Jump to content
The Education Forum
  • Announcements

    • Evan Burton


      We have 5 requirements for registration: 1.Sign up with your real name. (This will be your Username) 2.A valid email address 3.Your agreement to the Terms of Use, seen here: http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21403. 4. Your photo for use as an avatar  5.. A brief biography. We will post these for you, and send you your password. We cannot approve membership until we receive these. If you are interested, please send an email to: edforumbusiness@outlook.com We look forward to having you as a part of the Forum! Sincerely, The Education Forum Team

Paul Brancato

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Paul Brancato

  • Rank
    Super Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Interests
    Classical musician and author of several sets of trading cards including Iran-Contra Scandal, Bush League, and Coup D'etat JFK assassination.

Recent Profile Visitors

6,522 profile views
  1. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    I have no clue why you would characterize any of the writers and researchers in that way. Adoring respect and public worship? Youve gone too far. Seems like your ego is the big one.
  2. Trump: JFK files to be released

    Something like that.
  3. Eugene Dinkin: The Saga of an Unsung Hero

    Steve - The cable is excerpted on page 555. I'd rather see the cable itself, which is apparently dated Nov 7, 1963. I can't get a good pic of it. the relevant paragraph refers to 56631 and he quotes only the end of the cable, where the CIA Geneva office asks: "DIRECTOR: ADVISE ANY ACTION DESIRED. WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR DEVELOPMENTS VIA ARMY ATTACHÉ, FBI, GENEVA CINTACTS, BUT WILL NOT BECOME INVOLVED VISAVIS SWISS UNLESS SO DIRECTED" As usual, the problem is there are two documents, and Russell does not produce either in full. One is a document prepared by Helms for the WC. The other one which you are asking about is a CIA "in cable no. 56631. "
  4. Trump: JFK files to be released

    Weird - I've seen both versions, but when I googled it the one suggesting he would block some files was the more recent one. However it is more logical that it wasn't. I still think he won't release some.
  5. Trump: JFK files to be released

    I just googled - I'm somewhat technologically challenged Ron. 'Trump likely to block release of some JFK files' will get you there.
  6. Trump: JFK files to be released

    I'll add the identity of QJWIN, which I would think would include material on Harvey. according to an article in Politico, Trump is likely to block the release of some documents.
  7. Mort Sahl on JFK

    I walked by the small theater in Mill Valley CA where he still speaks on Thursday evenings. A friend of mine says he's kind of losing from old age. I'm thinking I should go meet him.
  8. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    I read through all of Jason's documents and in addition to what Ernie points out about sources I'm struck by the relatively tame portrait of Walker that emerges. Jason, Ernie, Paul, anyone else reading this - can any of you confirm a visit by Walker to Italy, presumably in the '60's, where he met with General de Lorenzo, head of Sifar and the Carabiniere?
  9. Trump: JFK files to be released

    Douglas the way I read that article is that Trump left himself some room to change his mind. The Washington Post article also cites Shenon and Stone. What is it with these reporters and editors that ensures they never talk to the dozens of credible researchers? Why Shenon and Stone? i think Trump is negotiating.
  10. Eugene Dinkin: The Saga of an Unsung Hero

    Jim - thanks for the free pass regarding Nagell. Of course there are reams of info on him. But do you find his central story that he was working for the Soviets who feared that Oswald was part of a plot to kill JFK? Do I have that right?
  11. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Ok Ernie I get it. Would you disagree with the statements made in my last post? Do you think the FBI ever used entrapment? It requires infiltration of course. we are diverting the thread btw
  12. The Larry and Phil Show Part 3

    Of course ZRRIFLE document is illegible.
  13. Did the Dallas Radical Right kill JFK?

    Thanks Ernie. I certainly haven't done research like you have. You might want to doublecheck the MLK letter, as news surfaced in the past few years that seemed to tie him directly to that letter. Im glad you brought up the 1967 arrest, because it so clearly distinguishes the difference between left and right. Perhaps you are correct that CPUSA helped infiltrate Soviet agents, though I have never read that anywhere. Did the FBI ever bust a violent Communist plot with weapons arsenal? It would make sense that Hoover and anyone else with a brain would view the ultra right as far more dangerous than American Communists. My knowledge comes from personal family history, not research, and thus may be a little like the blind men and the elephant story. But perhaps you could go a little easier on me in these discussions and at least give me credit for knowing that one side was physically dangerous and the other not, and for knowing that Hoover's info on CPUSA came from infiltrated FBI agents, whereas his info on the ultra right was from informants. If that is not true, try to help me see that. Btw I grew up two elevated subway stops from Allerton Ave.
  14. Eugene Dinkin: The Saga of an Unsung Hero

    Steve, i noticed the same irregularities in the article. And I agree that Dinkins' story is not a necessary part of a theory about military involvement and outsourced European assassins. It's hard to let go if the OAS angle because DeGaulle himself thought JFK had been killed by the same forces that tried to kill him. I'll take that as pointing his finger at CIA Jason Ward pointed out that there isn't a lot to go on when it comes to the question of whether or not Dinkins warned of the plot before Nov. 22. I have the same problem accepting Walker's claim that he knew Oswald shot at him very soon after the incident. David - Nagell's case does seem somewhat similar. I've never been able to accept his story, even with what appear to me weird supporting docs.
  15. Doug, do you have an opinion on the Golitsyn/Nosenko defector or false defector issue?