Jump to content
The Education Forum

It's time to play.... Pick That Nose!


Recommended Posts

You ever wonder why no one here has written a single word about vol 1 while you've spent the last year opening up the world of H&L to all sorts of people who want to know what could be so volitile to engulf your time and how you can be so wrong all the time.

Not true, Mr. Josephs. I found at least one individual who has written more than a single word about Volume 1:

"Of note is Greg Parker's account of the 1948 assassination in Bogota of Gaitan by a hypnotized patsy as John Foster Dulles attended a Panamerican conference in that city.

"The assassination was. . .blamed on communists."

http://forum.assassinationofjfk.net/index.php/topic/283-alliance-for-progress-alianza-para-el-progreso/

"Greg Parker in his first of a trilogy, The Cold War of Lee Harvey Oswald, treats the 1948 assassination of Colombian leader Gaitlan as the archetypal lone nut architecture so common in subsequent years. Foster was in Bogota when it went down."

http://forum.assassinationofjfk.net/index.php/topic/122-jfk-assassination-cia-and-new-york-times-are-still-lying-to-us-by-david-talbot/

Yes Randy, Phil is a good friend... These were posted almost 18 months ago...

"Posted 31 March 2014 - 10:28 AM"

"Posted 15 May 2014 - 02:31 AM"

2 post in 18 months... the interest and discussion about the work is overwhelming.

:up

The Harvey and Lee thread here - only one of them - started in 2004, readdressed in 2012, & again with the 29th post in May 2015... over 1400 replies since. No wonder he has grabbed JA's coat tails... a few more people may look his direction now... only now it will be with the understanding of how much contempt a person can have for a fellow researcher to create controversy to garner the littlest bit of attention. You don't suppose Greg used any of the JA ARchive info, Baylor info or anything else John brought to light... nah, never happen.

1,444 replies

54,096 views

You mean you don't even have a few threads at the new ROKC from this year discussing his work among yourselves? Nobody is even bothering with it in his own backyard - you have to go to yet another forum to find these old posts... Nothing here at all?

Yet they have time to create hate threads against the members here and post repeatedly - the attack on Glenn started Aug 1 and already has 28 posts... while no one is discussing either of the books

Guess that gives you all a good idea of the priorities there and why they need to come here to find something to talk about and someone to make fun of - it's what little boys do.

:sun

Glenn Nall

by

steely dan

August 1, 2015 at 8:48 PM

Posts 28

Views 917

Last post 7 hours ago

LOL. At least they know how to stay on topic,

What exactly did you enter this topic for, David? Doesn't appear to have been to address the issue raised, since all you've done is continually try and change topics and attack the messenger.

Guess I thought I was you for a minute...

Why? Cause your topic here is tautological crap and you can't seem to remember the first few pages of this joke when I did address the thread's title and did continue to show you how wrong you are about this....

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22151&page=1#entry311101 is the post where YOU ask me why this is the only photo with the large nose and then

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22151&page=2#entry311639 is you telling me everything you've proven - nothing at all to do with the topic... just you puffing out your chest.

Prove something? Your arrogance is only exceeded by your ignorance.

I have proved that Lee's letter to McBride was written in early September 1956.

I have proved that the alleged "father" and uncle" of "Harvey" are no such thing.

I have proven that tonsils can grow back.

I have proven that you guys have completely misread the school records.

I have proven that Voebel hung around a kid named Bobby Newman who fits Myra Darouse's description of "Harvey" and that she alone claimed that kid preferred to be called "Harvey"

& Lot's more here http://reopenkennedy...ey-lee-evidence

and yet, you've proven none of these.... you CLAIM to have proven them, but nothing you've posted is anything but your faith-based beliefs and speculation. And I addressed that...

I also addressed why there are no other photos of Oswald like that http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22151&page=2#entry312526 (I was on vacation thru the 18th)

When you finally reply http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22151&page=3#entry312554 it is you going off the reservation as you put it.

It is you who brings Gardos and Weinstock into this thread, claiming you ID'd them as "father and uncle" when we both know you only guessed based on your poor reading of the report.

Look in the mirror old man. Throw stones when you've cleaned up your own house...

As for staying on topic... yup - beating up Glenn or me is all you seem to do there.

Seems your little group is much more interested in HATE than in even discussing your own work... Good thing H&L is here so people find some of what you post worth scanning albeit completely wrong and misguided in its presentation and content.

You're remain incredibly transparent in your attempts to garner a little attention on the coat tails of Armstrong. Amazing how little conversation there is across the forums about your work while H&L continues to be discussed, reviewed, analyzed and understood.

Doesn't seem to be much interest about your work at all here. http://gregparke4.wix.com/hardlyleedotnut# remember that? 1 post in April and none since... :up You have such a following!

Then there is http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21911&hl=

Lee Harvey Oswald's Cold War
Started by Greg Parker, May 20 2015 02:33 PM
Yet you seem to be the only person to have posted anything... ???
But then there is your STRAUS Family thread... which proved more what you were NOT talking about than what you were... and was summarily abandoned
-------------------
You've got one helluva track record GP... You can't even muster up interest in your work from your own group of friends while spending months on end with H&L to at least be read and heard on some subject.
Really looking forward to that vol 2
:zzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guess I thought I was you for a minute...

Why? Cause your topic here is tautological crap and you can't seem to remember the first few pages of this joke when I did address the thread's title and did continue to show you how wrong you are about this....

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22151&page=1#entry311101 is the post where YOU ask me why this is the only photo with the large nose and then

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=22151&page=2#entry311639 is you telling me everything you've proven - nothing at all to do with the topic... just you puffing out your chest.

Hmm. You still don't know a tautology from your elbow, I see.

That response does not address the title. Not at all. Doesn't even mention the fake nose.

The nother link you posted was me responded to your "prove something" non sequitur. A direct response. Unlike yours throughout these threads.

Edited by Greg Parker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bumped

This El Toro vs Santa Ana problem .....did Mr. Parker or Mr. Purnell ever address that H & L confirming data ?

There is no problem.

Santa Ana was attached to and under the command of El Toro. Because of that, anyone talking about El Toro could be talking about El Toro itself, Santa Ana - or both. The opposite does not apply. If Santa Ana is mentioned, it can only be reference to Santa Ana.

That you guys see a problem here says it all about your willingness to see whatever you want to see.

PROBLEM ,gaal

Per Armstrong , 'the unit diaries from El Toro from the first half of 1959 have disappeared' link >>> http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Marines.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bumped

This El Toro vs Santa Ana problem .....did Mr. Parker or Mr. Purnell ever address that H & L confirming data ?

There is no problem.

Santa Ana was attached to and under the command of El Toro. Because of that, anyone talking about El Toro could be talking about El Toro itself, Santa Ana - or both. The opposite does not apply. If Santa Ana is mentioned, it can only be reference to Santa Ana.

That you guys see a problem here says it all about your willingness to see whatever you want to see.

PROBLEM ,gaal

Per Armstrong , 'the unit diaries from El Toro from the first half of 1959 have disappeared' link >>> http://harveyandlee.net/Marines/Marines.html

So no admission that this thing about one being at Santa Ana and one being at El Toro is complete malarkey - just the usual switch to some other piece of straw.

Per Parker - where's the proof they disappeared and if you have such proof where is the proof that there is anything unusual about that? Can you demonstrate for example that unit diaries have never been lost in the history of the armed services?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual Parker is wrong again. Two diff places, two different sets of friends and commanding officers, one record.

How long you going to continue this playing the moron ploy? Nobody can be as stupid as you're pretending to be Greg so we know you're being disingenuous and argumentative for grins and giggles with the other little girls you call members.

Why again does no one want to discuss your recent work or book? Oh right, no one cares about your work unless you're attacking John...

Desperate and pathetic is really no way for you to go thru life but to each his own I suppose.

Have you found where the 12 absences come from yet or finally understand that those numbers were made up when that bs record was created so it added to 180...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual Parker is wrong again. Two diff places, two different sets of friends and commanding officers, one record.

How long you going to continue this playing the moron ploy? Nobody can be as stupid as you're pretending to be Greg so we know you're being disingenuous and argumentative for grins and giggles with the other little girls you call members.

Why again does no one want to discuss your recent work or book? Oh right, no one cares about your work unless you're attacking John...

Desperate and pathetic is really no way for you to go thru life but to each his own I suppose.

Have you found where the 12 absences come from yet or finally understand that those numbers were made up when that bs record was created so it added to 180...?

1. Two different places - one under the command of the other.

2. Two different sets of friends and COs... according to YOU..

3. One record for one person. Congratulations.

4. Playing the moron? Because I disagree with you? :sun

5. Why does no one want to discuss my book? Gee... I thought i already addressed that. Seems you have some memory issues, so I'll tell you again. Few are interested in what happened in Bogota in 1948 and the new material on the Oswald clan and related matters was just not familiar territory for people. A lot of readers prefer the familiar. It really is that simple. I will remind you however that Len Ocanic compared it to "Unspeakable" and will add that the lack of interest in what happened in Bogota in 1948 is not universal. At least one prominent writer on both JFK and RFK has taken great interest in it due to recognizing the huge similarities to the RFK case - which really was he whole point of the inclusion.

I will also add that book 2 looks at some very familiar people while adding NEW information about them. I fully expect it it to gain much more attention BECAUSE of that familiarity. If it doesn't, please feel free to gloat as much as you want.

6. "Desperate and pathetic" is entering a thread for the sole purpose of steering it off course and attacking the messenger.

7. Amazing! Now you're saying they added 12 absences so it would add up to 180???? After RESISTING the idea that you needed to ADD those figures together to get the total number of school days... now you change tack with =out admitting any error, to claim they simply made one of the figures up? And you have the gaal to call me names? Unbelievable nerve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:zzz

When you wake up, please go and do some study on the T informant designations. Thanks.

I'll help since you need your nanny nap.

The report states: “A supplementary T symbol (SF T-2) was designated for SF 2496-S (Richard Matsui Aoki) for the limited purpose of describing his connections with the organization and characterizing him. Because of the top level position of this informant this additional designation is considered necessary to insure protection of his identity.” (T symbols are temporary code numbers assigned to sources in reports. The report misstates his middle name.)

https://www.revealnews.org/article/new-fbi-files-show-wide-range-of-black-panther-informants-activities/

Or... in the alternative universe you inhabit, the informant on Ruby moved to SanFran and began informing on the Black Panthers in '67 and "T" stands for THERE IS TWO OF EVERYTHING and is used exclusively for reporting on doppelganger activity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:zzz

When you wake up, please go and do some study on the T informant designations. Thanks.

I'll help since you need your nanny nap.

The report states: “A supplementary T symbol (SF T-2) was designated for SF 2496-S (Richard Matsui Aoki) for the limited purpose of describing his connections with the organization and characterizing him. Because of the top level position of this informant this additional designation is considered necessary to insure protection of his identity.” (T symbols are temporary code numbers assigned to sources in reports. The report misstates his middle name.)

https://www.revealnews.org/article/new-fbi-files-show-wide-range-of-black-panther-informants-activities/

Or... in the alternative universe you inhabit, the informant on Ruby moved to SanFran and began informing on the Black Panthers in '67 and "T" stands for THERE IS TWO OF EVERYTHING and is used exclusively for reporting on doppelganger activity.

Greg,

You realize of course that there are never innocent mistakes made in media reports, or, for that matter, in CIA, FBI, Marine Corps, or DPD reports, or the relaying of rumors and hearsay statements in said reports, and that the article you posted confirms something that I've suspected for a long, long time indeed -- Matsui and Masato were chosen by the bad guys at birth to participate in an evil evil doppelganger project some twenty years later. The fact that they grew up looking exactly alike was not a coincidence, but is obviously more proof of how powerful and omniscient the bad guys really, really are.

We live in a truly dangerous world, my friend, and it's a good thing I like green cheese because I'm moving to the moon. Praise the Lord and Good Golly Miss Molly, I've recently read a 1000-page book that proves that the moon is made out of it! I just hope they have 55-gallon drums of cooked pinto beans there, too.

--Tommy :sun

Edited by Thomas Graves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:zzz

When you wake up, please go and do some study on the T informant designations. Thanks.

I'll help since you need your nanny nap.

The report states: “A supplementary T symbol (SF T-2) was designated for SF 2496-S (Richard Matsui Aoki) for the limited purpose of describing his connections with the organization and characterizing him. Because of the top level position of this informant this additional designation is considered necessary to insure protection of his identity.” (T symbols are temporary code numbers assigned to sources in reports. The report misstates his middle name.)

https://www.revealnews.org/article/new-fbi-files-show-wide-range-of-black-panther-informants-activities/

Or... in the alternative universe you inhabit, the informant on Ruby moved to SanFran and began informing on the Black Panthers in '67 and "T" stands for THERE IS TWO OF EVERYTHING and is used exclusively for reporting on doppelganger activity.

That's interesting Greg... I believe Lee Farley posted this at one time - I also have the WCR doc that describes Dallas T-2 as Harry Holmes... yet gives no name for T-1 other than his being a Royal Canadian Mounted Policeman...

DL T-1 was FELIX BOTELLO

DL T-2 was MARGARITA LANDIN (Her husband Joe Landin was also an active informant of the Dallas FBI Office)

DL T-3 and DL 6-S are concealed but I'd hazard a guess that Joe Molina/William Lowery/Joe Landin could be one of them

DL T-4 was RUTH LOWERY

So your point was that in the 2 reports I posted the homosexual informant, T-1 mentioned in both, are different people?

The FBI list (DL 100-10461) shows Charles Steele Jr as Dallas T-14 and just goes on and on.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So your point was that in the 2 reports I posted the homosexual informant, T-1 mentioned in both, are different people?
Yes, they are different people.
The T1, T2 etc designations are used in documents to protect not only the name of the source but the real FBI informant number. Another layer of informant security.
The homosexual informant was used in other big cases to infiltrate and inform. He is still among the living and I will contact him during the course of writing the next volume. He did not know Oswald or Crafard and there is no doubt in my mind Crafard, like Ruby, swung both ways. In fact, I think that was a big part of why he did so much hitch-hiking. It served a dual purpose.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LEE ??

Posted 16 August 2015 - 02:23 PM , (Gaal) Gee you probably didn't understand. gaal

Bill Simpich

====================

Banister was good at this kind of thing -- he had people such as his associate Don Campbell and staffer Tommy Baumler working to infiltrate left-wing college groups. [31] Someone had to spy on the New Orleans Council for Peaceful Alternatives, who invited troublemakers like Father Phil Berrigan to speak on the immorality of nuclear weapons.

In May, Oswald started off by leaving FPCC fliers at the Tulane Library, a good way to flush out pro-Castro types that might try to infiltrate anti-communist groups. [32] In June, he was leafleting sailors at the USS Wasp. Using the waterfront was second nature for an ex-Marine like Oswald. No surprise that FPCC agitation at the harbor resulted in the circulation of the Oswald legend throughout military intelligence.

The DRE had been thoroughly penetrated by Carlos Bringuier's relative Jorge, and was considered totally insecure by the CIA

The DRE took the CIA's money but were difficult to work with. This group was young, motivated, and very dangerous. In August 1962, they shelled government buildings in Havana and then bragged about it, while Castro was infuriated at this latest act of terrorism and attempted assassination. They attracted the attention of the Cuban's government's DGI. The role of the DGI in Cuba was to penetrate counter-revolutionary organizations. Counterintelligence analyst Ray Rocca made it very clear years later that he agreed that the DRE was heavily infiltrated by Cuban government DGI agents by 1962.

Several CIA officers had also concluded that the DRE was totally insecure. Officer Calvin Thomas was concerned that the DRE might have even played a role in killing Kennedy.

Jorge Bringuier was the brother-in-law of New Orleans DRE leader Carlos Bringuier. (While DRE official Juan Salvat describes him as nephew, Carlos says brother-in-law.) Jorge Bringuier disgraced the family by becoming a Castro agent and betraying the Cuban wing of the DRE. After he became national coordinator in Cuba in 1962, just about all of the Cuban DRE members were arrested. There's a contemporaneous memo about this betrayal in early 1963. Jorge was pitched to defect on 12/6/63, and he sent a telegram to his mother on 12/13 saying that he was "out" and with the Americans. Jorge was a CIA agent by 1968.

In late July, ten Cuban exiles traveled from Miami to New Orleans and joined an anti-Castro training camp north of New Orleans. This training camp was on the land of Michael McLaney, a friend of "gamblers in Cuba", and the new arrivals at the camp had obtained some dynamite and were planning to bomb Cuban oil refineries. The leader of the dynamite procurement was Victor Espinosa Hernandez. Espinosa's group asked New Orleans DRE leader Carlos Bringuier to assist them. Bringuier had worked for some time in the same building as Banister, serving as the press and propaganda secretary of the aforementioned CRC.

On July 31, the FBI swooped into a home in the New Orleans area and seized a ton of dynamite, bomb casings, napalm material and other devices. Eleven people were arrested. Bringuier escaped arrest. Why? It looks like US intelligence forces wanted a more subtle approach to test Bringuier's loyalties.

Oswald Came to Center Stage After the Arms Seizure As An Asset

This arms seizure by the FBI triggered Oswald to go public, who had been working with Banister doing some quiet leafleting on behalf of the FPCC. At a minimum, Oswald was being used as an asset, defined by the House Select Committe on Assassinations as "anyone used in an operation or project, whether or not that (person) is aware that he is being used". The CIA referred to a person who did not know that he had done anything to help the CIA as an "unwilling co-optee". Whether he knew it or not, Oswald was being used as a counter-intelligence asset.

1. The main goal was to make the FPCC look bad.

2. Incidentally, an anti-FPCC operation would divert public attention from the recent terrorist plans of the anti-Castro underground. This vigilante plan to napalm Cuba did not look good.

3. Along the way, it made sense to try to determine if Carlos Bringuier might be pro-Castro, or if Jorge Bringuier could be brought back into the anti-Castro fold. Carlos may have been used by those using Oswald.

===

OH yeah WINK ;) ,gaal

================

The CIA examined Celso Hernandez as a Castro penetration agent

There is an intriguing report of FPCC member Oswald being arrested with Celso Hernandez in New Orleans in late 1962 (see pp. 6-7, (follow-up at pp. 16-18) The ID of Hernandez was made years later and is admittedly shaky. The ID of Oswald is more substantive, as he id'd himself to the police as an FPCC member - but he was living in the Dallas area. The story is that the two men were picked up at the lakefront in Celso's work truck, owned by an electronics firm that was Celso's employer.

The most important thing is that right about this time, Bill Harvey - who worked both the wiretapping side and the Cuban beat for the CIA during 1962 - was tipped off on 10/1/62 that Celso Hernandez might be a communist. This kicked off an investigation that revealed in the autumn of 1963 that there was a left-wing Celso and a right-wing Celso, and a brother and sister who couldn't agree on who was who. [33] Oswald and Celso Hernandez were arrested together again in August 1963. What we do know is that throughout this era, Hernandez was under close scrutiny as a possible pro-Castro infiltrator. Below, we see Oswald's interactions with Carlos and Celso.

==

[33] Bill Harvey - who worked both the wiretapping side and the Cuban beat for the CIA during 1962 - was tipped off on 10/1/62 that Celso Hernandez might be a communist: For the 1962 Oswald-Hernandez arrest, see memo from investigator John Volz to DA Jim Garrison, 3/1/67, pp. 6-7, (follow-up at pp. 16-18) RIF# 180-10085-10407. http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/41827/rec/3 =======

end older post,gaal

=========================================
THE IDEA THAT LHO WAS PART OF CE IS BOLSTERED BY THE STORY OF RCN. (AND YES THIS thus bolsterers Harvey & Lee ,gaal)
======================
coun·ter·es·pi·o·nage (AKA CE)
ˌkoun(t)ərˈespēəˌnäZH,ˌkoun(t)ərˈespēəˌnäj/
noun
noun: counter-espionage
  1. activities designed to prevent or thwart spying by an enemy.

=============================================================

LHO MONITORS COMMUNIST HERNANDEZ ( A CE TYPE OF OPERATION).,gaal

see https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=144378#relPageId=2 (link Hernandez above)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DAVE REITZES

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/nagell3.htm

Richard Case Nagell

"He specified November 1957 as the time that he and Oswald supposedly became involved in a CIA operation targeting Soviet colonel Nikolai Eroshkin."

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Simpich

[...]

The CIA examined Celso Hernandez as a Castro penetration agent

There is an intriguing report of FPCC member Oswald being arrested with Celso Hernandez in New Orleans in late 1962 (see pp. 6-7, (follow-up at pp. 16-18) The ID of Hernandez was made years later and is admittedly shaky. The ID of Oswald is more substantive, as he id'd himself to the police as an FPCC member - but he was living in the Dallas area. The story is that the two men were picked up at the lakefront in Celso's work truck, owned by an electronics firm that was Celso's employer.

The most important thing is that right about this time, Bill Harvey - who worked both the wiretapping side and the Cuban beat for the CIA during 1962 - was tipped off on 10/1/62 that Celso Hernandez might be a communist. This kicked off an investigation that revealed in the autumn of 1963 that there was a left-wing Celso and a right-wing Celso, and a brother and sister who couldn't agree on who was who. [33] Oswald and Celso Hernandez were arrested together again in August 1963. What we do know is that throughout this era, Hernandez was under close scrutiny as a possible pro-Castro infiltrator. Below, we see Oswald's interactions with Carlos and Celso.

==

[33] Bill Harvey - who worked both the wiretapping side and the Cuban beat for the CIA during 1962 - was tipped off on 10/1/62 that Celso Hernandez might be a communist: For the 1962 Oswald-Hernandez arrest, see memo from investigator John Volz to DA Jim Garrison, 3/1/67, pp. 6-7, (follow-up at pp. 16-18) RIF# 180-10085-10407. http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/41827/rec/3 =======

end older post,gaal

=========================================
THE IDEA THAT LHO WAS PART OF CE IS BOLSTERED BY THE STORY OF RCN. (AND YES THIS thus bolsterers Harvey & Lee ,gaal)
======================
[...]

=============================================================

LHO MONITORS COMMUNIST CELSO HERNANDEZ ( A CE TYPE OF OPERATION).,gaal

see https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=144378#relPageId=2 (link Hernandez above)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

DAVE REITZES

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/nagell3.htm

Richard Case Nagell

"He specified November 1957 as the time that he and Oswald supposedly became involved in a CIA operation targeting Soviet colonel Nikolai Eroshkin."

In 1967, Garrison spoke with police officer Charles Noto. Noto remembered the arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald as having occurred possibly in 1963, but probably in October or November of 1962.

See page 18:

http://digitalcollections.baylor.edu/cdm/compoundobject/collection/po-arm/id/41827/rec/3%20

Oswald was in inveterate prevaricator to authorities, IMHO, so it's not surprising at all that he told the arresting officers in New Orleans in late 1962 that he was living in Dallas. He didn't exactly have a driver's license to show them, did he?

Pray tell, how could Oswald's counter espionage activities in Japan in 1957 and in New Orleans in 1962 possibly "bolster" the Harvey and Lee theory?

--Tommy :sun

PS It makes a lot more sense to have the-one-and-only, New Orleans-dwelling, Lee Harvey Oswald running around New Orleans doing "CE" work in late 1962 than to have your "Dallas-dwelling Lee" do it while your "Minsk-dwelling Harvey" was dwelling in, well ... Minsk. For rather obvious reasons. Hint Hint: Like not wanting to bump into any of his old friends or acquaintances.

Edited by Thomas Graves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1967, Garrison spoke with police officer Charles Noto. Noto remembered the arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald as having occurred possibly in 1963, but probably in October or November of 1962.

See page 18:

http://digitalcollec...id/41827/rec/3

Oswald was in inveterate prevaricator to authorities, IMHO, so it's not surprising at all that he told the arresting officers in New Orleans in late 1962 that he was living in Dallas. He didn't exactly have a driver's license to show them, did he?

Pray tell, how could Oswald's counter espionage activities in Japan in 1957 and in New Orleans in 1962 possibly "bolster" the Harvey and Lee theory?

--Tommy :sun

PS It makes a lot more sense to have the one and only, New Orleans-dwelling, Lee Harvey Oswald running around New Orleans doing "CE" work in late 1962 than to have your "Dallas-dwelling Lee" do it while your "Misnk-dwelling Harvey" was dwelling in ... Minsk. For rather obvious reasons. Hint: Like not wanting to bump into any of his old friends or acquaintances.

(Tommy :sun,gaal)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  • NOTO WAS WRONG ABOUT DATE. OFFICER LOUSTEAU GAVE INFORMATION/DATA THAT CORRECTS OFFICER NOTO (see Baylor Documents refs below)
  • LHO WAS SEEN BY LOUSTEAU 1961,while another OSWALD in RUSSIA..gaal

==============================================================================================================================

GO TO THE BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ARMSTRONG FILES. link >>> http://digitalcollec...id/41827/rec/3

You will see Oct 15,1959-June 11,1962 then CLICK ON THE DOWNLOAD BUTTON BOX on the right. YOU WILL DOWN LOAD A PDF FILE (41810 pdf).

After download you will see COVER SHEET BOX 16 Notebook 2 TAB 79 Charles Noto.

GO TO Pages 9,11,12,14 and 16

DAVID LOUSTEAU - INTERVIEW WITH

As you remember from our interview with CHUCK, NOTO, Mr. NOTO stated that around October of November of 1962 he arrested 2 men on the Lakefront, one of whom was supposed to be LEE HARVEY OSWALD. He gauged his time in regard to the fact that MARCEL CHAMPON was working late during the time because they were trying to "knock off" a Mr. JOSEPH CRONIN. Mr. LOUSTEAU also said that he can recall the particular incident that NOTO was talking about, but he cannot place any faces or any names. He did take a look at the photograph and said that this man is always around the Lakefront area fishing; that he has talked to him on several occasion; ...but that he knovs this incident could not have been in

Octobber or November of 1962 because JOE CRONIN was .not working for the Levee Board at that time.

As the date of Mr. CRONIN's departure from the Levee Board seemed to be pertinent to the situation, especially to Mr. CRONIN"s presence in the Levee Eoard Police Station late at nioht, I contacted Miss Teal at the main office of the Orleans Levee'Board and ascertained that_Mr. JOSEPH CRONIN was dismissed from the Orleans Levee Board in Mav of 1962. You will recall "that OSWALD did not get into the United States until June 10, 1962 when he arrived in Dallas from Russia.

+++++++++++++++++
PHOTO OSWALD >>> THIS IS PART OF GARRISON INVESTIGATION OF JFK ASSASSINATION AND LAST SENTENCE GIVES THE CONTEXT THATS ITS AN OSWALD PROBLEM WHICH GARRISON ADDRESSED AS "impersonators" ,
gaal (copy problems via paste and Baylor photo file)

LEE in New Orleans Safe House working electronics game (fishing a lot )

LEE in Dallas at Diceman Apt with Ruby. //GAAL see link http://educationforu...=21547&p=297203

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

" wanting to bump into any of his old friends" GRAVES QUOTE.

New Orleans is a big area. Im sure that the haunts of the Oswald family were known and the data suggests he hung out so to speak in a small area "fishing". I guess the fishing area was a safe one for less , "bumping". /// gaal

==
The anti H & L crowd has asked ad nauseam about the why of the HARVEY/LEE double program. I am showing a pattern of behavior (behaviour British) of the OSWALDS in Japan and New Orleans that show CE activity. Pattern bolstering credibility is an obvious maxim that even a man contemplating the green cheese in his naval should see. THANKS gaal

Edited by Steven Gaal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...