-
Posts
4,105 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Robert Prudhomme
- Birthday 12/18/1955
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
British Columbia, Canada
-
Interests
Gold mining, horses, pickup trucks, fishing, hunting, killing trees, you know....the usual redneck stuff
Recent Profile Visitors
10,330 profile views
Robert Prudhomme's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
-
Another look at the back wound.
Robert Prudhomme replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Okay, how fast would the bullet be travelling, in feet per second, to only penetrate the flesh of the back one inch? Did the shooter know the round was faulty? Why would a home made bullet be more difficult to trace back to an assassin than a factory made bullet? Was the round attenuated (reduced in force) or faulty, or a combination of the two? Was the rifle zeroed (sighted) in for that particular round? -
Hi Thomas Once again, ignore everything above this line as I am still having problems with the Quote/Reply function. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Thomas If it was just one woman we were looking for it might not be so bad, but we have to find four women unaccounted for; unless we assume Calvery, Westbrook, Hicks and Reed were not actually together as a group. I was thinking about what Pat Speer said about the confusion regarding the two Elm Streets. Is it possible Calvery, and maybe the rest of her group, were watching the motorcade from the Elm St. extension?
-
I'm sorry, Bill, but since you seem intent on reporting me to James Gordon every time I disagree with you, I am placing you on "Ignore". I have just been told I stand a good chance of being permanently banned from this forum. It is quite clear at this point that discussing this case with you is rather futile, as you fail to recognize facts for what they are. For example, not having evidence that Linda's remarks were not true and factual? Don't you find that a bit absurd?
-
Another look at the back wound.
Robert Prudhomme replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Okay, Michael, whatever you say. I've shot more rifles at animals than I can remember but, what do I know? You've watched Youtube videos so now you're an expert. Just do me a favour and don't share your ballistics "knowledge" with me. -
" Mr. BALL. Did Gloria come up?Ms.. MOLINA. Yes, she came. I was in the lobby standing there and she came in with this other girl. [if Truly came in 20-30 secs after the shots as Molina says above, and we know Calvery was not far behind him - or Baker and him - and Molina says he SAW her "come in" - then I assumed, pretty logically I think, that Molina had to have followed Truly in, and he was then almost immediately followed in by Calvery. He says he saw her come in so he had to have gone in just after Truly and before her. Does that make sense? ] " Bill Are you by any chance related to a person by the name of Albert Doyle? He's the fellow James booted from this forum for posting a stream of non-stop nonsense. No, it does not make any sense at all. How do you know Calvery was not far behind Baker? You don't. There is nothing whatsoever to support your assumption. How do you know Molina followed Truly in to the entryway? You don't. There is nothing whatsoever to support your assumption. How do you know Moina was immediately followed in by Calvery? You don't. There is nothing whatsoever to support your assumption. "He says he saw her come in so he had to have gone in just after Truly and before her. Does that make sense?" That is a possibility. HOWEVER, what is the time frame involved? Did Calvery come in seconds after Molina, or minutes? Making assumptions is a waste of everyone's time, Bill, and only proves that you have a vivid imagination. Before you respond again, might I recommend you find some actual evidence to support your theories?
-
Another look at the back wound.
Robert Prudhomme replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
LOL I'll bite. How do you know? -
Hi Thomas I'm having trouble still with the Quote/Reply function and it keeps showing the 1st page of this thread. Just ignore everything above this. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Robert, Which begs the question, "Did the FBI fabricate all of their statements because they, or at least one of them, were somehow involved in the assassination?" Why else would the FBI fabricate their statements, Robert?" I'm thinking much the same thing you are, Thomas, but, for the life of me, I cannot figure out why they would go to such elaborate ends to conceal the location of one woman, and how all that ties in to the cover up.
-
Another look at the back wound.
Robert Prudhomme replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
That would be like two cars, each travelling 100 mph, colliding head on and coming to a dead stop after gently bouncing off of each other's bumper. -
Another look at the back wound.
Robert Prudhomme replied to Michael Clark's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Do you know how many deer I've killed over my lifetime? Bullets travelling 2200 feet per second simply do not come to a halt after penetrating a mere inch of flesh. -
Shelley and Lovelady? Are You Sure??
Robert Prudhomme replied to Robert Prudhomme's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
ac·com·pa·ny əˈkəmp(ə)nē/ verb 1. go somewhere with (someone) as a companion or escort. "the two sisters were to accompany us to New York" synonyms: go with, travel with, keep someone company, tag along with, hang out with; More 2. be present or occur at the same time as (something else). "the illness is often accompanied by nausea" synonyms: occur with, co-occur with, coexist with, go with, go together with, go hand in hand with, appear with, be attended by "the illness is often accompanied by nausea" As far as I can see, Bill, the two men in the Darnell film are nowhere close to anything resembling a police officer. In fact, they are not even accompanying each other. Of course, you're the photographic expert, and you might have a different opinion.