Defend the Warren Commission Report Findings? The 45 questions
Question #32

Back by popular demand - the 45 Questions that terrify those who try to defend
the Warren Commission Report. In the past, there have been only two
semi-serious attempts to answer them, one by John McAdams, and one by 'Bud' (the
troll listed below) - Both responses were basically denials of the facts in most
of the 'answers'.

*below question reposted with authors permission -- author: Ben Holmes...*

But first, an important note:

**********************************************************************
Important Note for Lurkers - there are many trolls on this forum (alt.conspiracy.jfk) who's
only purpose is to obstruct debate, deny the evidence, and attempt to change message
threads from discussing the evidence, to personal insults and attacks.

These trolls include (but are not limited to):

**22 trolls who post regularly to alt.conspiracy.jfk** names removed -dgh

Please beware when seeing their responses, and note that they will simply
deny the facts I mention, demand citations that I've provided before, or
simply run with insults. These trolls are only good material for the kill
files.

source: alt.conspiracy.jfk
**********************************************************************

The silence has been deafening... on to the next:

32. There were known assassination attempts in both Chicago and Tampa in the
weeks before the successful assassination attempt in Dallas. Although the
Chicago attempt was successfully kept out of the papers, this isn't true of the
Tampa attempt - which made it into one article. Why did the Secret Service not
inform the WC of these past attempts, and what can explain the WC's "ignorance"
of these previous assassination attempts? Why do LNT'ers refuse to even *admit*
that these attempts are historical and known?

And, I might add, (although an honest answer would be a surprise) what does the
fact of these two previous attempts suggest in terms of a "Lone Nut/Conspiracy"
theory of Dallas?
eof

Earl Warren allegedly said:
"Never in our lifetimes would we know the entire truth of what happened in Dallas."

• When did he make this statement. Can it be read on a specific document (except quote on Jim Marrs's "Crossfire book")?

• If true, did he mean the findings were not quite conclusive?

Thank you.

Pretty sure I know the source, let me confirm it and I'll get back to you soonest...

From a Vanity Fair article:

"Back in 1964, asked whether his Commission's documents would be made
public, Chief Justice Earl Warren replied, "Yes, there will come a
time. But it might not be in your lifetime. I am not referring to
anything especially, but there may be some things that would involve
security. This would be preserved but not made public."" [NY Times; 2/5/64]

Interesting DH....keep it coming

I think the original quote from Pierre was an amalgamation of Earl Warren's statement above and Jack Ruby's post-conviction press conference (video here).

Quite possibly referring to Mexico City???