Jump to content
The Education Forum

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Just read Jim Hougan's article in the Garrison magazine you recommended "Hougan, Lidddy, the Post and Watergate. Any knowledge about the escort service ran out of the Columbia Plaza apartments a block from the Watergate?
  3. Today
  4. Yesterday
  5. It is proof, your personal opinion doesn't carry any weight on this. There is zero evidence for two Oswald's in the TSBD, if so start listing it. No doubt it can be refuted w the back of a hand....as it is worthless and can be easily explained by looking at the larger picture at play here, something I really miss seeing from a lot of people here. You got some nerve introducing an even smudgier pic with the 6th floor hooey, than the Darnell stills. I thought it was already decided a decade or so ago that it was utter indiscernible rubbish. Why are you trying to flog this dead horse again? Sixth floor smudge indeed. I am going to tell you something else, and you will not like this. Had Armstrong paid better attention to Malcolm Blunt's research then he would have noticed the real stuff instead of speculating his rear off with Hansel and Gretal type innuendo. In the coming months I will release the stuff that puts the real story out, the one we at ROKC have been propagating for a few years already. No amount of dragon glass will even make a dent into it. And that's it from me, I am way too occupied w the above mentioned material (scanning/archiving etc.) and forum life isn't as appealing as it used to be.
  6. I failed to proof read my post before placing it on the forum. Heres the corrected copy: Hi. I'm Joel Peralez from Houston, Texas via the South Padre Island area where I was born and raised until the age of 21, whereupon I attended and graduated from The University of Texas School of Law in Austin, Texas. I've considered all the theories over the years, including the late Sherry Fiester's blood splatter analysis and the direction of the fatal shot from the area of the southern most area of the triple underpass, but I couldn't square the credible conclusions regarding the blood splatter analysis with the fact that a witness was located in the triple underpass area at the time of the assassination, cut in the face by a piece of concrete struck by a stray bullet, but evidently failed to hear a rifle shot nearby! Why, I asked myself. Then, last night, the thought occurred to me that if a silencer was on the rifle used by the shooter in the triple underpass area, that would explain why the nearby witness failed to hear a nearby rifle shot. I then googled "silencer 1963", and discovered that silencers were available that year, but ONLY TO THE US MILITARY. I came across an article on silencers and the jfk murder i'd like to share with the forum. I will update and post the article shortly. In the meantime, Google the info as indicated above and the article should appear. None of the commentators that I have heard or read about, including the house select committee on assassination considered the use of a silencer. It would explain so much. I.e., rifle shots made from the grassy knoll and the school book depository were distanctions, while the real killer made the fatal head shot from the triple underpass -as sherry fiester concluded in her fine analysis- employing a SILENCER as part of the murder weapon. 
  7. Hi. I'm Joel Peralez from Houston, Texas via the South Padre Island area where I was bon and raised u til the age of 21, whereupon I attended and graduated from The University of Texas School of Law in Austin, Texas. I've considered all the theories over the years, including the late Sherry Fiester's blood splatter analysis and the direction of the fatal shot from the area of the southern most area of the triple underpass. I couldn't square the credible blood splatter analysis with the fact that a witness was located in the triple underpass area at the time of the assassination and struck in the face by a piece of concrete that was struck by the stray bullet - and evidently failed to hear a rifle shot nearby. Why, I asked myself. Then, last night, the thought occurred to me that if a silencer was on the rifle used by the shooter in the triple underpass area. That would account for the witness not hearing the rifle shot nearby. I then googled "silencer 1963", and discovered that silencers were available that year. but ONLY TO THE US MILITARY. I came across am article on silencers and the jfk murder i'd like to share with the forum. I will update and post shortly. In the meantime, Google the info as indicated above and the article should appear. None of the commentators that I have heard or read about, including the hoiae selwct committee on assassination of jfk considered the use of a silencer. It would explain so much. I.e., rifle shots made from the grassy knoll and the school book depository were distanctions, while the real killer made the fatal head shot from the triple underpass as sherry fiester concluded, employing a SILENCER as part of the murder weapon.
  8. Seems like an excellent analysis: https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-mueller-found-russia-and-obstruction-first-analysis?utm_source=pocket-newtab
  9. I've located the text of that 1996 interview with Johnny Brewer. It can be found here. On the second page of the interview—here—Brewer does, indeed, say that the radio station he was listening to on 11/22/63 could have been KLIF. But he then adds, "but I honestly don't know". ____________________________________________________________________________________
  10. Paul, Regarding your post on the previous page.... No doubt certain Warren Commission apologists will just call that one of those amazing coordinated typos... you know, the kind of thing that happens all the time... like Magic Bullets, Magic Postal Money Orders, disappearing wallets, etc. As you probably know, John A. has written extensively on how the FBI altered the Dictabelt time stamps by transferring them tp audio to tape, editing the tape, and then re-cutting new Dictabelts. Here is a link directly to the altered Dictabelt discussion: https://harveyandlee.net/Tippit/Tippit.html#Dictabelt
  11. I know nothing of the kind. The two "Davis" bullet shells have a perfect, unbroken, 1-man chain of possession (Doughty & Dhority). Each officer marked the shell they got from the Davis girls. Check Dale Myers' book for up-close photos showing those markings. And those 2 shells were fired in Revolver V510210. CTers have no way out re: those two shells.
  12. Stephanie: No, I have never been afraid at what I know but maybe I should have been in past times. Right now I am being harassed frequently, including two entries into my residence when I have been away, by thugs stemming from my giving information to Special Counsel Mueller in 2017 about Roger Stone that Mueller undoubtedly explored during his investigation and which may or may not be in the redacted version of the Mueller Report released by AG Barr. The information may also be used by the prosecution when Stone faces his criminal trial in November. Also those who hired the thugs are upset about what I know about the history leading up to the two FISC (court) FISA warrants issued in 2017 that Barr is claiming are part of the "spying" on the Trump campaign. I plan to write about this in the EF in the near future. Mueller Report Likely to Renew Scrutiny of Steele Dossier https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html
  13. Dave, Not even the Warren Commission could link any bullets from that gun to Tippit's body. What they tried to link were the shells (cartridge cases) that were allegedly found at the scene with the above gun, but the problems with the cartridges are infamous: the bullets recovered from Tippit's body don't exactly match the shells. Some of the tested shells do match the above gun, but nobody can say for sure that the tested shells were, in fact, the same ones recovered at the Tippit scene. Not even the officers who marked the shells can say for sure. We just don't know, and the possibility of a later switch is real. Firm conclusions (based solely on the ballistics evidence) are impossible here, thanks to the apparent "mis-handling" of the evidence. You know this.
  14. Prior to Watergate, almost any conversation that I had with Howard Hunt included his talking about the Bay of Pigs military debacle, which he is on record for blaming on JFK. Howard was consumed with bitterness at what had occurred as were his Cuban-American friends in Miami. MPD Carl Shoffler knew that Howard and Dorothy were my closest friends in Washington and he feared at some point in time they would have told me too much. As I have recounted elsewhere, in April 1972 Howard introduced me to Lawrence Houston, the CIA General Counsel, at a meeting during which they tried to recruit me as a CIA agent. I demurred in giving them an answer. Watergate broke two months later and that changed everything.
  15. Jim, I will see your 1:15 death certificate and raise you one better : As you undoubtedly know, the Warren Commission "investigation" was hampered by the apparent incompetence of the Dallas PD in their own inability to make and provide a transcript of all Dallas Police radio traffic for 11/22/63. The Warren Commission published their Exhibit 705 which were the transcripts from the first and second Dallas PD submissions, plus the March 23, 1964 FBI verified submission of the "complete" logs for channels one and two. The DPD dispatch log as published by the Warren Commission was typed up by the DPD and verified by the FBI after listening to the entire DPD tape collection. On page 408, after being alerted that Tippit was shot, the following appears: "Disp: 10-4 603 and 602, 1:10 p .m" 1:10 pm . . . Lest anyone think this is a typo, check out the time stamp notation at the bottom of page 408. This is only a total of 63 words later than the previous time stamp. There is a second time stamp of 1:10, but this time the "0" has been partially whited out and typed over with a "9", but the original "0" is still plainly visible. So, on the logs according to the Dallas Police themselves, and verified by the FBI , the two earliest Dallas dispatch time stamps after the shooting of Tippit read "1:10", one of which was subsequently re-typed to read "1:19" And the Warren Commission published it! How did it happen? My guess is that the DPD and FBI were desperate to push the Tippit shooting back by roughly 7 or 8 minutes, so they phonied up the transcripts by '"adjusting" the times from the originals. Notice that many of the time stamps are (parenthetically noted), but the "1:10 pm" stamp is not. I bet someone went through and determined which time stamps needed "adjusting", put a parenthesis around those, and somehow overlooked the 1:10 time stamps. The second one was caught (and typed over), but the first one on page 408 was not. And there it sits to this day. The first two Dallas Police Time Stamps after the Tippit shooting were "1:10 pm" http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/pdf/WH17_CE_705.pdf
  16. Speculation. Where is the Willis girl in the Bronson frame?
  17. Says the man who thinks the Warren Commission got it right!
  18. Butch Burroughs told author James Douglass that two Oswalds were arrested in the Texas Theater. From p. 292-293 of JFK and the Unspeakable: Butch Burroughs, who witnessed Oswald’s arrest, startled me in his interview by saying he saw a second arrest occur in the Texas Theater only “three or four minutes later.” He said the Dallas Police then arrested “an Oswald lookalike.” Burroughs said the second man “looked almost like Oswald like he was his brother or something….” Douglass goes on to talk about Bernard J. Haire, owner of a store just two doors away from the theater, who saw the Oswald lookalike taken out the back of the theater. For decades, Haire thought he had seen the arrest of “Lee Harvey Oswald.”
  19. Bart, I wouldn't call that proof, but it is good evidence! I really hope Oswald WAS outside the theater during the shooting, because that would be the quickest, simplest way to disprove the entire Warren Commission nonsense! As for the evidence two Oswald's, or at least two people who looked like Classic Oswald, one in a white shirt (as seen by many witnesses) and one in a brown or dark red shirt (also as seen by many witnesses) were inside the TSBD, just look at this image of the white-shirted Oswald in the TSBD window: Many people saw the Oswald in the darker shirt. There’s also tons of evidence of two LHO’s in the Book Depository. For example, one left in a bus and taxi, the other in a Nash Rambler. No doubt you’ll want to tell me that one Oswald never rode on a bus and taxi. Then how do you explain how U.S. Army civilian employee Stuart Reed just happened to take high quality color photographs on the same roll of film of the front entrance of the TSBD, WcWatters’ bus 1213, and the front of the Texas Theater just as “Lee Harvey Oswald was being dragged out. Remarkable coincidence? No, obviously a planned operation designed to capture the movements of one of the “Oswalds,” i.e, the patsy. Harvey and Lee Depart the TSBD
  20. It's fun to fantasize, isn't it Jim H.? You must think so, because you sure do a lot of it around here.
  21. That’s easy. You will not admit it but many of us here know that the Tippit murder was a planned event, part of the set-up of Russian-speaking Lee HARVEY Oswald by American-born LEE Harvey Oswald. Who do we think was instrumental in this? None other than Captain Westbrook, the personnel director who had the magic disappearing wallet with Hidell and Oswald IDs at 10th and Patton and the Eisenhower-style jacket AND, I’ll bet, the .39 revolver used to murder Tippit, all given to him by LEE Oswald. Around 2:15 PM Sgt. Hill (assigned to Westbrook’s personnel office) brought the .38 revolver taken from HARVEY Oswald at the theater, to Capt. Westbrook's office. This gun should have been taken immediately to Homicide and Robbery, but Hill brought the gun to the personnel office. This .38 revolver remained in Capt. Westbrook's personnel office for the next hour! Our bet is that Westbrook secretly switched the revolver now laying on his desk, taken from HARVEY Oswald at the theater, with the .38 revolver used to murder Tippit and given to him by LEE Oswald. One hour later the .38 revolver used to murder Tippit was initialed by police officers in Westbrook's office, entered into evidence, and turned over to the FBI later that evening. At 3:15 PM Det. Baker arrived from Homicide and Robbery to pick up the gun. Before surrendering the gun to Det. Baker, officers McDonald, Bentley, Carroll, and Hill initialed the .38 revolver (see above). THE GUN PICKED UP BY DET. BAKER AND ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE was now the gun used to murder Tippit. The gun taken from HARVEY Oswald at the Texas Theater disappeared and was never seen again. Det. Baker took possession of the .38 revolver and 6 rounds of live ammunition (3 Western .38 Special & 3 Remington-Peters .38 Special) and then returned to Homicide and Robbery. --Above adapted from John Armstrong’s write-up on my website: The Murder of J.D. Tippit
  22. "Now, Skinny that's five and no more" (Misquoting Gene Hackman in the movie Unforgiven) If one summarizes one has this list: 1. A rifle shot to the left temple 2. A rifle shot to the right temple 3. A rifle shot to the upper right forehead (frontal bone rather than temporal bone) 4. A rifle shot from the front which makes a massive occipital wound as seen by Parkland doctors 5. A rifle shot from the Sniper's Nest blowing out the top and right side of the skull If we say these all happened in one event then that presents a problem. If we are talking about high powered rifles such as a 1903 Springfield, a British Enfield, a German Mauser, a M-1 or M-14 or even the lowly Carcano then 5 wounds would not leave much of the skull from their force. So, something different must have happened. Maybe a combination of some of these produced the effect that is noted. I really don't know. But, I favor No.3 and No. 4 for head wounds. Possibly, in this manner. A gunshot wound from a small caliber pistol such as a .22 or .32 silenced (probably not larger than a .38) and shot from the crowd. This round penetrates through the skull form left to right or from right to left and produces a right forehead and left temple wound. Then there is a rifle shot that produces the massive head wound from the front to the rear as seen by Parkland doctors. This could include the right temple wound. The top and side wound plus maybe the right temp are produced later either before the autopsy or during. At the time there is more shooting than this producing other wounds or missing. There is enough shooting to produce confusion along Houston Street and Elm Street to confuse witnesses with hearing more than 3 shots. As I said I don't know I'm just guessing based on my reading of events.
  23. Game over. Make all the excuses you can conjure: http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/08/Lee Harvey Oswald's Revolver
  24. Game over. Make all the excuses you can conjure.
  25. I have often wondered if the Texas Theater was like my home town theater back during the days of segregation. In our local theater the balcony area was used for black people only. Maybe that is why the stairs were located near the entrance at the Texas Theater. At home there was a private entrance into the balcony from outside the building. Inside the theater there was a set of stairs leading to the balcony but, that was roped off and accessible only by black people. I always wanted to see a movie from the balcony. I got to later when my brother ran the projection booth. It was cool. But, I don't know if I was forced to sit there. I bring this up to show that a white person going up to the balcony area would be very noticeable if they had the same practices as our local theater in 1963. I know from personal experience that Texas was still segregated to a certain point in 1969. Some night clubs were private and blacks were not allowed. In Austin there were mixed race clubs where white and black people could socialize. But, not in Killen, Texas outside of Fort Hood.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...