Jump to content
The Education Forum

Mark Vernon

Members
  • Content Count

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Mark Vernon

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Now that I have a better grasp of whats going on here I will comment further. The administration of this forum is fine, its the moderators who are over-moderating. Perhaps the admins should review who is capable of unbiased moderation, and who isn't. I have been around here a short time and can recognize who should immediately be removed from this position. If my last post that clearly debunked an attack on me for my opinion is not restored, you will no longer have the ability to moderate any future posts....there wont be any.
  2. Mark, that particular term is not allowed on this Forum. Debate with as much passion as you wish, but please refrain from calling other members liars. Steve I'm glad to see you are moderating again. Did you make Mark's post invisible? Perhaps it would have been better to edit it, I'm curious to see how he thought he had proven Kevin "to be in the least, 100% wrong". Yes, it would have. But what is left is the 'offending' part and whats missing is the susbstance. Great moderating there chief.
  3. Mark, that particular term is not allowed on this Forum. Debate with as much passion as you wish, but please refrain from calling other members liars. Steve I'm glad to see you are moderating again. Did you make Mark's post invisible? Perhaps it would have been better to edit it, I'm curious to see how he thought he had proven Kevin "to be in the least, 100% wrong". Hi Len, Nope, twas not me. I think Evan applied the coup de gras. i was just trying to save Mark from unnecessary grief. Where is my post now?? Did it have too much debunking info for this particular mod? Now I am feel
  4. Mark...it is refreshing to see somebody here who does not buy the OFFICIAL STORY. However, be prepared to see "agents" quickly attack you. Thanks for looking at the facts. Jack Thanks Jack... let them attack all they want, the truth is more powerful than their lies, I just hope for justice to be served in my lifetime.
  5. MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNbwLfczjt8 I guess embedding vids here isnt allowed. Explosion at WTC...or maybe its just a falling desk. "My story was never mentioned in the final report and I felt like I was being put on trial in a court room. They were trying to twist my words and make the story fit only what they wanted to hear" [PDF download] -Firefighter Louie Cacchioli "When I looked in the direction of the Trade Center before it came down, before No. 2 came down, ... I saw low-level flashes ... I saw a flash flash flash and then it l
  6. My apologies Mr. Healy, I never intentionally mispell anothers name...though I have to admit not to know what you mean by I have to do better than that in political conspiracy debate. If you are looking to joust me after every post I make here , you are free to do so, but don't expect me to respond in any timely fashion. I'm here to spend some of my recreation time reading topics and opinions that are of interest. If you have a problem with me personally, take it up with me in PM.
  7. we know you've discussed experience on internet forums, yet I see no quotes, rather silly -- to whom are you talking to, Mr. Vernon? I am talking to the person who posted before me. Are you seriously contending you did not know this?, or is this your way to say that you are my arch enemy, and that I will have to deal with you at every post I make?
  8. Mr. Vernon, I suppose if I told you Ms. Dixie probably has well over 7,000 posts spread over a few JFK assassination research forums (public and private) you wouldn't be offended would you? One of the leading women JFK assassination researchers on the net, I might add. You've managed to scribble out a few posts here and you've already found yourself in a wee-bit of controversy.... Now, if you have JFK related material needing review or if you'd like, strut your stuff in a few assassination related threads, please do -- we await being bolled over with your brilliance... Carry on sir! Your's
  9. To be offended by something that clearly has nothing to do with you is what made me say what I said...you are a very infrequent contributer to this forum, post counts do not lie. That is not to ridicule you for it, just stating an obvious fact. I am on forums that people make 20-100 posts per day at, that would laugh until they cried if I told them someone with 200 posts over 4+ years felt offended by a generic type of email from a site administrator. I am only stating my opinion of course, and while it doesn't have my usual sense of humor injected, I meant no harm or ill in the reply.
  10. I am not some newcomer to investigating 9/11 and have no desire or feel compelled to read anything from organizations that are not independent and unbiased. You are stating the government version of 9/11....a clearly biased point of view, that has been heavily debunked.... I do not intend to go tit for tat with you, as you clearly have more time to waste on this topic than I care to. What is fact is the 9/11 commission was ridiculously biased, they did not take any account of eyewitnesses that didn't spew the official account. This is well documented, and anything you say to the otherwise is
  11. JHC....you have 200 posts in over 4 years on this site.... get over yourself. There was nothing offensive in that email...in fact, it was one of the most respectful and informative/intelligent emails I have ever received from a site administrator. Don't take yourself so seriously....I don't.
  12. I think Jack is overreacting...I didnt feel that email was directed to me personally but thankful I got it because I had forgotten about this place... All forums of any size have these kind of issues periodically....the disgruntled poster who forms a clique and tries to start a revolt, and wind up forming a new forum of their own who then turn on eachother and spontaneously combust...lol...not saying you are doing that Jack! Dont shoot. Its just an observation from 10+ years on message boards in general. A solid admin. and mod base easily withstands these, and continues on...I believe the hig
  13. Fair enough comment, Mark, but can you support any of what you say? To simply state it is your opinion is one thing. We most all have opinions with respect to 9/11 in regard to any complicity of governments, if evidence is missing or faked, motives, etc. Supporting those opinions to claim they are fact ("... defies all known physics...") is another matter. Perhaps there is evidence to suggest your opinions are correct. Perhaps there is evidence to conclusively support your opinion. On the other hand, there might be evidence to suggest you are wrong, or conclusively refute your opinion. So,
  14. No actually, they aren't explosions. If you watch the video, the velocity of the clouds of smoke & dust being ejected is a couple orders of magnitude too slow to be an explosion. I can see how you think it looks like an explosion from the still frame though. As yourself this... If those are explosions, why do they start after the building starts to collapse, not before? Cause has to come before effect. How is it that you can say there were no explosions for a fact? Are you stating opinion, or do you have some other kind of supporting documentation?
  15. Fair enough comment, Mark, but can you support any of what you say? To simply state it is your opinion is one thing. We most all have opinions with respect to 9/11 in regard to any complicity of governments, if evidence is missing or faked, motives, etc. Supporting those opinions to claim they are fact ("... defies all known physics...") is another matter. Perhaps there is evidence to suggest your opinions are correct. Perhaps there is evidence to conclusively support your opinion. On the other hand, there might be evidence to suggest you are wrong, or conclusively refute your opinion. So,
×
×
  • Create New...