-
Posts
906 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Antti Hynonen
- Birthday 09/07/1971
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Helsinki, Finland
-
Interests
JFK assassination debate
Recent Profile Visitors
28,723 profile views
Antti Hynonen's Achievements
Newbie (1/14)
-
Diana Bowron and JFK's Back Wound
Antti Hynonen replied to Todd W. Vaughan's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
The nurses undressed the President after he was pronounced dead. Upon removing the clothes off the victim, they should have noticed and mentioned the obvious (bullet) holes in the clothes. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/testimony/henchlif.htm I do not recall them discussing the back wound, only the small round neck wound, below the Adam's apple. -
JFK Forum: Rules of Behaviour and other points
Antti Hynonen replied to John Simkin's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
As of today all moderators have been instructed to set all posts in violation of Forum rules as invisible. Breaking forum rules, includes posts with clear personal attacks, cursing etc. If your post becomes suddenly invisible, it is because your post does not comply with Forum rules. Normally such posts will not be set to visible again. The Education Forum rules are available on the Forum for all to see. http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=9792 http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=2243 On behalf of the Moderators Antti Hynonen -
note to evan or a mod please
Antti Hynonen replied to Bernice Moore's topic in JFK Assassination Debate
Posting here seems to work: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=16835&st=20 I see that you have 2 posts on page 2. Is something still missing? I don't know what else I could do from my end to facilitate? Antti -
(Merged) Fetzer / Burton Apollo Hoax debate thread
Antti Hynonen replied to Evan Burton's topic in The Apollo Moon Landings
Replying to bolded section below. I do not agree that Burton should limit his number of replies to a number less than those posted by White & Fetzer. Judging from posts from page 8&9 thus far, Burton has not posted significantly more than Fetzer&White together. I see no need to moderate this thread at this time. Antti --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
Thanks. Helps me in seeing the bigger picture. Antti No problem, Antti. Ist Pic 2nd Pic
-
(Merged) Fetzer / Burton Apollo Hoax debate thread
Antti Hynonen replied to Evan Burton's topic in The Apollo Moon Landings
Hi, The whole thread is confusing, in particular the agreed "rules". I have here Burton's and your agreement: ------------------------------------------- Posted 24 August 2010 - 12:46 PM, Evan Burton: I'd be happy with: Jack posts claim I respond Jim addresses my reply I respond to Jim last post Jim makes final comments Next image. Jim gets last word, we each make 2 posts regarding the image. It is still important, though, that Jim addresses my rebuttal to the claim, and I address the points Jim raises in his rebuttal. We must stay on topic. Gary will decide if a participant is not adressing claims or going off topic. -------------------------------------------- Then I have your comment to the above: -------------------------------------------- Posted 24 August 2010 - 03:40 PM; James H. Fetzer: This is a good plan, which I endorse. I would like to see the thread "cleaned up" as I have recommended. The moon rock issue has not been resolved. I mentioned it in post #7, he replied in #10 and I commented in #12. There is much more to be said on this subject, which I will bring up again in relation to the "Moon Movie" section. Clearly, it is a crucial question. I suggest deleting the other moon rock posts as well as those in which Evan indulges in his penchant for the use of RED and so on, which Gary can easily delete. If Gary thinks a section of the debate has had enough attention, he can recommend that we move on and afford an opportunity for each of us to explain why that is or why that is not a good idea. Many thanks. When Jack has several studies I would like him to post that are related to the same issue, such as those related to the moon rover, it would be appropriate to post them as a group to illustrate the dimensions of the issue being addressed. The idea of only posting one image at a time is really inappropriate, since they are evidence that is supportive of a single argument, which, in this case, is that at least some of the rover photos appear to have been faked. If Jack has five that I would like posted, it would be ridiculous to have him post five separate photos with five separate sequences of argumentative exchange. So that suggestion was a bad one. Otherwise, however, I would like to begin with Jack's moon rover photographs. ------------------------------------------------ According to this, Burton gets at least 2 posts per claim. If the rules have changed again, I refuse to moderate this mess. Antti -
(Merged) Fetzer / Burton Apollo Hoax debate thread
Antti Hynonen replied to Evan Burton's topic in The Apollo Moon Landings
Evan, I can not see why not. This thread was for you and Fetzer. -
(Merged) Fetzer / Burton Apollo Hoax debate thread
Antti Hynonen replied to Evan Burton's topic in The Apollo Moon Landings
I have investigated these posts, and as far as I can tell, both posts 7 and 42 are intact. They are posts by Jack White, neither has been deleted nor made invisible. Regards, Antti Hynonen Moderator -
Duncan, Can you post (or post a link) to the original photos used in this study, please? Thanks. Antti
-
(Merged) Fetzer / Burton Apollo Hoax debate thread
Antti Hynonen replied to Evan Burton's topic in The Apollo Moon Landings
Jack, reviewing your old posts and following what you have said/claimed in the past is a normal way to conduct research and participate on this forum. By doing this, another member is not "stalking you". I agree an apology is in place! -
Jim, Fascinating stuff. It would be fantastic if we could somehow find out more about your section 6 and the Tikander, Shepardson, Hurt etc. meeting on the Helsinki aspect. The time of events does tie in very nicely with Oswald's trip.
-
They need to check that date. It's probably 1962? On Dec 27th 1963, Kennedy had been dead for a month.
-
Same here, Results are: Choice A [ 1 ] ** [100.00%] Choice B [ 0 ] ** [0.00%] Choice C [ 0 ] ** [0.00%] Total Votes: 4 Mine appeared to be the 4th one, and no vote was entered by me either, you have already voted in this poll is what it says. And when I go back to vote, it does not let me cast a vote, bummer, I wanted to vote for C.
-
Thanks Duncan. Hmmm.... much of the clothing does match the description from before.