Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Left Arm in a Package
The Education Forum > Welcome to the Education Forum > Forum Birthday Party
John Simkin
David Clark received a package in the post. Inside was a man’s left-arm. Clark repackaged the arm and sent it to Roger Miller. After looking at the arm, Miller sent in onto Martin Butler. When he received it he burnt it in the fire. What had happened in the past to make these people behave in this way?

You will need to ask questions to solve this mystery. If you have already heard the story before, please do not immediately post the answer.
Kathryn Foong
Can I ask multiple questions?

1) Is it a real arm (ie. a human arm that came off a body)?
2) Were any of these men part of a plot to kill someone and the arm is evidence?
3) When Martin Butler burnt the arm - was it to get rid of evidence?
John Simkin
QUOTE (Kathryn Foong @ Jan 26 2007, 11:18 PM) *
Can I ask multiple questions?

1) Is it a real arm (ie. a human arm that came off a body)?
2) Were any of these men part of a plot to kill someone and the arm is evidence?
3) When Martin Butler burnt the arm - was it to get rid of evidence?


1) Yes.
2) No.
30 No.
Kathy Beckett
QUOTE (John Simkin @ Dec 26 2006, 12:59 PM) *
David Clark received a package in the post. Inside was a man’s left-arm. Clark repackaged the arm and sent it to Roger Miller. After looking at the arm, Miller sent in onto Martin Butler. When he received it he burnt it in the fire. What had happened in the past to make these people behave in this way?

You will need to ask questions to solve this mystery. If you have already heard the story before, please do not immediately post the answer.


Are the names of the persons involved important, or could you have used different names for the people in this story with the same result?
John Simkin
QUOTE (Kathy Beckett @ Jan 28 2007, 01:59 AM) *
Are the names of the persons involved important, or could you have used different names for the people in this story with the same result?


The names are unimportant.
Sid Walker
Was the arm originally part of Martin Butler's body?
Kathryn Foong
Is there a significance of the arm being LEFT? If so, has it got anything to do with the ring finger/ring?
John Simkin
QUOTE (Kathryn Foong @ Jan 28 2007, 07:32 AM) *
Is there a significance of the arm being LEFT?


It is very significant that it was not a right arm.

QUOTE (Kathryn Foong @ Jan 28 2007, 07:32 AM) *
If so, has it got anything to do with the ring finger/ring?


No.
John Simkin
QUOTE (Sid Walker @ Jan 28 2007, 07:23 AM) *
Was the arm originally part of Martin Butler's body?


No. But you are getting warm.
Kathryn Foong
Was it the arm of any of the other mentioned men?
John Simkin
QUOTE (Kathryn Foong @ Jan 28 2007, 08:07 AM) *
Was it the arm of any of the other mentioned men?


No, but they knew whose arm it was.
Kathryn Foong
Is the owner of the arm still alive (is this significant) ?
Kathryn Foong
Left arm is significant...hmm....

Was the person who's arm got taken off left handed or needed to use the left arm for something in particular like sports?
John Simkin
QUOTE (Kathryn Foong @ Jan 28 2007, 08:59 AM) *
Left arm is significant...hmm....

Was the person who's arm got taken off left handed or needed to use the left arm for something in particular like sports?


The man who sent the package and all the men who received it were right-handed. That is an important clue.
Mark Stapleton
Were all the parties involved one-armed or two-armed?

I'm thinking it's quite possible for a one-armed person to open a parcel and then re-package it.
Mark Valenti
Are all of the men friends? Have they known each other since childhood?
John Simkin
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 29 2007, 03:50 PM) *
Were all the parties involved one-armed or two-armed?

I'm thinking it's quite possible for a one-armed person to open a parcel and then re-package it.


They all had only one arm.

QUOTE (Mark Valenti @ Jan 29 2007, 04:37 PM) *
Are all of the men friends? Have they known each other since childhood?


They all became friends six months previously. If you can work out how they became friends, you will have a good idea of what was going on.
Mark Stapleton
Were they all involved in an accident which resulted in their having only one arm?

Did they become acquainted in hospital waiting for amputations?

Do they all possess a left arm or a right arm?
Kathryn Foong
On the same lines as the others with an "accident"

Did the person's left arm, cut it off himself after an accident/incident where all the others lost their left arm because of something he did (and he felt guilty about it).

Either that or he made a bet/deal with all of them that they would all lose their arm because of something.
John Simkin
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 30 2007, 06:52 PM) *
Were they all involved in an accident which resulted in their having only one arm?


It was an incident rather than an accident. All but one lost their left arm. He lost his later.

QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 30 2007, 06:52 PM) *
Do they all possess a left arm or a right arm?


The all had a right arm.
John Simkin
QUOTE (Kathryn Foong @ Jan 31 2007, 12:11 AM) *
Did the person's left arm, cut it off himself after an accident/incident where all the others lost their left arm because of something he did (and he felt guilty about it).


They all had their left arms removed by someone else. You have to work out why these men willingly had their left arms removed.
Mark Stapleton
I'm stumped (excuse the pun).

Burning the arm in the fire is the part that confuses me, but I'm confident the answer to this riddle lies therein.

Were they all surgeons, by any chance?
John Simkin
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 31 2007, 02:42 PM) *
Were they all surgeons, by any chance?


Only one. The man who sent the original parcel.
Mark Valenti
QUOTE (John Simkin @ Jan 31 2007, 03:51 PM) *
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 31 2007, 02:42 PM) *
Were they all surgeons, by any chance?


Only one. The man who sent the original parcel.



He's the one who cut off all the other arms. A crazed surgeon cut off their arms and then cut off his own arm which he sent in the post to taunt his former victims.
Mark Stapleton
QUOTE (John Simkin @ Jan 31 2007, 03:51 PM) *
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 31 2007, 02:42 PM) *
Were they all surgeons, by any chance?


Only one. The man who sent the original parcel.


Bingo.

The man who mailed the parcel in the first place was the surgeon who had removed the arms of the other three. The parcel contained the surgeon's left arm. You stated earlier that they all knew whose arm it was. He botched the minor surgery on the other three, resulting in amputations being necessary in those cases.

In order to avoid an expensive medical malpractice suit, the surgeon agreed to have his left arm amputated and presented for inspection as recompense.

He paid his debt. The only remaning evidence of this unusual and illegal undertaking was quickly destroyed.

Surely this was based on a true story. laugh.gif
John Simkin
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 31 2007, 04:23 PM) *
Bingo.

The man who mailed the parcel in the first place was the surgeon who had removed the arms of the other three. The parcel contained the surgeon's left arm. You stated earlier that they all knew whose arm it was.


You have solved this part of the puzzle. What you have to work out why he removed their left arms in the first place. It has nothing to do with botched operations. In fact, he did a very good job given the circumstances (that is in itself a clue).
Kathy Beckett
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 31 2007, 06:23 PM) *
QUOTE (John Simkin @ Jan 31 2007, 03:51 PM) *
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Jan 31 2007, 02:42 PM) *
Were they all surgeons, by any chance?


Only one. The man who sent the original parcel.


Bingo.

The man who mailed the parcel in the first place was the surgeon who had removed the arms of the other three. The parcel contained the surgeon's left arm. You stated earlier that they all knew whose arm it was. He botched the minor surgery on the other three, resulting in amputations being necessary in those cases.

In order to avoid an expensive medical malpractice suit, the surgeon agreed to have his left arm amputated and presented for inspection as recompense.

He paid his debt. The only remaning evidence of this unusual and illegal undertaking was quickly destroyed.

Surely this was based on a true story. laugh.gif



Hi Mark!! Good job solving part of this!!
Now will you do me a favor??
When you are done here, pop on over to the Sevenoaks Tunnel thread and jump right in!!! I am stumped!!!! unsure.gif
Kathy
Mark Valenti
I went online and peeked at the answer -- wish I hadn't. It's a really good puzzle. Keep going Mark, you'll solve it if you continue along your current line of thinking.
Mark Stapleton
Thanks Kathy and Mark for your kind words.

It must have been an industrial accident, trapping the arms of the three men and requiring immediate amputations. The surgeon hurriedly performed the amputations.

Am I on the right path?
John Simkin
QUOTE (Mark Valenti @ Jan 31 2007, 04:16 PM) *
He's the one who cut off all the other arms. A crazed surgeon cut off their arms and then cut off his own arm which he sent in the post to taunt his former victims.


He did but far from being crazy he was acting in a logical way. You now have to think of a situation where it is logical for people to willingly want to have their left arms removed.
Kathryn Foong
Were they on a stranded boat (or a place where there was no food) and had to eat their left arms to survive? Mind you, I probably would have taken one of the legs to eat instead as there is more meat to eat. After the surgeon removed each of their arms and was about to do his own, someone rescued them so he didn't have to lose his arm but they had already agreed before that they would all lose their left arm so he carried out the agreement.

?
John Dolva
The discharged army surgeon only became crazy later due to the post traumatic stress following the explosion which necessitated the amputations. Later his medication and 'the voices in his head' led him to misinterpret the NRA propaganda he subscribed to and compelled him to fulfill what he saw as a commandment that all are entitled to keep arms. So he provided his own to the others to share. By the time the fourth received it, it was so decomposed that he, in disgust, chucked it in the fire.
John Simkin
QUOTE (Kathryn Foong @ Feb 1 2007, 12:28 PM) *
Were they on a stranded boat (or a place where there was no food) and had to eat their left arms to survive? Mind you, I probably would have taken one of the legs to eat instead as there is more meat to eat. After the surgeon removed each of their arms and was about to do his own, someone rescued them so he didn't have to lose his arm but they had already agreed before that they would all lose their left arm so he carried out the agreement.


That is the right answer.
Mark Stapleton
What the....?

Anyway, it was fun.

Anyway, nice work Kathleen.

You should consider participating in the JFK debate. You too, Kathy.
John Simkin
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Feb 1 2007, 05:38 PM) *
What the....?

Anyway, it was fun.


What about solving this one?:

http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=8914
Kathryn Foong
YAY!! I got it right ! (and didn't cheat). I just for some reason started to think of those people whose planed crashed on a mountain and they had to start eating each other (lucky for them they had "dead" people who they could eat and not have to saw off their arms/legs).

Right...to the next puzzle..
Kathy Beckett
QUOTE (Mark Stapleton @ Feb 1 2007, 07:38 PM) *
What the....?

Anyway, it was fun.

Anyway, nice work Kathleen.

You should consider participating in the JFK debate. You too, Kathy.


I would've never guessed this in a million years!!!!!!

Glad I wasn't eating when I read this--yuk!!! (Note to self--no Simkin puzzles till after lunch or dinner!)

BTW,I spend time over at the Jfk debate. I'm kind of a Harvey and Lee person.
Kathy
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.