Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Inside job
The Education Forum > Controversial Issues in History > Political Conspiracies
Jack White
http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-0...attack-job.html

911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job
09 September, 2009, 17:50

9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real story?

By Robert Bridge, RT

Matthew Lewis
QUOTE (Jack White @ Sep 19 2009, 10:41 AM) *
http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-0...attack-job.html

911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job
09 September, 2009, 17:50

9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real story?

By Robert Bridge, RT

Part two starts out with the falsehood of a two minute intercept on Payne Stewart's jet. Great research standards there. rolleyes.gif

The intercept of Stewart's plane took over an hour. In the official report the time changes from Easter Daylight Time (EDT)to Central Daylight Time (CDT) when Stewart's plane crossed the time zone boundary.
The official NTSB report is located here
http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2000/AAB0001.htm
Here is an article that gets the timing right, adjusted for a single time zone
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?e...payne_stewart_1
More info here
http://www.911myths.com/html/payne_stewart.html
and here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payne_Stewart#Death
William Kelly
I don't understand why those who insist that the events of Sept. 11, 2001 were plotted and planned within the Bush administration, when you only have to show that they were allowed to happen despite numerous forewarnings and counter-intel ops that could have prevented it.

Especially when you have a synchronized Anthrax attack that most definately WAS an inside job, that gets little, if any attention at all.

BK
Ron Ecker
QUOTE (William Kelly @ Sep 19 2009, 10:00 PM) *
you only have to show that they were allowed to happen


Which is screamed from the rooftops by the concerted hiding out of the men at the top of the U.S. Defense Command during the attacks.


Evan Burton
My WAG Bill, is that some people cannot accept that some of those responsible were simply incompetent in their duties WITHOUT having kind of nefarious master plan behind it. It was the day when all the latent failures in various 'defence' mechanisms synchronised, when all the holes in the swiss cheese lined up (see the Reason model).
William Kelly
QUOTE (Evan Burton @ Sep 20 2009, 01:23 AM) *
My WAG Bill, is that some people cannot accept that some of those responsible were simply incompetent in their duties WITHOUT having kind of nefarious master plan behind it. It was the day when all the latent failures in various 'defence' mechanisms synchronised, when all the holes in the swiss cheese lined up (see the Reason model).


BUT the Anthrax attacks was an INSIDE Job, carefully planned and carried out, and gotten away with, right?

BK
David Andrews
QUOTE (William Kelly @ Sep 20 2009, 12:00 AM) *
I don't understand why those who insist that the events of Sept. 11, 2001 were plotted and planned within the Bush administration, when you only have to show that they were allowed to happen despite numerous forewarnings and counter-intel ops that could have prevented it.

Especially when you have a synchronized Anthrax attack that most definately WAS an inside job, that gets little, if any attention at all.

BK



Bill, I agree with your Anthrax paragraph, but I think 9/11 was set up in years and administrations before Bush's. Told you we'd differ. Best.
Jack White
QUOTE (Jack White @ Sep 19 2009, 04:41 PM) *
http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-0...attack-job.html

911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job
09 September, 2009, 17:50

9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real story?

By Robert Bridge, RT


Why was my posting modified by moderators without saying so?

Jack
Evan Burton
QUOTE (Jack White @ Sep 20 2009, 02:38 PM) *
QUOTE (Jack White @ Sep 19 2009, 04:41 PM) *
http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-0...attack-job.html

911 reasons why 9/11 was (probably) an inside job
09 September, 2009, 17:50

9/11 was the day steel-framed buildings fell like sandcastles, the law of physics worked in reverse and the United States Air Force went missing in action. So what is the real story?

By Robert Bridge, RT


Why was my posting modified by moderators without saying so?

Jack


It hasn't been modified Jack. If it had been, it would say "Last modified by....". It's exactly as you posted it.
Evan Burton
For instance - this is my original text.

And then I added this line. You can see I have edited it because it says so... and who edited it.
Ron Ecker
QUOTE (Evan Burton @ Sep 19 2009, 11:23 PM) *
some people cannot accept that some of those responsible were simply incompetent in their duties


Including everyone at the top of the U.S. Defense Command? Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, Wolfowitz. If you believe in such a hell of an across-the-board coincidence, you are simply in denial. All these men stayed in their cubby holes during the attacks (Bush in a classroom) because they were "incompetent"? Think real hard, could there be some kind of motive behind their concerted unavailability? Only Bush can be excused, because he's a known idiot. Rumsfeld, Myers, and Wolfowitz have no such excuse, and not a one of them was held accountable, when all three merited being fired. Myers got officially promoted less than one week later. How the behavior of these men is ignored or excused, including on this forum, is sickening.





Jack White
Someone lies. My original posting consisted of this line only:

http://www.russiatoday.com/Top_News/2009-0...attack-job.html

until someone added the rest.

Jack
Andy Walker
QUOTE (Jack White @ Sep 21 2009, 03:37 PM) *
Someone lies.


you possibly?
Jack White
QUOTE (Andy Walker @ Sep 21 2009, 03:07 PM) *
QUOTE (Jack White @ Sep 21 2009, 03:37 PM) *
Someone lies.


you possibly?


I posted ONLY the URL. Someone else thought it should be summarized, but will not admit it.
Not that I object to the addition. I object to the hypocrisy.

Jack
Andy Walker
QUOTE (Jack White @ Sep 22 2009, 01:20 AM) *
QUOTE (Andy Walker @ Sep 21 2009, 03:07 PM) *
QUOTE (Jack White @ Sep 21 2009, 03:37 PM) *
Someone lies.


you possibly?


I posted ONLY the URL. Someone else thought it should be summarized, but will not admit it.
Not that I object to the addition. I object to the hypocrisy.

Jack


There is no record of any editing of this thread in the board logs.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.