Jump to content
The Education Forum

Gil Jesus

Members
  • Content Count

    572
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Gil Jesus

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

11,413 profile views
  1. You can't have a transiting bullet without a bullet track through the body.
  2. The clown with the cigar was Dallas Detective Paul Bentley. I agree, Mr. Dobson that these 50 years have been nothing but a dog-and-pony show with respect to the media's handling of this case. These "Oswald-did-it" shows fail to address ANY of the evidence that suggests that Oswald was innocent. How did Oswald order a 36" M-C Troop Special rifle and end up with a 40.2" M-C Fucile Corto ? How did Oswald purchase and mail the money order when the EVIDENCE shows that Oswald was at work ? How did Oswald obtain the ammunition for that rifle when the ammunition was not sold commercially ? If the Dal
  3. I used to belong to that forum but I found that they are intolerant of any opinion other than Oswald was guilty. Posters were allowed to attack me and NOTHING was done about it, so I quit. That forum can go to hell.
  4. I swear....the closer to this anniversary we get....the more wacky things will be and the more colorful the red herrings will be....advance and read with caution folks. It's difficult to believe that this was a result of an accident. Hoover wanted the FBI to take over Presidential protection. If the FBI had found the SS that inept in protecting the President, to the extent that it actually killed him, he would have pulled whatever strings necessary to move that responsibility over to the FBI. I don't recall any of the witnesses in Dealey Plaza saying the SS killed him.
  5. And there's another issue that needs to be addressed in the Tippit case. Many of the witnesses who "identified" Oswald from a photograph were never shown a "photographic lineup". Instead, they were shown photographs only of Oswald and nearly every time that photograph was either the New Orleans mugshot or the DPD mugshot. One time, they even showed a witness the "backyard" photograph. So you have planted in the witness' mind the guy they saw was a criminal and armed. Talk about influencing a witness. There was even one witness, I think it was Patterson, who the FBI said identified Oswald from
  6. Absolutely not. Their power was such that NO defense lawyer in Dallas dared step forward to take Oswald's case. Last I knew, 25 people who had been convicted under the Wade tenure had had their convictions overturned by DNA evidence. The credibility of the Dallas prosecutory system in 1963 was garbage, from the police all the way up to the DA. But you'll never see David Von Pein or the Warren Commission apologists address that. Knowing what I know today, I believe that Ruby killed Oswald in order to prevent him from going to trial. IMO, that's why Ruby couldn't talk in Dallas. He needed to g
  7. Absolutely not. Their power was such that NO defense lawyer in Dallas dared step forward to take Oswald's case. Last I knew, 25 people who had been convicted under the Wade tenure had had their convictions overturned by DNA evidence. The credibility of the Dallas prosecutory system in 1963 was garbage, from the police all the way up to the DA. But you'll never see David Von Pein or the Warren Commission apologists address that. Knowing what I know today, I believe that Ruby killed Oswald in order to prevent him from going to trial. IMO, that's why Ruby couldn't talk in Dallas. He needed to g
  8. Thanks, Jim. I've been slacking off due to the holidays and now tax time, but now that I've gotten all of the distractions out of the way, I'm starting to research the issue again. Mr. Von Pein's "fall back " position is that even though the witnesses may be less than perfect, the physical evidence proves Oswald guilty. In this instance, he cites the four spent shells the Commission said were found at the Tippit murder scene. The Commission said that these shells were fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons. My question to Mr. Von Pein requires nothing more than a
  9. Hang on, they're coming. You mean Barbara Davis who said the shooter was wearing a dark jacket ? You mean Virginia Davis who said the shooter was 18 years old ? You mean Callaway and Guinyard who viewed a police lineup with Oswald and three police employees ? You mean Patterson, who was supposed to have identified Oswald from a photograph, but told the Commission he was never shown a photograph ? You mean Russell who identified Oswald from a mugshot and the "backyard photo" ? You mean Searcy who was never interviewed and Lewis who was never close enough to identify the shooter ? How abo
  10. Here's some news for ya. The shells didn't kill Tippit. The bullets did. Establish a chain of custody for those shells.
  11. Another piece of evidence that points to two shooters is that two different brands of ammunition was used. That says two different shooters. If Oswald had been "between" boxes of ammunition, the remnant of the second box should have been found in the search of his room. It was not. And don't tell me that they found two different types of bullets in his pocket. I'm not buying that BS story. Maybe David Von Pein believes that they could arrest an armed man and not search his person for almost two hours, but I'm not buying it.
  12. I am deeply saddened and shocked to hear of the passing of Jack White. He was always friendly and gracious to me and helpful in putting me in touch with other researchers. A real class act who will be sorely missed. Thank You so much for all your help and my most heartfelt condolences go out to Jack's family.
×
×
  • Create New...