Jump to content
The Education Forum

David Von Pein

Members
  • Content Count

    5,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by David Von Pein

  1. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    ~sigh~ I'm already there.
  2. David Von Pein

    Thursday at Ruth Paines House

    Then how can you reconcile all the witnesses at the Tippit scene? Why did so many identify OSWALD as the person they saw (if it really wasn't him)? And how can you reconcile the fact that the bullet shells at the Tippit murder scene were tied conclusively to the same gun that Oswald had on him when he was arrested?
  3. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    I am home. I told you that before.
  4. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    I guess you were unaware that a handwritten version of Officer Marrion L. Baker's first-day 11/22/63 affidavit exists in the Dallas Municipal Archives.... Page 1 Page 2 Page 3
  5. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    I am at home right now. Where do you think my computer is located? At Langley?
  6. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    So do you now want to claim that Officer Baker never went into the TSBD at all? Your entire list above is silly beyond tolerance. Nitpicky little points like the exact position Oswald was in during the brief 10-second encounter in the lunchroom. And Piper not seeing Baker. As if that HAS to mean something suspicious. Geesh. And "sightings" of Oswald near the front door. (Who else besides the wholly unreliable Carolyn Arnold said this?) Your list crumbles to dust when we have just one look at Truly's and Baker's statements and testimony.
  7. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    Good! Yet another person CTers get to call a l-i-a-r. Lovely.
  8. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    Tell that to Buell Frazier. He was completely unaware of that fact. (But Buell is just another l-i-a-r, right Bart?) https://drive.google.com/file/Buell Wesley Frazier Interview (2002)
  9. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    Oh, you mean like HARD EVIDENCE, such as Roy Truly's affidavit (which says, clear as day, "SECOND FLOOR")? And Marrion Baker's testimony, which says "SECOND FLOOR"? Those "fairy tales", you mean? End of message.
  10. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    Bart thinks that one word -- "FOR" -- proves the solo report is a fraud. Hilarious! Bart also apparently thinks that the ONLY time that Oswald could have purchased a Coke would have been BEFORE he started to eat his lunch. Granted, most people would purchase their drink before sitting down to have their lunch, but that's not a mandatory rule for all people----especially for liars like Lee Harvey Oswald. And for all we know, the notes that James Hosty took could have been slightly different than the notes taken by James W. Bookhout. And that difference in note-taking could very well explain the slight differences we find between the two FBI reports when it comes to the exact chronology of Oswald's (alleged) movements around lunchtime on November 22, 1963.
  11. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    Can't you read, Bart? I just spelled out in my last post what the "difference" between the two reports is.
  12. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    The difference is: The joint Hosty/Bookhout report (which was likely written up by Hosty alone; there's some testimony to back this up) doesn't mention the incident between Lee Harvey Oswald and the police officer, whereas the solo Bookhout report does mention it. Does that mean I'm supposed to believe the second-floor lunchroom encounter never happened at all? (According to you, I guess I am supposed to believe it never happened.) But there's Roy Truly's corroboration that proves that the encounter did occur---and on the second floor in the lunchroom, just as Truly said in his 11/23/63 affidavit. And there's the 11/23/63 television footage with Police Chief Jesse Curry, as he talks to newsmen about how there had been an encounter inside the Book Depository Building between one of his police officers and Oswald just after the assassination. But since Curry didn't say the words "second floor" in that TV footage, this gives CTers the perfect excuse to pretend that Curry's officer encountered Oswald somewhere OTHER than the lunchroom. But to that I say --- Hogwash! The conspiracy theorists have nothing but wild speculation about corrupt FBI reports. I've got Roy Truly and Marrion Baker and Jesse Curry. (All liars, I suppose?)
  13. David Von Pein

    Thursday at Ruth Paines House

    Indeed, Derek. It's refreshing to see this kind of thinking on this forum. It's very rare. You're one of the very few here who actually thinks in a reasonable way regarding Oswald's out-of-the-ordinary behavior on Nov. 21 and 22. Here's what I said to a CTer a few years ago.... "Don't you think it would be wise to evaluate Oswald's odd behavior on November 21 and 22 in connection with the physical evidence in the case, which all screams "Oswald"? Or would you prefer to isolate everything in a bubble and never be forced to assess Oswald's actions and movements in conjunction with all that physical evidence that came out of a gun owned by Lee Oswald? In my opinion, it's a package deal that fits together perfectly --- Oswald's actions + the physical evidence = Oswald's undeniable guilt in two murders in Dallas, Texas, on 11/22/63." -- DVP; June 2015 More: https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2015/06/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-959.html
  14. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    Oswald's guilt in both the JFK and Tippit murders is proven by the evidence. I don't think there's any room for reasonable doubt about that fact. CTers disagree, of course. (What else is new?) Allow me to quote two authors who wrote "Lone Assassin" books a few years ago. These are four of my favorite quotes from those two books: "There is no exculpatory evidence that outweighs the accumulated proof against him [Oswald]. .... A cloud hangs over [JFK's] murder and our nation because we refuse to accept what is so clearly the truth -- that his assassination was a simple act of murder, committed by a man who left evidence proving his guilt. .... The case is solved." -- Mark Fuhrman; Pages 89 and 217 of "A Simple Act Of Murder" "The totality of reliable physical evidence, supported by eyewitness accounts of his doing what the physical evidence shows he did, makes the case against Lee Harvey Oswald an open and shut case. He murdered John Kennedy and Officer Tippit and gravely wounded John Connally. The [Mark] Lane myth of 'Oswald as Patsy' and all similar conspiracy myths merit no serious consideration. .... While one of the pieces of physical evidence could conceivably have been faked by an expert, there is no possibility that an expert, or team of super-experts, could have fabricated the perfectly coordinated whole." -- Larry Sturdivan; Page 246 of "The JFK Myths"
  15. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    So, Bart, you think the evil masters of the Patsy Plot© wrote up a bogus second report (the Bookhout solo report), right? If so, why didn't they just destroy the first (joint) report? Were the evil masters of the Patsy Plot© just being nice by leaving the conspiracy theorists a little clue to their dastardly crime to be found in the Warren Commission volumes? Plus, both of those FBI reports can be found very easily in the 888-page Warren Report itself---just seven pages apart, on pages 612 and 619. That was awfully nice of the conspirators to leave that bread crumb of "conspiracy" and "cover-up" right there in the Warren Report for guys like you to find so easily, wasn't it? More about the various Bookhout reports here.... https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2015/01/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-881.html
  16. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    You CT guys see cover-up and "alterations" everywhere. It has reached the point of utter absurdity. The things that Sandy Larsen think are "a sure sign of alteration" are things that can certainly be explained in non-conspiratorial ways. One such way is: Oswald couldn't keep his alibi straight, and his story changed and shifted slightly during his interrogation. In short --- Even though CTers might strongly disagree, there can (and, IMO, are) "non-conspiratorial" explanations for the dozens of things connected with the JFK and J.D. Tippit murder cases that the conspiracy theorists of the world are convinced are the product of a devious plot. Also See: https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com / James W. Bookhout http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com / The Lunchroom Encounter
  17. David Von Pein

    “Hogwash” by the silly wc rascals.

    Oh, sure. I certainly have. The topic of Dr. Humes burning the first draft of the autopsy report and his blood-stained notes has come up many times in the discussions I have archived at my site. For some examples, CLICK HERE. And, BTW, Humes first testified about the burning of the first draft of the autopsy report in his 1964 Warren Commission testimony. That subject didn't first come up in the 1990s with the ARRB. Humes said this to Arlen Specter on Page 373 of WC Volume 2.... "In privacy of my own home, early in the morning of Sunday, November 24th, I made a draft of this report which I later revised, and of which this represents the revision. That draft I personally burned in the fireplace of my recreation room." And Humes also testified in 1964 that he had "destroyed certain preliminary draft notes" (also at 2 H 373). The specific reason for the burning of the notes (the blood stains) was not mentioned by Humes in his Warren Commission testimony, however. But, as we can see, Humes admitted to having "burned" and "destroyed" both the first draft of the autopsy report and some draft notes during his WC testimony in 1964. Dr. Humes never said the burned first draft of the autopsy report had any blood on it. The blood was only on the notes, not the "report".
  18. David Von Pein

    “Hogwash” by the silly wc rascals.

    The above ridiculous sentence was written by a person who, just three sentences later, accused me of making "silly assertions". Jim never gets tired of providing his readers with a non-stop flow of Pot/Kettle irony.
  19. David Von Pein

    “Hogwash” by the silly wc rascals.

    MY secret?? You're too funny, Jim. Anyway, don't blame me. I didn't do the autopsy. Go blame Humes for measuring from the mastoid. (Oh, wait, you DO blame Humes, right? And he's nothing but a l-i-a-r, to boot. So he's both incompetent AND a l-i-a-r, correct?)
  20. David Von Pein

    2nd Floor Never Happened

    It looks like the officer (Sawyer, you say?) is on a break possibly. He's got a cigarette in his left hand and the soda in his right. From the way he's holding it, I would say it's the officer's drink vs. it being a piece of evidence.
  21. David Von Pein

    “Hogwash” by the silly wc rascals.

    And I just noticed that Jackie & Nellie have been kidnapped out of the car too! (Plus Kellerman.) I'm calling Chief Curry right now! Something's not right here! And in addition to the multiple kidnappings, I also noticed that somebody stole Adam Johnson's and Jim DiEugenio's apostrophe keys too! There oughta be a law!
  22. David Von Pein

    “Hogwash” by the silly wc rascals.

    What does the position of Specter's RIGHT hand have to do with anything? And: the last photo you used isn't good at all for your "Left to Right" purposes. That's a photo from the SS re-enactment, using a standard Lincoln car. That's not a stretch Lincoln like SS-100-X. Here's the correct angle (slightly Right to Left):
  23. David Von Pein

    “Hogwash” by the silly wc rascals.

    I think you're confused. And your little markings on the CE903 picture are totally meaningless. You can't just start drawing lines on a 2D picture and get 3-dimensional results. It's impossible.
  24. David Von Pein

    “Hogwash” by the silly wc rascals.

    They subtracted the 3-degree, 9-minute slope of Elm when they went to the garage. Out on the street, the angle is 21+ degrees from the sixth-floor window to the inshoot wound on JFK's back. When the slope of Elm is taken off, the angle becomes 17.72 degrees (based, of course, on the "average" angle between Zapruder frames 210 and 225, which is the "range" of frames the WC was using for the SBT hit). And so, as we can easily see, SOME slack MUST be given to the WC's tests....because their re-creation is being based on just an AVERAGE angle between Z210 and 225 in the first place. So unless JFK was hit at exactly Z217.5 (which is quite unlikely), then the angles and measurements ARE going to be slightly off. But CTers can't permit any "slack" or "leeway" to be given to Mr. Specter & Company, can they? For a CTer, if it's not 100% exact to the millimeter, then we must toss the re-enactments in the trash can. Right? Come on! That's a ridiculously rigid mindset to have. Don't you agree?
  25. David Von Pein

    “Hogwash” by the silly wc rascals.

    Doesn't really matter. Because, as I just outlined previously, the WC didn't really rely on the crappy Rydberg drawing at all. Because if they HAD relied on it, we wouldn't find the wound where it is in Commission Exhibit 903 and in all of those "opposite angle" photographs.
×