I used the word XXX awhile ago in another post. "...would you like to take the bullit out of my AXXX" and got edited... However the following degrades me and all forum members and was posted on this Forum in an attempt to indirectly call me a liar and too, to degrade me as an untruthful person. FWIW

...."Hey dumb-XXX !! Ever heard of "Google" ??!! Crank in "DC-3/C-47" and then tell us how you reached across the whole overhead panel to "start an engine". The left-seater starts the engines, "pseudo-zoomie"; and you always start the RIGHT ENGINE first, because that's the one which has both the electric generator and the hydraulic pump !! What a phony !!.......".



I see this as a double standard. And I believe this is why good researchers who used to be on this forum have left and refuse to post their research and information.

Can you really be surprised if some of the members here are a little hostile, you did "die" in a plane crash a few months back. Remember?

No not really surprised. However did you see the Police Reports of the two stolden computers and the report of one being found in a Pawn shop in ABQ NM? Did you see the police report of the broken door and windows to gain entry to my home in NM while I was flying a trip?.. No you did not. It is easier to just say I'm a nut and not look or check what I say. I did not think you were that shallow. I will post what I think is true and I will post any documentation I obtain to back up what I say about the JFK.... If you do not want that information then do not read my post..... I mentioned double standard.. and referenced... had nothing to do with my "FAKED" death as you call it.... Is that your opinion.?.. or do you know something I do not?... if so post your referfences or shut up and let me get on with trying to help those who want my input and feed back or things I do know and played a part in... I mean this in the most nicest way. Thank you for you reply

I do not care about hostile people I have being dealing with those types ever since I have been on this Forum... Yoou miss the reason I post on this forum... I was ask by many to come back on this forum... reluctantly I did. And I have tried for hours and days to document and reference everything I have said. Now can we move on and do some research on the JFK assassination... I know where I am going with these post references... Do You?

I never mentioned the word "fake" or "nut"..... you did. You dont know my opinion of you Mr Plumlee because I have never stated it. I dont go in for insulting people over the net, I prefer it more face to face. But I know many that do, so I repeat, dont be supprised if some here are hostile.

Tosh, did you already make a post explaining the whole "Tosh is dead" story? I must have missed it. While I'm not sure if I believe everything you say, you've always behaved yourself on this forum, and I have no reason to believe you were behind some bogus story so you could watch your own funeral like Tom Sawyer.

No double standards here.

Report the post(s) with the offensive langauge and one of the moderators will edit it. You may use the "Report" function, visible on the left hand side of each post.

I personally am not offended by limited and appropriate use of 'bad' language. It is how people really talk and it shows great emotion. I know some are not as comfortable with it as others. I was just watching the film on Enron - The Brightest Boys In The Room. Its transcript couldn't be posted here - actual words spoken in Court and in telephone and other converstations in real life. Nixon, Johnson and other Presidents were famous for their foul language and not even always in private. I think, generally Americans are more comfortable with such language. Someone, who shall be nameless, who was apparently put on permanent moderation and left the Forum in disgust for use of one such word is not ranting and raving and using every word imaginable badmouthing this forum on another one. Each Forum has its own rules and sensibilities. The obscenities are in actions [most of the things we talk about here that really happen!] - not in words we may sometimes use. Please see the famous court case over James Joyce's Ulysses http://law.jrank.org/pages/12758/United-St...ed-Ulysses.html

On December 6, Judge Woolsey delivered his opinion on United States v. OneBook Called Ulysses:
I hold that Ulysses is a sincereand honest book, and I think that the criticisms of it are entirely disposedby its rationale . . . The words which are criticized as dirty are old Saxonwords known to almost all men, and, I venture, to many women, and are such words as would be naturally and habitually used, I believe, by the types of folk whose life, physical and mental, Joyce is seeking to describe. In respect of the recurrent emergence of the theme of sex in the minds of his characters,it must always be remembered that his locale was Celtic and his season Spring . . .

I am quite aware that owing to some of its scenes Ulyssesis a rather strong draught to ask some sensitive, though normal, persons to take. But my considered opinion, after long reflection, is that whilst in manyplaces the effect of Ulysses on the reader undoubtedly is somewhat emetic, nowhere does it tend to be an aphrodisiac. Ulysses may, therefore, be admitted into the United States.