http://www.maryferrell.org/mffweb/archive/viewer/showDoc.do?docId=16067&relPageId=3 AGENCY INFORMATION AGENCY : CIA
RECORD NUMBER : 104-10303-10001
RECORDS SERIES : JFK
AGENCY FILE NUMBER : CIA-OP
DOCUMENT INFORMATION ORIGINATOR : CIA
FROM : [No From]
TO : [No To]
TITLE : FILE ON FORD, CHARLES/RFK-MAFIA
DATE : 01/01/0000
PAGES : 10
DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER - TEXTUAL
DOCUMENTSUBJECTS :
CLASSIFICATION :
RESTRICTIONS : 1BDATE OF LAST REVIEW : 09/18/1998COMMENTS : JFK-M-03 : F6 : 1998.09.18.07:48:32:030120 : ARRBREQUEST.CIA - IR 13. CORRECTED TO 10 PAGES VICE 20
Date of interview Sept. 18, 1975
Mike Madigan SSC Staff reports that Mr Helms and Mr Halpern have testified
that in response to a request by Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy,
the assigned an officer to establish contacts with the underworld to look
for possible contacts for use against Castro.
Sam Halpern says the officer was Charles Ford who used the name Rocky
Siscalini.
Madigan wants any information we have on this and would like to interview
the Agency officer.
2...........I told them that I joined in 1949; that I was and am now a
member of the Office of Training; That in 1960 or thereabouts I had a
brief tour of duty with the Economic Group in the DDP, and I went directly
from that assignment to WH-4 in Sept., 1961.
3. I was asked to recall my major activities while with the Cuban operation
and I did so. I reported that my first major assignment was the handling
of a Cuban agent, one we were using to build a nucleus of an organization
for eventual operations into Cuba. I identified this man as Mr [ 6 ]. (Mr. Rhea having heard my description of this activity at our earlier session, did not pursue this matter any further.)
4. The investigators were interested in when I was assigned the code name
Fiscalini, the circumstances under which the name was assigned, and who
had assigned it. I told them I had seen a Xerox copy of the memorandum
(I saw this during a meeting with Bill Sturbits last Friday in Bill's
office) which requested that identification in the name of Fiscalini be
assigned to me. I explained the circumstances, which Mr. Postal and
Mr Rhea had heard at our earlier meeting, and said that I thought the
date was the end of March, 1962. The circumstances involved a contact
by a New York lawyer, thru the Department of Justice, concerning a
client who had access to Cuba and wanted to visit Castro to put in a
special plea on behalf of the Bay of Pigs prisoners. I identified the
individual concerned (I still can't remember his name) as the manager
of the Teresa Hotel in New York. I did not identify the lawyer and was
not asked for his name I identified a man I met at a second meeting in
New York as 'Bubbles' Abdallah. I explained that the latter individual
proposed to accompany the manager of the Teresa to Cuba, the manager
being an elderly man with some difficulty in walking. I explained to
the investigators that I had no further contact with these individuals
after I discovered that Abdallah was wanted, or under indictment -
I forget which, by Texas authorities for smuggling drugs from Mexico.
Mr. Robert Kelly was clearly interested in pursuing the matter further
of who assigned my "Code Name." I indicated that the document I received
came from the Office of Security, but that I did not know whether the
Office selected the name or not.
5. We went over again the story of my contact with a Canadian named "Joe,"
(I know this man's last name but have not been asked for it and have
not volunteered it.) I described one meeting and a telephone call
involving Joe. In the meeting he claimed that he could travel back and
forth from Canada to Cuba; revealed to me that he was interested in
starting a smuggling activity involving goods on the proscribed list;
that he wanted United States citizenship and a great deal of money in
exchange for allowing us to send materials or tamper with some of the
shipments if we could get the proscribed goods to Canada. I explained
to the investigators that my interest lay in the fact that Joe claimed
he could speak with Che Guevera and that I had attempted to get Joe to
serve as a means of communications between us and Che, which Joe refused
to do. As for the telephone call, I told them that when Joe returned
from his trip to Cuba he called to say that big things were going on
in Cuba and that we should meet right away. Being aware at that point
that we in the Agency were deep in the middle of what would later be
called the Cuban Missile Crisis, I told Joe I could not see him and
that we probably already knew what he had to tell me.
That was the last I heard of Joe.
6. We spent a great deal of time going over my meetings with the Attorney
General and his interest in a small group of Cubans who claimed to have
supporters ready to create an uprising in Santiago Province. This is the
case described in paragraph 3 of my earlier memorandum. The investigators
were quite interested in the identity of the man whom I saw at the
request of the Attorney General. I went over this again in as much
detail as I could remember, but without being able to recall who this
man was. I was asked if I could describe the man and I said that I
recalled him as a fairly tall man of average build with black hair,
black eyebrows and glasses. Of considerable interest is the fact that
perhaps 15 or 20 minutes later, I was shown an 8 x 10 glossy photograph
of several people walking in front of what appeared to be a public
building and was asked whether I could identify any of the people in
the picture. I could not. Mr. Postal pointed to the central figure
and asked if I could identify him. I said I could not. (The picture
was of a man probably in his mid-sixties with flowing white hair and
somewhat on the order of Sen. Kenneth Keating, a large, down-curving
nose, white straight eyebrows behind dark glasses, a somewhat lined,
puffy face and a slightly receding forehead accentuated by the fact
that his hair was combed straight from front to back. The man was
wearing a dark blue, or black suit, and one man appeared to be
accompanying him to his left and slightly ahead and another man
slightly to his right and rear. Without having any reference points
by which to judge, my best guess would be that the subject was about
5'10 inches tall. He appeared to be rather heavy, perhaps in the range
of 220 lbs. There appeared to be a caption of some sort at the bottom
of the picture, but this was hidden from my view.) Mr. Postal asked
whether the main figure in the photograph could have been the man the
Attorney General directed me to see. I replied that, even allowing for
the difference in years, the man in the photograph in no way resembled
the man I saw on behalf of the Attorney General.
7. Messrs. Postal and Rhea again brought up the topic of assassination and asked whether I had engaged in or had heard mention of, in Task Force
W, or SAS discussions on the subject of assassination either in general
or specifically with regards to Castro. I told the investigators that the
subject name came up repeatedly, when we were speaking with Cubans, many
of whom having bring forced to flee Cuba, sincerely wished for Castrol's
immediate demise. I said that I had never heard of, nor engaged in
conversations with Agency officers about any plan, the direct and only
aspect of which was the assassination of Fidel Castro. I pointed out
that on a number of occasions I dealt with Cubans who wanted to kill
Castro, but that my job was simply to attempt to extract from these
contacts the names of people in Cuba who might be of potential use to
us in intelligence operations. I said that I had never engaged in
plotting with Cubans regarding assassinations, but that I had many
conversations with Cubans regarding their desire to conduct paramilitary
activities which, as a by-product might well result in Castro's death.
I pointed out emphatically that the Agency's policy prohibits political
assassination.
8. I was asked if I know [ 3 ] and Nestor Sanchez. I told them
that I knew them both me and that Nestor and I shared an office for a
short period near the end of my attachment with SAS. I was asked if
AMLASH meant anything to me and I replied in the negative. This was
followed by whether [ 3 ] and Nestor had discussed with me or
mentioned an operation involving a high-level officer of the Cuban
government, a military man who made frequent trips out of Cuba. Again
I could only reply in the negative. I added the juxtaposition of [ 3 ]
and Nestor in the context of a single operation surprised me inasmuch
as I believed Nestor to have been involved only in psychological
operations and [ 3 ] working at collecting foreign intelligence.
I was then asked if the word "AMOTS" meant anything to me and I said
that it did but that all I could say was that it had to do with
counterintelligence activities. Mr. Rhea asked me whether I could
say that the "AMOTS" activity was concerned with contacting Cuban
exiles in the Miami area and I indicated that this was my understanding. The subject was not pursued further.
9. I was asked about my visit to New Orleans (which I had mentioned
during the previous session) and I explained that these two trips were
for the purpose of attempting to find ways of establishing lines of
communications between Cuban's in New Orleans and their friends in Cuba.
I indicated that I had been able to come up with a very fine prospect;
a Cuban, and that I had turned him over to one of our FI Case Officers.
I also said that I had several discussions with an American whom I
declined to identify under the general ground rule relating to sources
of information. Messrs Postal and Rhea asked if I would respond
affirmatively if they were to suggest some initials which might
correspond to my American contact. I agreed to do this but the initials
they mentioned meant nothing. (Unfortunately, I cannot recall them!)
I volunteered the initials of my contact "FJ" and this produced a blank
expression on the part of both of the investigators, and a shrug of
Mr. Rhea's shoulders. The final question I was asked was whether I
had any knowledge of the "Ponchartrain Operation." I told them that
I knew where Lake Ponchartrain was and that's as far as it went.
10. We spent a little time on the subject of General Lansdale.
I admitted I had attended one meeting in General Lansdale's office
in the Pentagon. I was asked whether anyone else was there, and said
I could recall only one name, Cornelius Roosevelt, but that there were
two other people at that meeting. In response to a series of questions,
about what was discussed at that meeting, I said that General Lansdale
was interested in various paramilitary possibilities and that my role was
limited to giving a quick assessment of whether we had the agent assets
to assist in carrying out the various possible operations that General
Lansdale suggested.
11. I was asked whether the term Mongoose meant anything to me and I
indicated that it was a general term to refer to a composite of planned
operational activities. I said that I had no knowledge of any specific
activity being planned under this name and further explained that it was
possible that some of my Cuban contacts may have been taken over by
other case officers for use under "Mongoose," but that I had no direct
knowledge of such having been done.
12. Mr. Robert Kelly expressed considerable interest in the organization
of Task Force W. At one point he asked how many echelons there were
between me and Mr. Helms. I told them that I reported to Bill Harvey;
that my title was Special Assistant; that Mr Harvey reported to Mr Helms;
That I frequently received assignment and reported to Sam Halpern;
and that I occasionally undertook tasks for Bruce Cheever, Harvey's deputy,
although these tasks were concerned with the workings of Task Force W and
did not involve contacts with the Cubans. I was asked if there were any
Special Assistant other than me in Task Force W and I replied that
Mr Zogby, C/WH/4 prior to Mr Harvey's arrival on the scene had been
retained as a member of Task Force W in an SA status. I said that there
may well have been others because people would show up from time to time
for short besides myself for short tours of duty for several months or
so and then depart to carry on their work elsewhere, but that I could
not recall anyone by name at this time
13. I was asked whether I used the name Fiscalini in circumstances other
than those described. I said that I frequently carried identification in
that name and I used it on several occasions. I described one occasion
which was an amusing one-time contact that had no bearing on any item of
interest to the committee. The investigator asked if I ever had contacts
among the Cuban's in Miami, and I replied in the negative.
14. I was asked if I had ever made contact with people in New York City
other than those described. I said that indeed I had; but that in one
case although the man in question lived in New York, the meeting took
place in Newark, New Jersey. In response to a question, I said that the
lead was provided by the FBI. I declined to identify the man involved on
the grounds of the sensitivity of his position at the time.
15. I was asked whether I had any knowledge of a meeting of the Attornel General and Cuban exile leaders in the summer of 1962. I said that sucha meeting would not have been unusual in my opinion, but that I had no knowledge of such a meeting. I pointed out that it was common practice among many Cuban leaders to acquire the support, or the appearance of support of U.S. Agencies and prominent U.S. political figures. I furtherstated that numerous attempts were made to get the U.S. to support a
Cuban government-in-exile and that I had one meeting in Washington with
a Cuban leader who was constantly trying to get us to support him as
head of such an arrangement. I identified this man as Mario Garcia-Kohly
and added that he was sentenced to prison some years later for
counterfeiting Cuban pesos. The name "Kohly" obviously rang a bell with
Mr. Postal as he repeated it in a surprised tone of voice. However,
Mr Postal did not pursue the matter.
16. Some of the other topics which were surfaced in connection with the
above major items: I was asked whether I knew the following people or
recognized the names (My responses are summarized in parentheses and I
can't vouch for all the spellings):
1 Carlos Teppedino (never heard of him)
2 Jose Orta (never heard of him)
3 Sam Giancana (read about him in the newspaper, never met him)
4 Roselli (read about him in the newspaper, never met him)
5 Tafficante (read about him in the newspaper, never met him)
6 Manuel Artime (read about him in the newspaper, never met him)
7 Big Jim O'Connell (heard about him in the newspaper, never met him) I was asked whether "No Name Key" meant anything to me and I gave noresponse.
I was asked whether I had gone to Chicago in the course of my work and
I told them I had not.
17. This is probably the appropriate point to underline my conviction
that the main, if not the only point of concern to the investigators
is whether I was directed to sally forth and initiate contact with
members of the underworld in the U.S. and who directed me to do so.
Their interest is even more pointedly focused on whether I had anything
to do with the Rosselli, Giancana, et al, "operations." Once again, I
explained that my job was broader than this by a longshot and that I
was never directed to take the initiative in establishing contacts with
the "underworld." I said that "several," probably no more than five
or six, of the people with whom I dealt were "somewhat" shady characters
in some cases with recorded "run-ins" with law enforcement agencies.
Charles D. Ford Chief of Training Services Staff, OTR