Jump to content
The Education Forum

W. Tracy Parnell

Members
  • Content Count

    1,359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About W. Tracy Parnell

  • Rank
    Super Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,288 profile views
  1. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    The two in the middle are obviously not LHO. But the first photo (hunter photo) falls under the "that doesn't look like you" criteria I mentioned before. For an explanation of the photo see: http://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/2017/03/the-hunter-photo.html
  2. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    Of course, you are right Francois but the H&L people pretend not to know these facts. How many times when looking at family photos does someone remark "that doesn't look like you"? This is especially true with photos taken in the good old days of film only which most here are old enough to remember.
  3. W. Tracy Parnell

    an honest question, please

    Francois, Several sources I found online state the date as August 21 and the cameraman as Mike Lala. None of these are what I would call "original" sources if that is what you are looking for. One is Denis Morisette's edited version of Shackleford's work. But I think if the date were wrong in Shackleford's original, he would probably know and change it. The other is a letter from Johann Rush to Harold Weisberg from 1982 listing the dates of various films and again, I think Rush would know. Perhaps others will have more specific information.
  4. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    Could you let us in on more detail please?
  5. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    Right Sandy-who knows what amazing conspiracies "they" have perpetrated in the past? But "they" must have been really something because the conspiracies before (or after) JFK remain undetected yet you guys have "easily" uncovered the JFK "conspiracy." Or perhaps you believe in 911 conspiracies and the like and these are in the process of being uncovered as well?
  6. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    Agreed.
  7. I will just say that Perry speculated without having all of the information which he shouldn't have done. But I don't really debate the medical evidence at this point in time. I have narrowed my research focus to LHO's life and related issues. David Von Pein has done a fantastic job at his site and I will refer you there.
  8. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    The articles you posted do indeed "document" Robert Oswald's assertion about Stripling. However, the newspaper did not attempt to verify his statement but rather merely reported it. I have already explained why he was in error. So, just because something is documented does not make it a fact.
  9. I believe all the wounds were from the rear.
  10. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    I guess the evil CIA kept individuals on a contingency program Francois for whatever evil purpose they would be needed for. And to answer your question, no nothing like this ever happened before or since.
  11. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    Yes, you are right testimony is evidence. But not all evidence is created equal. In this case, Robert was never challenged on his statement by the WC simply because it wasn't necessary. They knew that LHO moved to NYC and never attended Stripling. So just because Robert said it doesn't make it a fact. He was testifying honestly but was mistaken in this instance and a few others times in his testimony and later statements. EDIT: It should also be noted that Robert left for the Marines in July 1952. So by September 1952 (the period in question) he could not have seen LHO at Stripling (or anywhere else) firsthand. Attendance there by LHO was simply an assumption on his part.
  12. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    There is no "barrage" of evidence, only a few people speaking years and years after the fact with no documentary evidence. As far as Robert goes, it is a shame that the WC didn't confront him with the evidence because if that happened he certainly would have reversed his opinion. But they had better things to do and couldn't imagine that someone would cook up the H&L nonsense. The whole Stripling thing is silly. How could the evil CIA know that someone wouldn't photograph or otherwise document LHO and ruin their plans? This happened at another school (can't remember which off the top of my head) when LHO was photographed for the yearbook talking to a classmate. If he had been at Stripling, there would be hard evidence of that fact, but there is none.
  13. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    There is nothing to explain. Sandy is not qualified to make the observations he is. If and when a forensic dental expert reviews the material and thinks there is merit to it then Sandy will have something to talk about.
  14. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    Ok, I had forgotten about that article. I should have said that he never stated in his WC testimony that LHO attended Stripling.
  15. W. Tracy Parnell

    Bush not in Dallas- He is dead

    Actually, no it isn't. Evidence would be documentary such as a yearbook photo or any photo of LHO such as those that do exist from other schools that he did attend. Most of the witnesses are simply remembering Robert years and years later but a few may be lying for reasons known to them-people lie all the time, a fact that H&L supporters seem to be unaware of. Frank Kudlaty never said a word to anyone about the FBI confiscating records or his suspicions that LHO attended Stripling. Not until his friend Jack White told him about Armstrong's "research" that is. Then he "remembered" the story that Armstrong is promoting. But it's the same old story-all anyone would need is one piece of documentary evidence, which undoubtedly would exist, and produce that evidence to show that the WC was lying about LHO's background. But all that exists are unverified reports. But this type of evidence is what the H&L theory is built on and is the reason that it can exist. BTW, Robert Oswald never said LHO attended Stripling, only that during that time period "he would be" at Stripling, which he would have been had they not moved to NYC. But I am not going to hijack this thread any further. Lurkers can do a search for more information and also check out Greg Parker's site.
×