Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Appeasement: Neville Chamberlain’s Real Betrayal
The Education Forum > Curriculum Subjects > History > History Debates
John Simkin
A very important book, Hitler’s Spy Chief: The Wilhelm Canaris Mystety, was published in November, 2005. It received very little attention but it contained some very interesting new information about the relationship between the British government and Nazi Germany.

The author, Richard Bassett, found some very interesting documents that helps to explain the peace negotiations that went on between the two governments. Bassett shows that in July, 1938, a powerful group from within Nazi Germany that included Canaris, were on the verge of overthrowing Hitler because they feared war with Britain and France. The British government became aware of this plot. However, they were determined that Hitler should not be removed from power. The reason, they were expecting Hitler to destroy communism in the Soviet Union.

Bassett argues that this was the reason the Neville Chamberlain decided to fly out to meet Hitler the day before the German Army intended to invade Czechoslovakia. He had never flown before, took no interpreter and did not speak German. By doing a deal with Hitler over Czechoslovakia he prevented the coup from taking place. Hitler did of course eventually head east but because of the Labour Party and Conservatives led by Winston Churchill, Chamberlain’s backfired when the House of Commons forced him to declare war on Germany over Poland.
Mike Tribe
I haven't read the book, and unless I can persuade the school library to buy it, I probably won't be able to afford to do so, but Kershaw's view on the various pre-war military plots against Hitler was that they were characterized by indecision, division and timidness. Bassett may be right in claiming that this one was different, but I'd need quite a bit of convincing...
Daniel Wayne Dunn
QUOTE (mike tribe @ Jun 15 2006, 01:01 PM) *
I haven't read the book,... I probably won't be able to afford to do so, but...the various pre-war military plots against Hitler...were characterized by indecision, division and timidness. Bassett may be right in claiming that this one was different, but I'd need quite a bit of convincing...
I have the same view as Mike. Shirer's Rise and Fall of the Third Reich still seems to hold up well in indicating the "indecision, division and timidity" of the various plotters' plots, and my impression of Chamberlain remains that he thought so highly of himself that he felt he had estabished an "influential rapport" with Hitler and believed that "just one more concession" was all that was needed. This, plus some psychological factors and his anxiety about another WWI, seems to explain more than anything his hasty trip to Munich, paying obeisance to Hitler, etc........... They badly and baldly sold out the Czechs and Slovaks and then (FINALLY) began to wake up when Hitler didn't keep his word about not interfering with the non-Sudeten remainder of Czechoslovakia. It's an interesting point, though, since the Munich agreement also put the western powers in a less defensible position militarily because it ceded (Sudeten) territories with defensive fortifications that would've been helpful later.............
FWIW,
Dan
John Simkin
The ability to add videos to pages has really improved the educational qualities of online education.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWappeasement.htm
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.