Jump to content
The Education Forum

Oswald Leaving TSBD?


Recommended Posts

Do you think that Prayer Man was standing as far back as you were?

I think if we knew exactly where he was standing and drew 2 foot circle around that spot I would have had to have been in or touching it. I stood pretty close to the wall and in that corner.

Chris,

So I guess it was impossible for the sunlight to have hit him on that forearm, even though he was holding it out from his body a foot or so...

And even if he was standing a foot-and-a-half or so closer to the street in your two-foot circle.

-- Tommy :sun

Edited by Thomas Graves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Tommy,

I can't claim that's impossible. It wasn't something I was looking at or paying attention to. Next time I'm there I'll try to figure that out for you. :)

Okey dokey, Chris. At 12:31 on a sunny November 22 afternoon, right? (lol)

And maybe you can ask someone to stand about where Weigman / Darnell / Couch were filming from and tell you if your Imperial Reflex camera lens is glowing "in the dark" way way back there in the corner where the sun don't even shine.

-- Tommy :sun

Edited by Thomas Graves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If "Prayerman" was carrying his Imperial Reflex camera, how did it get back to the Paine's garage?

I think that's an excellent question, Ray. Thanks for asking it.

So, if PM was LHO, it looks like he couldn't have been holding his IR camera in Weigman and Darnell / Couch, unless the police took it back to Ruth's place, to be "found" there, later.

-- Tommy :sun

Maybe he was holding binoculars or a very full (and therefore two-handed) mug of very, very hot coffee.

Edited by Thomas Graves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or a camera mounted light so he could occasionally take a selfie to establish his alibi.

Tom,

The more I think about that idea, the more I like it. Which would suggest that Oswald realized that he'd been patsied-up, and stood just far enough outside so he might be captured on film, but wouldn't necessarily be noticed by any of the other bad guys who might be monitoring the situation.

I'm convinced he was holding something with both hands, probably a camera.

Either that or a very full mug of very, very hot coffee, forcing him to hold it with both hands in order to not spill any of it. (lol)

-- Tommy :sun

Edited by Thomas Graves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tommy,

What makes sense, at least to me, is that the plan was to have Oswald think he was performing some sort of necessary function in a secluded place on one of the upper floors of the TSBD. He would have been shot and killed there at 12:33, by whomever, and the Carcano would have been with him in the pool of blood.

It makes sense that Lee knew what was happening and was intentionally out of position.

What makes less sense, is why he wasn’t having a photo opportunity out on Elm Street wearing a bright red sweatshirt with “LHO” written across the front.

Tom

Edited by Tom Hume
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tommy,

What makes sense, at least to me, is that the plan was to have Oswald think he was performing some sort of necessary function in a secluded place on one of the upper floors of the TSBD. He would have been shot and killed there at 12:33, by whomever, and the Carcano would have been with him in the pool of blood.

It makes sense that Lee knew what was happening and was intentionally out of position.

What makes less sense, is why he wasn’t having a photo opportunity out on Elm Street wearing a bright red sweatshirt with “LHO” written across the front.

Tom

Tom,

Maybe because LHO was afraid another bad guy might see him outside and do something bad to him.

-- Tommy :sun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Tommy, your comment above makes sense. If Oswald was intentionally away from his assigned position (to save his own life), he might have wanted to be someplace with lots of witnesses around, yet someplace where he could keep a low profile; like in the shadows of the TSBD entrance. Speculating further, maybe Oswald’s assigned position required electricity (being at-the-ready in one of the elevators, or something), and it was Oswald or one of his cohorts that cut the power so Oswald had a good excuse for not being where is was supposed to be.

Sorry to divert things.

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Last year when I visited Dallas to speak briefly at the Lancer Conference I wandered around the Plaza the day before and took some pictures. This one is from the position of "Prayer Man" looking towards the direction of the approaching motorcade. I took it because I was curious as to whether this was a "good" vantage point to watch from and if there were any clues that could be gleamed. I post a link to it here to add it to the thread and maybe it can be some use to someone.

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/13150922/PM_view_11-21-2015.jpg

Chris,

Thanks for sharing your photo.

Not that it necessarily matters, but do you remember what time of day you took it? Were you as far back as you could get?

Was the sun shining on any part of you, or were you where the sun don't shine? Just a thought: Maybe Prayer Person had been expecting a coming-down-Houston head shot. (lol)

-- Tommy :sun

Guys,

Based on a shadow study I did a few years ago in Dealey Plaza....

The shadow from the lamp post across the street is a good indicator of the time of day (sun dials, etc. - OLD technology). It is almost 90 degrees across that curb, which is a natural 10 degrees off of N-S-E-W (whole Plaza is). I would say the time of day is about Noon.

Respectfully,

Jerry Dealey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROKC Scans of Bill Shelley's criminal record.scroll two/thirds down for the gallery.

So Shelley had a history, Givens did (from 1951 no less) and so did Lovelady (first 5 pix of the gallery at the bottom of the page)) of which Ochus Campbell paid off Lovelady's remainder of the fine

Bart,

Which, if any, of those 13 documents has to do with his 1960 criminal record?

(They are very slow to "open" on my computer.)

All I see is 1969.

Is his 1960 problem only mentioned in one of them?

-- Tommy :sun

Edited by Thomas Graves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...