Jump to content
The Education Forum

Dawn Meredith

Members
  • Posts

    2,646
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dawn Meredith

  1. The trial was very disappointing. Too technical and they totally lost the jurors. Did not focus on the one thing every criminal trial is about: the non guilt of the accused. More later, hope more will chime in.
  2. Really. The level of back stabbing and ad hominem attacks on this thread appear designed by the Armstrong haters to dissuade readers from reading or posting on this thread. And the irony is that John is one of the nicest researchers I have ever known.
  3. Hi Glen...I don't do much personal email these days but yes I am a long time friend of Richard, since 92 or so. My email is dmeredith@austin.rr.com and I will get it to him. (I see you have just joined us at DPF too). Hmm not sure why you could not PM me... Dawn sorry for the h and L interruption.
  4. Agreed. The level of anger here is hard to take. Have any of these naysayers actually read Harvey and Lee? Jim it is very admirable of you to continue to support this evidence with so many posters attacking you. Dawn
  5. I remember when Baden testified before HSCA. He was holding CE 399 and talking about how "DAMAGED and Flattened" the bullet was. A xxxx of the first order. I would not trust a word he said on any matter. Clearly a paid disinformationist.
  6. Joe he might have told Walt what he found. And he did tell me about seeing Poppy Bush there but I had forgotten about it. Our mutual friend reminded me yesterday. Tosh Plumlee also told me many times he had independent proof of Wallace being involved but he has never said exactly what. I think J trusted Walt to do a lot with his files. But only Joan Mellen got access. Not blaming Walt for this as it is a lot of material and he had a very cryptic way of noting things. FWIW I trust very little of what JM wrote on the Wallace case. She disregarded so very much yet trusted the FBI and Wallace's daughter. And some "note" in Nathan Darby's file. I have long believed that to understand the TX. connection to this case you may have to live here awhile.
  7. I learned something new yesterday while talking with another of J's good friends. He shared with her that he had picked something up that day in the Plaza after the assassination which connected Mac Wallace to the assassination. He never told her what it was stating that it was too dangerous for her to know. The other thing that this friend reminded me of yesterday was that J said he saw his distant cousin there too: George H. W. Bush.
  8. Update on Jim Marrs. He is home and is on dialysis every night. He is blind in his right eye, but is trying to still be active. This is a troubling time for him and Carol. Please remember them in your thoughts and prayers. I'll update as I know more. from chris gallop on fb.
  9. Exactly. No agency is in total lockstep, so perhaps there were a few in the CIA who would want to abort...Tosh is my friend but I have never really known what to make of his Dallas story. Anyone who doubts the CIA- at the highest level -being behind the assassination does not understand the hatred they had for JFK. And it's not like they did not have tons of experience in assassinating leaders.
  10. OMG Putin did zero re. the 2016 election. I am so sick of this silly lie. MSM keeps spreading it. Keep in mind its genesis : Julian Assange received hacked email from Hillary and Podesta. (Did you know Podesta's password was "password" ?) He has repeatedly said it did not come from a state actor. Couple that with the fact that there were several DNC staffers who were very angry at what Hillary and Co. had done to Bernie. I believe it was Seth Rich who sent the emails and he paid with his life. Assange has offered a large reward for information that will lead to Rich's killers. Glenn Greenwald has been very good on this issue. Dawn
  11. Amazing that this Nazi group was to act at the President's behest. Instead we find they murdered one president (JFK) and toppled another- Richard Nixon. They are virtually untouchable today. Dawn
  12. John does not post on forums. Jim maintains the website and does the posting on forums. John does the research, which he often calls and runs it by me before it's up on the site. I asked him about forums one time and he used to post I think he said on one many years back but there was too much bickering. (One of the reasons I hardly ever come here anymore).
  13. Jim I hardly ever come here anymore. Seems a waste of time. Answering all these questions and proving over and over that John Armstrong's research is valid goes no where. Naysayers don't care about truth, just argument for the sake of argument. All of the witnesses who testified as to the perfection of Harvey's Russian had zero motive to lie. And was pointed out he had not mastered the English language. Typical of someone whose second language is English.
  14. I agree but I think the plan was to kill him before he was even jailed. Get rid of him immediately before he had a chance to make any statements.
  15. Ya attack the messenger. Titovets is a mental case. While he was speaking at COPA I was sitting with Cyril Wecht and we were both cracking up at his nonsense. Are you also a Judy Baker believer? If so ask her to try to obtain her FBI (etc) records. That is my challenge to Ms. Baker. Rachel (Harvey's daughter) told John many years ago when he asked her about her "Uncle Robert" that she never met the man. Or had any contact. Someone needs to find him (I have his address but it's nowhere near me) and get a DNA sample then the same for Rachel and compare. John called me the other day and we talked about this issue again, he also filled me in on all the new research,. As I told him, I need a roadmap.
  16. You're right. In my (usual) haste I mis-read it. You actually say "not Oliver's son". So sorry. Roger Stone's talk was all about Trump's win. Waste of time to listen.
  17. Hey Pat I was surprised by you comments about Sean Stone. I love him. And I think he is totally sincere. Did Fetzer get into his Paul is dead insanity? Happy Thanksgiving. Dawn
  18. Wow that is great that this is online. This manuscript was self-published By Richard. Mine was given to me by him when we first met. Sandy we will be looking most forward to your break down on the finger print analysis. I am not watching any of the conference this afternoon. Instead getting ready to go out to dinner with one of the members/ mods of DPF- Lauren Johnson. Great guy, looking forward to meeting him.
  19. What is your email address. I will PM it to Richard via fb. He is still in Dallas now. He is a long time real life friend of mine, met him a year or tow after moving to Austin from MA in 1990. Been buds ever since. Ya his rambler manuscript was great but needed an editor. Or a map for all the names and links. Richard is always happy to interact with other JFK assassination researchers/readers. You will enjoy the presentation he gave this am. I only knew from a pm yesterday that he was speaking this morning, so I tuned in.
  20. I was in court all morning yesterday and really had no interest til St John Hunt's presentation which I missed most of. Then Doug Caddy and the fired up Ed Tatro, who unfortunately does not post on forums or on facebook.
  21. Are you able to watch any of this after the fact? I now it' s streaming live and I hope it will also be on you tube. Ya I knew Richard was going but did not realize he was also preresenting, which is why he would be going.
  22. Sandy don't know if you watched any of the conference but my good friend Richard Bartholomew just gave a great presentation refuting Mellen's chapter 17 in her Wallace book. He quoted quite a bit from your posts here and is eagerly awaiting your further research on these errors. His talk clarified a lot for me about the smudged prints Joan is trying to claim Nathan Darby used. The Austin police dept. 10 card. Not the excellent DPF prints that Nathan actually used. I wonder if her error on this was confusion. Or....
  23. I want to thank Doug Caddy here for his talk at the conference. Just finished watching it. Looking forward to Ed Tatro for the follow up and especially for pointing out how J Harrison had tried to get Mac Wallace's file but what he got was all blacked out. For those who do not know J was at one time military intel, then later a cop in Dallas on 11/22/63. A good cop. And later a very close friend of mine for many years. So he gets a blacked out "file" but when author Joan Mellen files a similar request she not only gets the full file she gets it free of charge. I knew this and was blown away when I read it. So thanks Ed for making that point.
×
×
  • Create New...