Jump to content


Spartacus

Wikileaks Press Release on Sealed Indictment of Assange


3 replies to this topic

#1 Douglas Caddy

Douglas Caddy

    Super Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,958 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, Texas

Posted 28 February 2012 - 10:50 PM

PRESS RELEASE - STRATFOR EMAILS: US HAS ISSUED SEALED INDICTMENT AGAINST JULIAN ASSANGE
Tuesday 28th February 2012 18:30 GMT

http://wikileaks.org...Has-Issued.html

Confidential emails obtained from the US private intelligence firm Stratfor show that the United States Government has had a secret indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for more than 12 months.

Fred Burton, Stratfor’s Vice-President for Counterterrorism and Corporate Security, is a former Deputy Chief of the Department of State’s (DoS) counterterrorism division for the Diplomatic Security Service (DSS).

In early 2011, Burton revealed in internal Stratfor correspondence that a secret Grand Jury had already issued a sealed indictment for Assange: "Not for Pub — We have a sealed indictment on Assange. Pls protect." (375123) According to Burton: "Assange is going to make a nice bride in prison. Screw the terrorist. He’ll be eating cat food forever." (1056988) A few weeks earlier, following Julian Assange’s release from a London jail, where he had been remanded as a result of a Swedish prosecutor’s arrest warrant, Fred Burton told SkyNews: "extradition [to the US is] more and more likely". (373862).

Emails from Fred Burton reveal that the US Government employs the same counterterrorism strategy against Julian Assange and WikiLeaks as against Al Qaeda: "Take down the money. Go after his infrastructure. The tools we are using to nail and de-construct Wiki are the same tools used to dismantle and track aQ [Al Qaeda]. Thank Cheney & 43 [former US President George W. Bush]. Big Brother owns his liberal terrorist arse." (1067796)

Ten days after the CIA reportedly assassinated Osama bin Laden, Burton writes in an email sent to Stratfor’s "Secure" mailing list that he "can get access to the materials seized from the OBL [Osama bin Laden] safe house." (1660854)

Burton states: "Ferreting out [Julian Assange’s] confederates is also key. Find out what other disgruntled rogues inside the tent or outside [sic]. Pile on. Move him from country to country to face various charges for the next 25 years. But, seize everything he and his family own, to include every person linked to Wiki." (1056763)

Along with the FBI, the Diplomatic Security Service and the Department of Defense (DoD) form a multi-agency US Government outfit seeking to criminally indict and prosecute WikiLeaks and Julian Assange. According to the Department of State, the DSS handles the investigation of all leads that involve the DoS and assists the DoD in forensic analysis of hard drives seized by the US Government in its ongoing criminal investigation.

Burton also says he "would pursue [c]onspiracy and [p]olitical [t]errorism charges and declassify the death of a source someone which [he] could link to Wiki" (1074383). Burton’s strategy is to: "[b]ankrupt the arsehole first," Burton states, "ruin his life. Give him 7-12 yrs for conspiracy." (1057220)

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said: "For over a year now, the US Attorny General Eric Holder has been conducting a "secret" Grand Jury investigation into WikiLeaks. This neo-McCarthyist witch hunt against WikiLeaks may be Mr Holder’s defining legacy. Any student of American history knows that secret justice is no justice at all. Justice must be seen to be done. Legitimate authority arises out of the informed consent of the governed, not Eric Holder’s press secretary. Secret Grand Juries with secret indictments are apparently Eric Holder’s preferred method of dealing with publishers who hold his administration to account. Eric Holder has betrayed the legacy of Madison and Jefferson. He should drop the case or resign. Should he continue, however, the Obama administration may not — Democrats and Republicans alike believe in the right to tell the truth."

As early as June 2010, after the release of the Collateral Murder video but prior to the Afghan War Diaries release, the emails talk of a sealed indictment. In an email conversation between Shane Harris, a National Security journalist, and Burton, Harris is surprised that Assange was reporteded to be attending a Las Vegas Investigative Reporters and Editors (IRE) conference. Burton remarks: "As a foreign national, we could revoke [Julian Assange’s] travel status and deport. Could also be taken into custody as a material witness. We COULD have a sealed indictment and lock him up. Depends upon how far along the military case is" (391504). Julian Assange cancelled his appearance at the IRE conference due to security concerns.

In another email to Stephen Feldhaus, Stratfor legal counsel, about Ronald Kessler, a "pro-FBI journalist", Burton remarks: “I look forward to Manning and Assange facing a bajillion-thousand counts [of espionage]." (1035283)

In July 2010 alleged WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning was moved from Camp Arifjan, Kuwait to the Quantico Brig in the Military District of Washington at the request of Maj. Gen. Terry Wolff, then Commanding General of the 1st Armored Division/US Division – Center in Iraq.

Wolff requested Manning’s move, the Pentagon reported, "due to a potentially lengthy pre-trial confinement because of the complexity of the charges and an ongoing investigation.” Three days before Manning arrived at Quantico Brig, Burton wrote to George Friedman, Stratfor CEO and founder:

“We probably asked the ASIS [Australian Secret Intelligence Service] to monitor Wiki coms and email, after the soldier from Potomac was nabbed. So, it’s reasonable to assume we probably already know who has done it. The delay could be figuring out how to declassify and use the Aussie intel on Wiki... The owner [Julian Assange] is a peacenik. He needs his head dunked in a full toilet bowl at Gitmo.” (402168)

The GI Files: http://wikileaks.org/the-gifiles.html

Please donate: http://shop.wikileaks.org/donate
WHO TO GO TO FOR COMMENT
WikiLeaks – Kristinn Hrafnsson, Official WikiLeaks representative: +35 4821 7121
Julian Burnside, Australian barrister and Human Rights expert: +61 412 157 230 or +61 03 9225 7488, burnside@vicbar.com.au
Jennifer Robinson, Legal adviser in Australia and available for interviews now: +61423871773
Michael Ratner, President, Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR): +1 2126146449, press@ccrjustice.org
Frank La Rue, United Nations Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Opinion and Expression +502 23 680-021
Scott Ludlam, Australian Senator: +61 6277 3467
Geoffrey Robertson, Australian-born Human Rights barrister, academic, author: +44 020 7404 1313, g.robertson@doughtystreet.co.uk
Glenn Greenwald (salon.com), Columnist/blogger/Constitutional lawyer: +1 (646) 400-5600, ggreenwald@salon.com
Ben Wizner, Litigation Director at ACLU’s National Security Project: +1 (212) 519 7860, bwizner@aclu.org
Oliver Spencer, Article 19, Global Campaign for Free Expression: +44 (0)20 7324 2517
John Perry Barlow, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF): +1 415 436 9333 and +1 202 797 9009, barlow@eff.org
Cindy Cohn, Legal Director, Electronic Frontier Foundation: +1 415 436 9333 x108, cindy@eff.org
Tala Dowlatshahi, Reporters without Borders (US): +1 917-239-0653

#2 Douglas Caddy

Douglas Caddy

    Super Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,958 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, Texas

Posted 28 February 2012 - 11:18 PM

CCR Condemns Reported Sealed Indictment Against WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange
Leak of Private Intelligence Firm Documents Confirm Existence of Secret Indictment by Secret Grand Jury
press@ccrjustice.org

February 28, 2012, New York – Leaks published today from Stratfor, a private intelligence corporation, indicate the United States Department of Justice has issued a secret, sealed indictment against Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks. In response, the Center for Constitutional Rights issued the following statement:

“A sealed indictment against Julian Assange would underscore the very thing Wikileaks has been fighting against: abuses the government commits in an environment of secrecy and expansive, reflexive calls for "national security." From the shocking, inhumane treatment of Bradley Manning, to secret grand jury proceedings, to Stratfor's apparent knowledge of the existence of a sealed indictment before either Mr. Assange or the American public had such knowledge, the government's conduct in this case reveals why more transparency, not more secrecy, is essential. This would also mark perhaps the first time a journalist has been prosecuted for allegedly receiving and publishing “classified” documents. Indicting Julian Assange would represent a dramatic assault on the First Amendment, journalists, and the public's right to know.

Rather than promoting transparency as promised, the Obama administration has aggressively pursued whistleblowers and dissenters, launching Espionage Act prosecutions twice as many times as all previous administrations in the last century combined. Attorney General Eric Holder should rethink this dangerous course. Instead of pursuing Julian Assange, Mr. Holder should investigate the serious crimes and abuse of government authority exposed by Wikileaks.

The Center for Constitutional Rights legally represents Wikileaks and Mr. Assange in the Bradley Manning hearings.
Read the WikiLeaks statement here: http://wikileaks.org...Has-Issued.html


The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.

#3 Len Colby

Len Colby

    Super Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8,224 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brazil

Posted 29 February 2012 - 02:30 AM

Doug,

Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't ALL federal grand juries 'secret' and isn't it fairly routine for indictments to remain sealed until the person is arrested?

#4 Douglas Caddy

Douglas Caddy

    Super Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 2,958 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, Texas

Posted 29 February 2012 - 06:08 PM

Doug,

Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't ALL federal grand juries 'secret' and isn't it fairly routine for indictments to remain sealed until the person is arrested?


Yes, federal grand juries are secret with the general exception that a witness before such a jury has the right to speak out publicly after giving testimony. But this seldom happens.

You are correct also that a sealed indictment remains sealed until the person is arrested. In the case of Assange, based on the above press releases, it is quite likely that the Assange's lawyers at the Center for Constitutional Rights will argue that any sealed indictment of Assange is flawed because one or more Department of Justice officials previously discussed its contents with non-government persons at the private intelligence company, Stratfor, located in Austin, Texas. Public opinion in both in the U.S. and around the globe may now come to believe that the U.S. Dept. of Justice prosecution of Assange is an orchestrated witch-hunt and violates his basic constitutional rights. This latest turn of events puts the pressure on the U.K.'s highest court and the courts in Sweden not to appear to be mere pawns acting under the direction of the U.S. government in the criminal case trumped up against Assange. Ultimately the European Court for Human Rights may make the final decision on the prosecution of Assange and whether he can be extradited to the U.S. Meanwhile, who knows what Wikileaks may come up with in public disclosures of vital documents? Assange may yet make it as Time's Person of the Year.


Edited by Douglas Caddy, 01 March 2012 - 01:25 AM.




Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users