Jump to content
The Education Forum

Bill Charleston

Members
  • Content Count

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Bill Charleston

  • Rank
    Experienced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

6,205 profile views
  1. Thanks for posting. I read my home town newspaper THE FLORIDA TIMES UNION that I surely read back in 1963. One front page story said that LHO was once a resident of Jacksonville which I didn't know before. But the end of the story said that shots were fired in the theater where LHO was arrested, and that policeman Tippit was killed there It listed Chicago Tribune Press Service as the source for that BS article. Another UPI story said they found a 30 cal Enfield rifle.
  2. James: I earlier cropped off the TSBD but the arrow is from the TSBD to the limo. During the last couple of shots there is no radical change in direction of Elm Street in relation to the shooter from the TSBD. I see no reason why Connally could not have been shot with the 5th shot (3rd from the TSBD).which is from the TSBD. John Connally said during the Warren Commission hearings that he had looked to the right and was turning to look over his left shoulder when he was bent over by the blow to his back. John Connally said he was facing forward when he was struck in the back. That is what we see in the Zapruder film, Connally was turning toward the left and was facing forward when at Z319 he and the other two SS agents in the front seat begin to duck forward when something different happens to John Connally, he is violently thrown directly forward and his head snaps downsward as part of this motion. Nellie could not have thrown John Connally forward as we see him move, the force of the bullet to his back is the only force adequate that I am aware of . This video addresses the momentum of the bullet that bent John Connally over: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2i7uHdYHsE There are many witnesses who were sure they heard about three equally spaced shots fired from the TSBD. If you look at the acoustical evidence summary and you factor in that it took almost three seconds to eject, aim and fire the next shot, the only possible scenario is that shots #1 and #3 which were 2.8 seconds apart and one of shots #4 and #5. Because analysis showed shot #4 was the grassy knoll shot that hit JFK in the head, shot #5 is definitely the last shot fired from the TSBD. I see no reason to believe the last shot fired 0.7 seconds after the JFK head shot was not fired from the TSBD. Bill
  3. Something else that seems to be missed by everyone is how the bullet managed to make its way from the back side of the wrist, between the radius and the ulna, and out the palm side of the wrist. Look at the diagram in your last post and try holding your wrist in such a fashion that would line up with the supposed trajectory of the bullet and allow the bullet to pass between the ulna and radius without striking the ulna. Unless JBC was severely double jointed, and I have seen no evidence that he was, it is far more likely the Magic Bullet would have struck his radius and stopped there, or struck his radius and been deflected away from his wrist. The lies continue. Robert: The SBT diagram is of course drawn for a shot around frame Z224 and Connally's hand is down where we can not see it that frame. The SBT trajectory is out Connally's chest, hit wrist and then a trivial wound to his left thigh.I drew the yellow line which shows a trajectory at a later time than assumed by the SBT so that no bullet could have hit his left thigh that late in the shooting. Every erudite JFK researcher knows Connally could not have been shot much later than frame 230 or so because CE399 could not have hit his left thigh. Here is how to correct that almost universally accepted incorrect assumption. Shortly after Z224, Connally responds to a minor wound by rapidly raising his arms (which causes his jacket lapel to pop out). We can see the hat in his hand and his hand is facing his chest. At Z224, Connally is looking right toward Zapruder At Z230, about 1/3 second later, Connally is looking left, we can clearly see Connally's palm is facing his chest. he could not have turned it so quickly, all he did was raise his arm in response to his FIRST wound. Connally is looking toward his LEFT! At Z2230+ Connally then begins turn to right to look toward where the sound came from Z290+ Connally is now beginning to turn back to look over his left shoulder Z313 JFK shot in the head, one of the motorcycle cops said it was REALLY LOUD the acoustical evidence proves it was from the grassy knoll Z319 All three men toward front of limo begin to duck forward after the loud JFK head shot Z325 Last shot is fired from TSBD, it misses JFK's head as the 313 shot knocked him out of the way and hits Connally in the back, exiting his chest and hits his wrist which is in a position you might find interesting: As I sat in the hot tub tonight, I put an imaginary hat in my hand as I turned to the right with my palm turned toward my chest. Then as I turned back to my left keeping my hand close to my chest, it was natural to roll my hand outward so that my palm was facing outward. That may help you agree that Connally was shot in the back a split second after JFK was shot in the head. This is probably the zillionth time I've repeated this BUT Connally made rapid movements that look like they were caused by gun shots 4.8 seconds before and 0.7 seconds after the JFK head shot. That is the exact timing of the last three shots per the acoustical analysis. 4.8 secs before the JFK head shot, John Connally receives a minor wound to his left leg from a bullet fragment, that is why by Z230 he can snap his head to look left and then by Z273 he is turned around in his seat. Nobody should have ever believed Connally was shot in the back bofore this turn to his right! Only because the gubermint said that is what happened are fools empowered enough to agree. agrr 0.7 seconds after the JFK head shot, the 3rd shot from the TSBD is fired, it misses JFK's head and hits Gov Connally in the back. Because the timing of the last three shots is the same in both the Zapruder film AND the acoustical evidence, it proves the Dallas police radio channel did record the sounds of the shots. Once you understand that, you then know absolutely for sure that a conspiracy killed JFK. There's no wiggle room, it proves it. It helps if you understand how the tape was analyzed by the HSCA audio experts and it helps if you make a back of the envelope probability calculation for if you argue the tape did not record the sounds of the shots, you have to say the HSCA guessed 4.8 seconds and 0.7 seconds using random noise as a guide. That is impossible. Now can you ask why did the US goverment lie then and forge evidence and why did they lie in 1978? Those question are now easily answered once you prove conspiracy and prove the US government forged evidence. The guilty men's fingerprints are all over the forged evidence. Using both the Z film and the audio evidence allows anyone to easily solve this "mystery." But it's never been a mystery to the insiders, it has always been a lie. And this time, pay attention to the witnesses, not the lying US Government. Once you get this down, you are prepared to understand US History for the last 50 years. If you listen to Connally again describe his turn, it might make more sense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NfgTEi12p0
  4. Mark After answering more questions on YOUTUBE today, I think I believe that the average person simply cannot believe that the US Gov't would lie to them. The JFK assassination is probably the biggest lie in history but until you understand what happened, it is simply not believable. And you can't believe and understand this issue until you yourself verify everything independently. And nothing seems to be trivial even though I thought that by showing that 4.8 seconds BEFORE and 0.7 Seconds AFTER JFK is shot in the head, that John Connally makes two of the quickest movements in the Zapruder film. That of course corresponds with the timing of the acoustical analysis, a shot fired 4.8 seconds before and 0.7 seconds after the JFK head shot. What is the probability that the HSCA audio experts picked those times from random noise when looking at an audio recording? The chance is nil, therefore the audio evidence is valid, it did record the sounds of the shots. Once you know the audio evidence is valid, the mystery of the shooting scenario becomes solvable. You know the wound locations and you know where 4 of the 5 shots were fired from. The HSCA test shots were fired from two locations because many witnesses said that is where they thought the shots were from, either the TSBD or the grassy knoll. The reasons that is true is: Shot #1 and #3 were 2.8 seconds apart, that is almost the 3 seconds you need to eject a shell and fire another shot from behind. The audio evidence shows there was a group of 3 shots, then a pause of 4.8 seconds then BANG-BANG. There is an overwhelming number of witnesses who were near the TSBD that said there were 3 shots fired from there. The only thing possible is that shots #1 and #3 were fired from the TSBD and one of the last two was from the TSBD. Shot 1 TSBD#1 Shot 2 Somewhere else Shot 3 TSBD #2 4.8 seconds Shot 4 Grassy Knoll Shot 5 TSBD #3 We know shot #4 was from the grassy knoll because Prof Barger wanted someone to check his results after reviewing the data from the audio tape. They hired a second set of audio "experts" and they were told there was insufficient money for more test shots! So they mathematically analyzed what they had and focused on shot #4, the grassy knoll shot. The audio experts figured that people wanted to know the answer when the insiders were working to shut the inquiry down. When you then combine the information you know from witnesses with the information you get from the audio evidence and the Zapruder film, you get this scenario: shot #1 Z178 missed the limo and hit a curb, James Tague slightly wounded TSBD#1 1.7 seconds shot #2 Z202 From left front through windshield, hit JFK in the front of his neck and exited the rear of his neck. You get the trajectory from the left front by noting there are several witnesses who saw the windshield with a hole just to the left of the rear view mirror 1.1 seconds shot #3 Bullet hit a branch and fragmented. CE840, bullet fragments under Nellie's seat proves a bullet fragmented. Another fragment hit John Connally in the left thigh which was just to the right of where CE840 fragments were found. Other witnesses saw something hit the street. Another fragment hit JFK in the back about 5.5 inches below his collar. TSBD#2 4.8 seconds later, the gunman see JFK is still alive and only wounded shot #4, fired from the grassy knoll, hits JFK just forward of his right ear in the hairline. It exits the right rear of JFK's head and leaves an exit wound about 5 inches across. Roy Kellerman's Warren Comm testimony matches the exit wound description given by the Parkland medical witnesses. 0.7 seconds shot #5 TSBD#3 misses JFK's head as he was knocked violently out of the way by shot #4. It hits Connally in the back and bends him over forward just exactly like he said. The bullet exits his chest, hits his right wrist and goes on toward the front of the limo CE567. Connally was wounded by shots #3 and #5. One of the lies told is that all of Connally's wounds were caused by one bullet, that is not true. Connally had a trivial wound right after the sign and that is why he could turn almost completely around in his seat. It is not credible to believe he had an exit wound in his chest the size of a baseball and he turned around to look over his right shoulder. Several seconds after Connally first reacted when a shot was fired. He only had a minor thigh wound when he turned. He was not shot in the back until Z frame 325. This is a magic bullet figure showing shows how the bullet exited JFK's neck and hit Connally in the back. The yellow trajectory is flatter as you would get if the limo was further away from the TSBD as in the Z325 shot. The JFK community bought the lie that Connally had to be shot in the back earlier because a flatter trajectory means he could not have been hit in the left thigh, therefore the erudite JFK community decided that Connally was wrong when he said " the force of the blow to his back bent him over"...... It all makes sense once you understand the audio evidence is valid because the sounds of the shots were recorded.
  5. Add this information to your film and it will finally make sense. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NfgTEi12p0
  6. James: Thank you for uploading that so I could better understand your position. It appears to me you are relying almost totally on what you see in the Zapruder film and you are ignoring what John Connally said happened. As I showed in my video, John Connally first reacts to a shot at Z224, 60 frames or so before you contend Nellie began to realize John Connally had been shot. John Connally says he was not shot in the back until he is bent over. We can clearly see it is a split second AFTER JFK is shot in the head that Connally is bent over. I listened several times to your presentation and you say John Connally is in Nellie's lap by Z325. That is NOT true, 325 is the point he is still facing forward and in the next 0.1 second, he is thrown FORWARD and then he collapses and is moved to Nellie's lap. I have stepped through the individual Z frames several times and there is no doubt that John Connally does NOT move toward Nellie until after Z325. I don't remember your position on several things from our previous discussion over this matter. But when you look at Z frame 273, John Connally has almost turned around completely to look over his right shoulder. To think he has a serious chest wound and no blood can be seen on his shirt in this or any other frame is not reasonable. The argument used to be the single bullet theory is hard to believe (my words) but it's the best we have..... But now there is an explanation that straightens it all out. Connally is not shot in the back at Z224, he was only slightly wounded by a bullet fragment. That is credible because there were three bullet fragments found under Nellie's seat (CE840). The only wound Connally has during his turn is the minor wound to his left thigh when he is turning from Z224 all the way up to when he is shot in the back 0.7 seconds after JFK is shot in the head. John Connally turned almost completely around to look toward where he thought the sound of the shot was from. Unless the US Gov't had told them, no one would ever have believed that he was shot in the back before this frame. If you repeat a lie often enough, some will accept it as truth. And of course this lie was repeated for over a decade with the Zapruder film not available to the pubic and autopsy photos also not available To ignore that the audio evidence is valid means that you think the HSCA acoustical experts just happened to guess the time between shots in 4.8 seconds. If you understand how they used the technique of echo correlation analysis, you will find that the odds are astronomical that the audio evidence is valid. A At Z312, John Connally is still on the right side of Nellie, he has not yet even faced forward yet which is what he said his position was when he was shot in the back. Z324 John Connally is facing forward Z327, 0.1 second AFTER the shot to his back which bent him over which is about 0.8 seconds after JFK was shot in the head. John Connally has not finished his movement after the shot hit him in the back, it is a split second after this frame that Nellie pulls him over into her lap. Nellie did not and could not have pushed John forward this quickly, she was not strong enough to move him like this and neither are you! John Connally made two extremely quick movements, 4.8 seconds BEFORE and 0.7 seconds AFTER JFK was shot in the head. That is the timing of the acoustical evidence which proves it is valid. I will keep repeating this until somebody proves it is wrong, which no one will ever be able to do. One by one, it will click and finally you will see that it makes perfect sense. We may always have to disagree. Bill
  7. Mr. Charleston I have long felt there to be something awry with the official explanation, as well. To me, the most glaring piece of information is Connally's persistent claim that the shot hit him in the back "doubled me up" and "knocked me over". These are strong definitive words and cannot be mistaken for any movement of JBC's prior to z313. The true paradox, however, is in both JBC's and his wife's also very persistent claim that JBC was shot in the back and they were both lying down on the seat when they heard the shot that struck JFK in the head AND felt a spray of brain matter on their persons. I believe you are on the right track with your research but I also believe the coverup and resulting alterations to the Zapruder film may be even more complicated than you and I can even imagine. You have aroused my suspicions and I am now just doublechecking some old statements to see if I missed some things the first time I read them. I would like to continue discussion with you on this thread. Robert: The Z film had to be forged to hide the massive wound in the rear of JFK's head and it had to hide the movement of Governor Connally when he was shot in the back a split second after JFK was shot in the headl 1. JFK head: Probably just cut and paste to hide the wound and they added Z314, they added a small movement forward so that fools like Bugliosi would be able to say that JFK initially went forward. 2. Connally shot to back 0.7 Seconds after JFK head shot was hidden by a massive blur of the Zapruder film. If you look at any computer stabilized Z film today, you can easily see Connally thrown forward and his head snaps rapidly downward, THEN after that movement Nellie pulls him over into her lap. The time difference according to the Zapruder film AND the acoustical timing between the JFK head shot and the Connally Z325 back shot PROVES that Connally was shot in the back a split second AFTER JFK was shot in the head. Both John and Nellie Connally said the investigators and ballistic experts disagreed and argued with them so I believe they were convinced to say that part. But both of them in every interview I've seen always insisted that after the first shot JFK reacted to John turned to the right and then was turning back toward his left when the shot hit him in the back and doubled him over. I have the "advantage" of being shot about that year in a hunting accident. I remember parts of it like it was yesterday and I can believe that John Connally remembered clearly being doubled over when the shot hit him in the back. So if you remove the part of what John Connally says of the timing, then it all makes sense as I show in the video for the first few minutes. Witnesses don't get everything right when a lot happens in just a few seconds. The audio evidence and the partially altered Zapruder film PROVE what happened, some of what Connally said is correct and some of it is wrong. Since we are on the subject of Connally look at Connally for the first few seconds after his Z224 reaction after coming from behind the sign. That is NOT what I would expect a man to do if he received a serious wound to his back when JFK first reacted. Connally makes TWO very rapid movements right after the sign but the acoustical evidence only indicates ONE shot then. 1. Z224 He throws up his hands and snaps his head to his LEFT 2. Z230+ then John Connally starts his turn to look over his right shoulder Connally makes TWO very rapid movements EXACTLY when the acoustical evidence shows shots were fired, 4.8 seconds BEFORE and 0.7 seconds AFTER the JFK head shot. In probability calculations, AND means multiply The Zapruder film shows reactions AND the acoustical evidence shows a shot was fired at each time! It takes it from a guess to a near certainty. That is why the acoustical evidence was viciously attacked by so many, it would have revealed the truth. Insiders in the US Government will do anything to keep you from knowing the truth, it exposes them as the lying criminals some of them are. This screen capture shows shots 4.8 seconds before and 0.7 seconds AFTER the shot from the grassy knoll. As I show in my video, the HSCA showed a shot hitting JFK in the head from behind, not from the front as anybody with an ounce of sense would show. The US Gov't found that it is easy to tell lies, even this idiotic alignment between the Zapruder film and the acoustical evidence is accepted by the press and they say: If a shot was fired from in front, it missed! They weren't that stupid, it was a huge lie that is still repeated today. Another thing the audio evidence proves is that Connally made two separate reactions when shots were fired which means not all of Connally's wounds were caused by one bullet! The Z film timing was not significantly altered, there was no need to as there were other films that showed parts of the shooting sequence. The acoustical evidence was found years later and proves the timing was not significantly changed but they had to alter what it showed! With only five shots on the acoustical recording and the locations defined where 4 of the 5 likely came from, it defines what wounds each of the shots had to have caused. You don't have to guess anymore once you understand the acoustical evidence is valid. http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b97/Cortex_2005/zapruder.gif
  8. Mark: The video shows it is reasonable to think that Connally turned after his Z224 reaction to look over his right shoulder to what he thought was a gunshot Connally looks to his right from Z 224+ to when he starts to turn back to his left to look over his left shoulder Z280+ JFK is shot from the right front at Z313 and he is knocked out of the way (violently back and to the left directly away from the grassy knoll gunman). 0.7 Seconds after the JFK head shot, shot #3 is fired from the Texas School Book Depository, it misses JFK's head and strikes Governor Connally in the back, driving him forward. Z324 thi Z327 Connally begins to duck at Z319 just like Kellerman and Greer do in response to Z313 shot but something different happens to Connally, at Z325 he is driven rapidly forward, his head snaps down and just 0.2 seconds later, his head is almost down. How did he move so quickly? The audio evidence explains it well. The last shot fired at Z325 was from the Texas School Book Depository, it missed JFK's head and hit Connally in the back, bending him over just EXACTLY LIKE HE SAID HAPPENED. The HSCA study that found evidence of gunfire had to be shutdown as quickly as possible. The HSCA said they ran out of money and no more test shots were fired for if they had been, they would have narrowed it down and identified three shooters, five shots. If you pursue this evidence, you will soon be asking: 1. Who had the power to corrupt the investigation? 2. Who had the power and the opportunity to forge evidence? ETC. Once you understand and believe the audio evidence is valid, the house of cards hiding the lies quickly collapse and you can find WHO, HOW and WHY rather easily. But first you have to do a little homework. For something so big, you shouldn't believe anything I say, you should verify it all. IF you need help, ask. It is important that you know the US Government has a playbook that allows them to tell really big lies and how to get away with it.
  9. With all due respect, is your opinion the point? Or is demonstrating the truth so convincingly by working together that the WC defenders pack up shop and go home what we are working toward? David's point may be that anyone who has looked at the available information believes that there is sufficient evidence to show that the SBT (Single Bullet Theory) did not happen. For example, when you look at the pictures of the back of JFK's shirt and jacket, there is no way the bullet went up to exit JFK's neck and then down to hit Connally in the back. There are many things that appear to show the lone gunman theory is not correct. The discussions have been reduced to the SBT is correct with the counter argument is that no it is not. It is analogous to two kids yelling yes it is, no it isn't. To move the argument forward, it is going to be necessary to show what actually happened during the shooting. Do you have any idea what happened if the SBT is not correct? There is no need to be concerned at all. There is no "SBT". There are merely different scenarios that the LNTs have tried to play a shell game with. I discuss this in my article "The Pretty Pig's Saturday Night"' http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=2372&hl=pretty+pig%27s+saturday+night The SBT did not happen so what did happen? This video shows the answer. Many, and I mean many, do not consider this proof that a conspiracy killed JFK. I show enough IMHO in the YOUTUBE video that it is consistent with what one of the best witnesses said happen, and those who said BANG-BANG. As with any investigation, not everything a witness says is correct but in this case, it is consistent with what Connally said happened. Virtually none of his observations have ever been consistent with the SBT. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NfgTEi12p0 I opened a new thread with thiat YOUTUBE link entitled "solving the JFK assassination."
  10. Then you have enough ancillary evidence to prove a conspiracy murder JFK, Bill. Go with it! All we need! Just the same, I'll stick with medical evidence and medical experts. I opened another thread entitled "solving the JFK assassination shooting mystery." I have seen MANY people who consider the common timing between the Z film and the audio evidence a coincidence and not proof of conspiracy but statistically, that argument is not reasonable. The HSCA audio experts did not guess times in the Zapruder film that were not even identified in 1978. The only reasonable explanation for the common times between shots is that the audio evidence does have the sounds of the shots. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NfgTEi12p0
  11. I wrote an E book that claims to solve the JFK assassination shooting mystery. It does that t by using the fact that there are two ways to time the shots that killed JFK. One way uses evidence that many think is valid and the second method uses evidence that has been viciously attacked by many. Virtually everybody believes the evidence is questionable if not obviously invalid. As I have stated previously on the Education Forum, if the US Government was involved in a cover up, then any evidence or information the US Government released is suspect. As you will eventually understand, the way the game has been played is that there is so much information out there that you can pick your evidence to reach many different conclusions. Then you are forced to try to deal with other information that shows your conclusion is suspect or may even be obviously incorrect. Here is how I play the game. There is independent evidence that proves the US Government forged large amounts of evidence. If the US Government had their hands on it and could have altered it to hide the truth, they did. For decades the strategy has worked with the hand they were dealt. They would consider many of the things that have come out as just bad luck but the public is still confused, confusion is a liars best friend. Polls generally show about 80% of Americans do not believe a single gunman killed JFK but almost 100% of Americans do not know what actually happened. A paradox is generated that some have locked into. Because the time between shots is the same in both ways to measure the shot timing, that statistically proves that both methods are valid. But it also proves that the Zapruder film has been altered. The answer is simple: The government changed what you can see but they did not significantly alter the timing shown in the Zapruder film. Back in 1963, things were analog and cut and paste was probably the method used. They did not know an audio recording was available that would prove that forgeries were done to the film so there was no reason to change the timing of the film. When the audio recording was found and the first analysis was performed, the keepers of the lie realized that this information had to be discredited. And it has been viciously attacked. I show in this video how one lie that many documentaries have locked into was generated: If there was a shot fired from the front, it missed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NfgTEi12p0
  12. With all due respect, is your opinion the point? Or is demonstrating the truth so convincingly by working together that the WC defenders pack up shop and go home what we are working toward? David's point may be that anyone who has looked at the available information believes that there is sufficient evidence to show that the SBT (Single Bullet Theory) did not happen. For example, when you look at the pictures of the back of JFK's shirt and jacket, there is no way the bullet went up to exit JFK's neck and then down to hit Connally in the back. There are many things that appear to show the lone gunman theory is not correct. The discussions have been reduced to the SBT is correct with the counter argument is that no it is not. It is analogous to two kids yelling yes it is, no it isn't. To move the argument forward, it is going to be necessary to show what actually happened during the shooting. Do you have any idea what happened if the SBT is not correct? There is no need to be concerned at all. There is no "SBT". There are merely different scenarios that the LNTs have tried to play a shell game with. I discuss this in my article "The Pretty Pig's Saturday Night"' http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=2372&hl=pretty+pig%27s+saturday+night I enjoyed reading the pretty pig and I am somewhat familiar with your limo work. Whether the US Government was destroying Secret Service records or altering the limo as a crime scene, it is apparent there is information that we do not know and there are probably people out there that do not want us to know it. Only by picking evidence and information the US Government did not and could not have altered can we arrive at the truth. I have listened to the press interview witnesses for decades and frequently when a witness says something that is really significant to solving the case, the press typically ignores it and moves on. Witnesses make mistakes and you can not believe everything they say but as any investigator knows, you have to look at the pjysical evidence and bounce that against what the witnesses say they saw and heard. When you get things to match up, then you can say BINGO! I have shown a couple of things that any reasonable person should agree with: 1. The US Gov't forged evidence and lied. I think we clearly agree on that. 2. To solve the case, only evidence the US Government could not have altered or forged can be used. I have shown that a couple of witnesses who said the last two shots were fired a split second apart, there are many more. Another thing stated is that there are numerous witnesses who saw a large hole in the back of JFK's head. All of this information is significant when you finally try to put it all together. If I throw out too much at once, it goes right by the typical JFK fan and they go into a state similar to ventricular fibrillation. I have already seen it here when it was said DUMB JFK arguments. It is a fact that many witnesses said that.there was a massive wound in the right rear of JFK's head AND that many other Dealey Plaza witnesses said that the last two shots were BANG-BANG.
  13. Indeed. And then there's the "missing bullets" problem that no conspiracy theorist ever wants to talk about. Is it truly "reasonable" to toss the Single-Bullet Theory into the trash can while at the same time embracing a theory that has JFK and Connally being hit by THREE separate bullets (as nearly all CTers believe, since those CTers insist that JFK's throat wound was an entry wound)? And then BOTH bullets that entered (but never exited) JFK just....vanished? Silly. Single-Bullet-Theory.blogspot.com [End Off-Topic Post.] Let's just agree to rename the SBT to the SBL- the single bullet lie. Be patient, I will show you how to PROVE that a conspiracy killed JFK. I will show you WHY some of the significant clues have been buried by vicious attacks and lies. The US Government has a license to lie and they do. Now to prove to you these statements are true......
  14. David, I am not looking for an argument, I'm looking for agreement: The ultimate goal is to show how to prove what happened during the shooting, not argue about what did not happen. ... Then 100% of our focus should be on the medical evidence, there is no wiggle room, nor room for debate. Especially if one is looking to prove, a conspiracy murdered JFK! Obviously you will do and pursue what you feel best. However, the door is closing on case debate and dumb JFK forum arguments that go absolutely no where... David Lifton argued with me one time that the JFK medical evidence is the key to solving the crime and proving conspiracy. I strongly disagreed One of the three things I wrote previously on this thread implied that anything the US Government could touch or control is suspect. There is little doubt that a significant amount of the medical evidence has been forged by the government to show that a lone gunman that was located behind and above JFK fired only three shots. If you are going to use forged evidence to prove something, you are going to find yourself in a very deep hole with Vince Bugliosi. Here is another witness who says the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG, or BAM-BAM or two shots almost on top of each other, or the sound of one had not stopped before she heard the next one. If you can explain/prove to me why these witnesses heard echoes and not two separate shots, please proceed. Otherwise, watch and you are going to learn how to PROVE that a conspiracy killed JFK. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8H_DaL_tQk If you listen starting at 5:30 of this youtube video with Lee Bowers, you will see him ALSO show that he heard the last two shots fired a split second apart. The two witnesses I have shown, Lee Bowers and Patrica Ann Donaldson, probably never knew each other, probably had no connection other than they both were in Dealey Plaza during the shooting. But they both indicated that they heard that the last two shots were fired a split second apart. I can show many more witnesses who indicated that the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG but that would't prove anything. The US Government shut down this key bit of information by saying these witnesses heard echoes, not two separate shots. The medical evidence does not directly provide clues how to resolve this dilemma but other evidence does.
×
×
  • Create New...