Jump to content
The Education Forum

Pamela Brown

Members
  • Content Count

    1,674
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Pamela Brown

  • Rank
    Super Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://ss100x.com
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Minneapolis, MN USA
  • Interests
    2013 JFKLancer NID, Dallas, TX, "MIdnight Blue to Black -- the Vanishing Act of the JFK Presidential Limousine In Broad Daylight
    2008 Documentary Inside the Target Car, limo researcher
    2004 documentary on the JFK Assassination Presidential Limousine SS-100-X "Behind the Headlights -- Presidential Limo" aired on the SPEED channel . Also aired 2005
    2001 "SS-100-X" in CAR CRASH CULTURE, Palgrave/McMillan.

Recent Profile Visitors

18,980 profile views
  1. When Judyth initially came onto the scene she just turned everything upside down and made new sides --- those who 'believe' her and those who don't.
  2. Well said, Paul. In fact, it seems that those she sucks in, such as Jesse Ventura, soon become irrelevant...
  3. Wait until he realizes she has no respect for Jim Garrison...
  4. My essay "Inside 'Inside the Target Car'" is now available with free reads on Amazon...https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0826FQ6JC This essay, previously published at Jimmie D's site, describes my involvement with the development of that program.
  5. Oliver Stone is quickly losing credibility in my eyes. He should check out my blog -- findingjudyth.blogspot.com...
  6. I don't know anything about her conferences. When I first became involved with Judyth I too thought she was just very narcissistic. However, over the seven years I knew her she would say things that did not make sense, such as "I was told you couldn't be trusted", and "why don't you ask me any questions?" I gradually came to suspect that there was someone prompting her. Fetzer took me on long ago and he was her biggest backer at that time, so he gets my vote. They are both nasty people in my book. And Judyth's treatment of Marina was vicious. It was almost unfathomably ruthless. I could not see any other reason for it than that Marina had to be completely discredited for some reason. Marina's vocal recanting of the WCR is the only thing that makes sense to me.
  7. Joe Bauer said: Could you imagine if 5 million American citizens who actually care about our history and the truths of such major and effecting events as JFK's slaughter could see this video, what it would do to the annual polls asking Americans if they believed the Warren Report conclusion of a lone assassin and no conspiracy? I agree. Marina was the star witness of the WC and she recanted. That destroyed any possibility of credibility. Marina became useless to the Ongoing Coverup. And even more serious -- she became a threat. She was thinking for herself. I think that if there was any intelligence connection to the advent of Judyth Baker, it was for this reason. Marina had to disappear from the consciousness of this country. Judyth has don everything possible to make that happen, including outright slander and contacting Marina's children. But I don't think Judyth did this on her own -- I think she is doing what Fetzer tells her to.
  8. Nice, Larry. Thank you for the link to the book and the letter. I recall that Marina was also on Oprah with the LaFontaines around that time...https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=marina+oswald+on+oprah&view=detail&mid=144086CA0659DABFEB1E144086CA0659DABFEB1E&FORM=VIRE
  9. Kirk Galloway said: Yes it's true there was a big divide between new money and old money 50 years ago. But that doesn't really exist so much anymore. It may be more accurate to say that the divide 'doesn't really exist' only to those who are on the outside.
  10. As Jimmie D also said, Breo is a journalist and not a doctor. Even so, he is stating his opinion as fact, which it is not. That is a form of railroading. There is no cogent argument.
  11. Cory Santos says: How does the bevilling and abrasion collar at the neck "definativekly" prove LHO shot JFK? See, this is a dr. making a legal conclusion. It doesn't. That's just the same kind of pseudo-logic that Prof. Ken Rahn used to try to use with me. This is nothing more than his opinion, stated many years after the event.
  12. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/08/books/review/letters-to-the-editor.html Not sure just which fallacy of logic is being violated in this article, but Mr. Breo is certainly comfortable stating his opinion, garnered 30 years after the assassination, as fact. In addition to the various changes in wound position that Jim D. lists for us, there is the fact that the body traveled 1600 miles between the events at Parkland Hospital and the autopsy at Bethesda. That fact alone has caused gaping holes to exist as to what actually happened. Earl Rose, who was rudely prevented from keeping JFK's body in Dallas for autopsy, was right to assert that the autopsy should have been done in Dallas. The fact that it was not is just one indicator that points toward a cover-up.
  13. Robert Wheeler said: "If I understand what you are saying, the Blue Blooded Bush's considered the Kennedys "vulgar" because they were new money, and recent immigrants, and Catholic. The Blue Blooded Bush's are now horrified by the exponentially outrageous vulgarity of the Trump family because their money is also new, they are also recent immigrants (none of Trumps grandparents were born in the USA), and at a total disregard for proper "breeding", even allow family members to marry Jews and Slavs. " Exactly, Robert.
  14. W. Niederhut said: Indeed, the Bush clan are Connecticut Yankee blue bloods with deep roots in the New England W.A.S.P. establishment, Wall Street, and, of course, the CIA. Growing up in Fairfield, CT, with extended family with ancestors on the Mayflower, graduates of Yale, and with deep roots in the New England WASP establishment, I can confirm that they and their friends heartily disliked the Kennedys and considered them to be vulgar and neuveau riche.
  15. Well, there are different versions of his story. The later ones are more sanitized. The early version was given in Weldon's 1998 NID presentation. https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=4883#relPageId=35&tab=page But, yes, the Ferguson Memo, sent to me by mistake by NARA, has been an explosive bombshell. We are not supposed to have any definitive information about what happened to SS100X after the assassination. We are supposed to go around in circles with rumours and lies. The fact that the trolls about the man from the Rouge continue give credence to this, imo. You might also like my updated essay "SS100X Revisited" on Kindle; the original essay is uploaded in it as well. It discusses the rumours and false stories about SS100X. https://www.amazon.com/SS100X-Revisited-Unmasking-development-original-ebook/dp/B07TKCRSB2/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=ss100x+revisited+kindle+pamela+brown&qid=1573008576&sr=8-1
×
×
  • Create New...