IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Inside the Assassination Records Review Board
John Simkin
post Nov 21 2009, 11:41 AM
Post #1


Super Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 14081
Joined: 16-December 03
From: Worthing, Sussex
Member No.: 7



Doug Horne worked on the staff of the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) in Washington, DC for the final 3 years of the Review Board's 4-year lifespan, from August 1995 through September 1998. He was hired as a Senior Analyst on the Military Records Team, and was later promoted to the position of Chief Analyst for Military Records (i.e., the Head of the Military Records Team).

Doug's book, Inside the Assassination Records Review Board will be published next month. He has agreed to discuss the book on the forum.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKhomeD.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
William Kelly
post Jan 4 2010, 08:18 PM
Post #2


Super Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 5034
Joined: 20-October 05
Member No.: 3667



QUOTE (John Simkin @ Nov 21 2009, 11:41 AM) *
Doug Horne worked on the staff of the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) in Washington, DC for the final 3 years of the Review Board's 4-year lifespan, from August 1995 through September 1998. He was hired as a Senior Analyst on the Military Records Team, and was later promoted to the position of Chief Analyst for Military Records (i.e., the Head of the Military Records Team).

Doug's book, Inside the Assassination Records Review Board will be published next month. He has agreed to discuss the book on the forum.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/JFKhomeD.htm


Now that some of the forum members have IARRB and are reading it, I thought that Doug Horne might now answer some questions, though I understand he might be a little burnt out and maybe want to wait until things settle down a little more.

My first question is why weren't the Paines questioned?

I asked that same question to an ARRB lawyer at the AARC conference in 2004 and the response was they decided - who decided? to concentrate on the medical evidence and not bother with the rest. I don't think that answer is appropriate since the Paines were not questioned by the HSCA and Michael Paine had said in the meantime that he saw the backyard photo the first time he met Oswald, so there's a discrepency in the record there that should have been rectified.

And as you have shown in your book, if they decided to concentrate on the medical records, why weren't they done more thorough, leaving many issues hanging, like the two brain exams that could have been resolved by recalling Humes and Boswell?

And thanks for all you've done Doug,
BK


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dean Hagerman
post Jan 4 2010, 10:24 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 583
Joined: 1-November 09
From: Redding California
Member No.: 6285



I have some questions for Doug on Vol 4

Just wanted to say great job Doug, your books are very easy to read and I am enjoying them very much

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 08:59 PM