Jump to content
The Education Forum

W. Tracy Parnell

Members
  • Posts

    2,220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://wtracyparnell.blogspot.com/

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

5,061 profile views

W. Tracy Parnell's Achievements

Rising Star

Rising Star (9/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Dedicated

Recent Badges

  1. Let me say this-I'll wait until the publication of book 5 before I make a definitive statement. But in my opinion the theory is nonsense as I currently understand it.
  2. Right David. Please allow me to add my own link: W. Tracy Parnell: The Assassination and Mrs. Paine (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com)
  3. When he publishes book number 5 and if that book actually contains specifics about the assassination-i.e. who did it, how and why, he will be dead in the water. It is the easiest thing in the world to poke holes in something specific as the conspiracy people have done with the official version for years. That is why most conspiracy books are vague. Nice guy and I am sure there are many who appreciate the work he has done. but the theory (as I understand it currently) is nonsense.
  4. When faced with anything that doesn't fit the H&L theory, they can fall back on this. Very handy.
  5. What does the fact that they did not want Wilcott to publicly reveal potentially classified information have to do with what I said? The point is when given the opportunity under oath (and under penalty of perjury) to reveal the alleged cryptonym, Wilcott refused. BTW, for lurkers who are unaware, Jim has posted this "information" previously possibly on more than one occasion. He is renowned for his "data dumps" as Jonathan pointed out.
  6. Thanks for the mention, Jonathan. BTW, in re-reading my article I see that Wilcott, when under oath before the HSCA, couldn't remember the cryptonym or the name of the employee who told him about it.
  7. The Mary Ferrell Foundation website reports that the alleged cryptonym "RX-ZIM" is "speculative" and "not corroborated." Cryptonym: RXZIM (maryferrell.org) Also, there is no other cryptonym listed at MFF that begins with "RX."
  8. Thank you Jeremy (and Jonathan) for mentioning my work and coming to my defense. First, let me say that I try and stay out of these threads because I think when a CT person (or at least an agnostic-I am unsure of the position of some) speaks out against the Armstrong theory it has more impact than my own statements as an LN do-especially here at what is essentially a CT forum. Next let me mention that I no longer have the source material that I quoted from (Denial #2). I sold all my Armstrong material years ago (at a profit I might add). I would say that my quote was almost certainly accurate though. It was my experience that Armstrong's early material was even more inaccurate than his book (if you can believe it). Jeremy has accurately represented the point I was trying to make, which I will concede is a minor one. That was written around the beginning of the anti-Armstrong movement (2002), so we were looking at everything, I guess. It is good to see that LNs and CTs alike have pointed out the absurdity of the Armstrong theories in the years since and have greatly expanded on my work. As a result, very few researchers pay much attention to the theory these days. But when it comes up, you can always rely on Jim to have a "data dump" ready to go. One other thing I do want to comment on is Sandy Larsen. A moderator is supposed to be someone with a neutral mindset. Now, we all know that everyone has bias and since we are all human beings that bias will show through. But Sandy is not even trying to hide his. I think a moderator should remember his role and temper his comments if he/she is to be effective. I don't see Sandy doing that unfortunately.
  9. Unfortunately, this was very predictable. Anytime anyone who supported aspects of the "Oswald-did-it" mindset passes on, we see this here at EF. It is especially uncalled for coming from an individual who is supposed to be a "moderator" and as such represents the forum. Perhaps another perspective is needed: Hugh Aynesworth, R.I.P. (onthetrailofdelusion.com)
  10. Since the same arguments are repeated over and over, I'll refrain from commenting and just include this link to my series on Max Good for those who haven't seen it: W. Tracy Parnell: The Assassination and Mrs. Paine (wtracyparnell.blogspot.com)
  11. You're welcome Jonathan, although my opinion of the article was much more positive than yours and Greg's.
  12. Fred Litwin has been engaged in a debate with Morley regarding the latter's assertions about Operation Northwoods. The following article debunks Morley's Northwoods assertions and some other dubious Morley claims: A Reply to Jefferson Morley regarding Operation Northwoods (onthetrailofdelusion.com)
×
×
  • Create New...