Glenn Nall Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 13 hours ago, Kirk Gallaway said: Glenn, It sounds like you lost focus on Sandy's issue of campaign rhetoric and now you're trying to make this about Hilary's lies or alleged improprieties. But we've already had this debate in great detail a while back. I contributed what I could. I'm not sure where you were but I personally see no reason to re- litigate it. I'm pretty sure I just referred to things that Hillary has said, not to her "campaign speak." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Nall Posted December 15, 2016 Share Posted December 15, 2016 'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' said [ex-British Ambassador Craig and Assange partner] Murray in an interview with Dailymail.com on Tuesday. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4034038/Ex-British-ambassador-WikiLeaks-operative-claims-Russia-did-NOT-provide-Clinton-emails-handed-D-C-park-intermediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Doyle Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Update 2/10/17 Wikipedia has just banned The Daily News because of too many fake news articles. Recall that this same "news" paper was the source, i.e., they broke the news, of the Anthony Weiner sexting scandal which led to FBI's Comey writing a letter to Congress that he was re-opening the Hillary email investigation..... 2 weeks before the election. Down the rabbit hole once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Walton Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 unsub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now