Jump to content
The Education Forum

David Von Pein

Members
  • Content Count

    5,574
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by David Von Pein

  1. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Michael Hogan is the one who can't interpret the Gallup 2003 poll. 19% of the 533 people polled by Gallup said that "one man" (who would obviously be Oswald) was involved in the JFK murder, vs. the 75% who said that "others" were involved in a "conspiracy". The question below the main Gallup question is a totally different question, and also (from the looks of the number of people questioned) could have been a completely different batch of people polled. http://www.pollingreport.com/news2.htm#Kennedy
  2. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    Bernice, Why on Earth would anyone want to kill Roger Craig AFTER he had already spilled his guts about various things that seem to lead toward "conspiracy" in the case? The same logical question needs to be asked about Lee Bowers too? Why wouldn't "they" have knocked off Bowers BEFORE he was filmed by Mark Lane spilling his guts in the movie version of "Rush To Judgment"? It makes no sense to let these witnesses live for years and years -- and in the case of both Craig and Bowers, to let them go in front of cameras and preserve their tales on film and videotape. "They" can bump off the President, with tons of Secret Service and cops all around, but they can't manage to bump off unprotected witnesses like Lee Bowers and Roger Craig until YEARS after the assassination? That's crazy.
  3. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Are you saying that most researchers have reached the conclusion that Ruth and Michael Paine thought that Oswald was innocent? And most researchers have concluded that Clay Shaw really did call up Dean Andrews on Nov. 22? That's nonsense, Steve. True. But this place needs a resident "LN voice", if only for a tiny bit of balance. There are, indeed, a lot of "LNers" in the world, although Jim D., for some reason, seems to think that only myself, VB, John McAdams, and Tom Hanks (and perhaps a small handful of others) belong in the LN category. But, in fact, almost 1 out of every 5 people think the Warren Commission got it right (as of November 2003). 19% is far from a majority, that's true enough. But the percentage of LNers is certainly not as small as DiEugenio and others want to believe: http://www.pollingreport.com/news2.htm#Kennedy
  4. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    Thank you, Bernice. Since my last post about that Craig article, I've found out a little more about it via two sources -- Vincent Bugliosi's book and John McAdams' website. The latter has an excellent article all about Roger Craig's lies (and the McAdams page is something I have read before, but I had forgotten all about it when this topic came up here at this forum). I've now discovered the L.A. Free Press interview with Craig (and Penn Jones) occurred in March of 1968, six years before Craig added his "7.65 Mauser stamped on the barrel" lie to his already-lengthy list of lies. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/craig.htm http://img36.imageshack.us/i/craigandjonespage10.jpg/
  5. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Who cares? Spout all the conspiracy nonsense you want, Jimbo. I wouldn't believe a thing Jim DiEugenio ever said anyway. No reasonable person could possibly even begin to believe all of the stupid things Jim DiEugenio believes when it comes to his ludicrously elaborate and impossible conspiracy theories re JFK's death. You're only good for laughs, Jimmy. BTW, for those lurkers who might be unaware, Delusional DiEugenio is the same conspiracy-hungry monger who thinks Buell Wesley Frazier and Linnie Mae Randle were liars and just made up out of whole cloth the story about Oswald carrying a large brown bag on the morning of November 22, 1963. (The evil DPD "forced" them to make up the paper bag, per Jimbo. How's that for ludicrously elaborate?) "Blinkered", indeed. Jimmy D. is so bent on having a JFK conspiracy that he can't even see that his latest list of 10 items in his last post is totally laughable from beginning to end. Numbers 2, 9, and 10 are particularly hilarious. And Jimbo has surely got to know that those things are hilarious. But that won't stop him from spouting such crap, 24/7. Pathetic, as usual.
  6. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Oh, brother, what a goofy and idiotic title that is. Of course Bugliosi "acquitted everyone but Oswald", and he should have done so. Why? Because everyone was innocent except Oswald. (Duh.) I think Vince B. should have probably had a similar chapter in the second half of "Reclaiming History", entitled "How The Conspiracy Kooks Have Convicted Everyone Under The Sun EXCEPT Oswald". I wonder if Part 11 of DiEugenio's never-ending series of VB-bashing tripe is going to be: "Bugliosi's A Boob For Not Throwing Out All Of The Evidence Against Oswald, Which Is What I (James DiEugenio) Have Done In The JFK And Tippit Murder Cases"
  7. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    Well, Ian, it's more like the "DUMB OL' SHERIFF'S DEPT." card, since Boone and Weitzman were with the Dallas County Sheriff's Office. But, yeah, Fritz was DPD, and he apparently thought the rifle was initially a Mauser too. But none of the officers were allowed to make an honest mistake, right Ian? Every error HAS to be of a sinister nature, right?
  8. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    The whole "Mauser" business has been blown up to absurd levels by conspiracy theorists since 1963. The fact is (and always was) that the police just simply goofed on 11/22/63 when multiple officers thought (incorrectly) that the rifle pulled from the box stacks on the sixth floor of the TSBD was a Mauser. And both Eugene Boone and Seymour Weitzman have stated publicly that they were both in error regarding their respective initial "Mauser" identifications (and these retractions don't even count both Boone's and Weitzman's Warren Commision testimony, wherein they each corrected their initial "Mauser" mistake): SEYMOUR WEITZMAN (ON CBS-TV IN JUNE 1967) -- "To my sorrow, I looked at it and it looked like a Mauser, which I said it was. But I said the wrong one; because just at a glance, I saw the Mauser action....and, I don't know, it just came out as words it was a German Mauser. Which it wasn't. It's an Italian type gun. But from a glance, it's hard to describe; and that's all I saw, was at a glance. I was mistaken. And it was proven that my statement was a mistake; but it was an honest mistake." EUGENE BOONE (IN 1986): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Addsk7GpnaA&p=974A39F551630434 Plus, I think it's also worth noting that the initial "Mauser" error was corrected in the media just a little more than 24 hours after the assassination, because I have the video of CBS-TV's Walter Cronkite announcing to the world on the afternoon of November 23rd that the rifle found on the sixth floor of the Book Depository was not a Mauser at all, but instead it was an Italian Mannlicher-Carcano (or, to use Cronkite's hilarious mispronunciation at the 4-minute mark of the video below -- a "Mann-lisher Car-CHANT-o"): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YrtLLQpA4uU&p=364F4A4B1BBC9DC6 And, btw, Bernice, there is no date on this article at all -- unless the "_68.jpg" at the tail end of your image file is supposed to signify the date--as in "1968". Is that the date you're talking about? And I have no idea where the SECOND date notation would be on that article. ~shrug~
  9. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Glenn, Oh, okay. That must be only for the very few Hulu videos I have embedded. But 99% of my embeds are through Blogger.com. You can surely play those, can't you?
  10. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    Roger Craig was a 10 on the xxxx Scale. No doubt. Gerald Ford was a 0, of course. He didn't lie about a damn thing, including the back wound. J. Edgar was probably about a 2 or 3 (for his career). For the JFK case, however, he was a 0. He was just plain stupid and ignorant about a lot of the evidence in the early going of the JFK investigation. But he wasn't a xxxx. http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/09/fbi-errors.html (Awaiting the roars of laughter from all the lifelong "Hoover Was The Devil In Disguise" CT fanatics.)
  11. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    That's news to me, Glenn. I'm confused. What happens when you click on the play buttons? Nothing? The videos just don't play?
  12. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Bill Kelly, FYI -- For a slightly better-quality version (640 x 480) of "JFK In Ireland", and to play it in a bigger video player, you can go to my YouTube version of that program, here: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=B5C44717828AE67D
  13. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Nah, I doubt that. I'm just a goofy LN freak. But that doesn't mean you can't enjoy my video links, Bill. Many good and rare items in there. And HERE. Have you ever seen JFK's very first archived interview on NBC-TV (from 1951)? --- http://dvp-potpourri.blogspot.com/2010/10/nbc-news-time-capsule-john-f-kennedy.html
  14. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    I wouldn't believe a single thing uttered by Roger Dean Craig under any circumstances. I just proved above that Craig lied like a cheap rug re the 7.65 Mauser BS. But Craig's obvious lies don't bother CT monger Jim Di. in the least. And that's because R.D. Craig was a conspiracy nut....and that makes his stories okay in Jimmy DiEugenio's book. And note how DiEugenio totally ignores the timing for when Craig says he saw the "7.65 Mauser" stamp. Craig said he saw it just after Day took it from between the boxes on the sixth floor. So as far as his 7.65 Mauser lie is concerned, what difference does it make exactly WHEN Craig got to the sixth floor? And also note how DiEugenio actually seems to believe Craig about there being another rifle "brought down" from the roof. Of course, as we all know, there was no other rifle to be brought down from the rooftop, because no rifle (Mauser or otherwise) was found on the roof of the Depository. And Jimmy Boy knows this. He just likes the idea of supporting a Big Fat xxxx like Roger D. Craig. Pathetic. Roger Craig lied. And he lied about multiple important things associated with the JFK murder case. And DiEugenio has to know he was a xxxx. But Jimmy just doesn't give a damn, as long as he can support another ABO conspiracy monger.
  15. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    More BS from Jimbo, of course. After Roger Craig invented his bald-faced lie about seeing "7.65 Mauser" stamped on the rifle, he always maintained that it was stamped on the rifle that Lt. J.C. Day had just lifted out of the boxes on the northwest corner of the sixth floor. Craig never claimed to see the stamp on a rifle that had later been carried down from the roof. Craig's 7.65 Mauser lie is exposed in this article that Bernice Moore linked to earlier (even though Bernice undoubtedly thinks that that article she posted is further proof that Roger D. Craig is the Saint to end all Saints.) But here's the proof (in the video below) to prove for all time that Craig's lies evolved over a period of time. In the article Bernice posted, "RC" (Roger Craig) said this: QUESTION: "Did you handle that rifle [that was pulled from the boxes on the sixth floor of the TSBD]?" ROGER CRAIG: "Yes, I did. I couldn't give its name because I don't know foreign rifles." But in Mark Lane's video "Two Men In Dallas" (linked below), Roger Craig specifically says that he saw "7.65 Mauser" stamped on the rifle that had just been lifted from the box stacks on the sixth floor. The combination of that Craig interview posted by Bernice and the video below exposes Roger Craig's "7.65 Mauser" lie like never before. But I'm sure conspiracy mongers like James DiEugenio and Lee Farley will continue to pat Roger Craig on the back and treat him as a perfectly truthful and upstanding witness when it comes to this 7.65 Mauser bullxxxx and his tale about the bullet shells being only about three-fourths of an inch to one inch apart and all facing the exact same direction (and who would even want to PLANT shells in such a silly manner anyway?), etc. Plus, there's also the fact that Roger Craig never said a single word about seeing any rifle with "7.65 Mauser" stamped on it during his testimony in front of the Warren Commission either. Which is, of course, yet another indication that Deputy Sheriff Craig invented his "Mauser" story only after appearing before the Warren Commission. The word "Mauser" is not mentioned once during Craig's 1964 WC session, even after David Belin said this to Craig right after Craig told the WC about the discovery of the rifle on the sixth floor: "Anything else happen up to that time that you haven't related here that you feel might be important?" Roger Craig's answer to Belin's above question: "No." In addition, Craig never said a word about seeing the Mauser stamp on the sixth-floor rifle during his 1969 Clay Shaw Trial testimony either. And also contradicting the interview supplied by Bernice, Craig never mentions handling the rifle during his testimony at Shaw's New Orleans trial either. In short -- Anyone who supports Roger Dean Craig is supporting a known xxxx.
  16. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Why leave me out, Jimbo? I'm deeply hurt by the omission.
  17. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Oh, for Pete sake, Jimbo. Why the hell can't you start your own thread linking to your conspiracy-happy nonsense? Why are you using my thread for your junk? Start your own.
  18. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    You're strange.
  19. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    Take note of Roger Craig's comments in the article posted by Bernice above: Craig claims he had no idea what type of gun was recovered from the boxes on the 6th Floor, even though he said he HANDLED the rifle himself (another big fat lie from Craig....and I am assuming the "RC" in that text is, indeed, referring to Roger Craig; correct, Bernice?). Craig also talks about a Mauser being found on "the roof" of the TSBD (another ridiculous statement). I guess Craig later decided to add his tall tale about actually seeing the words "7.65 Mauser" stamped on a rifle that was supposedly (per the above article) found ON THE ROOF, and not on the sixth floor at all. That's the trouble with evolving lies like Roger Craig told. It's hard for the big fat xxxx to keep all of his lies straight....as we can easily see via that interview with Craig. When was that bullxxxx article printed, Bernice? There's no date mentioned.
  20. David Von Pein

    JFK-Related Video & Audio Programs

    Who cares? Why do you even ask? Just do it. A goodly percentage of Bernice Moore's posts are "FYI: Here's A Video" type of posts. So, obviously there's no Education Forum law against posting links to such material, or posting the embedded videos themselves. And, btw, there's a heck of a lot of good stuff in the links I posted in my thread-starter above. So, I figured a few people who visit this JFK forum might be interested in JFK video and audio material. (Silly me, huh?)
  21. Oh. And you think the small bullet hole created a visible and very noticeable "indentation" that can be seen in the Zapruder Film? That's a strange theory, Duncan.
  22. Huh? No bullet entered the "side" of JFK's head. What on Earth are you talking about?
  23. David Von Pein

    Damage to the BOH

    One more time--- Boone and Weitzman never claimed to see the words 7.65 MAUSER on any rifle in the Depository. Therefore, they didn't "LIE". They were merely mistaken about the type of rifle that was being hoisted in the air by J.C. Day. And when we look at the similarities, it's easy to see how such a mistake could easily be made:
  24. Duncan, I know that the "protrusion at the back of the head" theory that is often touted as the truth by conspiracy theorists is total nonsense (mainly because I know that the back of President Kennedy's head is completely intact [i.e., there is absolutely NO MISSING SKULL BONE in the rear portions of JFK's head, as the X-ray below proves for now and for all-time]), but your "indentation" caption leaves me scratching my head as well. I need further explanation regarding your "indentation" theory. You've placed a line around the contour of JFK's head that you believe to be the accurate configuration of Kennedy's head at Z337, correct? But what is the "indentation" you're referring to? What's causing the indented area? (Your line around the head doesn't "indent" to conform to your indented area.) I'm sorry, but I just don't get it. It sounds like you're saying that there WAS, indeed, a large damaged area in the exact place where the CTers claim to see a "protrusion" of JFK's skull. But you surely aren't suggesting that the rear of JFK's head was "indented" in some fashion--are you, Duncan? Because the following two images are the best evidence (and always have been) to debunk the silliness spouted by CTers for decades regarding any perceived "BOH" wound in the occipital (right-rear) area of John Kennedy's head:
  25. David Von Pein

    The Mauser?

    Isn't the answer obvious, Bill? Boone and Weitzman weren't "liars" because neither of them ever told the lie about seeing the words "7.65 Mauser" stamped on the barrel of the rifle that was hoisted from the boxes by J.C. Day. (And Craig definitely was talking about THAT rifle too; i.e., the rifle that was lifted from between boxes by Day. Craig wasn't talking about some other rifle.) The rifle that's not a Carcano has got to be a rifle belonging to the police. That's obvious too. And the same explanation accounts for Bob Groden's claim that the Mentesana film proves that a second rifle was found in the TSBD. How Groden knows that rifle in the Mentesana film is NOT a cop's rifle is anyone's guess. You don't think this officer/detective is holding Oswald's Carcano here, do you Bill?:
×