Jump to content
The Education Forum

Sandy Larsen

Members
  • Content Count

    4,571
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Sandy Larsen

  • Rank
    Super Member
  • Birthday 11/18/1955

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

6,025 profile views
  1. Sandy Larsen

    The vanishing pool of blood

    It must have been quite a large chunk of brain matter for Couch to have recognized it. I mean, how does one recognize brain matter without the folds?
  2. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    Here are links to the two proofs, Fred:
  3. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    The very argument you make -- about Gloria Calvery's unbelievably "lightning" fast speed -- indicates that your own theory must be wrong about those two fellows walking down the road being Shelley and Lovelady. Because if Gloria Calvery didn't have time to be at the steps in Darnell, as I and Tommy Graves contend, then she ALSO could not have been at the concrete island across that little road in time to have talked to your Shelley! (Which he stated he did in his first-day affidavit.) But the truth is that Gloria Calvery did indeed have time to get to the steps in Darnell. We know this because The Woman in White -- who had been in the same vicinity as Gloria Calvery when the shooting took place -- DID make it back to the steps in time to be filmed by Darnell! There was only ONE woman in all white, including white scarf, in the crowd. And we see her during the shooting in Zapruder AND in Darnell 30 seconds later. This fact is what made mine and Tommy's breakthrough possible! See Woman in White (including white scarf) here... in both Zapruder and Darnell:
  4. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    I never said that I was the person who first noticed or believed that Baker ran right past the TSBD entrance. I said that I proved he did. In fact, I decided to determine one way or another if Prudhomme was right because there were people disagreeing with him. So I studied the film carefully and determined Prudhomme was indeed right. So I decided to post my findings, which I did in a new thread. Prudhomme read it and made this remark: "Excellent work, Sandy. As Bart stated, this is the clearest presentation of Baker on film I have seen to date. If only Darnell had tracked Baker for two more seconds!" P.S. Tommy Graves had nothing to do with this.
  5. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    Read the proofs Francois.
  6. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    No you have not, as a matter of fact I had hoped that by now you had wised up a tad, and realise your theory resembles Swiss cheese. Here is what I claimed in my post that I proved (along with Thomas Graves for #2): * 1. Officer Baker wasn't headed for the TSBD entrance at all when he crossed Elm Street extension. I posted a link to that proof above. It's not my problem if you don't understand the proof. 2. Bill Shelley and Billy Lovelady lied when they said that they waited three or four minutes for Gloria Calvery to arrive at the front steps . The following photo shows Gloria Calvery with her friend Woman in White (who was either Karan Hicks or Carol Reed), first in the Z-film watching the motorcade (inset), and then in the Darnell film 30 seconds later at the TSBD steps. This proves that Shelley and Lovelady lied when they said she arrived at the steps three to four minutes after the shooting. (For those who do not know, it was important to the WC's case to have Shelley and Lovelady testify that they entered the west TSBD door after a few minutes, not right away.)  *Regarding #2, our complete proof is very involved and is spread out over several threads. Unfortunately we didn't have the opportunity to compile it all and present it in a single thread.
  7. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    You have proved no such thing. You have zero expertise in the field of forensic dentistry so someone who does would have to write a paper agreeing with your theory and then publish in a peer reviewed journal. You think a person needs to be an expert in forensic dentistry to see whether or not a tooth is missing?
  8. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    Quite the contrary. You didn't prove what you think you proved at all in our long "Money Order" discussion. David, I posted the actual federal regulation that was in force in 1963 and it states that postal money orders are to be stamped by banks when presenting them to a Federal Reserve Bank. There's simply no denying it. Long Version of the Proof Short Version of the Proof Addendum to the Short Version of the Proof That's pure BS. When Lance Payette realized that I had posted the applicable regulation, he scrambled to find a way out. At first he claimed that a Special Agreement between the Postmaster General and the Federal Reserve made an exception to the bank stamp requirement. He made that claim without posting (or even reading!) the Special Agreement. In other words, he simply made his claim up! I eventually found the Special Agreement and posted it, and Lance's claim wasn't to be found there. (No surprise to me.) Lance couldn't disagree with what was right before his face, and so he made up yet another exception to the rule. In this one he claimed that member banks of the Federal Reserve System were actually a part of the system, and therefore were not required to stamp the money orders. I asked Lance for evidence supporting his claim and he came up empty handed. His response was essentially that he's a damn good lawyer and so therefore he knows that his claim is right. Yeah, sure Lance.
  9. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    Holy Toledo! You've got to be joking here! You "proved" no such thing. You must have a very low threshold for "proof".... The Darnell film clearly shows (to those who actually study it with care) that Baker was headed somewhere to the east of the TSBD as he crossed Elm Street Extension. Baker had already run past the TSBD entrance by the time the film ends.
  10. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    Did you really write that sentence ? Do you seriously believe that ? But of course, Francois.
  11. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    David, I have personally proved that a number of things were faked or lied about by the WC. For example, I proved that Officer Baker wasn't headed for the TSBD entrance at all when he crossed Elm Street extension. I (and Thomas Graves) proved that Bill Shelley and Billy Lovelady lied when they said that they waited three or four minutes for Gloria Calvery to arrive at the front steps (she arrived there within twenty seconds) and that this (and other things) calls into question their crucial testimony about entering the west TSBD door after the shooting. I proved that federal regulation required that postal money orders be stamped by banks when presented to Federal Reserve Banks. I proved that Lee Harvey Oswald was missing two teeth and at the same time was missing no teeth. (Thus corroborating the research of John Armstrong, Jim Hargrove, and David Josephs.) And I'm just one researcher/analyst out of hundreds... and a rookie at that. There are certainly numerous other such things that have been proven by JFK assassination researchers. That you don't accept these proofs is a reflection of your preconceived bias that there was no conspiracy and that LHO alone killed Kennedy.
  12. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    David, why do you think the autopsist found it necessary to note that there were no burns in Ferrie's mouth? There were also no bullet holes, no stab wounds, and no malignant tumors according to the autopsist. We know that because he wrote, "The ears, nose and mouth show no abnormalities." But for some reason the autopsist found it necessary to be very specific about there being no burns. And also no cuts ("hemorrhages"). He wrote, " There are no burns or hemorrhages in the oral cavity ." Why did the autopsist do that? He had already stated that there were no abnormalities. Isn't it interesting that it was precisely those two things -- cuts and burns -- that Jim D. says that the photos showed. (At least that's my understanding when Jim wrote, " Yes Jim, the autopsy report DOES mention the "burns and cuts" inside Ferrie's mouth. It specifically states that they are not there! And so yes, that does indeed look like a cover-up. A clumsily done one.
  13. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    Except that the autopsy was perfectly clear. Ferrie died from a berry aneurysm. Yeah, sure. And he died with no burns in his mouth. Yep.... that's an autopsy that can be trusted.
  14. Sandy Larsen

    I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak

    What? There were no burns in the mouth? Why would the autopsist even note that? What about the anus, ear canals, and navel? Were there burns there? The fact that the autopsist reported that there were no burns in the mouth makes me think that there were indeed burns in the mouth that he was clumsily trying to deny.
×