired me greatly in several ways including his important

"true insider" role in the Watergate affair.

Mr. Caddy was "the opposite" of Robert Morrow in his response e-mail content and manner.

Mr. Caddy and his e-mails back to me were polite, respectful, intelligently and personally thoughtful, patient, even kind and well ... just incredibly classy.

I haven't contacted any other member since those few initial "first joining " e-mails to Morrow and Caddy, ( I now remember sending "one" e-mail to Joseph McBride however, which he never responded to ) and those were probably motivated in part because I just felt a need to have some initial personal connection to the forum.

Speaking of Morrow's "unnerving" postings...I must say that watching this second Presidential election debate was equally unnerving.

To see women who have claimed Bill Clinton personally abused them sexually right in the audience ( and before at that Trump news conference ) and to hear Trump dig into Clinton's sexual abuse of these women ( and Hillary's alleged ancillary role ) in the most lurid and even criminally charging way, right on stage in front of 60 million viewers, was as unnerving and bad as anything Robert Morrow has done.

To me, Trump is the highest visibility version of Robert Morrow.

Again, I am not saying these lurid charges against the Clinton's aren't true.

But to see and hear them stated in such a hugely media covered forum and in such an animated and kind of turned on shouting way by Trump and worst of all right "in front of the children of both Clinton and Trump ?" ... well, you actually wanted to turn off the debate at that point.

I was left feeling kind of sick about it all.

But, still, It seems that so few ever try to keep the L.B.J. murder and other corruption truths out there to keep them from continued burying and ignoring.

Too bad there aren't more besides Morrow and Barr McClellan ( who I have more respect for than most ) doing this.

Edited October 12, 2016 by Joe Bauer

[Chris Newton]

I've been on Robert's mailing list for years. A lot of times I read his "news" and wonder if his head is screwed on as tight as it should be...

...but on the other hand, I notice that when he's reporting on a subject that I have knowledge of, such as the Jeffrey Epstein case and all of it's related shenanigans, he seems to be quite accurate and lucid. The Epstein case is one of those in which "truth is stranger than fiction" is in full play.

[Kathleen Collins]

About Barr McClennan. Dr. Walt Brown gave a good review of his book about LBJ

before publication. But then something happened. Walt said that the book

was entirely changed (full of lies). Walt Brown denounced the book. Walt is a

historian. He's written many books about the Kennedy Assassination and

was featured in "The Guilty Men." He spoke about specialists who found a

fingerprint on one of the boxes in the sniper's nest November 22, 1963, left by

Mac Wallace. Wallace knew LBJ since childhood and murdered people for LBJ.

Kathy C

[Douglas Caddy]

I've been on Robert's mailing list for years. A lot of times I read his "news" and wonder if his head is screwed on as tight as it should be...

...but on the other hand, I notice that when he's reporting on a subject that I have knowledge of, such as the Jeffrey Epstein case and all of it's related shenanigans, he seems to be quite accurate and lucid. The Epstein case is one of those in which "truth is stranger than fiction" is in full play.

I viewed an announcement on the Internet today by Anonymous that said the group was about to release a video on Bill Clinton's involvement with Epstein and Epstein's private plane and his "orgy island" in the Caribbean where underage children are sexually assaulted. The announcement was most graphic in what it said the video contained, so graphic that I shall not post the Anonymous announcement here. However, I have reason to believe that if the video is released its truth will have a tremendous impact on the presidential campaign and the election, not enough to elect Trump but enough to shake American society to its core for many years. All this can be traced to Trump whose public discourse in pure poison.

Edited October 14, 2016 by Douglas Caddy

[Roger DeLaria]

I've been on Robert's mailing list for awhile as well, and have found his emails interesting. Definitely not mainstream, thankfully.

I have Mutual Contempt as well, but haven't gotten to it yet.

Edited October 14, 2016 by Roger DeLaria

[Chris Newton]

I viewed an announcement on the Internet today by Anonymous that said the group was about to release a video on Bill Clinton's involvement with Epstein and Epstein's private plane and his "orgy island" in the Caribbean where underage children are sexually assaulted. The announcement was most graphic in what it said the video contained, so graphic that I shall not post the Anonymous announcement here. However, I have reason to believe that if the video is released its truth will have a tremendous impact on the presidential campaign and the election, not enough to elect Trump but enough to shake American society to its core for many years. All this can be traced to Trump whose public discourse in pure poison.

There's a lot of crossover between the "alt/right" and "Anonymous" and this subject has been tossed about among both groups for about 2 years. I'm hardly surprised that they would grasp just the piece of the story that denigrates their opponent while conveniently ignoring the part that damns their candidate as well.