Steven Skeen

Im guessing a lot of Bobby Kennedys remarks would be deleted too. lighten up gentlemen

Is this a clever photo edit?

I dont recall anyone addressing Jean Hills account of the event (while mary moorman stands quietly at her side during the interview) that "the president slumped over toward mrs kennedy...she said they have shot my husband...there was an interval...then 3 or 4 more shots rang out and the motorcade sped away". I dont remember anyone attempting to provide an explanation for an eyewitness account of "3 or 4 shots" after the fatal head shot -an eyewitness standing 3 yards from the fatal head shot so close that she could hear what Jackie said.

I'm having trouble finding information on LBJ's life after Presidency. Heresay is he secluded himself to his ranch, behaved eccentrically, and revealed haunting secrets to psychiatrists who visited regularly. Any information or literature references appreciated. I would guess if he truly became guilt ridden and unstable, he would have been wanted dead.

How much weight does the theory of multiple persons on the 6th floor at 12:30 that day, complicit in the murder, carry with the members here? Have been fascinated for some time by the postulations of theorists like Glenn Sample based on the statements of possible assassination participants and other debatable evidence. So I bring it to no other venue but here, to who I consider the foremost experts.

I will open this hypothetical fantasy and say I would be very tempted to choose the murder scene of Tippet to provide the most compelling eyewitness evidence.

If you could travel to that Nov day 1963, where would you place yourself to best solve this crime at 1pm to 3pm. 1. the 6th floor SBD 2. Parkland ER JFK room 3. Anywhere in Dealy of your choosing. Where? 4. Some other place. Where?

The feelings of the man mean nearly everything. Show me how the man feels and we can solve his intentions.

For purposes of a quick and simple statistical view, how many researchers believe LHO had good intentions toward the President?

While it's longevity exists in not being substantially proven or disproven, it most certainly has been reborn through intrinsic monetary motives and the window afforded by Hick's passing, as noted by John. I also agree the book is a good read, but the raising and inadvertent discharge of an AR-15 in the follow vehicle would have been significantly observed and impossible to suppress. As well, the weapon's striking of the President's head from that position would have to rate as the worst misfortune in history, and closely rank with the plausibility of the stories of Jackie having shot John in the left temple with a pistol during her 'lean in'.

Menninger's book citing SS agent Hickey as accidental shooter is reinforced by an upcoming television program. This theory researched in depth and never appreciably debunked as far as I have seen. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/28/jfk-second-shooter-documentary_n_3667317.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl4%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D350520 A brief discussion of the 1992 book: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=20021&hl=%2Bgeorge+%2Bhickey

Reading thru just now. Cannot comprehend why contributors are so emotionally charged. Why the emotions and personal attacks? If an assassination study contributor is thought to be dishonest, just provide the facts or evidence justifying that suspicion and suspend the emotions.

So it seems Dan Marvin was discredited. I am at a loss to think of one witness with a profoundly difference making experience related to Nov 23, 63 to convey that would alter what little we've known all along; not Marvin, Craig, Baker, Files, etc, etc, ad nauseum. How irretrievably wrong, pathetic, and mostly what an indictment of the soul of mankind! The darkness within the liars far outweighs that what exists within the murderers.

Tom forgive my error. Posting too quickly without enough software control to harness the input. Bernice, thank you. William Bruce Pitzer is the name I intended.

I appreciate the fact that no credibility was given to Morningstar's body switch theory (another good researcher who has ventured a bit too far into the quagmire, imo). I do approve of the techniques he used to validate the alteration of Zapruder's film: ie, timing of motorcade flashing lights and stance of bystanders in motion. Why would CIA hold the film for so long while other pictures confiscated were never released or released with blots and mars.So I do not approve of Zapruder references for head damage. Daniel and David, I have spoken to Parkland Dr's and can cite medical sources swearing there is no way the body could be altered so significantly in the brevity of time allowed even with wax, makeup, grafts, etc,etc, and David, thank you for keeping the disagreement civil. I mildly and respectfully regret that the wording of my stem post was not more gracious. The fault I find with this forum is unwarranted pseudointellectualism and repugnant arrogance. Also thank you for using the word "reread". Your book is fascinating to me. I know you have critics, but I have not read any of them though I know of Posner's name.