Steven Gaal Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 Graduate Student Conference Presentations and Publications U of Oklahoma Fall 2009 Conference Presentations Michael Snyder "'I Feel Like a Spring Lamb': What Clay Shaw's Literary Life Reveals" John F Kennedy: History, Memory, Legacy; University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND [Research - Herlihy and Purdy Collections] University of Delaware Library Special Collections, Newark, DE =========================================================== John Kennedy Assassination: What Clay Shaw’s Early Career as a Playwright Reveals “I Feel Like a Spring Lamb” What Clay Shaw’s Literary Life Reveals Michael Snyder http://www.constantinereport.com/allposts/john-john-kennedy-assassination-what-clay-shaws-early-career-as-a-playwright-reveals/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Raymond Carroll Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 John Kennedy Assassination: What Clay Shaw’s Early Career as a Playwright Reveals What Clay Shaw’s Literary Life Reveals Michael Snyder http://www.constanti...wright-reveals/ According to Snyder, Oz was really a right-wing radical. I would be interested to hear the evidence in support of this proposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Raymond Carroll Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 Ray Carroll is always asking for evidence, but never provides any. Mr. Farley prefers the ad hominem to reasoned discussion of the case, and he now sounds like a busted gramophone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Raymond Carroll Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 Either way, your words are worthless. Mr. Farley's words, by contrast, are worth examining. On the thread entitled WAS OSWALD AN IDIOT? Mr. Farley is still promoting a piece of disinformation that was discredited when he was still a kid. http://educationforu...pic=19778&st=15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hogan Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 It is not an ad hominem to expect a man to keep his word. We would all be interested to hear the evidence you claim you have of Mark Lane "running away" from you with "his tail between his legs." Ray Carroll is always asking for evidence, but never provides any. Mr. Farley prefers the ad hominem to reasoned discussion of the case, and he now sounds like a busted gramophone Ray C: Please post a wave file of your audiotape of you accusing Lane of not serving his client well. I was at that conference and recall no such event. JIM D THe reason you do not recall the event is because you were not present during my encounter with Mark Lane I do have an audio of the event, which is stored among a pile of clutter in my garage. I will post it here in due course, when I straighten out the clutter and figure out how to post an audiotape. But for now lets just accept that you ask everyone to accept your bona fides, while you ask everyone to treat me as a xxxx! Bold added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Raymond Carroll Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 in due course At the proper or right time. http://www.thefreedi...m/in due course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hogan Posted December 15, 2012 Share Posted December 15, 2012 in due course At the proper or right time. http://www.thefreedi...m/in due course The proper or right time has come and gone. I do have an audio of the event, which is stored among a pile of clutter in my garage. I will post it here in due course, when I straighten out the clutter and figure out how to post an audiotape. But for now lets just accept that you ask everyone to accept your bona fides, while you ask everyone to treat me as a xxxx! As Jim DiEugenio predicted and Lee Farley has noted, Raymond Carroll has failed to produce the audio that he trumpeted. Since Carroll made that claim, Mark Lane has authored two books, his last word on the JFK assassination and his life story. Apparently Carroll spent the corresponding (and ensuing) time pondering the pile of clutter in his garage. Considering the vituperative nature of the remarks Carroll made about Mark Lane, his failure to produce renders his otherwise vile charges laughable. I would be surprised if anyone here really expected Raymond Carroll to produce an audio of Mark Lane running away with his tail between his legs. Carroll's attempt to hide behind the skirt of semantics in explaining his failure won't wash. Here's a more complete description of the phrase in due course from the same source Carroll used: http://idioms.thefre...m/in due course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Raymond Carroll Posted December 15, 2012 Share Posted December 15, 2012 Since the two jokers messers Hogan & Di Eugenio insist on turning this into an ad-hominem-fest let me just say, while Hogan is struggling to understand a simple phrase in the dictionary, that I am delighted to hear that Di Eugenio is publishing a revised version of his book. A new version is badly needed, because the first version really sucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hogan Posted December 15, 2012 Share Posted December 15, 2012 Since the two jokers messers Hogan & Di Eugenio insist on turning this into an ad-hominem-fest When a man publicly proclaims he is going to produce something and fails to do so, it is not an ad hominem to call attention to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karl Kinaski Posted December 15, 2012 Share Posted December 15, 2012 (edited) edit Edited June 3, 2015 by Karl Kinaski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. Raymond Carroll Posted December 15, 2012 Share Posted December 15, 2012 This guy is a class act and an Education Forum treasure. Thank you, I am taking a bow. Glad to see that the THREE STOOGES are all here in one place: Curly Di Eugenio Mo Hogan & Larry Farley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Meredith Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 Why is this thread purporting to be about Harvey and Lee? Shouldn't it be moved to the "how we eat our young" thread??? Dawn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 Why is this thread purporting to be about Harvey and Lee? Shouldn't it be moved to the "how we eat our young" thread??? Dawn Dawn, I agree. --Tommy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Hargrove Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 (edited) Hi, This is my first post to the Education Forum. For the past 15 or 20 years or so, I've run John Armstrong's HarveyandLee.net website, which, in the last year or three, John Armstrong actually noticed and made significantly longer. Among the MANY people who seem to hate me and John are John McAdams, Dave Reitzes, David Lifton, Greg Parker, and Tracy Parnell, though there are clearly others. From reading what they say, there can be little doubt that JA and I are TOTAL IDIOTS, though I'd like to thank Steve Gaal and David Josephs for their support. Before agreeing with Mr. Lifton and declaring the entire John Armstrong camp totally daft, please visit my website here: HarveyandLee.net Thank you. Edited May 13, 2015 by Jim Hargrove Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Parker Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Hi, This is my first post to the Education Forum. For the past 15 or 20 years or so, I've run John Armstrong's HarveyandLee.net website, which, in the last year or three, John Armstrong actually noticed and made significantly longer. Among the MANY people who seem to hate me and John are John McAdams, Dave Reitzes, David Lifton, Greg Parker, and Tracy Parnell, though there are clearly others. From reading what they say, there can be little doubt that JA and I are TOTAL IDIOTS, though I'd like to thank Steve Gaal and David Josephs for their support. Before agreeing with Mr. Lifton and declaring the entire John Armstrong camp totally daft, please visit my website here: HarveyandLee.net Thank you. Which shows the level of understanding you exhibit quite nicely. I don't hate people I have never met. I hate what you do to this case. Just another side-show. They latest installment of the foolishness had me rolling in the aisles. This woman is the H & L Brains Trust chief "suspect" as the ahem cough cough "second Marguerite"? Still trying to put my sides back together... If anyone can get over that speed hump to logic, I agree -- toddle off and read the site. But be warned: any errors found are in no way reflective of the theory, the book or the author. They are the sole responsibility of the webmaster. So sayeth the Webmaster. After that, take a cold shower and read the threads here. You can also buy volume 2 of my book when it comes out for further demolition of the House of Cards these guys constructed. http://reopenkennedycase.forumotion.net/f13-the-harvey-lee-evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts