Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton


      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Bernie Laverick

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Bernie Laverick

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 07/08/1958

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

10,937 profile views
  1. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    I don't know what game you are playing here Sandy but a few pages ago you told us all how you had read this link and couldn't make head nor tail of it. You said you would criticise it but you didn't understand the point Greg was actually making. Your words. Do you deny that? Now apparently you 'can't' find it even though it is the second one on the list entitled "PS-33 Beaureguard School Reords"!! Duh!!! Here is the link so you don't have to look through more than two topics from the main menu Jeremy posted. So did you truly read this before? Or did you just assume it would be wrong so didn't bother? It's very odd behaviour Sandy. To demand that a link be spoon fed to you - a link that, apparently, according to you, you have already 'seen' and commented on - because you can't be bothered to look two topics downwards is lazy beyond belief. It shows us that you don't want to read anything that may contradict your microscopic world view, so you simply pretend you can't find it. Shame that you forgot you had already apparently seen it and commented on it...! Oops! Sounds like a porky to me... https://reopenkennedycase.forumotion.net/t1500-one-more-attempt-at-those-darn-school-records Found any mistakes JA may have made yet Sandy? None of you EVER answer that do you? I wonder why? Is it because whatever answer you give you know how stupid you would look? Yes of course he made a few mistakes...Ok, list them. No he didn't make one single error...That's never happened the history of all human endeavour and any reasonable person would see that. I know it's embarrassing but you cannot give me ONE new development in this case. 'Lee' would be 78 today. That means potentially there has been FIFTY FOUR years for someone to come forward since 'he' disappeared and 20 years AFTER Armstrong wrote the book. Could you please name me one? Same for Marguerite...not one single sighting since that weekend. How do you explain that? I didn't bump into LHO's doppelganger but I'm here reading all about the assassination of JFK. You'd think that if a truck dealer's assistant apparently saw 'Lee' when he shouldn't have done it figures that there must have been lots of others who did also. After the assassination wouldn't some of them have been even slightly intrigued to do a bit of research to find out if others had also seen a LHO imposter? After all, they would KNOW he didn't look anything like the one shot by Ruby, (because they looked totally different right?) and that therefore there may have been something very suspicious and strange going on. You would be intrigued wouldn't you? And yet not ONE new witness inspired by the H&L story has found their way onto any of these forums to verify that?? You found out all about this topic, but as yet not one person who must have had some form of contact with 'Lee' at some point in all those years has come forward with any new information And to make matters worse...that fact doesn't bother you in the slightest. It's a full blown cult. Scary...
  2. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    "You can't solve this case only by looking at pictures." Says the man who posts thousands and thousands of photos to 'prove' his point. Where they disprove his point we get..."You can't solve this case only by looking at pictures."
  3. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    "...Russian-speaking Harvey Oswald pasted his own face on his application for a 1959 passport and not Lee's..." They must have looked very similar then? Only a page ago though, you strenuously told us that they didn't!!! That was in response to me pointing out that ten pages previously you admitted that they were almost identical!! When it suits the H&L crowd 'they' were almost identical. When it is pointed out how fantastically impossible that two unrelated boys picked for some future espionage plot could fortuitously grow up to look that identical, then we are told that they weren't at all similar, one is taller, has sloping shoulders etc... But they looked so alike they could share an official identification photo! Ha ha ha! As I have said, this is just a game for Jim. Presumably a lucrative one given the thousands of H&L copies that must have been ordered. But in my opinion he doesn't really believe it. The yapping hyenas can't get beyond their own issues to see this for what it is. But Jim is playing a different game. He's good at it. Very good. But ultimately, he has nothing to play with. Jim reminds me of the premier league footballer having to play for a part time Sunday league team manned by amateurs and dreamers. Jim thinks he can captain this rag-bag collection of one legged footballers into the big time. If only they'd stop scoring own goals...
  4. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    No because that would be impossible given the laws of our universe. But no one has proved that one individual attended two different schools. We believe, as in the post you have 'cleverly' responded to, that there is a common sense answer! Ever used those two words before Sandy? Common sense? If you did it would sure lessen your confusion...
  5. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    Is there even one piece of the 'Harvey and Lee' evidence that doesn't have a common-sense explanation? No. Not one Jeremy. And furthermore, there is nothing else left to discover. There are no new witnesses; there are no new documents, there is not one jot of new research; there is no further evidence of a doppelganger LHO or a doppelganger Marguerite since the weekend of the assassination. Armstrong covered Everything! EVERYTHING! Pointless looking because the boss has found everything there is to find. How do they know Armstrong has found everything? Cos he said so! Where did 'Lee' go? They aren't even interested in finding this out. It is totally irrelevant to them as to what became of 'Lee'. They've not looked nor have the slightest intention of doing so. Imagine how stupid we would look if they actually did a bit of research and found a new witness that corroborated their story. "No need", is the reply. They've got all they need. The H&L investigation stopped when Armstrong published it. Since then it has been treated as a static, carved in stone bible, rather than a basis for a co-ordinated and structured search for the truth. Jim doesn't believe a word of it either. It's so obvious!
  6. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    Thanks for providing the blow up version. Can you confirm though, was LHO hit by a fist? Or was it a bullet from a Magnum! There's hardly any of his mouth left!!!
  7. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    So he had a dental bridge did he? Is that a fact Sandy? Or are you just riffing with the melody a bit? You have no proof nor evidence or even any hearsay that he had a dental bridge. You've just plucked that from thin air and then presented it as fact. H&L is like a virtual story isn't it? Lots and lots of inter-changeable plastic parts that you can put together in different ways to fob off any objections. Did you miss the irony of telling us all about your relative's teeth in a post designed to illustrate how nobody ever mentions your relative's teeth?
  8. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    Yes and had one of the above been accused of assassinating JFK but there was a possibility of there being a doppelganger....It might, just might, become in that context a bit important wouldn't you think? You mentioned a variation of this before. Do you remember? Then it was just the one friend who had a tooth missing and that apparently no one ever mentioned it, (except for you in that post!!) But of course you would remember it. As you did. And of course you would mention it. As you did. This is Sandy telling us about a guy with a missing tooth and that no one ever mentions it....Not even you? Right now? Jeez! Give me strength! I'll find the post where you told us this. But I see that the examples have grown. Because now we have a multiplicity of family members with varying degrees of dental imperfections and once again Sandy doesn't even mention it! He doesn't mention it because "it's not a particularly interesting topic". YOU have just told us all about your brother's false teeth in a post designed to show how people never talk about other folk's dental status!!!!! Jeez! Can you see your schoolboy error here Sandy? YOU have now established just how important this detail is under certain circumstances. As I said to you the last time you said this (but then only mentioned just the ONE friend. Hmmm). If one of the above had gone missing and the police needed a description...would you just leave the missing tooth bit out? Silly men intoxicated by their own puffed up sense of self importance.
  9. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    Yes! That's Lee! And he's got a 13" head. Now I get it! Foul play. Big plot. Bad CIA. Ok, well done. I'm now a convert. But how did he end up in Harvey's grave?
  10. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    Jim a few pages ago even YOU admitted they looked almost identical...You swap and change and you tack and you weave. It's officially impossible to argue against H&L. Not because it has any merit. But because you won't/can't even agree what 'it' actually is! When you get your story straight come back and try and convince more than the handful of people in twenty years of pushing that it has so far lured
  11. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    Can't you get a fix...?
  12. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    Er...I was. It's called S.A.R.C.A.S.M.
  13. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    You are a trouble causer; anyone who questions H&L is. You are also stupid and ignorant with not ounce of original thought. Have you even read the book? No? Oh, there's tons of stuff in there that we haven't talked about. Oh yes all the compelling parts are in there if you read it. Just because we don't share those bits doesn't mean they aren't there. We just share the bits that have an inherent alternative explanation, but the bits from the book that we don't talk about on here prove the theory to be 100% correct. If you buy/read the book you too will be the recipient of this superior knowledge and you will be convinced of the ultimate truth. Don't go by what we write on here, that doesn't mean a thing. It's ALL in the book! So Michael, since you haven't taken out a mortgage to buy a book who's central themes have been discussed infinitum on here over many many years, you are simply not qualified to even make a comment unless it is in agreement. So give us your best shot, son! Let's see your chops! You are a joke sunshine a complete joke! I thought I'd give David Josephs a day off!
  14. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    To be fair Dawn, while sadly, I do sometimes get reduced to venting my frustration in a non too pleasant manner, you have to agree that we also receive as much, if not more in return. My frustration is both honest and clear. As I explained before in an earlier post, I temporarily believed in the possibility of H&L. I was actually a passive advocate on this very forum. I cannot be accused of being closed minded when I started from a position of support. Then I read the rebuttals from others and compared the differing explanations. Because that's what adults are supposed to do. I should have been a prime target as an interested student of the assassination, someone looking for answers with no preconditions, and like a lot of H&L supporters, someone who despaired at the naivety of believing that our governments aren't capable of doing whatever it takes to further their own murky agenda. I think that's what first intrigued/attracted me to the idea. That we have to think BIG and not rule anything out, including H&L. But there are just too many unanswered questions, and the more I witnessed on here with the deliberate flame wars and personal insults, but worse, the tacking and weaving and not being totally honest convinced me that H&L was actually a more potent weapon against discovering the truth than anything that a 1,000 DVPs could achieve. I don't believe those proposing it are working for anyone other than themselves; it's not cointelpro, or some carefully laid out scheme, or any other such wild accusation. I simply think you have bought into a scenario that for me doesn't fit the known facts. So in my opinion, for what it's worth, H&L is an obstacle to overcome and I cringe at the very idea of the MSM deciding to focus in on this aspect of the case. What on earth would you say to them? Best regards...
  15. A Couple of Real Gems from the "Harvey and Lee" Website

    Hi Gene, this isn't a provocative question, you've seen all the posts in this thread, which of the four options do you think is the most likely to explain how Lee's body is where Harvey should have been, if H&L has any credibility at all? Not knowing the answer is fine...But that surely must put a massive question mark on everything for you. If DVP were to make bold outrageous statements pointing at LHO's guilt without any evidence to back it up you would rightly see straight through it, wouldn't you? You would demand that he backed his nonsense up with some facts. If he then offered you multiple explanations, none of which with any evidence, you would probably become a little irritated towards the end. This is what is happening here. Data dumps and with reams and reams of info mean nothing if you can't explain how the known reality conflicts with the H&L story.