Ian Lloyd Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 Why did the FBI and the SS do a recreation anyway? Wouldn't one have been sufficient? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Burnham Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 Why did the FBI and the SS do a recreation anyway? Wouldn't one have been sufficient? I'll go one step further. Not even a single "re-creation" film should have been required! Think about it: Two armed robbers enter a bank and demand that the teller give them all the cash in their drawer. After they have the cash they tie the employee's hands together and put gags in their mouths before getting away. Luckily, the robbers wore no masks and the entire episode was recorded by a security camera. When the police arrive the robbers have vanished. Shortly after that the FBI arrive on scene since bank robbery is a federal offense. Can you imagine the city police AND the FBI separately coming back days later to each shoot a "re-creation film" of the crime? For what purpose would they do such a thing? They already have the REAL film of the entire crime in their possession. If they already had the REAL DEAL on film a "re-creation" film serves absolutely no innocuous purpose. This is particularly evident due to the fact that they shot the films from the exact location from which the REAL film was shot! However, such an otherwise extraneous film could serve several "not so innocent" purposes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Brancato Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 Greg - of course. We have spent decades examining so-called evidence that exists only to divert or mislead us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon G. Tidd Posted June 16, 2015 Share Posted June 16, 2015 Greg Burnham, You make an incredibly important point. Why did the U.S. Government make recreations of the assassination when it was in possession of the Z-Film and the Nix film. These films recorded the facts of the assassination. Unless the films were bungled fakes that needed to be corrected. A+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted June 17, 2015 Author Share Posted June 17, 2015 (edited) I wish everyone well in their research endeavors. chris Edited July 8, 2015 by Chris Davidson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Burnham Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 Greg Burnham, You make an incredibly important point. Why did the U.S. Government make recreations of the assassination when it was in possession of the Z-Film and the Nix film. These films recorded the facts of the assassination. Unless the films were bungled fakes that needed to be corrected. A+ Something we agree on. You said: "Unless the films were bungled fakes that needed to be corrected." I would tend to agree with that statement or with a similar explanation. [PS: Don't look now, but that statement has added validity because it is the simplest explanation adequate to the evidence. Any other explanation I can think of violates Occam's Razor]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 17, 2015 Share Posted June 17, 2015 (edited) Greg Burnham, You make an incredibly important point. Why did the U.S. Government make recreations of the assassination when it was in possession of the Z-Film and the Nix film. These films recorded the facts of the assassination. Unless the films were bungled fakes that needed to be corrected. A+ So the assassination could be filmed, studied, and shown to the public from many different angles, not just from Zapruder's and Nix's perspectives? --Tommy Edited June 17, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted June 17, 2015 Author Share Posted June 17, 2015 (edited) I wish everyone well in their research endeavors. chris Edited July 8, 2015 by Chris Davidson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted June 17, 2015 Author Share Posted June 17, 2015 (edited) I wish everyone well in their research endeavors. chris Edited July 8, 2015 by Chris Davidson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted June 22, 2015 Author Share Posted June 22, 2015 (edited) I wish everyone well in their research endeavors. chris Edited July 8, 2015 by Chris Davidson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 (edited) Greg Burnham, You make an incredibly important point. Why did the U.S. Government make recreations of the assassination when it was in possession of the Z-Film and the Nix film. These films recorded the facts of the assassination. Unless the films were bungled fakes that needed to be corrected. A+ So the assassination could be filmed, studied, and shown to the public from many different angles, not just from Zapruder's and Nix's perspectives? --Tommy bumped PS How exactly would "the recreations" (plural?) help the bad guys correct the "bungled" Zapruder and Nix films? So they know how many frames to cut or add? Couldn't they have figured that out without "the recreations" ? What was "bungled" about the Nix's film and the Z-film? --Tommy Edited June 22, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Graves Posted June 22, 2015 Share Posted June 22, 2015 (edited) Greg Burnham, You make an incredibly important point. Why did the U.S. Government make recreations of the assassination when it was in possession of the Z-Film and the Nix film. These films recorded the facts of the assassination. Unless the films were bungled fakes that needed to be corrected. A+ So the assassination could be filmed, studied, and shown to the public from many different angles, not just from Zapruder's and Nix's perspectives? --Tommy bumped PS How exactly would "the recreations" (plural?) help the bad guys correct the "bungled" Zapruder and Nix films? So they could study the recreations and figure our how many frames to cut or add? Couldn't they have figured that out without "the recreations" ? What was "bungled" about the Nix's film and the Z-film, anyway? Expected answer: That's hard to say, Tommy, because as they are today, they're perfect. But it's obvious that they must have been bungled and edited, because why else would they have needed to make the recreations? --Tommy Edited June 22, 2015 by Thomas Graves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted June 22, 2015 Author Share Posted June 22, 2015 (edited) I wish everyone well in their research endeavors. chris Edited July 8, 2015 by Chris Davidson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Davidson Posted June 23, 2015 Author Share Posted June 23, 2015 (edited) I wish everyone well in their research endeavors. chris Edited July 8, 2015 by Chris Davidson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Lloyd Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 Maybe the recreations were produced so that the public could be shown (one/either of) those instead of the Z-film? If there are differences between the recreations and the Z-film (which Chris seems to be demonstrating), then the public could be 'duped'? Let's not forget that the Z-film was kept under wraps until when?...1975? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now