Jump to content
The Education Forum

David Von Pein

Members
  • Content count

    5,018
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About David Von Pein

  • Rank
    Super Member
  • Birthday 12/27/1961

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://DavidVonPein.blogspot.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Indiana, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

21,001 profile views
  1. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    And the 2018 Academy Award winner for Best Actor In A Fictional Drama Series is.... [...envelope please...] Michael Clark
  2. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    How do you know David Ferrie was "murdered", Michael Clark?
  3. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    So the coroner of New Orleans is part of the "cover up" too, eh? He said Ferrie died of natural causes. But you've decided that Ferrie was "murdered", despite the lack of evidence for such an assertion. Is that about the size of it? Do you understand what sheer speculation is, Michael Clark?
  4. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    And what EXACTLY was that "evidence", Michael? Fill me in on that evidence....because, as you know, I "do not know jack about New Orleans" or the Shaw case.
  5. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    I know enough to know that there was NO SOLID EVIDENCE against the man that Garrison was prosecuting. Well, Jim, with a trail of purely laughable quotes like the ones I cited in a previous post --- like "I don't think Oswald had anything to do with the rifle transaction" and "Baker never saw Oswald" and "I don't believe Oswald shot Tippit" --- do you REALLY think that YOU are the one who should be talking about someone ELSE "falling on [their] face"? And, I say again, with such unbelievably wrong beliefs in your hip pocket (beliefs that are NOT supported by the actual EVIDENCE at all!), why should anyone take seriously ANYTHING you have ever said regarding the JFK case? If you can't even figure out the really easy ones---like Oswald ordering the C2766 rifle and Oswald shooting J.D. Tippit four times---then how can anyone expect you to get ANYTHING right at all? (Seems like a sensible question to me.)
  6. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    You don't actually expect me to fall at the feet of DiEugenio when it comes to ANYTHING he says about the JFK murder case, do you Michael? Get real. (And take a glance at the litany of things [quoted in my last post] that Jimmy has gotten COMPLETELY WRONG when it comes to evaluating the facts in this case.) With a laundry list of absurdity like that one (and this one) staring everyone in the face who cares to look, the only question that remains is: Why would anybody who considers themselves to be a reasonable person ever take James DiEugenio of Los Angeles seriously about ANYTHING relating to the events of November 22, 1963? (Which is not just a smart-ass or smart-alecky remark on my part.....it's a truly valid and legitimate question from my point-of-view.)
  7. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    Bugliosi's book has not been "discredited" in any major way whatsoever. Certainly not with respect to his main bottom-line conclusions, i.e.: ....Oswald killed Kennedy. ....Oswald killed Tippit. ....Oswald shot at General Walker. ....The Warren Commission conducted a very good investigation and reached a proper conclusion based on the available evidence. ....There is no solid evidence for conspiracy in the JFK case at all. And just because James DiEugenio wrote a book that claims to have "discredited" virtually every last thing uttered by Vince Bugliosi in his 2007 tome, that most certainly does NOT mean that VB's book HAS been "discredited". "Discredited" obviously has a completely different definition to a CTer like DiEugenio than it does to many other people. I mean, let's face the music here.... The guy who just said Bugliosi's tome has been "discredited" is the very same guy who, incredibly, actually believes that Oswald didn't fire a shot at EITHER Kennedy OR Tippit (OR Walker either)! And there's also this list of fantastic things that Jim believes (or says he does).... "[Marrion] Baker never saw Oswald." -- James DiEugenio; July 13, 2015 "Kennedy is murdered at 12:30 PM. Oswald is almost undoubtedly on the first floor at the time." -- James DiEugenio; 2008 "A Mauser was the first weapon found and...a Mauser shell was found in Dealey Plaza." -- James DiEugenio; April 3, 2015 "It's like I have always said, the WC was the Troika: Dulles, McCloy and Ford, with Warren for window dressing." -- James DiEugenio; August 1, 2015 "I think that that whole thing about burning the [autopsy] notes...was just a cover story." -- James DiEugenio; December 11, 2008 "I'm not even sure they [the real killers of JFK, not Lee Harvey Oswald, naturally] were on the sixth floor [of the Book Depository]. .... What's the definitive evidence that the hit team was on the sixth floor? .... If they WERE on the sixth floor, they could have been at the other [west] end." -- James DiEugenio; February 11, 2010 "Specter and Humes understood that the probe was gonna be a big problem. They thought the photographs would never be declassified. So Specter made up this B.S. story about the strap muscles, never knowing that that story was going to be exposed." -- James DiEugenio; July 16, 2009 "I have minimized the testimony of Linnie Mae [Randle]. I do so because in my view it is highly questionable." -- James DiEugenio; 2008 "I don't think Oswald had anything to do with the rifle transaction." -- James DiEugenio; August 5, 2015 "I just proved that CE 399 was not found at Parkland." -- James DiEugenio; June 4, 2010 "At Bethesda, the military severely curtails the autopsy so that no one will ever know the true circumstances of how Kennedy was killed. Also, the FBI switches the bullet found at Parkland Hospital to fit the second rifle found at the TSBD, a Mannlicher Carcano." -- James DiEugenio; 2008 "I think Wesley Frazier was pressured into doing what he did, and the Dallas police forced him into doing it because they needed somebody besides [Howard] Brennan to pin the thing on Oswald." -- James DiEugenio; January 14, 2010 "I don't think Brennan was at any lineup. I think that was all manufactured after the fact. I think Brennan is a completely created witness." -- James DiEugenio; May 27, 2010 "You cannot even prove he [Lee Harvey Oswald] ever had possession of the handgun." -- James DiEugenio; June 25, 2013 "I don't believe Oswald shot Tippit." -- James DiEugenio; January 14, 2010 "JBC [John B. Connally] does not react until around frame 237." -- James DiEugenio; August 2010 "I am not calling [Dallas police officer M.N.] McDonald a xxxx, the evidence is doing it." -- James DiEugenio; July 26, 2015 -------------------------- [End Fantasy Quotes.] ------------------------- And yet, with beliefs like that laundry list above hanging out there for all to see, I'm supposed to believe that Vincent T. Bugliosi is really the one who has been "discredited", plus every official committee who has ever looked into the JFK murder case. Those committees, via Jim's definition, have also ALL been "discredited" too. Please, James! Give a reasonable man with a weak bladder a freakin' break for once!
  8. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    Oh really? Then why do you suppose this occurred?.... "Instead of referring to [Clay] Shaw (or "the defendant") a great number of times as he tried to connect him to the conspiracy and murder, as any prosecutor would do if he believed the person he was prosecuting was guilty, unbelievably Garrison only referred to Shaw once in his entire summation [to the jury], and then not to say that the evidence showed he was guilty. Not once did Garrison tell the jury he had proved Shaw's guilt or that the evidence pointed toward Shaw's guilt." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Page 1380 of "Reclaiming History" (2007)
  9. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    Oh, get real, Dawn! There are a whopping TWO (maybe three) LNers posting here. And one of those LNers (Francois Carlier) hadn't posted here in 8 years prior to this month. That's hardly "so many lone nut voices". It's not even close to a level playing field. CTers outnumber LNers 20 to 1 (at least). And, anyway, why is it "sad" to have a few LNers posting, Dawn? Are you against free speech? We all know you've totally banned all LNers at the all-CTer forum you control at DPF, but that doesn't mean that Kathy Becket, James Gordon, et al, have to exhibit that same kind of censorship here at EF. "We don't allow LN ers. So that omits that waste of time." -- Dawn Meredith; Founding Member of Deep Politics Forum; Feb. 20, 2014
  10. David Von Pein

    Backyard Photos, invitation for Jack White.

    Chris, It's just a general comparison of the so-called "impossible" Oswald stance. I'm not saying the angles are identical. They obviously aren't EXACTLY the same angle. But just look at his general "stance" in both pictures. They're the same basic posture. It's just how Oswald stood. Leaning back somewhat on his right foot, with his left foot in front of his right. It's a very similar stance in both photos. (Do some CTers claim the photo on the left is an "Imposter Oswald" too?)
  11. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    More head-in-sand weasel words of your own. What's your opinion of Garrison's "case" against Shaw?
  12. David Von Pein

    Backyard Photos, invitation for Jack White.

    http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/06/backyard-photos.html#The-Leaning-Tower-Of-Oswald
  13. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    You actually want to pretend that Garrison DIDN'T "knowingly" prosecute a man he had to know was innocent? Come now. Let's be realistic. There was as much evidence against Elvis Presley in March 1967 as there was against Clay Shaw.
  14. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    Hint.... Was Shaw convicted or acquitted?
  15. David Von Pein

    A question to David Lifton

    So, you equate a statement of obvious truth is the same as "sinking to lower and lower depths"?? Very curious indeed. http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2011/04/index.html#Jim-Garrison
×