Jump to content
The Education Forum

Gil Jesus

Members
  • Posts

    1,539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/JFK63Conspiracy/videos
  • MSN
    Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@giljesus8298/videos
  • Website URL
    www.gil-jesus.com
  • ICQ
    email: GJJmail120253@aol.com
  • Yahoo
    posts: https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/user/86/recent

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    United States
  • Interests
    20th Century American History, JFK assassination

Recent Profile Visitors

14,511 profile views

Gil Jesus's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Dedicated
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

  1. Pointing out that we don't know when the rifle was assembled is not speculation. You didn't say that. You suggested that Oswald reassembled the rifle earlier that morning. Again, you have no evidence to support that. That's called speculation. You're the one attempting to artificially narrow down the window of opportunity. Narrowing what window ? You've got him reassembling the rifle sometime between 8am and 12:25 pm. Isn't that YOUR window ? What evidence did you produce to support that ? ** Answer: NONE Oswald feigning lack of interest? You're speculating again. You have no evidence to support that either. I said sixth floor, not building, So now you have Oswald assembling the rifle on the sixth floor sometime that morning while the crew was present laying down a new floor ? but thank you for admitting that Oswald had access. As I pointed out, so did the rest of the world. What's your point ? Thank you for admitting that Oswald had legitimate, work-related reasons to make unsupervised visits to the sixth floor at various times, including the morning hours of 11/22. With a crew present laying down a new floor and nobody saw him reassembling the rifle ? Nobody knew he was even on the floor ? I rest my case. What case ? You haven't provided one stitch of evidence to prove anything you've said. No testimony, no documents, no exhibits, no photographs. Nothing. You've provided nothing but your own opinions without fact. And you haven't addressed one point I've made or answered one single question that I've asked you. Yeah, some case you've got there.
  2. It certainly does matter if the shooting was at 12:30 and Oswald is seen on the first floor at 12:25 and it takes six minutes to reassemble the rifle. That makes it impossible for him to have done the shooting at 12:30. Do the math. And while you can speculate that he somehow assembled the rifle earlier in the day somewhere in the building without being seen, there's no evidence to support that. The lack of evidence "allows" me to rule that out. In fact, there's evidence that he didn't even know the motorcade was coming by his building until after 9:00 am, when he asked James Jarman why the people were gathering outside and which way the motorcade might come. ( 3 H 201 ) ( see also 24 H 213 ) To your argument that Oswald had access to the building prior to 12:25, the truth is ANYBODY had access to that building prior to 12:25. It was not locked up. There was no security. Access was not controlled. Anybody could have gotten into that building and used the elevators to get to the sixth floor after everyone had gone to lunch and/or were outside waiting for the motorcade. So your argument that Oswald had access to the building is a moot point. It proves nothing. The "sniper's nest" was nothing more than a row of boxes that had been moved into the southeast corner because they were laying down a new floor. According to Oswald’s supervisor, William Shelley, that morning Oswald had been filling orders for Scott-Foresman Publishing, one of the tenants of the Texas School Book Depository building. In fact, Shelley testified that Oswald filled mostly Scott-Foresman orders. ( 6 H 332 ) Superintendent Roy Truly testified that overflow stock of Scott-Foresman books were kept on the sixth floor and that Oswald, “had occasion to go to the sixth floor quite a number of times every day, each day after books.” ( 3 H 215 ) Studebaker Exhibit A shows evidence that cartons of Scott-Foresman books were in the southeast corner of the sixth floor and made up part of the “wall” that was the “sniper’s nest”. In fact, Charles Givens testified that he saw Oswald coming from the southeast corner at 11:55 pm ( 6 H 349 ) and he had his, "board with his orders on it." So we would expect to find Oswald's fingerprints on cartons in that area if he were moving cartons in his search for books to fill those orders. Now, I've provided evidence that Oswald's prints on the cartons were part of his doing his job. Tell us how do you get from Oswald's prints being on the cartons, to him firing a rifle ? And when did Zahm say the ten shots were for sighting in the rifle for the FIRST TIME ? I can't find that in his testimony. Please post your source for that.
  3. Exactly. And you can't sight a scope in without firing test shots. Period.
  4. "Disassembling and reassembling a precision weapon will cause “zero shift”, that is a change in point of aim vs. point of impact." - Chris Everett, gun expert.
  5. Thank you for expressing that Greg. Either the 40" rifle was brought into the building in the 38-inch "paper gunsack" disassembled and had to be sighted-in by firing ten shots, or the rifle was brought into the building intact and the "gunsack" is a fake that never contained the rifle. They can take their pick, but they can't have it both ways. They can't have a 40" rifle in a 38" package. Let's see them squirm out of this one. Don't hold your breath waiting for any answers to your questions.
  6. There's plenty of evidence to support the fact that Oswald ate his lunch in the first floor "Domino Room" on November 22nd. He didn't eat his lunch in the second floor lunchroom. Mrs. Robert Reid testified that she was in the second floor lunchroom between Noon and 12:30. ( 3 H 271 ) She never mentioned Oswald being there. Oswald said he had lunch with a co-worker he knew as "Junior" and another Negro whose name he did not know. James "Junior" Jarman testified that he had his lunch on the first floor and Harold Norman testified that the had his lunch in the first floor Domino Room. ( 3 H 188 ) How did Oswald know the specific whereabouts of these two men if he was on the 6th floor, as you claim ? Jarman testified that Oswald typically ate his lunch either in the Domino Room or at the coffee table on the first floor. ( 3 H 200 ) Charles Givens testified that Oswald "always" ate lunch in the Domino Room. ( 6 H 354 ) Victoria Adams came down the rear stairway from the fourth floor after the shooting and saw no one on the second floor. ( 6 H 389 ) Not only did she not see Oswald on the second floor, she testified that she saw neither Off. Baker nor Roy Truly on the stairway. ( ibid., pg. 390 ) Oswald had his lunch on the first floor as he always did and remained on the first floor where he was seen by Carolyn Arnold, "between the front doors and the double doors on the FIRST floor" ( CD 5, pg. 41 ) when she left the building, "at about 12:25 PM". ( CD 706, pg. 7 ) If Oswald was on the first floor at 12:25, he could NOT have been the shooter on the sixth floor at 12:30. Because when the FBI tried to assemble the rifle using a dime, it took them SIX minutes to do so. ( 2 H 252 ) In addition, any rifleman will tell you that once a rifle is disassembled, the scope has to be readjusted because you lose "Zero" ( the POI or Point of Impact ). The Commission's own expert on the scope, Sgt. James Zahm, testified that in order to scope the rifle in, Oswald would have had to have fired ten rounds through the weapon. ( 11 H 308 ) The first was not possible if Oswald was on the first floor at 12:25. The second was not possible once Oswald had the weapon in the building, as you claim. There's no way he could have fired off ten rounds without anyone knowing and scoped that rifle in once he reassembled it. Now, I've given you chapter and verse on why Oswald was not the shooter on the sixth floor at 12:30. Name one witness who puts Oswald on the 6th floor with a rifle in his hands at that time. BTW, you still haven't answered my OTHER question: Baker testified that he saw Oswald being interrogated while he was writing out his affidavit in a back room in the Homicide Bureau. ( 3 H 257-258 ) Why didn't Baker put in his written affidavit that the man they had in custody ( Oswald ) was the man he encountered in the building ?
  7. Who said anything about Truly ? The subject here is Baker. YOU said Baker mentioned his encounter with Oswald in his affidavit of 11/22. He did not. He mentioned an encounter with a man whose description he gave did NOT match Oswald. Baker gave his affidavit sometime between 3pm and 2am on the 23rd. We know that because it was Detective Marvin Johnson who took that affidavit. And Johnson wrote in his report that he didn't arrive at police headquarters that day until 3pm and stayed until 2 am. ( 24 H 307 ) Baker gave his affidavit AFTER Oswald was in police custody and police had in their possession "his tan jacket". In his testimony, he admitted that he saw Oswald, "when I went to give the affidavit." ( 3 H 257 ) So why doesn't his affidavit say that he recognized the man he saw in the police station as the man he encountered in the building ? Because the man he encountered on the "third or fourth floor" wearing a "light brown jacket" WASN'T Oswald. Baker's description of the jacket matches that of JOHN POWELL, a prisoner in the county jail who claimed to see two men adjusting the scope of a rifle. They were darker skinned than whites and appeared to be wearing "brownish or duller clothes like work clothes." ( Dallas Norning News, 12/19/78 ) Baker encountered a man on the third or fourth floor wearing a light brown ( work ) jacket. And the Commission didn't ask him ONE QUESTION about his SWORN affidavit. Even though at the time of his testimony ( 3/25/64 ), he was still saying the man he encountered was wearing a light brown jacket. ( 3 H 257 ) **But since you wanna change the subject to Roy Truly, consider this: If that man was one of the men John Powell saw and was involved in the shooting and Roy Truly vouched for him, then Roy Truly was involved in the President's assassination as well. Oswald was one of two men Truly hired and it was Truly who assigned Oswald to the Depository building. The other man was sent to the warehouse down the street. ( FBI file # 105-82555, Sec A-3, pg. 58 ). It was Truly who put Oswald in the building. It was Truly who let Oswald leave the building ( James Jarman Testimony to HSCA, 9-25-77, pgs. 2-3 ). And it was Truly who then turned the police on to him. Consider also that it was Truly who allowed two rifles to be brought into the building the day after the motorcade route was publicized as going in front of the TSBD. In addition, Truly "disapproved strongly" of Kennedy's policies abroad and considered him a "race-mixer" at home. ( Manchester, The Death of a President, pg. 49 ) For all we know, it was Truly who put that C2766 rifle in the building. In a normal criminal investigation, your star witness Mr. Truly, would have been given closer scutiny. But because he cooperated with the framing of Oswald and the subsequent coverup, he wasn't.
  8. That's not true. Nowhere in that affidavit does he identify the man he saw as Oswald. In fact, his description of the man does NOT match Oswald. YOU identify the man as Oswald, not Baker.
  9. Another hero in the search for the truth has passed. RIP Jim G.
  10. In a January 11, 1964 memo, "For the Members of the Commission", Chief Counsel J. Lee Rankin outlined the areas of the Commission's "work". In this memo, he used the phrases, "Lee Harvey Oswald as the Assassin of President Kennedy", "Evidence Demonstrating Oswald's Guilt", "Evidence Identifying Oswald as the Assassin of President Kennedy", the "Permissable Inferences of Oswald's Murder of Tippit", "Lee Harvey Oswald: Background and Possible Motives" and "Lee H. Oswald as the Assassin". Keep in mind that this memo naming Oswald as the President's lone assassin, was written almost one month BEFORE the Commission heard its first witness or saw its first piece of evidence. This was NOT a criminal investigation. This was a collection of evidence against one suspect who had been deemed guilty by his accusers. If this were a court case, you could say that the verdict was in before the trial had even begun. And there'd be no defense.
  11. Oswald would not have been interrogated after he asked for a lawyer. His family would not have been denied access to him on Friday evening. His use of a phone to contact a lawyer would not have been delayed until 1:40 pm on Saturday. The interrogation sessions would have been recorded or transcribed. No lineups would have been conducted without defense counsel present. The lineups would have been conducted fairly, not using "fillers" that did not resemble witnesses' descriptions, like blonds, teenagers or a Mexican. Oswald would have been assigned counsel at the Tippit arraignment, as required by Texas law. The paper "gunsack" would have been in the crime scene photographs. Witnesses who saw the "package" he allegedly brought to work that morning would have identified the 38 inch "gunsack" as the package he had. Jack Dougherty would have seen the package when Oswald entered the building. The shells recovered from the Tippit murder scene would have matched the bullets removed from Tippit's body. The autopsy photographs would have matched the autopsy x-rays and the autopsy report. A solid "chain of custody" would have been established for ALL of the evidence. Oswald's receipt of the weapons would have been established by identifying the persons who handed him the weapons at the Dallas Post Office and at REA Express. Witnesses who found items would have positively identified the evidence in the government's possession as the items they found. Every effort would have been made to protect the prisoner after death threats were received by police and the FBI. This included transferring the prisoner under the cover of darkness.
  12. Especially when it was the testimonial dinner for Thomas in Houston the night before that lured Kennedy to Texas. According to Wikipedia, Thomas was a protégé of Texas Senator (later President) Lyndon B. Johnson but maintained a generally conservative voting record. Thomas was planning not to run for another term in Congress because he had cancer. The dinner was to convince him to stay on. After the assassination, he decided to stay on, dying of cancer while in office on Feb. 15, 1966. There are FBI reports that said that as early as 1961, people who visited Dallas, upon returning home, were commenting that if Kennedy ever went to Dallas, they would kill him. And Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't even in the country at that time.
  13. A look at the atmosphere in the city of Dallas leading up to the assassination of President Kennedy. https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/nut-country.mp4
  14. And yet in the Tippit killing, he flees on foot, even though he has $13.87 in his pocket. He has the money to hail a taxi or jump on a bus when he gets to Jefferson Ave., but he flees on foot. Different M.O. He discards his jacket, but keeps the gun that ties him to the murder. Then he beats the Texas Theater out of 90 cents to hide inside. I agree, some planning. A criminal mastermind.
×
×
  • Create New...