Randy Gunter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LC-KgRfEEI8

Wasn't the Dillard photo taken 90 seconds or so after the last shots? If so, it doesn't seem to match Mrs. Mooneyham's timeline unless the unknown person tarried for an extended time. Time estimation also varies like opinions. Far from an exact science. FWIW - The man in question appears to be dressed in a DPD uniform, with a regulation military haircut, and spectacles.

It's very amusing to see all these alpha egos in a tug-of-war over so many personal opinion calculations and conclusions over ONE altered photo. Dr. David Mantik proved long ago that the radiological photos were fake, and not those of JFK's true skull. Why would any researcher assume that the other autopsy photos are any different? US Government hijacked and controlled autopsy, US Government controlled photos, and US Government controlled cover-up. What more do you need to know? Realize until the real autopsy photos are found, which will be never, since LCDR Pitzer was executed for them, this always has been and always will be an exercise in futility.

Slattery = Von Pein, Von Pein = Slattery. Hopefully neither are still here.

Never let it be said, that Palamara misses a chance at self-promotion. Even in trying to honor a true hero, he exalts himself. Wow.

Does anyone know if Billy James Hargis is related to Bobby Hargis, the motorcycle cop that was sprayed with JFKs brain matter? "Charles Willoughby's publisher and friend Billy James Hargis was a short, portly, double-chinned fellow in his midthirties who gained much of his financial support from H. L. Hunt and other wealthy oilmen. Along with Willoughby, who was his Washington eyes and ears, another of Hargis's advisory committee members was retired lieutenant general Pedro del Valle, US Marine commander in the Pacific Theater during World War II. After the Korean War, del Valle had become vice president of ITT's Latin American operations." http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKwilloughbyC.htm

Jack Ruby keeping close watch on the days events in Willis #9, while a Dallas PD Officer keeps a close watch on him. So very interesting.

Why did Ruby kill Oswald? “He had no choice,” Raven said. When I asked her to explain why he “had no choice,” she replied only, “Jack had bosses, just like everyone else.” Raven says she believes “he was instructed on what he needed to do, therefore he did it. And when the opportunity presented itself he went ahead and took it.” http://jfkfacts.org/...wald/#more-3504

I agree that this presentation is excellent, Randy. It's a video I've had for 15 years (it was made 20 years ago) and I'm delighted that it's finally available on YouTube for everybody to see. It has Information from the original HSCA team (before Robert Blakey's hatchet job). It has video of Malcom Thompson and Major John Pickard as they speak about the Backyard Photographs. Gerry Patrick Hemming speaks up in a relevant way...just excellent. I highly recommended this video to newbies -- it will bring them up to speed and sail they past the Warren Commission quickly. As for Oswald's efforts to become a professional spy -- I accept that wholeheartedly. Yet one thing we should also recognize, IMHO, is that Oswald never quite made the grade. He was not earning a regular salary from any intelligence agency -- at best he was getting small change from the FBI, the CIA, the OSI, for photographic work, bag transport, and so on. He was being tested. Surely, not just anybody could get approved for testing -- Lee Harvey Oswald had to have some talent and some brains. Yet he wasn't on the payroll in the same way that E. Howard Hunt, Anne Goodpasture or James Jesus Angleton were on the CIA payroll. There were other mercenary intelligence contractors, too, and Oswald hung out with them -- like Gerry Patrick Hemming, and perhaps Hemming's companions like Loran Hall, Larry Howard or Frank Sturgis. Also, to the best of my knowledge, Oswald kept all of these associates far away from his wife, Marina. She never had a clue about them -- she thought he was at work for weeks at a time, when actually Oswald had lost this or that job without telling Marina. Best regards, --Paul Trejo <edit typos> Paul, Excellent comments, and I echo them with one small caveat. That excellent production was released in 1978 (35 years ago). Even the narration was superb by Bob Sherman (who I intend to research also). Time flies when you're having fun researching the JFK Conspiracy and Coverup, or so it would seem! Cheers, RG

Excellent presentation. http://www.youtube.c...v=_aPcSI76wC8#! Gerry Hemming (Fellow Marine at Atsugi AB JAPAN) says "LHO" was working for Naval Intelligence. Richard Sprague (Director of HSCA) says "LHO" was given special consideration NEVER before given a DEFECTOR, AKA "Special Dispensation". @ 21:56, "LHO" gets the GREEN LIGHT to bring his Russian born wife out of the USSR. LHO's ties to the Intelligence community have only strengthened over the years. RG

LOL. From the guy who goes to Ken Rahn's site to revive the deader than a doornail NAA bullet lead analysis. Talk about rich. THUD! NAA analysis? There's still someone out there who thinks that's serious stuff? Gary Mack quotes the NAA analysis faster than a jackrabbit. Is that surprising?

Robert Kennedy had another revealing phone conversation on the afternoon of Nov. 22. Speaking with Enrique "Harry" Ruiz-Williams, a Bay of Pigs veteran who was his most trusted ally among exiled political leaders, Bobby shocked his friend by telling him point-blank, "One of your guys did it." Who did Kennedy mean? By then Oswald had been arrested in Dallas. The CIA and its anti-Castro client groups were already trying to connect the alleged assassin to the Havana regime. But as Kennedy's blunt remark to Williams makes clear, the attorney general wasn't buying it. Recent evidence suggests that Bobby Kennedy had heard the name Lee Harvey Oswald long before it exploded in news bulletins around the world, and he connected it with the government's underground war on Castro. With Oswald's arrest in Dallas, Kennedy apparently realized that the government's clandestine campaign against Castro had boomeranged at his brother. http://www.infowars...._conspiracy.htm Did RFK mean LHO or someone else? RG

Thanks Bill...Check out this "pile of mularkey" from Gary Stern of the National Archives. "We recognize that the remaining records are of high public interest and historical value, and we appreciate your stated desire not to have to wait five more years to obtain access to these records. Given this public interest, we have been consulting with the CIA to see if it would be possible to review and release any of these remaining documents in time for the 50th anniversary of President Kennedy's assassination in 2013. Although the CIA shares NARA's interest in wanting to be responsive to your request, they have concluded there are substantial logistical requirements that must take place prior to the release of these remaining records and there is simply not sufficient time or resources to complete these tasks prior to 2017. Accordingly, we will not be able to accommodate your request." http://www.aarclibrary.org/notices/AARC_-_NARA_Letter_2012-06-12.pdf "Not sufficient time or resources" AKA "Not important enough". This clown should be banished to Siberia. Randy

If you are really sincere about the truth of the JFK assassination, sign the PETITION. The Joannides file could possibly be the Holy Grail of the case. http://jfkfacts.org/assassination/petition-for-jfk-documents-tops-2200-signatures/ IMO - 2200 signatures is a very weak showing. Randy

IF ONLY the all and powerful OZ aka THE CIA would release the Joannides file, but we shouldn't hold our proverbial breath. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKjoannides.htm