James DiEugenio Posted November 21, 2016 Share Posted November 21, 2016 Quite interesting article by Paul Bleau on the previous attempts to kill Kennedy prior to the successful one. http://ctka.net/2016/bleau-historians/bleau-article.pdf Pay special attention to the chart near at the end. Pretty incriminating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 21, 2016 Author Share Posted November 21, 2016 I should add, note in the chart the common trait of the FPCC among the patsies. Just recall, David Phillips was one of the two men in charge of the CIA's anti FPCC program. (McCord was the other.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Wagner Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 Hi JIm, That's a very interesting and worthwhile article. I did a similar exercise a couple years ago, comparing plots and patsies. I agree that the FPCC affiliation is a key point, as it strengthens the case against David Phillips as the man who managed the patsy angle. It's also interesting to construct a timeline of events from the spring of 1963 through November 22. Particularly in light of how close Chicago, Tampa and Dallas were to each other, the planning for these ops must have overlapped and to some degree been going on simultaneously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramon F. Herrera Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 A hypothesis that could be very relevant occurred to me recently. No, I don't claim originality. There were 3 capos, 3 cities, 3 attempts. It was no coincidence that the selected cities were Chicago, Tampa and Dallas. Why is that? Easy! To quiet down any rumors. The high-level, formal media was under control: TIME-Life, New York Times (till this day), etc. That leaves the street GOSSIP: after all “loose lips sink ships”. Let’s say that the successful hit took place in Giancana’s territory. If some drunk guy in a Chicago bar started babbling too much, he would be promptly silenced, one way or the other. Man! The bastard sons of bitches thought of everything! http://jfkfacts.org/oswald-deny-shooting-president-kennedy/#comment-885220 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Newton Posted November 22, 2016 Share Posted November 22, 2016 I think the preparation of an CIA IG report on the Castro Assassination attempts, (ZR/RIFLE - Eyes Only for CIA Director), and the subsequent destruction of all records pertaining to the said report, (including Harvey's), was an action designed to destroy any core CIA records pertaining to the JFK assassination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 23, 2016 Author Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) Greg: Nice observation about how close those three plots were in time. I mean, they must have really targeted the autumn of 1963. And the FPCC affiliation to me is really something. Ramon, if you are like I am, my idea is that the CIA brought in the Mob after Oswald survived the Texas Theater. So therefore that would be correct about Giancana, Trafficante, and maybe Marcello through Campisi. Nice clean up guys. Its all so fascinating and so clearly a pattern that can be seen today. Thanks Paul Bleau. Some group was really stalking JFK in the fall of 1963. Edited November 23, 2016 by James DiEugenio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Newton Posted November 23, 2016 Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) 18 minutes ago, James DiEugenio said: Ramon, if you are like I am, my idea is that the CIA brought in the Mob after Oswald survived the Texas Theater. So therefore that would be correct about about Giancana, Trafficante, and maybe Marcello through Campisi. Nice clean up guys. Jim, This has been my feeling for a long time, although maybe it had always been intended that the mob play cleanup. I think it really worked to shut people up. What type of signal did it send to the man on the street when Campisi visted Ruby in jail the very next day? and can we draw a dotted line from Ruby to Lt. George Butler, (who was in charge of Oswald's transfer), and right back to the mob? Edited November 23, 2016 by Chris Newton sp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James DiEugenio Posted November 23, 2016 Author Share Posted November 23, 2016 (edited) That is really something isn't it, about the Campisi visit? It gets overlooked a lot. Was he bringing him spaghetti and meatballs? The Butler line is interesting also. The cover up about Ruby was so assiduous, so complete, that today its almost laughable. The guy was the perfect clean up man because he had connections to the DPD, the FBI and the CIA. Its really cogent what Seth Kantor said about Ruby in his book: The day after he shot Oswald you could not find a policeman who said he knew Ruby. Jack was a Man for All Seasons. Edited November 23, 2016 by James DiEugenio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now