Jump to content
The Education Forum

McGoo

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

McGoo's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. I read your opinions with interest and as always on this subject, become increasingly confused by the never ending web of possible scenarios, motives, conspirators etc. The 'cover up' comes from the top in my opinion. LBJ, Hoover, CIA etc. Take any 'run of the mill' murder. In most cases you have a victim, a likely motive, at most 2 or 3 main suspects and where there is no immediate conclusion, an investigating team of police etc. The JFK murder required all of the usual ingredients to be diluted beyond belief to effectively cover the tracks of the true conspirators. To do this requires long term maticulous planning, financing, media control, government involvement, dummy leads, witnesses with conflicting stories, rumours, more rumours, a few more rumours etc. Who could achieve this level of deceit? Probably all the very people who benefitted most from the assassination. I believe we will never know the truth and to a great extent, we will only ever know what the powers that be want us to know. Disinformation, drip feeding, evidence being witheld and ignored at the time, seemingly sloppy police work, etc. The perfect crime. The countries top pathologists couldn't even agree on where the back wounds were, whether the throat wound was a bullet hole or the result of a trachaeostomy. Have you ever heard of anything so ridiculous?
  2. Two theories. Firstly various other films such as that shot by Orville Nix appear to fit with the timing of the Zapruder film which makes me doubt that it has been edited to any great extent. A camera dropping frames, say 1 in 13 every now and then may produce similar results as the irregular physical actions of some of the subjects. Second, the entire conspiracy/lone-gunman arguement is based on the Zapruder film and other images and audio recorded during the assassination. The CIA, FBI, MI5 etc. etc. use a very powerful opinion manipulation method where by misinforming and confusing us, they can make us believe anything, or dis-believe as the case may be. The Zapruder film may be a classic example of this. Using the excuse that the people of America were not ready to witness the Zapruder film until Geraldo first aired it in 1975 would have given them 12 years to work on the film to show us what they wanted us to see. If the film in any way halped to clear things up and give us an idea who was involved, do you think it would have been aired, ever? If it was expected to muddy the waters and make people even more confused then it worked well. The more opinions and theories they can construct the less likely we are of ever finding the truth.
  3. OK. I have been researching this for a while using various resources such as Burkes Peerage in the UK. The ones I cannot find any link to this family line so far are as follows.... 15 James Buchanan 1861 16 Abraham Lincoln 1865 17 Andrew Johnson 1869 20 James A. Garfield 1881 - 1881 21 Chester A. Arthur 1885 25 William McKinley 1901 28 Woodrow Wilson 1921 33 Harry S. Truman 1953 34 Dwight David Eisenhower 1961 35 John F. Kennedy 1963 36 Lyndon B. Johnson 1969 39 Jimmy Carter 1981 42 Bill Clinton 2001 So, of these 13, apparently 4 are members of this blood line. My original question to this forum was whether anyone knew if LBJ was linked and if so, could this have been a possible motive for the killing of JFK who was not. I have also been studying the involvement of groups such as Bilderberg who seem to have more control over what happens in the political world than anyone could imagine. I know that guys like Bill Clinton were heavily linked to this and that JFK revered them.
  4. I agree the Bush family are probably the biggest family of crooks in the US and didn't become wealthy selling tea towels door to door or laying bricks. Look Here However, I would not dismiss this 'coincidence' as something trivial, of course we are all related if you go back far enough. I am not (I don't think) a member of the Sax Coburg family and would be surprised if you or your neighbours are. But the bulk of US presidents are or have been related to each other. Start Here......... Maybe Kennedy, or The Kennedy family, were a threat to this succession of rule. They had the financial means to 'buy' the vote in Chicago for instance and ultimately the keys to the Whitehouse. The motive for his assassination could have been to get 'the family' back in power? It's a motive pretty much ignored by JFK scholars and I am really interested to hear some eductaed views on this as a possibility.
  5. In America, are people aware that.............. Of 43 American Presidents to date, 34 can trace their ancestory back to the Sax-Coburg bloodline. The British Monarchs, known to their neighbours as the Windsor family, are actually the Sax Coburg family. The bloodline can be traced back a lot further than this if you can be bothered to do your research. Other people who belong to this bloodline include Winston Churchill, Earl Spencer (Princess Diana's Father) and many more. Kennedy was not a part of this as far as I can establish. Is anyone else aware of this and was LBJ a Sax Coburg? The Bush family are up there to and I wonder if John Kerry can stake a claim to the US Throne. Interestingly, Al Gore's family are also part of this tree which makes me wonder why Jeb Bush's Florida state was where the recount was required. My theory is that it was to buy time for the family heads to decide which of the 2 princes should be crowned king. Finally, as I am rambling now, all European Monarchs are members of the Sax Coburg gang. Note that the countries who supported the UK and the US in Iraq were all MONARCHIES. Some food for thought maybe? McGoo
×
×
  • Create New...