Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions
Question #28

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend
the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two
semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the
troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most
of the 'answers'.

*reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************
Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's
only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message
threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply
deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or
simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill
files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk
**********************************************************************

I've decided to repost this one - since no-one has even tried to answer it. If
those who believe the Warren Commission Report want to defend it - they *MUST*
answer these questions... running away from them, or claiming that they are
"dead on arrival" or have "already been answered" simply won't do the trick.

If there are any honest LNT'ers out there - I won't hold you to trying to
justify McAdams lies about this - just answer the first question below.

Yesterday's question on the Altgen's photo - and why it contradicts the films
didn't have a single attempted response. Today's question is related... let's
see if the crowd that believes in the authenticity of the photos/X-rays/films
are willing to support their belief:

28. LNT'ers get really nervous and never seem to have any explanation for the
reported Limo slowdown/stop that took place in Dealey Plaza.

With dozens of eyewitnesses all reporting the slowdown/stop - and many of them
*highly* credible (such as the motorcycle cops who were *with* the limo),
LNT'ers really can't deny what happened.

So when it's pointed out that this *IS NOT SEEN* in the extant Z-Film - they all
immediately jump into a chorus of "Hallelujah Alvarez"... pointing out that
Alvarez found a slowdown in the film.

BUT IT CAN'T BE SEEN BY THE CASUAL VIEWER!!!

And Tony Marsh ran screaming away - and starting talking about something else
(ghost images) and refused to explain this... as *no* LNT'er has been able to
do.

LNT'ers just *hate* the eyewitnesses - even when they are forced to imagine the
eyewitnesses being correct, as in this case.

Any LNT'ers care to explain what Tony ducked? Why is a slowdown *NOT SEEN IN THE
EXTANT Z-FILM TO THE CASUAL VIEWER?*
eof

Perhaps out resident photo expert/researcher Bill Miller (sic) can give this one a whirl -- awfully quiet for an expert...