There are so many threads on 9-11 that often on the same topic, it is becoming difficult to refer to previous material. Therefore over the upcoming weeks I am going to try to separate the 9-11 threads into a semblance of order. I'll merge threads / posts under appropriate heading.

The major topics I suggest are as follows:

9/11 - The Accused (the 19 hijackers & any backers)
9/11 - The Unaccused (people you think are responsible - Bush, Cheney, etc. Includes reasons & motivation for MIHOP / LIHOP)
9/11 - Other players (people involved in pre / post 9-11, when what they say does not fit into another topic)
9/11 - Air defences and official reactions to the hijackings (general stuff about how they got through, suspicions of a stand down, etc)
9/11 - The Pentagon
9/11 - World Trade Center - General
9/11 - WTC 1 & 2
9/11 - WTC 6
9/11 - WTC 7
9/11 - Flight 93
9/11 - General

If anyone can suggest other topics, or revisions of the ones suggested here, it would be appreciated.

Once we have finalised the list, the mods on this sub-board will start to move stuff around as we get the time & inclination. This may take some time, but eventually you'll be able to more easily find material you want.

Thanks!

I don't think someone hostile the the posts against the official conspiracy version is in any position to touch any such thread! I object and will fight this. If someone neutral were to do it, I might not. Personally, I think all is fine as is. The same could be done with JFK and all other subjects...why don't you 'go' there. Answer: JS doens't post on 911 matters. Second reason: short of Apollo fake threads, you post more and pay more attention for 911 matters.

Peter,

Then I suggest you do it. We have posts / threads dealing with the same subject all over the place. I am more than happy to leave it in your hands, but I think it needs to be done. Perhaps you'd like to suggest a new topic list?

As always, no posts will be deleted; it's just they be placed in an area where you can find the resources you need.

If Members can except me as neutral, then I will volunteer to complete this. For the record, I don't believe that the Towers were brought down by anything other than airplane strikes, nor do I believe that the Pentagon was struc by anything other than a passenger jet. i do not believe, however, that we know anything like the deep truth behind these attacks, or the Wars, and curbs on civil rights that they led to.

I'm happy for Stephen to do this.

Stephen, if you want me to help in any way, just ask.

Thanks Evan, I'll make a start next week, and will probably need some help. BTW, I became a Grandfather yesterday, Little Girl, Rose May.

I would point-out that the JFK and other areas have multiple threads. JS himself usually has two somewhat related going at the same time - to which  he posts the same new post on each. WHY are we doing this on this sensitive topic. Why was it proposed by someone hostile the notion that anything but the official version took place. I'd say start with other areas of the Forum or better lay off this entirely. I suspect strongly this is an effort to weaken [not enhance] this area. I oppose anyone doing it. Combine JS's first, Older posts from years back first - then get back to us on this......
I'll not have my posts or other 911 truth posts mixed with 911 'untruth' posts to dilute them. This is just IMO a clever psyop. I'll oppose it to the end and get very vocal about it if this nonsense continues. Why is this 'housecleaning' starting on 911? I'll bet without counting there are more than 40-50 threads on the Z-film's reality; SBT maybe 60; Plumlee and Hemming each 30+, so - why start with 911?...answer...911 is the most sensitive subject to the Secret Government today...so this is planned. NO! - even by a more neutral [but 911 skeptic] new Grandad. Over my dead electrons!

What I would support, however, is a new sub-category of [911, and related events], but do not suggest at this time individual threads attempt to be combined.