Steven Gaal Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 (edited) Kathleen Collins Super Member http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showuser=5645 Members 1,697 posts Posted 13 November 2011 - 03:05 AM Please answer 2 questions. 1. Why was Tosh kicked out of this forum?2. Yesterday I read in a post that if the Grassy Knoll shooters didn't kill Kennedy, the limo was going to be bombed after it's through the triple underpass. I wish I knew where I read this. And how true is it?Kathy C=================== http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=17786&page=3 Thomas Graves Super Member http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showuser=3525 Members 3,363 posts Gender:Male Location:La Jolla, California Posted 13 November 2011 - 04:38 AM 'Kathleen Collins', on 12 Nov 2011 - 7:05 PM, said:http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?app=forums&module=forums§ion=findpost&pid=237846http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?app=forums&module=forums§ion=findpost&pid=237846 Please answer 2 questions. 1. Why was Tosh kicked out of this forum?2. Yesterday I read in a post that if the Grassy Knoll shooters didn't kill Kennedy, the limo was going to be bombed after it's through the triple underpass. I wish I knew where I read this. And how true is it?Kathy C ==============================================================Kathleen,Tosh Plumlee wasn't kicked off the Forum, he decided that he no longer wanted to participate because only a few people were paying attention to his posts and some members were, in so many words, accusing him of having been a conspirator in the assassination of JFK.--Tommyhttp://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=17786&page=3 ============================ Steve Duffy Experienced Member http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showuser=6306 Posted 13 November 2011 - 09:58 AM Kathy, the limo bomb was mentioned in Larry Hancock's book "Nexus"..might be in that thread...it was told to Twyman by Roy Hargreaves....ipb.global.registerReputation( 'rep_post_237865', { domLikeStripId: 'like_post_237865', app: 'forums', type: 'pid', typeid: '237865' }, parseInt('') ); http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=17786&page=3Biography: http://educationforu...showtopic=15547 ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]======================= ]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]======================= =========[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ =========[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ The Car Bomb - JFK Assassination Debate - The Education ... educationforum.ipbhost.com › ... › JFK Assassination DebateCached Mar 20, 2005 - 10 posts - 5 authors The Car Bomb - posted in JFK Assassination Debate: As you all know, ... the vehicles parked by the side of the road beyond the triple overpass. South Knoll Witness: Mr. Plumlee - Page 3 - JFK ... 6 posts Jun 4, 2011 Op Dallas - Page 2 15 posts Jun 30, 2007 Marita Lorenz 9 posts May 26, 2005 Roy Hargraves - Page 2 12 posts Jun 6, 2004 More results from educationforum.ipbhost.com Edited March 28, 2015 by Steven Gaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Schwartz Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Steve, very good post. Very informative. Very minor footnote - Charles and Earle Cabell's grandfather, William Cabell, was a General in the Confederate Army during the Civil War. Anyway, with Earle C. (who was the mayor of Dallas in '63 /'64) managing the Dallas Police and DAP handling LHO, Dulles 's cover up action plan was very streamlined. On a personal note, my Dad was in the Pacific theatre during WW2 (fought in Iwo Jimo, Guadacanal, Solomon Islands and occupied Japan in '46)- I found your comment on MacArthur not letting the OSS in the Pacific theatre interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Prouty and Krulak are convincing enough. Lansdale may have been running a military coup. Assuming he was in Dealey Plaza running an assassination, who might he have been working with, or for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 (edited) Prouty and Krulak are convincing enough. Lansdale may have been running a military coup. Assuming he was in Dealey Plaza running an assassination, who might he have been working with, or for? Paul B., David Sanchez Morales? Could this be Morales? (The tall, dark-complected guy in the light grey suit with his back to the camera on the right.) This guy reminds me of the tall, athletic, dark-complected, grey suit-wearing who is watching Oswald in New Orleans and scratching, scratching, scratching the back of his neck in the James "Jim" Doyle film. You can see the neck scratcher (Morales?) starting at 3:56 of this video. --Tommy Edited March 29, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Simpich Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Look at 4:01, you see the same neck scratcher, with a big bald spot on the back of his head. Sorry, Tommy, I want to believe but I don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 (edited) Look at 4:01, you see the same neck scratcher, with a big bald spot on the back of his head. Sorry, Tommy, I want to believe but I don't think so. Please watch it again, Bill, starting at 3:50. At 3:55 Neck Scratcher walks up and stands right behind the guy you're talking about. The guy you're talking about is also wearing a grey suit and he's wearing glasses and has a bald spot and you can see a few seconds later, after the camera position is changed, that he's holding a bunch of stuff in his hands.. Both of them are in the same frame at 5:55-3:56 and you can see the bald spot on the guy in front. I think the guy who is scratching his neck is Morales. --Tommy Edited March 29, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 (edited) Look at 4:01, you see the same neck scratcher, with a big bald spot on the back of his head. Sorry, Tommy, I want to believe but I don't think so. Please watch it again, Bill, starting at 3:50. At 3:55 Neck Scratcher walks up and stands right behind the guy you're talking about. The guy you're talking about is also wearing a grey suit and he's wearing glasses and has a bald spot and you can see a few seconds later, after the camera position is changed, that he's holding a bunch of stuff in his hands.. Both of the men in grey suits can be seen simultaneously at 3:55-3:56 and you can see the bald spot on the guy in front of Neck Scratcher. I think the guy who is scratching his neck and standing behind the guy with the bald spot is David Sanchez Morales. --Tommy bumped one last time for Bill Simpich Edited April 5, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mark Valenti Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Impossible to identify people who are facing away from the camera. Fun parlor game, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Burnham Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 (edited) For the record: I do not find anything about this subject to be "fun" nor do I participate in "parlor games" concerning our dead president. I sensed early on that this is where the thread was headed and expressed my objections to it before the moderators found my posts to that effect needed to be hidden. EDIT: I should add that the posts that were hidden have been restored by the moderator. Edited March 29, 2015 by Greg Burnham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mark Valenti Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 For the record: I do not find anything about this subject to be "fun" nor do I participate in "parlor games" concerning our dead president. I sensed early on that this is where the thread was headed and expressed my objections to it before the moderators found my posts to that effect needed to be hidden. The research community has been burdened by a kind of pompous certainty regarding some topics. If, as they assert, their observations were indeed correct, as in this instance, the case would have been solved and perpetrators would be in jail. But that isn't how events have unfolded. The observations remain fascinating but unproven theories, despite their posturing and chest thumping. Whether they acknowledge it or not, they are indeed engaging in a parlor game. That they don't know this is unfortunate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Burnham Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 "They" are engaging in a parlor game? It appears to me that you initiated this specific "Mr. Potato Head" ear location photo analysis parlor game yourself and have now elected to point the finger at "the research community" for participating in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mark Valenti Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 "They" are engaging in a parlor game? It appears to me that you initiated this specific "Mr. Potato Head" ear location photo analysis parlor game yourself and have now elected to point the finger at "the research community" for participating in it. No. You have this wrong and I'm not surprised. "Some" in the research community take it upon themselves to act as melodramatic leaders of the charge, believing themselves to be Keepers of the Truth. I'm not saying that everyone acts like mini-Pattons, just some. The rest understand this for what it is: a fascinating mystery, maybe the greatest one of all. I found it interesting to note that Lansdale's ears are in the same general location and angle of the mysterious walking man's, nothing more. To each his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Burnham Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Not to be argumentative, sincerely, but aren't almost everyone's ears in the same general location and angle of just about everyone else's? The key word is "general" [location]. There is an actual science called Ear Biometrics from which identification can perhaps be relied upon. But it involves a lot more than "general" location and angle. My original objection to the approach you adopted was based on a fallacy known as false equivalence. Although it was not stated, it was in play early in the thread. There is a great deal of difference in the value of the evidence being compared. The evidence offered by two respected eye witnesses--each of whom independently and positively identified the subject--versus your self described "parlor game." I do not think it is accurate to label a positive identification, even one with which you take exception, as a "parlor game." You are, of course, entitled to label your own study whatever you think most accurately describes it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David G. Healy Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 hidden posts (from acknowledged researchers) = tacit approval of the WCR, PERIOD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Andrews Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 (edited) Re: Lansdale above the ears. Take a look at a full-face photo of EGL on this thread. Look at his elongated forehead. Now put your thumbnail on the top of your ear, and your index finger on your cranium. Do you have as great a length of skull up there as EGL seems to have? Read a bit about acromegaly, which I suspect EGL had benign symptoms of. Even if I'm wrong, that's a lot of cranium up there, even on a tall man. Edited March 29, 2015 by David Andrews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now