Jump to content
The Education Forum

Brendan Slattery

Members
  • Posts

    321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

4,444 profile views

Brendan Slattery's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  1. "O'Reilly was rude to a certifiable nut! How dare he!" Um, you have watched his show before, right? Fetzer knew he wasn't there to play pattycake. Fetz is leveling some pretty serious charges, and O'Reilly cross-examined him quite devastatingly. The ex-professor did nothing but stammer, plug his website, and fade into a catatonic trance when challenged. It was almost as good as Groden on the witness stand in the OJ civil suit. That's what happens to the nuts when they leave their comfort zones. They fall apart under the weight of their own hubris. Nor is it particularly libelous to describe Fetz as an "anti-American loon." Why is it so hard to believe that there are Islamic jihadists in the world who wish the US and the West nothing but death and destruction?
  2. Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet! sock puppet? that term got started on alt.vietnam.war USNET group about 12 years ago Gee, I'm impressed. Did they copyright it or something? What would you know about Vietnam other than being fragged?
  3. Brendan Slattery There is a problem with your photo, it seems your eyes are way too close together, must be a problem with your software and you should have that fixed. You are right, Shanet. A makeover would do wonders for his self-esteem. Jack Jack's just jealous 'cause I'm gonna outlive him by 40 years ... and do a little dance on his grave. Thanks for the craven Nazi smear. It's been awhile.
  4. Hey morons: where's your precious Mr. Arnold in the Moorman polaroid? Seems to me he should be plainly visible. Either that or a lying sack of xxxx.
  5. Well, you hate this country too, Jack, so you and Fetz can spoon to your heart's content. Accusing the Prez of murdering 3,000 innocent people is indicative of "calm class"? And you think this reflects well on the Marine Corps? What is his idea of "experts"? Those pimple-popping twits from Loose Change? Hilarious. Thankfully, I know an asshole when I see one (or read their posts). Just remember folks: you won't read any of Fetz's shocking revelations in the Bush-hating NY Times or Nation magazine because they're influenced by the evil gum'mint! LOL.
  6. Skanks with too much time on their hands........and they are jealous! Hey look! It's Jack's personal sock puppet!
  7. Delicious. http://hotair.com/archives/2006/10/12/vide...not-be-handled/
  8. Let's call this the "sore loser" thread of the day. You couldn't get Rove, Cheney or Bush, so you had to settle for a pipsqueak like Libby. It is to laugh. Presumably, the moonbats who believe that Cheney was orchestrating the "Get Joe" conspiracy will also believe that Libby was ordered to avoid including her in his notes. LOL. When will you dopes realize that partisan hack Joe Wilson is the real villain? Washingon Post: Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame’s CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming — falsely, as it turned out — that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush’s closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It’s unfortunate that so many people took him seriously.
  9. Does it go into the White House pedophilia ring? There is some evidence for that too, dating back to the Reagan administration. (There may have been a hiatus during the days of Clinton, who had more orthodox forms of diversion. It may be just a Republican thing.) Skolnick has written about it among others, though of course it will never see the light of day in the mainstream press. If it's true, however, it helps explain why the Republican leadership considered Mark Foley's behavior to be nothing (till he was caught). Ron...this is what you are referring to I think. On another thread I posted the link to Dubya's proclivities. Jack PS...since when are headlines from a Washington newspaper SINKING TO A NEW LOW? Would it be better if it were Clinton? Jack And it keeps getting worse john w John...if the president is a pedophile, why would you not want to know about it? To me, citizens should be concerned about the moral character of elected officials. Why do you think Dubya should get a free pass? Some may wish to read this. Do not click if you don't. http://www.anu.org/viewnationallistnews.as...356060401FB0%7D Support morality in government. Jack So you agree that Clinton should have done the honorable thing and resigned. Good to hear.
  10. More to the point: don't you think 2006 technology would be able to spot/uncover alterations to a film using relatively primitive 1963 technology?
  11. ______________________________________________ Brendan, Regarding my "real" last name, I was adopted at four months of age and found/met my biological parents in 1987. Thats when I found out that my original surname was "Mahon." Care to make a joke about that? ______________________________________________ That means sooo much coming from a man who ridicules the appearance of others in an unprovoked manner. I suggest you get out of the "joke" business yourself.
  12. ______________________________ Nope. P.S. How quaint for a consummate baiter to accuse someone else of being a baiter... But we digress, don't we, Brendan? P.P.S. You do look a bit "cross-eyed" in your photo. Maybe you should get your eyes checked? ___________________ Let's see: you call me out by name in a special thread, yet somehow you're the aggrieved party? Nice. Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not cross-eyed, though I notice you're four-eyed. And could your pose be any gayer? Unlikely. ______________________________________ (Quote) "And could your pose be any gayer? Unlikely. (End quote) --Brendan Slattery Wow. Regarding the "pose," all I can say is that the girls in the Czech Republic and here in San Diego seem to like it. It "works" for me... You're straight?? Yikes. You have a very active imagination, not to mention a short memory: I believe it was you who fired the first salvo about others' looks. And since when does accurately describing someone impute hostility? Goody for you. You can fend for yourself at the bathhouses. I'm sure you use it on yourself with regularity. I don't date effeminate men who use aliases. Another vain stab at humor. Go to bed, little fella. You're tired.
×
×
  • Create New...