Jump to content
The Education Forum

François Carlier

Two Posts Per day
  • Content Count

    507
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About François Carlier

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 11/01/1967

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://www.facebook.com/Carlier.Kennedy/
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Paris, France
  • Interests
    Science, history, critical thinking, crimes investigations.

Recent Profile Visitors

7,214 profile views
  1. Apparently, on this forum (whose moderators are conspiracy believers) conspiracy theorists can insult those who disagree with them at will, They can mock whomever they want. They risk nothing. But if I post just a bit of humor, Mister Mark Knight feels the need to block the thread and then threatens to expell me from the forum (so easy to brag through a computer screen !…).OK.I'm leaving.For good.I bet some people will be happy.Good luck to everybody ! I wish you well !
  2. Apparently, on this forum (whose moderators are conspiracy believers) conspiracy theorists can insult those who disagree with them at will, They can mock whomever they want. They risk nothing. But if I post just a bit of humor, Mister Mark Knight feels the need to block the thread and then threatens me to expell me from the forum (so easy to brag through a computer screen !…). OK. I'm leaving. For good. I bet some people will be happy. Good luck to everybody ! I wish you well !
  3. Mister DiEugenio. It is very funny, in a way. You never reply to the logical comments that I write, but you expect me to reply to every single item of comment that you make. Well, never mind. There are three possibilities : - 1. Oswald fired the shots on Kennedy, he is the sole assassin, and in his flight, trying to flee Dallas, he was seen and caught by a police officer and he killed him. That makes sense ! - 2. Oswald is innocent, he has nothing to do with the Kennedy assassination. When he learned that the president had been shot, he just decided to go to see a movie to have a good time, so he left work without telling anybody and on his way there took his revolver and shot a police officer. That does not make any sense ! - 3. Oswald had nothing to do with the assassination. He was chosen by conspirators to be the scapegoat. He was framed. He realised it. So he fled the scene. He was scared. When apprehended by Tippit, he feared that it was all part of the plot so he killed the police officer. OK. That's farfetched, but why not ? The problem is : if he was framed by conspirators, how in the world did those conspirators let him on the loose, running around, watching the presidential parade on the steps of the TSBD ? That does not make sense either ! In other words, only the first proposition makes sense. As I told you, several people saw Oswald on the scene of the Tippit murder. Callaway talked to him. I never said that Callaway saw him fire the shots. I know the sequence of events. David Von Pein gave a few reasonable comments about that on this thread. As I explained in a long post earlier on this thread, all you do is ask questions which, most of the time, are truly irrelevant. Nelson and Jackson were never "silenced" . So if they wanted to volunteer information, why didn't they do that ? Nobody stopped them. There was confusion, no doubt. Maybe disorganisation. Even unfortnate initiatives. But nothing sinister. I say that nobody in their right mind can deny that Lee Oswald killed Officer Tippit. Hence, you'll have a hard time trying to show that Oswald didn't have anything to do with the shooting of President Kennedy. Another note : I am seriously, genuinely surprised at you apparent joining of the "prayer man" group. You seem to follow the trend with enthousiasm. I'm surprised. I thought you were more careful in your positions. In all honesty, I am convinced beyond certainty that the "prayer man" theory is a dead-end, a big mistake, a soon-to-be-forgotten ludicrous theory, a totally erroneous supposition, a delusion. Nothing more. Of course, when I issued my so-called "challenge", I know it was just silliness (the thunderstorm part was funny, though), but, very seriously, I am asking you, when all is said and done, and everybody admits that the "prayer man" theory has to be discarded as a big mistake, you'll come here to publicly acknowledge that you had been wrong and I had been right !
  4. I know. I know. I am going to reply to you. To be honest, I haven't had the time to come back and read seriously and type a serious reply. I have had a tough day. I just felt like having some fun a little bit, for a change. We always argue. We can smile, from time to time. I'll come back later.
  5. Didn't you listen to Billy Lovelady ? I gave a link to his interview a few posts earlier. He specifically says that they talked to each other. He was well aware of who was there with him. And didn't you read my post when I talked about myself and my colleagues outside of our place of work the day of the solar eclipse ? We did watch and focus on the sun (with special glasses) but I can assure you that I was aware of my fellow employees around me ! I know who was there and who was not. Come on, it is ridiculous to pretend that Oswald was there but nobody noticed !
  6. Actually, I would be proud to be called "pathetic" by a man who calls Oswald "innocent" ! 😁
  7. That non-answer by Kamp is very telling ! David Von Pein mentions the Texas School Book employees who were there and said unequivocally that they did not see Oswald. They gave their statements at the time, on the spot. Bart Kamp has no answer for that but can only try to criticize someone who writes in another forum nowadays. What does this have to do with the actual evidence ? Nothing.
  8. I quote : "I did not see Lee Harvey Oswald at that time" Yet another person who was there and who says unequivocally that Lee Oswald was not there ! Sadly, I doubt that the Larsen/Kamp group will take that into account. As I wrote yesterday, they don't take those things into account...
  9. Just as I said yesterday. The more I learn about that case, the more I am convinced that Lee Oswald was not "prayer man".
  10. Good morning, Mister DiEugenio, I'll answer you this mornig.
  11. I'll make an important announcement tomorrow. Stay tuned !
  12. What I wrote is both true and sad. But I have to add that Andrej Stancak has always been very disciplined, factual, respectful, neat. Thank you for that !
  13. I don't know whether Lee Oswald is "prayer man", but I already know that Bart Kamp is "player man" !!!! 😁
×
×
  • Create New...