Jump to content
The Education Forum

David Von Pein

Members
  • Content Count

    5,216
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by David Von Pein

  1. David Von Pein

    Kennedy Videos

    "THE FOUR DARK DAYS" (CBS-TV SPECIAL, AIRED ON NOVEMBER 25, 1963): http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-four-dark-days-cbs-special.html
  2. David Von Pein

    Kennedy Videos

    "PRESIDENTS AND ASSASSINS" (CBS NEWS SPECIAL REPORT, AIRED ON NOVEMBER 25, 1963): http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2016/05/presidents-and-assassins.html
  3. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    Yes, they can. And these 3 images prove that they can---because there is no "BOH" wound anywhere to be found in these THREE different examples of photographic evidence. (Were ALL of these pictures faked?)....
  4. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    ARLEN SPECTER -- "Based on the appearance of the neck wound alone, could it have been either an entrance or an exit wound?" DR. MALCOLM PERRY -- "It could have been either." [At 3 H 373.] ------------------------------- ARLEN SPECTER -- "Was the wound in the neck consistent with being either an entry or exit wound, in your opinion?" DR. CHARLES CARRICO -- "Yes." MR. SPECTER -- "Or, did it look to be more one than the other?" DR. CARRICO -- "No; it could have been either, depending on the size of the missile, the velocity of the missile, the tissues that it struck." [At 6 H 5.] ------------------------------- ARLEN SPECTER -- "What did you mean when you just made your reference to the academic aspect with the wound, Dr. Akin?" DR. GENE AKIN -- "Well, naturally, the thought flashed through my mind that this might have been an entrance wound. I immediately thought it could also have been an exit wound, depending upon the nature of the missile that made the wound." [At 6 H 65.] ------------------------------- Related Links: http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2012/06/jfk-wounds-and-more-sbt-talk.html http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2018/02/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-1273.html
  5. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    I supplied a perfectly credible (and evidence-based) answer to your question some fourteen days ago, on July 26th.... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/25088-where-is-the-exit/?page=5&tab=comments#comment-383269
  6. David Von Pein

    Who changed the motorcade route?

    REPRISE.... JOSEPH McBRIDE SAID: No Dan Rather in the [McIntire] photo. I noticed that immediately when this was first printed by the Dallas Morning News in 1988 when I was in town for the twenty-fifth anniversary. A colleague has said Rather was at the Trade Mart. Rather has given various claims for his whereabouts at the time of the shooting, including his frequent claim he was on the other side of the overpass from the shooting area waiting for a film drop. DAVID VON PEIN SAID: But that doesn't mean Rather wasn't there in the area nearby. Not every last square inch of the area is covered in the McIntire photo. Maybe Rather was standing just outside McIntire's camera range. For that matter, how do you know that the man on the far right of the picture isn't Dan Rather?
  7. David Von Pein

    David Von Pein

    Have you been getting your info from Dave Healy again?
  8. David Von Pein

    David Von Pein

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/#DVP-Vs-Various-Individual-Conspiracy-Theorists http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2013/09/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-430.html
  9. David Von Pein

    Was Dubya in Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63?

    http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2013/07/why-would-they-do-this.html
  10. David Von Pein

    VOICING FOR BANNED MEMBERS

    Professor James H. Fetzer was definitely an active member of this forum in circa 2009—2010, as the three threads linked below (all started by Fetzer) would indicate. And he almost certainly was "banned" at some point after 2010, otherwise his name in these posts would still be presented as a clickable link that leads to a profile page. But he's now listed as only a "Guest" in these threads and his name can't be clicked on.... http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/14121-did-zapruder-take-the-zapruder-film/ http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/15173-six-seconds-in-dallas-truth-or-obfuscation/ http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/15218-did-josiah-thompson-rip-off-david-lifton/ Side note.... Even though Jim Fetzer can no longer post anything here at EF, I'm glad to see that his old posts are still visible here at this forum, instead of having them totally wiped out for all time (like John Simkin did with banned members' posts a few years ago, such as with my own EF posts from 2006 and James DiEugenio's contributions from 2010—2013, all of which were wiped out with the click of a button by Simkin). It's good to have the ability to search for even a banned person's posts and have the material still available for viewing, like those threads linked above that were started by Prof. Fetzer.
  11. David Von Pein

    VOICING FOR BANNED MEMBERS

    Good questions, Sandy. As a general rule, I think James Gordon's newest forum rule is a good one. But I also think that in order for someone to be penalized, the person posting the banned person's material must have knowledge of the "banned" status of the quoted person. That's only fair, right? And why in the world would every member here be aware of the "banned or not banned" status of all other members? It's not reasonable to think that such information is known by everybody here---or that everybody would even care about knowing such info. I certainly don't care about such things. For example, I was not aware of the banned status of the fellow named Doyle until today. So that seems like it'd be a problem for the EF staff --- how can the moderators prove that a member knows that another person has been officially banned from posting at EF? Seems to me like the best policy would be to warn the offender first (to allow for the very real possibility that the offender had no idea that he/she was posting stuff from a "banned" member), and if a second occurrence of the violation takes place, then penalize the offender.
  12. David Von Pein

    VOICING FOR BANNED MEMBERS

    Because the forum member in question (Jim H.) was posting verbatim quotes written by a person who was (evidently) banned from this forum. Such activity should be considered unacceptable, IMO. I agree with James Gordon's new rule.
  13. David Von Pein

    Plaza Man: Bob Groden vs the City of Dallas

    Oh, OK. I didn't see the link. Thanks, Jim. Here's the direct link to the whole film: https://www.npostart.nl/2doc/11-11-2015/VPWON_1250532
  14. David Von Pein

    Plaza Man: Bob Groden vs the City of Dallas

    FYI.... Here's the "Plaza Man" trailer: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d9MooGuoEcxP9-eIePvbwTiQ3KPyexki/view
  15. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The complete 1992 JAMA interview with Dr. James Humes can be found HERE. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  16. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    But what about Dr. McClelland's observations concerning the throat wound?.... "Some people have even said 'Oh, that tracheostomy has been altered; it's too big a wound'. Well, I can speak for that -- no, it had not been altered. That's exactly the way it was made at Parkland. It's just that people expected it to be smaller." -- Dr. Robert McClelland; 2009 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0KFei3W7bGOODhkYTRkOFdNUlU/view
  17. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    Go to 4:19—5:22 in this video. Do you think Dr. Perry was merely lying his butt off in that 1967 interview? (More of Elmer Moore's handiwork perhaps?)
  18. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    But Dr. Burkley didn't perform the autopsy on the President's body, did he? https://drive.google.com/audio file/Interview With George Burkley
  19. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    Oh brother. The Pot/Kettle irony is so thick in that last quote of Ray's, you could slice it with O.J.'s knife. The fact is, of course, that conspiracy theorists will constantly "discount evidence of people who were actually at the autopsy...because they disagree with [their] arguments". Like, say, the following extremely important conclusions reached by three people who "were actually at the autopsy": "It is our opinion that the deceased died as a result of two perforating gunshot wounds. .... The projectiles were fired from a point behind and somewhat above the level of the deceased. .... The fatal missile entered the skull above and to the right of the external occipital protuberance. .... The other missile...made its exit through the anterior surface of the neck." -- Page 6 of JFK's Autopsy Report [Warren Report, Page 543] Conspiracists own the patent on "discounting evidence because they disagree" with it. Don't they, Ray?
  20. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    You need to back up to Page 75 of that ARRB deposition of Edward Reed, because you, Cory, have totally misrepresented what Reed was talking about when he mentioned a "bullet". He was clearly talking about being aware during the autopsy that a bullet had been found in Dallas. He wasn't referring to any bullet being recovered from JFK's body during the autopsy. In fact, when discussing whether any bullet was found by the autopsy surgeons during the autopsy, Reed specifically said these words on Page 77 of his 1997 ARRB deposition --- "But there was no bullet." And to show how bad Mr. Reed's memory was about some things in 1997, he stated he was pretty certain that President Kennedy's body arrived at Bethesda at about 4:30 PM on November 22nd. (Mr. Reed apparently was not even aware of the fact that JFK's body didn't even land in Washington on Air Force One until 5:58 PM on 11/22/63, which means his "4:30" body arrival time is impossible.) With blatant errors like that "4:30" mistake on display in Mr. Reed's deposition, it makes you wonder what other things Reed might have misremembered 34 years after the assassination. ARRB Footnote.... Interestingly (and humorously) enough, according to that document issued by the ARRB which features the testimony of Edward Reed, apparently little 2-year-old "John F. Kennedy, Jr." was the President who was really assassinated in Dallas. Well, I guess this means that even an Assassination Records Review Board can make an honest mistake every now and then.
  21. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    Huh? Cory said nothing about it being a "the combined statements" of two different techs. Cory said.... "...the x-ray tech who testified I believe to the Assassination Review Board that he was told to tape pieces of skull together to make sure it looked like one piece..." And Cory seemed unsure about it when I asked him for clarification. But the part about "taping pieces of skull together" sure sounds to me like POST-autopsy work done by the morticians.
  22. "Even the 'evidence' which ISN'T present in the JFK murder case (but SHOULD definitely be in existence if the SBT is a false scenario) is telling us that the Commission's single-bullet conclusion almost HAS to be accurate -- e.g., no bullets found in the victims; no other bullets in evidence except CE399; no damage to the limo's back-seat areas; plus: virtually no damage done to the interior portions of JFK's upper back and neck (i.e., no broken bones and no hard, bony structures being struck by either of the TWO projectiles that conspiracists believe entered these regions of the President's body and failed to exit). The total absence of injuries within President Kennedy's neck and back is enough--all by itself--to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that just a single bullet made a clean getaway through JFK's body, without pausing to do any substantial damage whatsoever. It's always been amazing to me that so many people who bash Mr. Specter and the Single-Bullet Theory can then seemingly believe in some "alternate" scenario that is far more fanciful and full of implausibilities and complications and vanishing bullets than is the Single-Bullet Conclusion. And there MUST be a correct alternate theory if the SBT is untrue. So what the heck is it?! Conspiracists never say, of course. In short, those who disbelieve the SBT are, by default, automatically choosing to believe some OTHER theory regarding the wounding of President Kennedy and Governor Connally. And ANY alternate theory in this matter falls way, way short in the common-sense and realistic departments--not to mention in the "physical evidence" category as well." -- DVP; March 29, 2006
  23. SBT Addendum.... https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/02/jfk-assassination-arguments-part-652.html
  24. From "Reclaiming History".... --- Quote On: --- "From the first moment that I heard that [Arlen] Specter had come up with the single-bullet theory, it made very little sense to me since the theory was so obvious that a child could author it. .... Since [the members of the WC staff] all knew that the bullet, fired from Kennedy's right rear, had passed through soft tissue in Kennedy's body on a straight line, and that Connally was seated to the president's left front, the bullet, after emerging from Kennedy's body, would have had to go on and hit Connally for the simple reason it had nowhere else to go. How could it be that among many bright lawyers earnestly focusing their minds on this issue, only Specter saw it? .... When I asked [Norman Redlich on September 6, 2005] if, indeed, Arlen Specter was the sole author of the single-bullet theory, his exact words were, "No, we all came to this conclusion simultaneously." When I asked him whom he meant by "we," he said, "Arlen, myself, Howard Willens, David Belin, and Mel Eisenberg." .... I don't know about you folks, but I'm inclined to take what Redlich told me to the bank. My sense is that Redlich, who by almost all accounts worked harder on the case than anyone else, was a team player only interested in doing his job well. .... If I have done a disservice to Specter in what I have written above, I apologize to him. But I did give him an opportunity to respond to this issue [via a letter sent to Specter on June 24, 2005], and he declined." -- Vincent Bugliosi; Pages 302-304 of Endnotes in "Reclaiming History" (2007) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Also See.... http://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2014/02/single-bullet-theory-notebook.html#The-First-SBT-Seeds ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  25. David Von Pein

    Where is the exit?

    I can easily answer that one..... There is no "exit" wound for the alleged "entrance" wound in the throat----because the alleged entry wound in the throat was really an exit wound --- just as the 3 autopsists said in the official autopsy report. But, of course, as far as most conspiracy theorists are concerned, this Official Autopsy Report of President Kennedy might as well have "Charmin" written across the top of it. That's how it's treated by CTers anyway. They think it's a worthless and useless document, worthy only of being flushed. (A pathetic way to treat such an important document, to be sure. But that's the way it is in Conspiracy Fantasy Land.)
×